I thought a key benefit of Euro 6 was that less EGR was needed
So I have a 2016 Mazda 2.2 diesel which has not one but two EGR valves. Interestingly the 2017 engines onwards have the adblue system whereas older engines don’t, but the adblue engines have nowhere near the same problems as the older ones, despite them both being Euro 6 engines.
I think the biggest problem with the euro 6 engines is them not being driven in they way they should. They were sold as being cleaner and with super low VED so lots of people snapped them up despite only using them purely for the 2 mile school run and maybe a run to the shops. They’re then shocked when the inlet manifold and EGR valves end up absolutely clogged with carbon deposits.
All that black crap that used to come out the exhausts of diesels has to go somewhere and it’s ending up clogging intakes or finding its way into the oil.
Personally other than encountering the DPF regen issue I had, I don’t suffer the same problems others have with euro 6 engines because I’m doing a couple of 90 mile runs every weekend and 2 x 210 mile runs up and down to Manchester once a month, and very little short run. The engine gets nice and hot and gets a good run rather than barely reaching operating temps a few times a week.
Previously I had a euro 5 diesel engine which in about 50,000 miles I don’t think it ever did a DPF regen and never gave me a single issue, whereas Mazda software in my current car dictates a regen every 200 miles which in turn puts diesel into the oil