Forum menu
Costs need to be cut, so what treatments that are currently available on the NHS shouldn't really be covered?
physio ?
It's kind of going that way.
IVF
all treatments for fattys and smokers.............. 😉
Any complications resulting from private healthcare - removing that burden from the nhs would save a fair bit of cash.
Surely treating fatties and smokers will bring the costs down in the long run?
*dons flameproof suit*
IVF
Heart transplants
Heceptin and similar
Gastric Bypass
Treatments all should be.
Cosmetic enhancements not unless they can prove there's some sort of psychological issue caused by them. Then even pay some sort of part cost.
Anything related to "Lifestyle"
Otherwise...FFS.
Oh, and injuries caused by falling off a horse.
Finger tip injuries caused by fixed gear chainring fettling, you've only yourselves to blame I'm afraid.
what was the reasoning behind heart transplants tj ?
Maybe treatments don't need to be cut. But start fining people if injurys are self inflicted whilst drunk or under the influence of other drugs. Obviously some cases won't be clear cut, but if someone crashes their car drunk or on CCTV clearly starts a fight then why not fine them a hefty sum to pay for their treatment.
Also, I've always wondered does the NHS sell equipment, skills or services to private companies? Surely having one of the largest medical organisations in the world there must be a business opportunity somewhere?
how about injuries caused by falling off a bicycle?
poor troll DD
It's all very well pointing the finger at [insert spurious choice of treatment here], but the real challenge is going to be provision of a decent standard of elderly care, coupled with the fact that what [i]really[/i] costs is things like ITU bed occupancy.
It'd work out cheaper if we could prevent things happening 'downstream' - but that would mean using our common sense...
I don't think there are going to be any easy answers, beyond making everybody do national service on the wards. 😀
anything for drug addicts. and fat people, oh and anyone with that tired all the time thing.
i can just see you in A and E now crikey " no you can fek of with that you moron " 😆
Car crash victims should be kept in some kind of stasis until the police have confirmed who's at fault. Any patient found to be at fault...down the chute to the incinerator.
Anyone injured by falling from a tandem. Even if it's not his or her fault.
😆 at ton
*Depending on whether people are prepared to be heartless in the name of cost savings, any treatment for the terminally ill that will prolong their life and not cure them could be axed.
The slogan "Man up & die for your country!" could be the next "Keep calm and carry on". But it probly wouldn't stimulate sales of spin-off paraphernalia about cup cakes etc.
Is that the kind of thing you wanted to hear?
Are bullets cheaper than pain meds?
the real challenge is going to be provision of a decent standard of elderly care
You not familiar with Logan's Run or Soylent Green?
*Not necessarily Rob's actual views.
Anyone injured by falling from a tandem. Even if it's not his or her fault.
There would have to be some sort of clause about helmets...
Cosmetic enhancements not unless they can prove there's some sort of psychological issue caused by them.
it's all too easy to convince a doc that you need something if you cry enough!
I think they should stop wasting money in other ways than cutting treatments. there are a number of overpaid middle and upper managers that could be got rid of.
Weekend drunken A&E ....
As an aside - does the NHS carry out any drug development research? That could save them or indeed earn them a fortune could it not?
*wonders if should agree with SBZ* 😳Any complications resulting from private healthcare
(wouldn't really amount to much though, would it?)
(wouldn't really amount to much though, would it?)
It would, if they (private provider) had to pay full-whack for critical care capacity and workforce training. 😈
well workforce training's a bit different (I guess BA should pay the military for their pilots too ?)
critical care, a bit yeah but I doubt it's very common. They don't do many properly major ops in PP anyway (err, do they ?), so it's only when a simple one goes tits up
TandemJeremy - Member*dons flameproof suit*
IVF
Heart transplants
Heceptin and similar
Gastric Bypass
I can sort of see where you're coming from with the IVF and gastric bypass (although I don't necessarily agree with the views) and I don't know what heceptin is but I'm wondering why you've included heart transplants in that list?
well workforce training's a bit different
I suppose it's a related issue - transparency of costs.
I've always wondered about drug research too. They're a few issues with it though, such as the huge investment to bring a drug to market and drug companies aren't known for being the most ethical organizations. Perhaps producing out of patent drugs could save money?
non essential cesarean sections.
apparently it costs £700 more than a natural birth so if people want to pay the extra fair enough but it shouldn't be a free option.
poor troll DD
Ah fleck it. Thought I'd disguised it really well.
Right, while we're at it; injuries from fighting in town centres at the weekend; sprained ankles from wearing high heels; brain surgery for anyone with a double digit iQ; heart transplants for those not in love; hip replacements for bad dancers.
Well, apart from the Wellcome Trust, you mean? 😉
The old saw is that the second pill costs £1, the first pill costs £100M. Drug research, especially getting through the layers of testing and approval before it can be prescribed, costs a huge amount of money.
We already use a lot of out-of-patent drugs, but it's pretty much a tautology that new drugs are usually better than the old drugs, so they cost more.
transplants due to lifestyle damage. ie liver for alcoholics. lungs for smokers.
Oh, and the problem isn't the cost of treatment, it's the lack of attention to making sure that treatment never becomes necessary. It's like reducing your bike repair bills by deciding to do without brakes, instead of giving the cables a little bit of oil occasionally.
Yeah, I know, bad metaphor 😉
Weekend drunken A&E ....
We have a winner!!!
Heceptin and similar
Seriously? What's your reasoning that breast cancer treatment shouldn't be available on the NHS?
Sunburn for baldies; get a hat!
Seriously? What's your reasoning that breast cancer treatment shouldn't be available on the NHS?
Maybe TJ is an ass man?
Or
An ass, man.
?
Any banana skin related falls; come on people, you know how they work...
There should no treatment at all for the over 50s.
Or ginger people.
nonk - Memberwhat was the reasoning behind heart transplants tj ?
cost / benefit. very expensive, absorbs a lot of money and skilled labour which is in short supply, outcomes not that great on the whole.
Heceptin and similarSeriously? What's your reasoning that breast cancer treatment shouldn't be available on the NHS?
Not all breast cancer treatments but herceptin and a number of similar drugs are very expensive and produce little benefit this is why NICE refused them. The manufacturers did a lot of lobbying and of course people will want any treatment possible. However all it does is gives them a few months more to die in. Not useful life but prolonged death.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/aug/20/price-cancer-drug-herceptin
Doctors at the Norfolk and Norwich University hospital NHS trust said it would cost £1.9m a year to pay for Herceptin for the 75 patients with the type of breast cancer for which it is recommended. That is four times the cost of the drugs used to treat a range of other cancers, including lung, colon and post-menopausal breast cancer. The doctors calculate that the trust could only pay for Herceptin if they did not give treatment to 355 patients with other cancers, 16 of whom would be cured.
http://www.bmj.com/content/333/7578/1118.full
Air ambulances for injured people who ride beyond their ability in remote areas? Surely you should get insurance cover for that.
Complications of cosmetic surgery performed overseas by cowboys? In fact any complications of bungled cosmetic surgery by non trained personnel in private clinics.
It is nearly impossible to get any cosmetic surgery done on the nhs. My wife is a plastic surgeon and she does virtually no cosmetic work, it is all cancer related and reconstruction after cancer surgery and trauma.
As for those saying no gastric bands, it seems that gastric bands and bypasses are cheaper than treating the complications of morbid obesity long term.
The problem is that everyone is selfish about their own healthcare. Cuts need to happen but you try telling someone who wants the nhs to pay for their sex change that we need to prioritise cancer ops etc. they will be straight down to their nearest lawyer complaining of breaches to their human rights.
Do the NHS pay for air ambulances? Thought they were independent charity funded.
