I was wondering this the other day.
Even if some were monumentally crap, the cars I grew up with all had character, they were distinctive. Even now, you can look at a 70s / 80s car and pretty much instantly recognise it. I’d wager there’s few folk reading this thread who wouldn’t be able to identify, say, a MkII Escort (and that’s not just the model but the revision!).
These days, all “family hatchbacks” look the bloody same. The last real revolutionary design was the Ford Sierra; since then, everything that’s followed has been Sierra-shaped. And silver, christ even the colours are bland.
I agree to a certain extent, but back in the 60-70’s there were plenty of cars that all looked identical for all practical purposes, like Mk 2 Escorts, Hillman Minx, Cortinas, Vivas, then they all went jelly-mould shape, and you still couldn’t really tell cars apart.
Now, though, the manufacturers seem to be really designing distinctive cars that follow through the models, but can easily be told apart from the competition, and not only that, the cars are attractive; just compare the really ugly Renaults of about a decade ago, like the Clio and Megane, with the ugly fat ass, and now look at their new model range, same with Citroen, Vauxhall, Volvo, Ford…
Going back to the original post, I’d be looking for a really tidy Racing Puma, or even a well maintained tidy standard 1.7 Zetec, never that many produced, lots got chopped in under the trading-in scrappage scheme, and they’re a really fun little car to drive, and very comfy even for a six foot bloke, mine felt like it had been designed for me, fitted perfectly.
The Yamaha engine really does need to be treated with care, the nicasyl plasma-coated bores can be very easily trashed, as there’s no liner.
I’d dearly love another, if I could afford to run one.