coming form the motorcycle world, only in a marketing mans head can something that is heavier, less agile and be marketed as more stable and quicker in a straight line, and the next best thing
I guess the biking comparison who be a Hayabusa vs a Panigale
OK – I not light, and I’m not short – so in “ratio” terms a 29er would make sense – the higher front end alone is an attraction. I do look like a gorilla humping a football on a 26er
But I have a Soul and a BFe that I love. My only real gripe being that at 6ft 3ins I find the front end quite low (so correct with riser bars – top tube length is fine)
So when “the man” goes on about 29ers rolloing over things better – can anyone tell me if the front wheel hits a 15 cm object – what is the difference in angle of attack between a 29 inch wheel and a 26ers – is it 2 degrees, 5 degrees or much greater?
Rides over objects / depressions easier – so you hit a 30 hole in the track – a 29er is 10% bigger as a wheel – so this translates perhaps at 3mm more at the depression. Does that make such a big difference ?
I can understand that with a 29er that if BB height is the same , then you are sitting “lower” on the bike , so the CoG will be lower.
Isn’t this the only reason why 29ers seem to ride better?
It would appear that everyone in now lower the BB heights of suspension bikes … is that just coincidence?
Can we expect to seem some 26ers with lower CoG?
Or am I just being a luddite …
I keep on thinking mini-disc player and betamax