A) they aren’t
Yes they are.
Every “solution” to air quality and pollution we are willing to consider merely moves it somewhere else.
No it doesn't.
Which is different from inner London. Most urban areas don’t have a tube system for a start.
Not a tube specifically but.... (Any one can fill in gaps I've missed)
Glasgow - Underground plus rail
Edinburgh - Tram
Newcastle - Light rail (over and underground)
Manchester - Tram and Rail
Liverpool - Underground trians
That is just my experience in the UK, down in Oz lots of good mass transit systems in all cities moving loads of people without touching cars at all.
I think it was Athens that electrified their bus network, there are heaps of systems in place
if you replace them with something else, which you will have to unless you are willing to have the much harder conversations referenced above, you will end up in the same place but with different things taking up the space..
Happy to have the hard conversations. as for space
Where do you out the kid you are taking to school, the toddler you are taking to daycare, Tge bulky equipment you need for your job, the diapers you need to buy and the foodstuffs to make dinner on your bike/ebike? Biking as a primary form of transportation just isn’t going to cut it for all but a select few (who tend to work in certain reasonably well paid jobs in areas with good resources).
More whataboutery
Just look at the girls face in that GSD video - it makes me well up every time i see it. I have no use for a GSD at all but my god would i love one. How much fun do they look?
Which is different from inner London. Most urban areas don’t have a tube system for a start.
Right, so we're back to "we shouldn't improve public transport because it's not very good at present"? We know that public transport isn't very good, e.g., no tube system outside London (and Glasgow and Newcastle), that's the whole point, it should be better. People take the most natural, easy choice when they decide how to get around. Like I said, for my friends in London it's public transport because it's relatively cheap (in time and money), reliable, easy to use, goes where they want to go. For me, and most other people, it's the private car, because in comparison to the rubbish alternatives it's relatively cheap (in time and money), reliable, easy to use, goes where I want to go.
If you live in city, have easy access to to a shop and are normally abled, true but try to step outside your own experience and consider how others live.
I said "A short journey to get a pint of milk", which kind of implies it's y'know a short journey. You can live in deepest darkest North Wales and still have a village shop less than a mile away. Spar isn't the preserve of the metropolitan elite for crying out loud!
In terms of disability, why on earth is "someone might live in the Highlands, 40 miles from the nearest shop and be disabled" an argument against improving public transport and building safe cycle routes?
As Simons-nicolai_uk said, it's not about banning all cars or making every single person travel every single journey by bike or foot. It's about getting some people to change some journeys.
Where do you out the kid you are taking to school, the toddler you are taking to daycare, Tge bulky equipment you need for your job, the diapers you need to buy and the foodstuffs to make dinner on your bike/ebike? Biking as a primary form of transportation just isn’t going to cut it for all but a select few
When the right infrastructure is there, you can use a bakfiets or cargobike if you need it.
But no, I wouldn't expect a skip delivery driver to load 6 skips in one of those. Nor would I expect a building supplies delivery driver to carry 20 tonnes of gravel on one. But for SOME people, it could be a replacement vehicle for SOME journeys.
Also, just to go back to my earlier post, I think we've reached that point. https://singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/cars-are-killing-us-within-10-years-we-must-phase-them-out/#post-10523398
We are one week into a three month experiment to live without a car. I do plan to hire a car occasionally for visiting family or going to festivals (maybe), but we just don't need one for daily living as we live in a city.
Not having a car will mean that we have to make changes, but so far that means doing smaller, more frequent and local shopping. In the longer term it will mean less visits to trail centres or spur of the moment outings. On the plus side my level of activity has increased in the last week, life has slowed down a bit, and I have explored more of my local area than I have in the last five years. I fully expect to give up the car permanently at the end of the three months.
You can live in deepest darkest North Wales and still have a village shop less than a mile away.
This bit is a joke right? Please tell me it's a joke.
Why not they probably don't have the internet down there.... you can just milk whatever walks past
Why not they probably don’t have the internet down there…. you can just milk whatever walks past
Well they've been milking the pit closures for years.
Of course it's not a joke. There are shops selling milk in rural North Wales. You don't have to live in a city to have a shop a cycle-able distance away from you, was my point.
Of course it’s not a joke. There are shops selling milk in rural North Wales. You don’t have to live in a city to have a shop a cycle-able distance away from you, was my point.
All within a mile of a house?
All within a mile of a house?
He didn't say "all".
and here we go, best way to deal with a modern transport issue is to deal with the serious concerns of rural welsh shopping and driving from FNQ to Alaska with your boat and entire extended family
He didn’t say “all”.
Ah so he means.
You can live in deepest darkest Wales and can be over a mile from a shop.
All within a mile of a house?
I haven't been to them all! What a ridiculous line of argument.
I said
You can live in deepest darkest North Wales and still have a village shop less than a mile away. Spar isn’t the preserve of the metropolitan elite for crying out loud!
I didn't say everybody in North Wales, I just said it's possible to live in rural North Wales (which is most of it) and have a shop nearby. Do you really believe that NOBODY in rural North Wales lives within a mile of a shop that sells milk?
But...
This shows exactly what happens with these discussions. Someone says "we should make public and active transport better in cities" and someone replies with "but what about disabled people who need to travel a long way in/between rural areas?" And the discussion gets derailed.
Edit
well, yes, of course. Who ever claimed otherwise? Certainly not me.You can live in deepest darkest Wales and can be over a mile from a shop
Phase out cars?
Not going to happen. 😀
Ah so he means.
You can live in deepest darkest Wales and can be over a mile from a shop.
Your response to misrepresenting someone is to state the bleeding obvious? Poor form, Drac.
well, yes, of course. Who ever claimed otherwise? Certainly not me.
So what exactly were you getting at?
So what exactly were you getting at?
Was it not clear from the rest of the post you left out from your quote?
Was it not clear from the rest of the post you left out from your quote?
No. Hence why I asked.
i don't think finding milk in north wales will be an issue, finding petrol to fuel your car to get it might be.
No. Hence why I asked.
I don't see how it could be any clearer. I think you're proving the point that people like to argue extremes when talking about general situations.
I think it's a bit more fundamental than just swapping a school run car for a cargo bike, it is going to require a general shift in lots of people's lifestyles and some of their expectations.
First of all if you're doing stuff without a car of course it is going to take longer. By bike, bus or on foot you simply have to allow more time for people to get about. So perhaps that means a change to our increasingly long hours/presentism type working culture...
It's clear to me now that all of the technologies from the last hundred years or so which were meant to save us effort and improve productivity giving us free time back, stuff like like cars and computers, actually mean many of us now work longer harder hours, the common belief being that we can produce exponentially more...
British people are generally "time poor" and part of the equation that leads to that is the expectation that we'll just rip about in our cars between home, work and all our other commitments rather than taking any time over things, that's got to change...
A life without the same level of rush and panic sort of has to go hand in hand with reduced car use...
Drac:
My point was that even people who don't live in a city could potentially change how they make some journeys.
It was a counter point to cromolyolly's point that this sort of stuff is only a good idea if you're able-bodied and live in a city.
I gave the example of someone who lives in or just outside a village in North Wales travelling to buy a pint of milk from a shop. They don't live in a city, but it's still a journey that could change.
The select few who don’t need to transport children to two different locations? You’re undermining your own argument.
You did see the all but, yes? Or are you just being obtuse via literism?
Yes they are
According to actual sources, not wikipebelief, transport, power generation/supply and power intensive parts of the ICI sector are the largest single sources of pollution in urban areas. Which actually stop depends on the exact urban areas and the blend of activities. Transport includes, but is not limited to, cars. Heavy vehicles, like buses and trucks contribute pollution up to 5x their proportion if the sector. So no they don't unless you can find legitimate sources that say otherwise.
No it doesn’t.
Does too. EVs !over the pollution from the tailpipe to the smokestack. Stringent environmental regulations move production to places with none, or lax.
Happy to have the hard conversations.
Not singling you out in particular but no, we are most definitely not ready for those discussions yet. There evidence is overwhelming on that front.
Right, so we’re back to “we shouldn’t improve public transport because it’s not very good at present”
I have absolutely no idea how you got that from
Which is different from inner London. Most urban areas don’t have a tube system for a start.
But it appears you missed everything that preceded it.
More whataboutery
This word, i think it doesn't mean what he thinks it means.
“but what about disabled people who need to travel a long way in/between rural areas?
I actually didn't specify a distance or location, just people who aren't able bodied. Shadow one for a couple of days, better yet take care of one for 20 years and then speak about their experience.
Plus it was largely in response to the "I bike everywhere, why can't everyone else which always infects these discussions". It's like empathy is a foreign disease these days.
A short journey to get a pint of milk”, which kind of implies it’s y’know a short journey.
In case you missed it, I never specified a distance or local because u understand that is all utterly irrelevant if you are not able bodied. Or older. Or inform in some way. A short journey, climb Everest, it's all the same if you can do it. Which is why people spend their entire lives fighting for the consideration and respect they are due.
I gave the example of someone who lives in or just outside a village in North Wales travelling to buy a pint of milk from a shop.
When I was 11yrs old I helped the local milkman deliver fresh milk to a local village/district. Via an EV with giant lead acid batteries. The milk was contained in reusable/recollected bottles. It tasted really fresh.
The vehicle was very quiet and didnt wake hardly anyone. Not all things improve over time.
Cromolyolly: I don't know what point you're trying to make re. people with disabilities. If the alternatives (cycling, walking, public transport) are improved then that helps people who truly need to drive because the roads will be quieter. Also, safe cycling routes and decent public transport improve mobility for people whose medical conditions mean that they can't drive.
Once again, this is about SOME people changing how they make SOME journeys. Absolutely not about making everybody cycle every journey.
My point was that even people who don’t live in a city could potentially change how they make some journeys.
It was a counter point to cromolyolly’s point that this sort of stuff is only a good idea if you’re able-bodied and live in a city.
I gave the example of someone who lives in or just outside a village in North Wales travelling to buy a pint of milk from a shop. They don’t live in a city, but it’s still a journey that could change.
Ah! Thank you.
Yes absolutely agree we all can do our bit for the very few that can't it's such a small percentage that it will have little effect.
Transport includes, but is not limited to, cars. Heavy vehicles, like buses and trucks contribute pollution up to 5x their proportion if the sector. So no they don’t unless you can find legitimate sources that say otherwise.
Transport is the largest sector of which cars are the largest contributor. My source? I work with the people who measure it.
Does too. EVs !over the pollution from the tailpipe to the smokestack. Stringent environmental regulations move production to places with none, or lax.
Who said anything about EVs?
You did see the all but, yes? Or are you just being obtuse via literism?
In yet another attempt at tedious whataboutery you missed the following.
Most people are able bodied
Most people live in urban areas
Most car journeys are very short
Most car journeys are very short
*even in rural areas*
Christ it's like a 9am post rave conversation in here
anyone got any booze?
what was I talking about again?
Imagine the change if 50% of people did 50% of their current car journeys by some other means. car share, bus, train, bike, walk, mobility scooter, rollerblade, met via skype instead of in person, whatever.
If you can think of a reason why someone would still need to travel by car then great, they're in the 75% of journeys that won't change. But with a 25% reduction we're back to a level of traffic last seen in 1988.( https://www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/road-traffic-statistics-tra#traffic-volume-in-miles-tra01)
It's incredible how many people are against this, like it's some kind of attack on their basic freedom. Yet they won't let their kids out the door for fear of them being mown down by a car.
We live in a society that is effectively being strangled by its own success, by our own road networks. We've now reached a point where it has become evident that it's not all positive, yet we've lived with it so long we're blind to the negatives.
I've always loved cars and loved driving. I'm a bit of a petrolhead, in the same way I like bikes and other stuff. But we seriously need to rethink our values and reassess what is important. We have the technology to negate the need for travel in many circumstances, yet our ever evolving infrastructure continues to move in the opposite direction, ensuring we must travel further than ever.
It's not idealism either. The solutions to some of these problems are already working in places around the world. They might not yet be perfect, and we have a long, long way to go to phase out cars, but the knowledge and experience exists right now, to make huge improvements.
I'm all for a world where we feel safe letting our kids out of the door.
Yeah it’s the kids I feel most sorry for tbh, if only we could think of some ideas to stop them being murdered.
(Deliberate pun on stop der kindermoort)
Rather than force people to cycle, we need the average joe/josephine to suddenly realise they don’t always need to use the car all the time.
Obviously, some journeys still need to be in cars, but many journeys could be done without cars.
It takes a societal change in attitude.
Just as a btw, one of the best things i saw last year was a young mum on an Ecargo bike, with 2 kids on the front, going home/past Edinburgh zoo, really made me smile, I hope it’s the thin edge of the wedge.
https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/disused-railway-stations-you-could-15949230
Well that sounds like progress
Public transport in early 80's Liverpool was cheap and efficient, Mersyrail decent, would be good to see the network developed, look to be plenty of scope for re-opening stations.
I had to go to a site in London yesterday. My employer pretty much insisted we drive even after I bemoaned not using the train which would have been no more hassle so we left at the sparrows fart to get there and even then only just got there for 9am (50 mile trip). Was there for all of an hour and drove back only to get stuck in the horrific 2 lorry and car collision which shut the road for 2 and half hours! Got back at 2.30 after leaving the house at 6.45 for a trip that wasn’t necessary and could have been done by train.... it just seems to be entrenched in people’s mindset to drive no matter the cost or reasoning.
And as an additional more seeing the light
https://www.bicyclenetwork.com.au/newsroom/2019/03/14/roads-lobby-back-pedals-on-cars/
"Late last year, Roads Australia led a delegation of public and private sector leaders to Tokyo, Seoul and Singapore to get a better understanding of how these cities are coping with population growth, transport and liveability.
"The conclusion we drew is that ordinary Australians, businesses and governments require an urgent and major change of mindset if we’re to maintain both our standard of living and our sanity.
"In essence, the Australian love affair with the car needs to come to an end. In its place, we need to invest massively and exponentially in the renewal and expansion of our public transport infrastructure and modes”, Mr Stuart-Watt said.