That’s an interesting point. ‘His feet were wrong and he couldn’t have saved it’ – could anyone have saved it? How far do you go with the Minority Report type processing before deciding whether it’s material?
**
“VAR to Ref: he’s definitely onside when the ball’s played
Ref: OK, so does the defender pull him back?
VAR: yes, there’s a clear pull
Ref: and the left back, is he getting across to cover?
VAR: no, he’s too far away, it’s a clear run on goal
Ref: OK so it’s a clear foul, and a clear DOGSA, so I’m seeing freekick and a red card, do you agree?
VAR: No
Ref: No? Why no?
VAR: It’s Darwin Nunes. He couldn’t hit a cow’s arse with a banjo.