Viewing 40 posts - 42,081 through 42,120 (of 77,140 total)
  • EU Referendum – are you in or out?
  • chestrockwell
    Full Member

    Farage said it to head off questions about him saying a 48/52 split against leaving would require another vote. It was mentioned earlier in the show.

    It was only on as it follows Milkshake and I hadn’t turned the telly off.

    Del
    Full Member

    The percentage that would vote to leave next time would be very much bigger than it was last time round. And we may just finish the whole thing off.

    ‘like’
    ( above from farage if not clear ).
    so shall we say 65% for leave swings it then? if they got that i would just accept it.

    mattjg
    Free Member

    I don’t think Farage, Gove, Johnson et al ever expected or wanted to win.

    But a new referendum would be a poison chalice for Tory & Labour … what would they campaign for?

    As for a result, that may well be down to last time’s abstainers pitching in, and the young coming out in force.

    But the red tops are still for leave.

    Very hard to call.

    kelvin
    Full Member

    I’m pretty sure Farage wants us out of the EU (and the EU taken apart). He wanted to win.

    Farage and Gove wanted to aggrandise themselves with their party members, bring UKIPers back to their party, gain personal power, keep their party in power, and also use a narrow loss as leverage to even further improve our exceptional position within the EU. That’s my take anyway.

    deadlydarcy
    Free Member

    I agree Kelvin. There’s no doubt that Farage and his UKIP loons want to leave the EU and hope that one of the biggies leaving will hasten a break-up by encouraging Pexit, etc., emboldening the Far Right in Austria, France, Germany, Holland to destabilise the progressive social democratic consensus that has built up over the last few decades.

    As for Gove, Johnson and other Tory Brexiteers etc. I dunno, I think some of them want to leave, thinking that a cake-and-eat-it-because-TNUMTWNT was possible but are finding that increasingly difficult to deliver, but also realising that had there been a remain vote, they could happily live with that because WOTP while still flinging poo at Brussels whenever they fancied.

    wwaswas
    Full Member

    For Remainers the harsh reality that underlies Farage’s confidence is that while the costs of non-membership are becoming clearer there is still no strong narrative as to the tangible benefits of membership. That was a problem in 2016 and it still is.

    I think this is part of the issue. There’s no argument and no one (bar Adonis) really putting one forward.

    With Corbyn pro-hard brexit there really isn’t a voice from the centre or left or anyone with charisma who can put an argument for staying beyond the old ‘project fear’ (albeit with rather more substance behind it now).

    dissonance
    Full Member

    Gove wanted to aggrandise themselves with their party members

    I got the impression Gove really is against the EU and would want out. Probably even if it did him political harm.
    Boris on the other hand was just an opportunist who saw it as the best gain for him.

    For Farage I am not completely convinced. I think he likes seeing himself as a plucky rebel rather than the career politician that he is and would probably have liked to keep in that mode. Hence why he still pops up throwing shit around.

    Leku
    Free Member

    Has he realised he is about to lose his MEP job?

    kelvin
    Full Member

    Messy idiot again…

    Farage Boris and Gove wanted to aggrandise themselves with their party members…

    Sorry.

    mattjg
    Free Member

    Has he realised he is about to lose his MEP job?

    Perhaps, tho regardless he gets to keep his £78k annual EU pension and his kids can have EU passports of course as their mother is German. My daughter on the other hand has the “good fortune” to be English going back multiple generations. Thx for that, our Nige.

    Del
    Full Member

    Ha! ( with apologies to Mike Skinner ) I’m 45th generation Roman. that’s got to count for something?

    mattjg
    Free Member

    Yes – I’m Norman so you have 700+ years advantage on me.

    Bloody incomers.

    Northwind
    Full Member

    kelvin – Member

    I’m pretty sure Farage wants us out of the EU (and the EU taken apart). He wanted to win.

    I think Farage likes his fantasy brexit. I don’t think he much likes any of the real brexits available though, and he certainly won’t like being held to account for any of it.

    But another round of campaigns and another referendum, that’d suit him very nicely. Stir up some shit, get on the telly, have loads of people tell him how great he is, maybe get someone shot.

    mattjg
    Free Member

    (tho maybe I should try again for that French passport!)

    the Normans were vikings though.

    Norway! result!

    deadkenny
    Free Member

    He wants back into UKIP that’s all. Referendum, he can get in and take over the campaign. Lose, he stays on to “fight the cause”.

    mrlebowski
    Free Member

    the Normans were vikings though

    Were we? Result!

    I’m off for a bit of pillaging at Rumbleow’s & Oddbins! Need a new TV & I’ve run out of Malibu..

    Northwind
    Full Member

    Being originally from the north of Scotland I’m 33% viking, 33% sheep, 33% my own grandpa

    mattjg
    Free Member

    Were we? Result!

    Absolutely. Norman = Norseman.

    Hard as nails us.

    Except I’m, errr, now a middle-aged middle class computer guy from Surrey who never won a fight in his life. Oh.

    tjagain
    Full Member

    I’m 65% ( or something) Sami. NO idea how. Most of the rest is german or french

    P-Jay
    Free Member

    Farage is just going in for some attention seeking, I guess he’s only been on Question Time 3 times this year or something.

    centralscrutinizer
    Free Member

    A referendum on whether or not we should have a second referendum should be held.

    💡 😀

    teamhurtmore
    Free Member

    For Remainers the harsh reality that underlies Farage’s confidence is that while the costs of non-membership are becoming clearer there is still no strong narrative as to the tangible benefits of membership. That was a problem in 2016 and it still is.

    100% and “our” (ok the remoaner) reaction has been to abuse and bully leavers and to make things up to scare people again. The stupidity of not learning from history.

    Such an approach almost allowed the BS brigade to win in the Indy vote and did allow them to win the brexit vote. And then there is the US

    Without a major change the result would not be turned around. But having said that it is a hard sell 😉 still if you fail to learn mistakes from history…

    P-Jay
    Free Member

    TBH if we had a 2nd vote, if it did still say leave I think I could accept that, the lies and the bullshit is largely gone now – no, it won’t mean a better economy, no we can’t tell the EU to ‘do one’, yes it will cost a lot of money to leave and no the US isn’t about the throw their arms open and let us export our good to them tarrif free and no there’s no extra money for the NHS, which is a shame for the leave campaign as it’s their core dying of Aussie Flu in corridors.

    If after all that, the majority of voters still think Blue passports are worth it, then I guess we’ve got to accept it.

    P-Jay
    Free Member

    Oh if we do have another vote it would be nice if Labour could knock pretectionist Corbyn off his perch.

    teamhurtmore
    Free Member

    So would Jezza come out the closet and would May get back in it?

    Not that we need another BS referendum to add to the uncertainty but the scenarios as amusing nonetheless

    cloudnine
    Free Member

    IMO..
    If the Tories came clean and told us what a shitshow Brexit is, actually really promised to fix the NHS.. called an election and a 2nd referendum on Brexit..

    They’d totally clean up.

    deadkenny
    Free Member

    What we really need is something actually representative. Like using voting for MPs who can truly represent our opinions, which are assessed on the impact of staying or leaving, letting those in charge make the sensible decision on what’s best for the country based on all the boring tedious legalities and economics, rather than emotive decisions by a portion of the British public who have no idea whatsoever with no genuine facts at hand.

    General election, whichever can offer to fix(ish) the country first and then look the practicalities of Brexit in the future if and when we’re ready. That’s what the referendum should have been and technically was in the first place. An advisory to look into Brexit, not blindly jump off a cliff.

    The money saved by putting Brexit on the back burner could do a hell of a lot for the NHS. Though there’s more to it than that as the concept of full public social care for everyone is flawed in the modern age. It’s not practical for the state to entirely fund it any more.

    mikewsmith
    Free Member

    MPs are “far from confident” that HM Revenue and Customs can deal with the tax avoidance allegations made in the wake of the Paradise Paper leaks.

    The public accounts committee said the department would also struggle to deal with the pressure of Brexit and its own internal changes.

    HMRC believes Brexit alone could add 15% to its workload, the report said.

    The department says it has secured billions tackling tax avoidance and is focused on making Brexit a success.

    HMRC is undertaking 15 major transformation projects, according to the MPs’ report, involving the closure of offices around the country, relocating staff to 13 regional centres and and making tax returns digital.
    Another success story for Brexit there
    http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-42656739
    Wonder what the net take on a lot of the new tarifs will be after the administration costs get added in.

    kerley
    Free Member

    Though there’s more to it than that as the concept of full public social care for everyone is flawed in the modern age. It’s not practical for the state to entirely fund it any more.

    Of course it is practical. The money is easily obtained and the majority of tax payers would see it as money well spent. All about priorities.

    Twodogs
    Full Member

    Anyone catch Question Time last night? Just saw a few minutes where the odious Piers Morgan was trying to get Labour MP to answer a simple question on whether Labour would stay in single market. She couldn’t answer….just trotted out crap about “a Brexit for jobs” and how Labour would negotiate some fantasy deal

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    yes they lack the clarity of vision of the tories 😉

    Both parties are divided on the issue , we all know this.

    tjagain
    Full Member

    Though there’s more to it than that as the concept of full public social care for everyone is flawed in the modern age. It’s not practical for the state to entirely fund it any more.

    given that state provided healthcare is cheaper than private healthcare and it all has to be paid for somehow are you really suggesting its better we each pay £x for full state care or £x+20% for private care?

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    well someone has to make a profit and so what if its ill people [ who also tend to be poorer] who are paying to make the rich richer

    Poopscoop
    Full Member

    Though there’s more to it than that as the concept of full public social care for everyone is flawed in the modern age. It’s not practical for the state to entirely fund it any more.

    Irrelevant of party I see the NHS and associated social care as the biggest achievement of any modern British government.

    It has improved the lives of more people in this country that any other single initiative.

    It’s for those reasons I think it is an utter tragedy to see it being driven into the ground, set up to fail in preparation for full privatisation.

    It’s the one thing money should go to by default before the likes of nukes and aircraft carriers are even considered.

    kimbers
    Full Member

    whether Labour would stay in single market.

    Constructive ambiguity innit! A luxury of opposition, for now….

    bikebouy
    Free Member

    Caught the tail end of Farrage on BBC News earlier prattling on about another referendum on Brexshite.. says he’d support it.

    Ties in nicely with the other evenings Party Political Broadcast by the Tories..

    Definitely another referendum or gen election on the way.

    Clearly the Tories are shitting themselves, and as proven have absolutely no clue how to run a) the country and b) themselves and c) brexshite but they are very proficient at a) lying in parliament b) wasting “company” paid time scanning Porn sites c) getting interns to go Sex Toys shopping for them and d) ramming their private parts in Pigs Heads.

    Bring it on, most brexiters are dead behind the ears. A great deal of them are dead by now too.

    Northwind
    Full Member

    Twodogs – Member

    Anyone catch Question Time last night? Just saw a few minutes where the odious Piers Morgan was trying to get Labour MP to answer a simple question on whether Labour would stay in single market. She couldn’t answer….just trotted out crap about “a Brexit for jobs” and how Labour would negotiate some fantasy deal

    Obviously she should have done what the Tories do and just said “this is what we want and we’ll definitely get it”

    Del
    Full Member

    TBF all labour have to do right now is avoid brexit questions, and either point at the tories dealing with it and laugh, or ask them pointed questions about the shitshow that the nhs appears to be right now.
    they don’t have to have a coherent position on anything very much when the tories are running out of their own feet to shoot.

    slowoldman
    Full Member

    It has improved the lives of more people in this country that any other single initiative.

    Eh, don’t forget civil engineering! Sewers and potable water supplies were the first step.

    But yes, I agree, the NHS is the jewel in the crown of (what’s left of) our democracy.

    thecaptain
    Free Member

    Some people might vote labour irrespective of how incoherent and incomplete their policies appear to be but I won’t.

Viewing 40 posts - 42,081 through 42,120 (of 77,140 total)

The topic ‘EU Referendum – are you in or out?’ is closed to new replies.