oof, I don’t often disagree with you cougar but I do disagree with that. My kids are also more interested in the Smeds and Smoos on tv if I let them, but I refuse to let it go too far and they benefit greatly from getting outside. They don’t know what’s good for them, sat on their arses is not good for them.
Oh, sure, that wasn’t what I meant. Sorry, I probably could have explained that better. Rather, the OP is painting their options like it’s Belmarsh or Colditz and I don’t think that’s the case.
Of course there needs to be a degree of Adult In The Room rather than letting them do as they please. The kids in her care spend more time outside than I do. They go to playgroups, the library, we’re a brickbat away from “shared use” green infrastructure, it’s a rare day that they’re inside all day. They’re not rattling tin mugs across the fire guard. (Well, actually they are, but not due to Stir Fever.)
For a non-parent it’s been something of an eye-opener for me. They usually get home-cooked meals despite me being the cook in the relationship from day one and her hating doing it. There’s strict guidelines on interaction, enrichment activities, nap times, storytelling… yet if I closed the blinds I doubt any of them would even notice. We’d have more of a rebellion if I turned off the twinkly lights.