Home › Forums › Chat Forum › Furiosa: A Mad Max saga 24th May
- This topic has 42 replies, 24 voices, and was last updated 4 months ago by ossify.
-
Furiosa: A Mad Max saga 24th May
-
1roneFull Member
9 years since Fury Road burst onto the screen and 45 years since Mad Max began.
How does George Miller do it at 80?
So, so looking forward to this! Unlike Ridley Scott – George Miller doesn’t really do disappointment in my book. An absolute legend (okay Thunderdome aside – a co-direction.)
Reviews are good, and Chris Hemsworth and Anya Taylor-Joy are great performers.
Stylistically I always preferred the old look of Mad Max but i guess they have to move with the times. It’s also so good leaving 9 years between the films that they haven’t franchised the nuts off it.
I always felt Mad Max 2 was indicative of the way society might end up but I guess they didn’t factor in EVs and solar power. There is an army of quad riders around here that are Mad Max try hards…
longdogFree MemberSaw the trailer when I went to see Fall Guy, but wasn’t impressed. I was pretty disappointed with Fury Road, more so as I’d been looking forward to it, so I may watch this when it comes to some streaming service whenever, but not in any rush.
1scudFree MemberI loved Fury Road and the fact that he is still making these films at 80.
Empire giving Furiosa 5 stars:
https://www.empireonline.com/movies/reviews/furiosa-a-mad-max-saga/
1vintagewinoFree MemberCan’t wait! Loved Fury Road, I’m hyped on these good reviews too.
Thunderdome I used to love (came out when I was 10 – perfect age for it) but once I read Riddley Walker a lot of the shine came off. There’s quite a lot of blatant appropriation from that book, which is a shame.
2martinhutchFull MemberLooks good, but from the trailer it looked like there was a lot more CGI than in Fury Road. The reliance on practical effects was one of the best things about FR.
roneFull MemberI think they still do lots of practical effects but go a bit heavy on CGI to create the look and feel.
When I saw Fury Road – I wasn’t too sure of the look but now I quite enjoy the hyper-real look. When you look back at Road Warrior I think it still looks quite real but also dated too.
Maybe they could dial back a bit on the heavy colour grade of the new films!
There’s a good book about the making of Fury Road which is well worth a read or purchase.
“Blood, Sweat and Chrome.”
Absolutely crazy circumstances to make a film in.
1desperatebicycleFull MemberEmpire giving Furiosa 5 stars..
Doesn’t mean a lot – they gave Roadhouse 4 stars and it was utter gubbins!
but yeah, looking forward to Furiosa. Anya T-J is always brilliant.
roneFull MemberNew Roadhouse was great as far as that sort of film ever goes.
Yes and Empire can be a bit too enthusiastic with reviews … (Any of their Star Wars reviews for example )
kelvinFull MemberExcitedly watched the trailer… cgi looked awful… I can’t sit through a whole movie like that.
roneFull MemberYeah but sometimes trailers are not always the best showcase of the actual film with regards plotting etc.
Will be back here on the 24th for the honest review.
1sharkattackFull MemberFury Road was awesome so I’ll be checking this out. Early reviews are very good.
I love how the myth persists that Fury Road somehow didn’t have any CGI. All the vehicles and stunt work might have been real but almost every other element on screen was heavily manipulated.
No CGI just means CGI you didn’t notice.
binnersFull MemberIt looks ace! Definitely a big screen one, so I’m getting tickets for the first weekend it’s on . Can’t wait! 😃
kelvinFull MemberNo CGI just means CGI you didn’t notice.
Absolutely. Trailer for this one was the opposite. Of course they could be the whizz bang bits chosen for the trailer and prove to be the exception not the rule. Will wait for Rone’s review….
1martinhutchFull MemberI love how the myth persists that Fury Road somehow didn’t have any CGI. All the vehicles and stunt work might have been real but almost every other element on screen was heavily manipulated.
Oh, I don’t doubt it, never thought there was no CGI, just that a lot of the action was grounded in practical effects. Perhaps the problem here is that the CGI seems obvious in places you really wouldn’t expect it, and looks unfinished/jarring from my first viewing of the trailer.
roneFull MemberIt’s worth pointing out most films have some CGI – you just don’t see it.
And it’s also usual for trailers to show unfinished stuff.
I’m getting the impression Furiosa is not the long chase sequence of Fury Road and a different sort of set-up.
desperatebicycleFull MemberNew Roadhouse was great as far as that sort of film ever goes
I didn’t get past “A draw, what’s that?” or whatever the diabolically scripted line was. Pathetic attempt at humour. You may be more forgiving 🙂
the-muffin-manFull MemberAs someone bought up on the original Mad Max films I really wanted to hate Fury Road. But I loved it, action from start to finish.
Hopefully this new one will be as good.
And if they had access to the CGI we have now back in 1979 they’d have certainly used it! 🙂
sharkattackFull MemberI’m getting the impression Furiosa is not the long chase sequence of Fury Road and a different sort of set-up.
It definitely isn’t a road/chase movie. The story takes place over a period of years.
I’m trying not to learn too much about it and I haven’t watch the trailer yet because I know I’m going to see it regardless.
Plus, anyone interested in stunts, visual effects and CGI should be watching Corridor Crew on YouTube. They’ve looked at Fury Road before but everything they do is educational. I’m expecting some Furiosa content soon.
reluctantjumperFull MemberLooks good, but from the trailer it looked like there was a lot more CGI than in Fury Road. The reliance on practical effects was one of the best things about FR.
Same thoughts here, just didn’t look ‘right’ in the trailer. Still will go and see it though as Fury Road was my favourite film that year, scary to think that’s nearly a decade ago!
ChrisLFull MemberI really enjoyed Fury Road, but Furiosa is coming out very near to my birthday and that seems to have been a cursed period for films I was initially excited about (one of the Matrix sequels, one of the Pirates of the Caribbean sequels and Indiana Jones 4 all came out in time for my birthday, after that I stopped going to the cinema on my birthday!) so I’m currently pretty cautious about it.
honourablegeorgeFull MemberkelvinFull Member
Excitedly watched the trailer… cgi looked awfulYeah, I couldn’t believe how bad it looked, especially given how Fury Road was so much the opposite, all real cars/stunts with a bit of CGI enhancement
I think they just couldn’t get everyone back in the desert for a repeat
1simondbarnesFull MemberHow is Mel Gibson looking these days? Have they had to CGI him much?
roneFull MemberYeah, I couldn’t believe how bad it looked, especially given how Fury Road was so much the opposite, all real cars/stunts with a bit of CGI enhancement
Trailers – early CGI – more often than not.
I’d be surprised if it still looks like this. After all the initial trailer was released ages ago. They just often need to put trailers our whilst they’re sitll making the thing.
I’d fully expect Furiosa to be better than Fury Road in the CGI department. Nearly 10 years of tech and a rather hefty budget and similar credentials.
1honourablegeorgeFull MemberroneFul
Trailers – early CGI – more often than not.
Yes – but it was SO bad
NorthwindFull MemberYeah likewise I saw the trailer and cringed, it wasn’t just that it was bad, it was that it looked terrible in basically all the places a mad max film has to look fantastic. But it is just a trailer at the end of the day, trailers are weird these days, you have fake scenes filmed only for rhe trailer, scenes that have been cut from the finished film but still go in teh trailer, I suspect here you’ve got a bit of an effort to target it at non Mad Max fans because they expect we’ll all go anyway.
sharkattack
Full MemberI love how the myth persists that Fury Road somehow didn’t have any CGI. All the vehicles and stunt work might have been real but almost every other element on screen was heavily manipulated.
Yeah but it’s the backwardness of it that made Fury Road look so amazing, the insane impossible stuff is real and the minimum wage extras saying rhubarb are cgi
alexandersupertrampFree MemberWatched 1 & 2 yesterday, I forgot how amazing physical stunts with real stuntmen were. Also huge wide shots.
Watched them on bluray with the 4k player, excellent quality for a low budget (MM1) film. My son bought me the trilogy from ebay after we watched the 4DX trailer for the new one with Dune 2. But it is a 15, bollocks.
the Tina Turner one tonight😜
EdukatorFree MemberThe first one was well ridden, driven, acted and plausible enough to be quite disturbing. 2 lacked the plausibility of 1 but gained on black humour. After that they’re just silly nonsense and the addition of cgi just makes the nonsense sillier.
roneFull MemberJust back from Sheffield im£x. Had to see it on the biggest screen possible. (Sorry local independent.)
George Lucas needs to take lessons from George Miller about cinematic world building – and connecting the dots within your own universe.
What an incredible film though – I thought it was an absolute pulse pounding visceral cinematic achievement that had something the other Max’s don’t have – an emotional core.
I was expecting something less than Fury Road but this was a different level for me. Whereas Fury Road is just a chase this film elevates itself into the bigger, more 3 dimensional and interesting picture.
I was certainly expecting some dampening down of action – but the action that has been put on screen here to me is far far more involving than the showcasing of Fury Road. The stunt work coupled with new fangled ways of pushing the camera around has gotten to astonishing levels.
Pixel peepers needn’t not worry – I only noticed a couple of flaky bits (the VW type van going off the cliff is much better)- most of the stuff in the trailer has been altered or improved as you would expect. In fact the physics here I thought were better than Fury road. There was just something about the imagination and attention to detail of clunking metal.
They’ve definitely dialled back the crazy colour grading to something approaching a more realistic colour palette. Compare the sand storms to Fury Road – these seemed far more grounded in reality. That was welcome for me as I really didn’t like the sand storms in Fury Road.
Anya Taylor-Joy really does do a lot with minimal dialogue. And the characters are fleshed out a bit more this time. It feels like this film should have been made before Fury Road really.
Chris Hemsworth is pretty bat-shit as are many of the auxiliary characters. And they’ve really played up the violence, torture and squirm factor on this. Feels more like Max 2 in that respect.
Downsides? I thought the ending felt a bit like Gladiator in that it needed a big set piece to finish it off. But I really liked the coda of the film as it moves to Fury Road. Some of the supporting actors are given bumpy dialogue to say – which isn’t always filled with clarity.
I absolutely loved it and it delivered the perfect marriage of moving characters along and upping the game. It didn’t have that laboured franchise feel to it either.
The cinematography and editing is some of the best I’ve ever seen – placing characters in wide shots on the war rigs to close up in the same take. Outstanding editing too. Loved the score which never lets up.
Easily in my top 5 action films of all time and above Fury Road as a story and piece of cinema.
An almost certainty to be a huge hit and probably underrated in recent reviews.
It’s got that cult classic vibe to it as well.
You know it’s good when you haven’t a clue how long the film is. This is a big screen experience – as much as a cliché that is.
Brilliant. Jaw-dropping.
1martinhutchFull MemberGeorge..george? Is that you? 🙂
Nice write-up, almost makes me want to brave Bradford IMAX!
scudFree MemberI was a bit disappointed, it is so heavy with CGI it was almost like watching a cartoon, or a film like 300, not helped by Hemsworth’s comedy nose and teddy bear that meant i couldn’t really take it seriously. I enjoyed it, but didn’t feel it was as good as Fury Road which seemed to rely much more heavily on real action and stunts.
vintagewinoFree MemberI liked it, it’s definitely not as good as Fury Road though. Got going for me when Dementus and Immortan Joe meet for the first time. The last chapter is great.
I’m convinced the snippets of broadcast media overheard at the start are the same ones heard at the start of Mad Max 2. Would be a nice touch if so.
fasthaggisFull MemberDisappointed
For me..6/10
Some of the sketchy CGI sections were an annoying distraction,I then started to notice them everywhere.😒
Some small parts of the main scenes looked like they were running at the wrong film speed,a bit like an old silent movie.
No idea what that was about.🫤
Small detail, but that jump from –>>Furiosa falling down in the sand,car and driver up on the hill (?) ,being dragged behind something (a car?),then wakes up covered with maggots in a scene from Macbeth.🙃🤣
As always,the War Rig scenes saved it……….just.😉
1vintagewinoFree Memberthe car and driver up on the hill is something and someone you might recognise…
wooobobFull MemberI think they used that ‘speeded up’ thing in Fury Road, it’s quite subtle but noticeable.
CougarFull MemberNice write-up, almost makes me want to brave Bradford IMAX!
What’s wrong with Bradford IMAX?
Last I checked, there are only three true IMAXen in the country. BFI, Manchester Printworks, and London somewhere. Of those, only BFI still uses film.
prettygreenparrotFull Member@cougar was Bradford’s the first IMAX in Britain? The Bradford museum of film and TV was the first place I saw IMAX back in the 80s.
used to be neat seeing the huge horizontal reels of film through the projection room viewing window.
edit it was more – first IMAX in Europe https://www.scienceandmediamuseum.org.uk/cinema/imax
edit edit Furiosa was magnificent. A bit long, but well done. I rewatched mad max at the weekend I’d forgotten the 1979-ness of it.
desperatebicycleFull MemberBit late to the party, but went to see Furiosa last night. Loved it. A big OTT,violent, funny, crazy adventure. Never lets up. Quite a surprise to see Cormoran Strike in a big action film part… some silly plot holes and “huh” moments (how can Furiosa and her mum ride motorbikes in a sandstorm with nothing on their faces??), but hey, it’s not a documentary 😀
Also the Wolverine and Deadpool “turn your phones off” before the film is hilarious! (Vue)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.