You didn’t post any whistleblowers though so everyone is confused.

Was the disclaimer.

“Here is a list of people who aren’t whistleblowers”

You wouldnt know a fact if it walked up to you with “FACT” tattooed on its face and bit you on the arse 🙄

Isn’t the statistic that something like 30% of people in the Middle East and North Africa believe 9/11 was a joint operation by the Israeli and American secret service in order to make “Muslims look bad and give them an excuse to bomb/invade”

Good in what way ?

That’s why I asked.

The conspiracy vids are all “good” until you actually fact check what they are lying about.

They are for the people taken in by them.

They are massive money makers for the people trading off them such as multi millionaire Alex Jones/Prison Planet.

Some of you may find this (lengthy) piece interesting:

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/09/how-america-lost-its-mind/534231/

I only hope that the UK decides to make some substantial U-turns as we seem always to be heading ‘that way’. Pre-referendum sadly seemed to mark us out as accelerating further ‘that way’.

Some of you may find this piece interesting:

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/09/how-america-lost-its-mind/534231/

Kurt Anderson, the author of that piece was on Sam Harris’ podcast recently where he discussed this subject in depth. Very interesting.

[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FDpjKdlIxA[/video]

@Neal yes good is the wrong word and to be clear I get no pleasure from thinking about or seeing people die.

Enjoyable as an art form? Interesting as a cultural phenomenom? I cant think of a better way of putting what I get out of vids like this.

The best conspiracy theory is of course the one which suggests that conspiracy theories are put out there to distract people from the real truth.

30% eh? So a minority?

F(***ed)TFY

*Further unconfirmed allegation.

A made up statistic about how many people believe something, to be fair it’s better supporting evidence than he normally punts out.

I know. Imagine being able to keep a thread going for a whole DAY. Incredible isn’t it.

I found the analysis of WTC7 collapse here interesting: http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7

Yeah of course they did. I mean allow a large number of your capital ships be destroyed which almost tips the balance of power completely to enter a war, which was pretty inevitable anyway.

Yeah of course they did. I mean allow a large number of your capital ships be destroyed which almost tips the balance of power completely to enter a war, which was pretty inevitable anyway.

Actually only 2 were lost- Arizona and Oklahoma. (and Utah but it was retired). But it can definitely be explained by arrogance, a degree of incompetence, and the general workings of armed forces, and those things all seem simpler and more reasonable than a conspiracy.

I can’t be arsed to read all this but I have two comments:
1) Freefall – My sister is a concrete/cement scientist and told me that what people do not realise is that brittle fracture normally occurs at the speed of sound in the fracturing solid. Which is faster than freefall..
There is is this fallacy that you expect the building collapse to kind of pause at each level or meet obstacle or overcome them – but imagine the kinetic energy of 40 floors (that above the point of entry) after they have moved one meter it must have been massive – so every bit of concrete or steel it hit was way beyond its fracture or crush point so ti just swept all before it. The laws of physics tell you it should fall at about freefall speed.
2) As everyone else said, they couldn’t keep a blow job in the white house a secret, don’t you think we would have had lots of inside testimony by now?

The point I was making wa:

which the attack almost did. By 1944, those 2 battleships hardly made any difference, however, they would of been very useful in 1942.

The point I was making wa:

I think you’re missing the point- you said they were destroyed, I pointed out they weren’t, that’s all.