Home Forums Chat Forum Good News At Last

Viewing 40 posts - 161 through 200 (of 222 total)
  • Good News At Last
  • binners
    Full Member

    The removal of the necessity defense was a political act of interference from a politican

    From a democratically elected politician and passed by a vote in Parliament. That’s the way this whole democracy lark works,

    We have to deal with the world as it is, rather than how we’d like it to de, particularly when talking about laws and rules. Everything must be universal and apply to everyone, or it’s worthless

    If you want to see what the alternative looks like, with genuine interference in individual cases, then this gives something of a perspective

    Russia jails US journalist Gershkovich for 16 years

    irc
    Free Member

    “Lammy sticks out like a sore thumb in comparison.”

    I agree. I am confident the others would not have thought Henry VII came after Henry VIII.

    Having read the judgement I realised I chose the wrong thread title. As it was a Sun journalist that infiltrated the zoom call then reported it to the police the thread should have been titled “Gotcha!”

    Sandwich
    Full Member

    passed by a vote in Parliament

    That’s just it the removal of the defence was not passed by parliament it was enacted using Henry VIII rules, there was no scrutiny.

    tjagain
    Full Member

    as sandwich says so very democratic.

    If the government banned Greggs would you just accept it?

    tjagain
    Full Member

    The lengthy multi-year sentences handed to Just Stop Oil activists are “not acceptable in a democracy”, a UN special rapporteur has said, as the government faced growing pressure to reverse the previous administration’s “hardline anti-protest” approach.

    Michel Forst, the UN special rapporteur for environmental defenders, joined a growing chorus of voices condemning the sentences handed down to the five defendants for planning non-violent protests on the M25.

    tjagain
    Full Member

    A host of human rights campaigners joined Forst in decrying the sentences. Sam Grant, director of advocacy at Liberty, said what appeared to be a trend for increasingly severe sentences for non-violent protest indicated “a grave erosion of … freedoms” in the UK. Hanna Hindstrom, who investigates rights abuses against environmental defenders for Global Witness, said the “incredibly harsh” sentences were “a profound injustice”.

    And Tom Southerden, Amnesty International UK’s human rights adviser, called on the government to repeal the portions of the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022 that legislated the statutory offence of public nuisance used against the defendants.

    nickc
    Full Member

    @irc, thanks for throwing up the Judge’s summing up. I was wrong; they didn’t get a longer sentence for arsing about in court, but it makes for more balanced reading that this thread at least.

    fasgadh
    Free Member

    If you want to see what the alternative looks like

    Thats the point – what we saw this week was a long way down the road to that alternative.

    (The title of this thread is disgusting, the threat we face is closer to home than Moscow)

    Bruce
    Full Member

    A first past the post democracy works because the policies and laws they enact are resonable and proportionate. The last Tory Government did not think laws oe decent standards applied to them and some of their Covid practices and behaviour was corrupt and illegal. The using of draconian laws and sentences to imprison people for legitimate peaceful protest is plain wrong.

    The last government passed laws which undermined individuals rights to protest and this is not part of a democracy. The dragging of the goverment by various members of the Tory right is not what most people voted for.

    The homeless were fortunate that they didn’t make some nasty laws to stop rough sleeping.

    I agree with @fasgadh these prosecutions would attact howls of protest if they happened in Russia or China.

    binners
    Full Member

    I agree with all of that.

    I just like winding TJ up 😀

    ernielynch
    Full Member

    The Edinburgh defence again so soon binners?

    irc
    Free Member

    The point is it wasn’t legitimate protest. That is why they were convicted. Legitimate protest would be things like marches and rallies.

    The danger there being poor  attendance  might demonstrate the true level of support they have in the wider public.

    Bruce
    Full Member

    So standing outside a oil terminal with a slogan on a bit of cardboard is not legitimate protest? You can be jailed for that. When we confronted the NF and BNP that wasn’t a march or rally but it needed doing. Now some of their abhorent facist views seem to be shared by sections of the Tory party.

    winston
    Free Member

    I suspect the disproportionately harsh sentences will have the opposite effect to that intended by the establishment.

    This is what usually happens when the intellectual and moral balance of power lies with those punished.
    It’s clear to anyone with any intelligence that the protesters cause is far more important than a bit of disruption and a few missed flights, no matter how irritating that might be to individuals and that the protests to come will turn violent. I fully expect innocent people will lose their lives in protest situations before humanity starts to realise climate change is an existential threat. Of course by that point many many more innocent people will have died through direct consequences of actual climate change…..

    tjagain
    Full Member

    IRC – under this draconian law any protest that inconveniences anyone can be prosecuted.    From attempting to stop the BNP from marching to a march or demo on any subject.

    All protest is now illegal in the UK unless it has zero effect.

    the CND marches, greenham common, – all now punishable by long jail tgerms

    ransos
    Free Member

    The point is it wasn’t legitimate protest

    Do you think the Colston protest in Bristol was legitimate?

    winston
    Free Member

    Exactly.

    if peaceful protest is now illegal and punished by lengthy sentences why not just go straight for violent protest – what you got to lose?

    Tom-B
    Free Member

    The point is it wasn’t legitimate protest. That is why they were convicted.

    I’d have another read of the court transcripts that you’ve posted. That isn’t why they were convicted.

    Just to lighten this thread up a bit….fun fact about Extinction Rebellion….their inaugural meeting was at a church in Macclesfield. Such an unlikely place for a movement like this to first meet!

    ernielynch
    Full Member

    winston

    Free Member

    I suspect the disproportionately harsh sentences will have the opposite effect to that intended by the establishment.

    You mean the endless headlines created by the campaigns to have them released or the five page threads on social media forums?

    winston
    Free Member

    @ernielynch No. I mean the letter-bombs.

    irc
    Free Member

    Seems it was a JSO insider who leaked the zoom call to The Sun.

    “The story had begun almost two years ago when a concerned whistleblower from JSO contacted me, prompted by a genuine fear that lives were at stake.Arrangements were made for me to infiltrate a closely guarded JSO meeting at which I listened in amazement and horror as plans were set out to bring the M25 to a halt.

    “”The plan is to block the M25 between now and 2023.“It’ll be daily and go on for the rest of the year.””

    Seems Hallam enjoys jail anyway according to the article.

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/29351268/undercover-just-stop-oil-plot-m25/

    Nobody will be jailed for standing somewhere holding a placard. This was a plan for prolonged huge disruption. Sentences well deserved.

    ernielynch
    Full Member

    No. I mean the letter-bombs.

    Much less likely imo

    ransos
    Free Member

    Sentences well deserved.

    Do you think the Colston protest in Bristol was legitimate?

    Bruce
    Full Member

    Read the Guardian article linked above, an NHS GP was jailed for holding a placard outside an oil terminal.

    The Sun ? Not a exactly credible and unbiased source.

    tjagain
    Full Member

    Nobody will be jailed for standing somewhere holding a placard.

    Under this law they can be if they inconvenience anyone in the slightest.  Peaceful protest is now banned in the UK

    redthunder
    Free Member

    What an odius thread :-(.  Some sad colours being flown here 🙁

    I think another sabbatical is in order, nothing changes here

    RT

    Ps might post a few tractors later 😉

    munrobiker
    Free Member

    Sentences well deserved.

    Just because you keep repeating it doesn’t mean it’s true.

    How would you go about encouraging the public and government to realise that climate change is a serious problem that they’re a part of and start doing something about it?

    ernielynch
    Full Member

    So was that all the good news you had in mind irc or is there more?

    There must be more surely?

    joshvegas
    Free Member

    Just because you keep repeating it doesn’t mean it’s true.

    Doubling down is a classic response when limits of comprehension have been reached…

    ernielynch
    Full Member
    winston
    Free Member

    I guess @irc good news can be filed in the same bin as brexit benefits and paying multi-million pound bonuses to retain ‘talent’

    argee
    Full Member

    No. I mean the letter-bombs.

    I wouldn’t even mention that, the second they start violence they’ll be on the terrorist organisation list, that’s a whole different ball game to what’s happening now.

    pondo
    Full Member

    The point is it wasn’t legitimate protest. 

    1 – they weren’t convicted of protesting

    2 – peaceful protest is completely 100% legitimate in a functional democracy.

    rone
    Full Member

    Our friend Irc is a piston heads regular and has enjoyed setting the cat amongst the pigeons as he said so on that forum.

    Coming from that position you are bound to find it good news.

    Bruce
    Full Member

    Maybe Irc should return under his bridge ?

    MoreCashThanDash
    Full Member

    2 – peaceful protest is completely 100% legitimate in a functional democracy.

    Covered by the ECHR – that pesky thing that the last government wanted to withdraw from to bring us more into line with, er,  Russia and Belarus.

    binners
    Full Member

    Serious question… Does anyone know where they’ll serve their sentences?

    They’re not exactly terrorists, so will it be some Cat C open prison or will they get shoved in somewhere terrifying with all the hard cases?

    I’d imagine that’s as much of an issue as the length of their sentences

    tjagain
    Full Member

    IIRC you normally start in a general prison like Strangeways or Pentonville.  ( cat B?? ) After a part of your sentence you may be eligible for cat C or D  YOu may have more than one catergory in each prison complex

Viewing 40 posts - 161 through 200 (of 222 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.