Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 65 total)
  • 29er geometry – some specific questions about forks/frames and fast handling…
  • clubber
    Free Member

    So… I'm getting a 29er of my own together and got some queries on the numbers.

    At the moment I'm planning to build up a Viper 29er which has pretty steep geometry ( 21" frame as here – 71 deg ) as I understand it – I plan to fit a 100mm fork and at the moment, one option is to fit a 2008 reba which I believe is 38mm offset.

    So, considering that most 29ers I've ridden have felt pretty slow in the handling dept, a trait that I really don't like, is the relatively steep head angle of the viper going to offset the lower offset of the Reba compared to the more current 45mm ish models?

    If it helps, riding a friend's Singular Swift this weekend felt really quite nice (except for the silly wide bars 🙂 ) – set up with the Singular rigid fork – and that's 72 deg head angle with 48mm offset – eg in combination a lot more than the Viper/Reba combination I mentioned.

    (Sadly getting a Swift isn't really an option – out of my price range – really wish I'd won that one at SSUK07 now!)

    And if my planned combination is really likely to be barking up the wrong tree, any other suggestions? Particularly for the forks

    anotherdeadhero
    Free Member

    29erhater aboard 29er he likes shock!:

    Wide bars FTW 😉

    M6TTF
    Free Member

    how does the offset affect the handling then? is it just down to the wheelbase length?

    TooTall
    Free Member

    ADH – he liked the bike – he is now going to build up a bike he really doesn't like as punishment for his personal failing – his own big-wheeled sack-cloth and ashes!

    clubber
    Free Member

    LOL – well, sort of TooTall 😉

    I liked it but that unfortunately doesn't mean that I can have it. As such, I want to see if I can get what I want a different way. Unless you fancy buying me one, TooTall…

    More offset (aka rake) makes for faster handling (reduces trail)

    bigsi
    Free Member

    Clubber – My first 29er was a Viper (bought it 18mths abo) and it was run with 100 mm Manitou Minutes. Previous to building the 29er i was riding a BlurLT and to be honest i didn't notice too much difference is handling in the twisty stuff but i have put that down to steeper angles and a bolt through fork as opposed to a qr on the blur. However I've since owned a Swift & currently a Paradox.

    The Swift with the same forks on it was better in the tighter stuff but felt a bit compromised when pointing downhill as the standover height was less than it was on the Viper. It did handle quicker and was more fun to ride but i think thats because the top tube on the Viper was longer than on the Swift even with a 70mm stem.

    I have to say that the Paradox handles most like a 26er as its got slacker angles and shorter chainstays than either of the other 2 but then its 4x the price of the Viper as well.

    In short, the Viper with that set up is not going to be the quickest handling machine in the world but then i have come to realise over the past 18 mths of riding 29ers that they do need a bit of manhandling, or maybe thats just my "special" riding style 😳

    clubber
    Free Member

    Thanks for that – how was the Viper btw? What was the mudroom like around the chain/seat stays? Just wondering if it'll fit a 2.3 ok.

    TooTall
    Free Member

    Have you seen a 2.3 on 29ers? It is an awful lot of rubber. 2.2 and you'll be reet.

    bigsi – you reinforce my belief that you get more out of a bike (regardless of how slow you think the steering etc is) the longer you ride it. There is something different about riding a bike that actually fits rather than riding what is almost a bmx – subtle but it sounds like you get it now with the bigger wheels.

    bigsi
    Free Member

    I ran Spesh "The Captain's" in 2.0 during the summer and then Bonty ACX's in 2.2 when it got a bit soggy, never noticed clearance being an issue so guess it must have been fine.

    I've never had any issues with the bike/frame etc other than the paint is waffer thin so protect it where ever you can, chainstays are a must.

    I don't know how much you are paying for yours but i paid £125 new off of CRC and was/am very happy with it. In fact its currently resting against the office wall behind me as its now my commuter.

    A good first foray in to the murkey world of 29ers if you ask me but you'll be wanting a Swift before too long, and yes the Swifts work really well with a 100mm fork 😉

    bigsi
    Free Member

    Too-Tall. Yep, i no longer own a small wheeled bike and hated the one's i tried on my lbs demo day.

    All the guys a i ride with say i ride better on a 29er than i ever did on a 26" wheeler and it doesn't look like a 29er next to me. One guy on a 26" even offered me one of his spare inners when i punctured that Thursday and i had to point out that it wouldn't fit. He was mistified till i explained to him i was on a 29er. 😆

    TooTall
    Free Member

    The 26" inner tube fits fine – I ran my bike for 2 years on 26" inners – you just need to stretch them a little bit before inflation.

    clubber
    Free Member

    Ah, good point – 2.2 it is then 🙂

    bigsi
    Free Member

    clubber – just seen your post on rd's forks. I wouldn't go longer than 100mm on a Viper frame if i were you. I think it will handle real odd with 120mm.

    It's just my opinion but the Viper was designed round an 80mm fork and the headtube is very short.

    rOcKeTdOg
    Full Member

    put an emergency 26" in my 29" wheel, felt awful, very squirmy around corners, thought the tyre was going to roll off the rim, ok for "slowly get you home" emergencies

    p.s. agree 120mm is too long Clubber

    clubber
    Free Member

    Yeah agree too. I was working on the basis that they could be shortened to 100mm

    epicyclo
    Full Member

    To calculate trail:

    h = headtube angle
    f = Fork offset
    r = radius of tyre
    t = trail

    then t= (rcosh – f)/sinh

    2unfit2ride
    Free Member

    To reiterate what I said in the email (before its to late 😉 )
    I ran the viper on a 440AC RC31, & TBH I thought it was trying to kill me!
    Now I'll admit I'm only 6', but I now run exactly the same stuff on an OO scandal, albeit with a longer stem, & it feels quick steering but not nervous, now just so you know its not me being a woos, I let a roadie friend have a go & he thought it was stupidly steep/'quick steering'.

    So,
    1, you know its long in the TT

    2, you know the steering will be silly on short AC forks

    3, you know the paint is crap 😉

    4, you know your only sending me money for postage, you have it on approval.

    Cheers.

    Andy
    Full Member

    hmmm I'd just get a Swift. Yes they look expensive, but are wrth it IMO

    clubber
    Free Member

    Are you going to give me the money I don't have for it? 😉

    Andy
    Full Member

    You wouldn't want one anyway as they are blue and not some silly purple colour 😉

    I recommend a Swift because your 853 SS is a pretty good bike (I swapped from an 853SS to a swift) and a Swift will give you the same kind of ride quality. Its just a really sorted bike. I'd be saving up the extra pennies!

    clubber
    Free Member

    It's a fair point but I quite like the Singular blue as it happens 😉

    KINGTUT
    Free Member

    As I said on the day clubber, you looked 'right' with a 29er, hopefully it will ride as well.

    cynic-al
    Free Member

    I have to say my 29er felt a little sluggish steering wise.

    This made perfect sense to me in that the wheels have 10% more weight 10% further away from the timr.

    Andy
    Full Member

    cynic-al I would not disagree with that. There are some distinct compensations though. Mainly that lovely blue colour hmmmmmm 😀

    clubber
    Free Member

    I already have a bike in a pretty similar blue (the 26" one I was riding at BBF 🙂 )

    Andy
    Full Member

    Ah, so you have started to convert over. Good. Well there you are then. Sell that purple thing, get a Swift and your bikes will match. Always important to have a matching "quiver". 8)

    TooTall
    Free Member

    I wonder whether clubber can drag this out to 100 posts, 6 months later and still no 29er?

    Get 10% lighter wheels and anticipate a bit more – that more than compensates for perceived slowness!

    clubber
    Free Member

    I'll give it a go 😉

    Actually I should have the frame on the way shortly, I already have the wheels so just need to find a set of suspension forks..

    cynic-al
    Free Member

    TooTall – Member

    Get 10% lighter wheels and anticipate a bit more – that more than compensates for perceived slowness!

    You know what – I did (the latter)! But thanks for the helpful (and not at all pompous) advice!

    I wasn't seeing it as a negative – it suited the bike tbh, but it was always noticeable as I was swapping with 26ers. I sold the 29er in the end, couldn't justify it albeit there were interesting facets.

    clubber
    Free Member

    I read the advice as "spend more and ride better" – Practical advice we should all aim for 😉

    Sam
    Full Member

    That Tony Foale article is really very interesting. In that his experiments keep trail constant, while altering head angle and rake/offset. His conclusions are somewhat surprising though, that a steep head angle (what we would call 90deg) and negative offset to achieve a certain trail figure provide improved handling over a more traditional ~75deg head angle. The determination that 'ideal' trail is related to wheel size also accordsd with my experience. How you go about achieving that trail figure (slack head angle and lots of offset, or steep and little offset) also has a significant impact on how the bike rides. Would be interesting to repeat similar trials on a bicycle. I've done it to a degree, but only within what would be accepted as relatively 'normal' in a bike environment.

    Anna-B
    Free Member

    clubber have just e-mailed you.

    yossarian
    Free Member

    Get 10% lighter wheels and anticipate a bit more – that more than compensates for perceived slowness!

    yep, i'm currently running an alfine and halo freedom rims/halo tyres on my swift – 28plus pounds which is hefty and has made me pay a lot more attention to my bars/stem/saddle postion to eek out the best handling and i'm saving for some lighter wheels!

    epicyclo
    Full Member

    Sam – Member
    That Tony Foale article is really very interesting

    It works on motorbikes for sure. In about 1972 my brother & I were riding long distances in the bush in Oz and basically we had to go fast to get anywhere (like Mt Isa to Birdsville for a weekend).

    He had a Suzuki 500T. After a bit of experimentaion we lengthened the swing arm and jacked up the rear suspension for more travel (which steepened the head angle), then reversed the fork yoke to pull the front wheel back and get more trail. It could be held flat out on the dirt and wasn't troubled by deep holes full of bulldust whereas I ended up doing cartwheels at 90mph just south of Bedourie trying to keep up with him, and ended up somewhat bent and battered.

    Phil Irving explained it best IMO

    TooTall
    Free Member

    I mostly take the proverbial given that I just ride bikes cos I likes it – I could care less about stuff because my bikes work for me and thats about all that matters. I do like al being a mardy old man tho – that pleases me.

    clubber
    Free Member

    It entertains me too 🙂

    thekingofsweden
    Full Member

    Go for the swift and stop worrying about all those things as there already done for you 😀

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 65 total)

The topic ‘29er geometry – some specific questions about forks/frames and fast handling…’ is closed to new replies.