Forum menu
I'm not a guy
Any good bits?
It's got my willy, Cougars willy and Mrs Barnsleymitchs lady lumps in.
Given the amount of time you have spent on this thread and the content of your argument (such as it is) it would be an education and consequently time well spent.
What are you saying, Surfer? You sound almost [i]angry[/i]. 😆
I have ADHD so I'm never going to sit through [i]thirty minutes[/i] of Chris Hitchens.
So, summary? 😀
Look, I'll do one for Mol:
Any good bits?
Same old same old Mol. Usual narrow-mindedness and bigotry from the usual suspects (surprise surprise), with the odd interesting bit now and then, and actually some fairly civil debate, mostly.
Not something I'd bother to sit down and read from start to finish in one go though.
I'm not a guy
Everyone's a guy to me. Whether its a girl or a boy.
I'll pick a random page then and dive in for a bit.
I'm not in IT
I can't face 18 pages of this either...it's even more boring than most church services I've been to and TBH whilst I'm not in there with millitant atheists, I do feel anyone who has faith should be good humoured about a small amount of piss taking (I think of it as payback for having had the t*ts bored off me over the years!)....I've got several friends who are clergy and they laugh along with the jokes likes the rest of my friends!
Usual narrow-mindedness and bigotry from the usual suspects
I must've missed that bit. Can you show me an example of what you're referring to?
molgrips - Member
I'll pick a random page then and dive in for a bit.
POSTED 12 SECONDS AGO # REPORT-POST
I'll pick a random page then and dive in for a bit.
I tried that. But it didn't work so just did the last few pages.
I must've missed that bit. Can you show me an example of what you're referring to?
Well, Woppit called me a 'nit-wit' and a 'tit', just cos I said stuff he does not in any way agree with. 😀
He's run away now. Probbly cos I asked him a serious question. He tends to do that quite a lot. 😆
I think he's frightened of me. 😐
Question: How come believers in an all-powerfull god feel the need to leap to it's defence as if it can't stick up for itself?
I must've missed that bit. Can you show me an example of what you're referring to?
Me too.
But as I am a "white IT guy" my Bigotdar is considerably less fine-tuned than others. 🙂
Oh there he is! Almost as if he were 'summoned'.... 😉
Question: How come belevers in an all-powerfull god feel the need to leap to it's defence as if it can't stick up for itself?
Why does God need to 'defend' itself? From what?
Oh, and considering you're just one person, Woppit, with a fairly narrow view of things; why do you think you are 'right' and others 'wrong'?
Can you prove that you are 'right' in your beliefs?
And you are very quick to ask questions, but loathe to answer any yourself, it seems. Why not have a go at answering these?
http://singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/why-are-you-atheists-so-angry/page/17#post-3222438
And then we'll move on to the next bit...
Unless you're frightened? 😐
I'm not white
I'm not a guy
I'm not in IT
Yeah, but apart from that.
Funny; Woppit's gone quiet again.... 😆
But, but, but.
Dear Fred,
Following your previous brief comment as to your personal circumstances (as it were) and having gone off and had a look at some reference material, I now realise why your posts read the way they do and why you respond in what some might describe as your own inimitable style.
I unreservedley withdraw my previous comments in this regard.
I suspect that this provides the answer to a question intermittently posed on this forum as to why you seem to be given more rope than others, by the moderators (no life ban for multiple alter-egos etc).
I won't be more specific because that's your prerogative, should you want to expand on it. Or not. As you see fit.
But I think I understand.
Woppit.
What what what what?
I know! Elfin is king of the gypsies!!
In fairness Charlie, it was Cougar, Gee and Effin's comments I was paying attention to, hence my comment.
Are the gypsies aware of this?
Oooh.... 😮
I won't be more specific
No, please do. I'm intrigued and excited. 😀
And we were doing so well.
Oh Jeebus, please no. Not gypsies. Noooooooooooooooo.
Elfinsafety - Member
Oooh....I won't be more specific
No, please do. I'm intrigued and excited.
O.K. You said you suffered from ADHD.
Can someone explain, I'm not sure what Mr Woppit means?
I thought it was common knowledge that Effin suffers from ADHD.
In fact, we all suffer from Effin's ADHD...a little. 🙂
Oh poor Elfin, I hadn't realised you were a disabled!
Would you like a cup of tea?
You poor thing, were you born like it or did your parents do it to you to make you a more better beggar?
Elfin's the King of Elfland.
Ah... so God's a great big cream bun.
No wonder some aethesits are so upset, if they can't eat cake!
"The whole religion business will now put me in mind of diamond cutting erections and the contents of Mrs Barnsleymitches jumper. What this means in terms of intelligent design, eternality, and the literal versus figurative nature of scriptural interpretation remains open to question."
I cant really comment about anyones erections, but I can safely say the big feller upstairs was having a particularly good day when he came up with the contents of Mrs BM's jumper. And if he is a cream bun, I like to think of him as a particularly well filled elephants foot, or a custard slice. Mmmm, tasty and just a bit blasphemous! 😆
I always loved Ben Goldacre's quote about GM.
Gillian McKeith – or to give her full medical title, “Gillian McKeith”
I believe in cake.
In fact, I'm off to feed brandy to the Christmas cake, fruity little ****er that it is.
I may sing a little atheist non-denominational carol whilst I do so:
We are, Cougar!Chelsea 0- 2 Liverpool!
Woohoo!
We do seem to be giving your guys a good hammering lately Fred.
'My' guys? 😕
I'm a Liverpool fayn....
I was forgettin. London contingent.
I think le surf knows that Effin.
EDIT: oops, maybe not
Here's some atheist/anti-creationist cake:
[img] http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRz8yV2iYbG4pVPBhbX5C5XpHFeInX8wK4v9aUCHYyzd1SiFLnD [/img]
Mmmnnn, doesn't rationality taste good?
CharlieMungus - MemberI'm not a guy
Why didn't you say?
If I'd known I was arguing with a woman I'd have [s]used smaller words[/s] realised I must be wrong! 😉
Great result. Pity Carroll din't tuck away that pen. And nice to see Chelsea once again moaning about stuff. 😆 Did you see them walking out of their own ground before the end? Ha ha!
So, a semi-final then! What's the bets we [i]don't[/i] get Cardiff? 😐
Probbly be Citeh or Scum away. Always happenz like that.
touch my winky again
I always thought touching wood was superstitious nonsense, personally.
Think the semis are two-leg games anyway Effin.
If I'd known I was arguing with a woman I'd have used smaller words
Yes, yours were huge, massive, honestly they were the biggest i've ever seen! I'm surprised you managed to fit them in, and they were so beautiful and long. They were amaaaaazing! Don't ever stop using them with me, etc. etc.
All i know is that they are a touchy lot
Aparently, they are not angry, they are just very easy to irratate
been arguing with an atheist today - you can't win
the way i look at it, either you are a beleiver or you are not a beleiver
if you are not a beleiver, then don't worry about - find something else to get angry about
i couldn't give a rats arse, unless someone starts sprouting rubbish at me, then they can f*ck right off
see, even an agnostic like me can get angry!!
Yes, yours were huge, massive, honestly they were the biggest i've ever seen! I'm surprised you managed to fit them in, and they were so beautiful and long. They were amaaaaazing! Don't ever stop using them with me, etc. etc.
[autoresponse]
Yes dear.
[/autoresponse]
Carling Cup semi final draw:
Cardiff V Crystal Palace
Man City V Liverpool.
Knew it. 😆
Crystal Palace though eh? At Old Trafford an' all! 😮
If football is a religion, I'm an atheist.
Binners in't happy, is he? 🙁
Knew it.
Effin, from the Carling Cup site...
The semi-finals will be played over two legs.
First leg - week commencing 9th January.
Second leg - week commencing 23rd January.
Yeah, but we still get City. Not Cardiff or Palace.
Will be a tough two legs. Let's hope they've cracked by then. Mind you, we shooduv had 'em on Sunday tbh. Had it not bin for Joe Hart, we'duv done 'em. They are beatable, for sure.
you can't drag this thread out just to reach, how do you say, a fahzand? you've changed topic and i call foul!!
you can't drag this thread out just to reach, how do you say, a fahzand?
But, but, I've never had a 1000 post thread. Go on, go on, go on.
i call foul!!
Ref sez 'play on'.
Anyway, I did try to drag it back on track. Is anybody going to claim to be football agnostic?
I don't like the new BBC website layout. Only just got used to the last one. Why they keep changing it so often?
The thread is dead, Fred. No one was able to show a link between the catholic church and Aids in Africa, or anywhere else. The irony being that those who insisted on that connection, did so without any proof, basing their ideas on belief. Yet mocked others for their belief in a God without proof.
So, ultimately, it's over and I won.
Thanks for playing.
So, ultimately, it's over and I won.
For negative values of 'won'.
Lol@Adam
I won, in the end. I always do, cos I know the truth.
Anyway, God - he's smashing isnt he?
No, that's the LHC you're thinking of.
Anyway, God - he's smashing isnt he?
No, that's the Old Testament God you're thinking of. The New Testament God is far less destructive, unless you count earthquakes and famine and stuff
What is this LHC you speak of cougar?
Is Google down?
I'm not going to all that bother cougar! And, Charlie, "God - he's smitey" doesnt have quite the same ring to it. 😉
Typing three letters into Google is a bother? Good heavens. Do you tie your own shoelaces or are do you have people to do that too? (-:
I did google it cougar, I was just being awkward. It was sciencey! Now I'm just off out to bury some big bones to confuse the creationists. 😀
The thread is dead, Fred. No one was able to show a link between the catholic church and Aids in Africa, or anywhere else. The irony being that those who insisted on that connection, did so without any proof, basing their ideas on belief. Yet mocked others for their belief in a God without proof.So, ultimately, it's over and I won.
You appear to have completely missed the point of this thread. Which is a shame as you'll have to go right back to the beginning and start all over again.
You appear to have completely missed the point of this thread.
You appear to think this thread had a point, you need to read the posts randomly and see if the arguments make more sense that way.
burying big bones
careful now, dont let this thread get pulled by the mods for being mysogamthingy!
😀
I was just being awkward
Ah yes, silly me, this is the Internet.
I think that its OK to believe in god, if you want to, and its ok not to, if you dont want to.
I think that its OK to believe in god, if you want to, and its ok not to, if you dont want to.
What the hell are you doing on here with your open even minded views 😆
dogmatix: I don't think anyone on the thread has argued otherwise.
The trouble arises because "private beliefs" (on both sides) often spill out into public areas like laws, education and justice.
is it not more because one lot are wrong and they then use this values system to impose values on the others
I have not fiorgiven them for what they did to Galileo
Did he do the Fandango?
I think you'll find it works both ways. Haven't forgiven the Belgians for what they did to Tyndale
yay - it's going again (how do we know how many posts?)


