These are the two countries most difficult to invade. Nobody will even think about it.
Lots of countries are very difficult to invade, either size, geography or location. Off the top of my head, Russia, Ukraine...But also, Australia, New Zealand, Canada,US, Iran, Greece, Turkey, China. the list is a long one. In fact unless you're a country with a land border in Africa or Europe, it's next to impossible
I’ve just read the AP article about the last journalists, and was about to post a link after reading the latest posts, and I see I’ve been beaten to it. Truly frightening situation, and I have to say that journos who report from war-zones like that, unarmed, are performing a heroic service in bringing back the truth about what’s being done to innocent people by a megalomaniac.
Lots of countries are very difficult to invade
Funny that's where the borders ended-up, eh?
Various KIA/wounded figures floating around, this one got a brief airing on the Pravda channel.
https://twitter.com/jsrailton/status/1505990253139709958
And there is some suggestion that this does not include 'private contractor' (Wagner/Liga) deaths, which may also be significant.
In terms of manpower lost, Russia is approaching its 10-year Afghan totals within a month. A terrible slaughter, if true.
Blimey, if those Russian dead and wounded figures are even ball park correct, Putin isn't going to be able to keep a lid on the domestic situation.
With thanks to Paul Woodadge I thought this was rather good…
[url= https://i.postimg.cc/cCVdY1hQ/1554351-F-7-A6-D-42-E5-9-F4-D-1-CCECB19480-D.jp g" target="_blank">https://i.postimg.cc/cCVdY1hQ/1554351-F-7-A6-D-42-E5-9-F4-D-1-CCECB19480-D.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
On Panorama tonight a Ukrainian official said 15,000. There were trains full of bodies.
Channel4 news was a hard watch this evening. The interviews with refugees in Poland, and their host, hit me harder than the reports from Ukraine. Easier to relate to the families who have left parents/children behind to defend their homes than those still there facing the bombings, incursions and occupations first hand. And then they played this at the end…
https://twitter.com/Channel4News/status/1505951971731283975?s=20&t=oZeeSn5T04K6Tk5nzJjyYg
So, technically, Japan and Russia are still at war?
https://twitter.com/SamRamani2/status/1505948016032759816
I won't believe ANY* figures of dead/injured, on either side, whether military or civilian until this war is over and validated by a credible, independent source (if that's even possible...)
* Even "order of magnitude" figures are going to be subject to propaganda usage
So, technically, Japan and Russia are still at war?
Russia’s response to countries adding to its increasing isolation is… to further isolate itself?
I won’t believe ANY* figures of dead/injured, on either side
Wise. I don’t see any Russian media publishing inflated figures for Russian losses though, do you? Not citing RF military sources, anyway.
Wise. I don’t see any Russian media publishing inflated figures for Russian losses though, do you? Not citing RF military sources, anyway.
No, as it wouldn't suit their propaganda needs. The figures MartinHutch references in his Twitter post above are being attributed to a website hack by someone who is, presumably, not pro-Putin (and, strangely, I actually find the hack claim to be believable!)
Interesting. Who’s identified that it’s a hack, rather than published by staff… and then edited after publishing by staff?
Interesting. Who’s identified that it’s a hack, rather than published by staff… and then edited after publishing by staff?
Hmmm...link may not work but C&P:
We reported earlier that our colleagues at BBC Russian had compiled a list of 557 confirmed Russian military deaths in the Ukraine invasion, mentioning that Russia's defence ministry has so far only once provided fatality figures - 498 deaths as of 2 March.
All that suddenly changed in the last few hours, or so it seemed...
The staunchly pro-Kremlin newspaper Komsomolskaya Pravda (KP) published an article quoting the ministry as saying 9,861 Russian servicemen had died, a figure which exceeds even US intelligence estimates of Russian fatalities.
It gave the number of wounded as 16,153.
Minutes later, this part of the article disappeared from the page, but we were able to take screen grabs of the relevant paragraphs.
KP editor Vladimir Sungorkin subsequently told the BBC the information had been the result of a hack, and said the paper will post an explanation later.
KP editor Vladimir Sungorkin ...
Lots of countries are very difficult to invade, either size, geography or location. Off the top of my head, Russia, Ukraine…But also, Australia, New Zealand, Canada,US, Iran, Greece, Turkey, China. the list is a long one. In fact unless you’re a country with a land border in Africa or Europe, it’s next to impossible
I feel The Princess Bride has been missed off the World Leader's 101 viewing list...
What we really want is for them to run out of artillery shells.
I read a article that suggests the Ukrainians think the Russians have about 3 days worth of supplies left
I read an analysis that concluded that Russia has a limitless supply of generals so they're going to keep sending them forward until the Ukrainians run out of ammo, then the real Russian attack will begin.
The report of 3 days remaining supplies looks to be sourced from here
I’ll take a pinch of salt with that
Found via here https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesstaffreports/2022/03/21/live-russia-ukraine-invasion/?sh=1947a0a23689
All the usual caveats, poss UKr propaganda, unconfirmed etc. but there are lots of reports on Twitter claiming a large Russian force has been encircled NW of Kyiv. A couple of examples.
https://twitter.com/sumlenny/status/1506265327973376009?t=rbdQETK6aoiqlRgwii5lww&s=19
https://twitter.com/johnsweeneyroar/status/1506280676387172365?t=C5psCSfpAZWXW3biu4AbIg&s=19
I won’t believe ANY* figures of dead/injured, on either side
Either way, I think it's going to be "A Shit Ton" I think we (in the west) are used to seeing the sorts of wars that are pretty much one sided, even the insurgency type of war we saw in Gulf and Afghanistan; the sorts of IED ambush, and short fire fire that were often on the news, are nothing like what's going on here.
Russia have deployed 190,000 troops with modern battlefield artillery, tanks and so on, the Ukrainians have approx. 250,000 in the fight and are very much deploying, "one hand on the enemies belt buckle" type engagements. Add to that the lack (on both sides) of the sorts of very qualified and experienced medics at the front line, helicopter Casevac, and well equipped rear field hospitals, and the losses are mounting. The final count will be shocking I think
Not sure if this doesn’t deserve a separate thread, but it describes Putin and his enablers so much better than I can put in (ha!) to words…
https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2022/3/22/putin-proves-there-are-no-statesmen-left-just-thugs
I also read this article earlier - the Russians put a prototype of one of their top MBT’s, with special reactive armour into front-line action. Hands up anyone who’d like to guess how well it went…
the Ukrainians have approx. 250,000 in the fight
The Ukranians potentially have every male between the age 18 and 60 ready to resist the Russians in any way they can, I'd guess in the millions if it comes to it. Most obvs with no military expertise but as history has shown someone fighting for their homeland will fight harder and longer than a paid/conscripted soldier
Most obvs with no military expertise
No, they'll all have done national service, so they might be as well trained as the Russian conscripts.
Yep don’t underestimate a little national service. The Swiss people I knew could handle a gun a lot better than me.
I read a article that suggests the Ukrainians think the Russians have about 3 days worth of supplies left
I don't believe that for a minute - you don't have a military the size of Russia's without having a stockpile of ammunition and the war factories to produce more. Unless the claim is that they only have access to 3 days' worth on the frontlines?
I think that’s more likely - that they resupplied post the initial invasion and will soon have to do so again. I suspect they could go on for a very long time like this.
Many articles (again of limited provenance) about how disfunctional the manufacturing supply chains and maintenance / logistics are as a result of the cronyism, kleptocrats and fearful yes-men. It’s entirely plausible to believe they’re simply running out of stuff that is fundamental to sustaining a war.
I don’t believe that for a minute – you don’t have a military the size of Russia’s without having a stockpile of ammunition and the war factories to produce more. Unless the claim is that they only have access to 3 days’ worth on the frontlines?
Again, this comes very much from social media and "sources report..." type stuff but there seems to be widespread consensus that the Russian military is institutionally corrupt with vast sums of money and/or vast amounts of general supplies simply unaccounted for. The actual frontline stuff seems to be of good strength but its all the back-up and logistics that is lacking. There's a fair stab at it here (written as the build-up was starting):
https://warontherocks.com/2021/11/feeding-the-bear-a-closer-look-at-russian-army-logistics/
I don’t believe that for a minute – you don’t have a military the size of Russia’s without having a stockpile of ammunition
1. It's amazing how quickly armies get through ammo. 2. It's really difficult to get more than a few weeks worth forward at a time, even if you've got really organised logistics support which 3. the Russians don't have, and haven't had from the get go.
As an historic comparison, the French and Germans at the start of the WW1 threw so much at each other than within days they were down to just 3 shots from each gun a day and It took the french until 1917 just to get back to what they had at the start of 1914.
Mariupol has, effectively, been razed to the ground.
That will do one of two things to Ukrainian military and citizens:
either
- strengthen their resolve to resist
or
- cause them to think...this is what will happen to all our towns and cities if we continue fighting.
To those politicians who played nice with putin and failed to properly recognise the threat just over the horizon, contempt is too good for you.
Everything now being done to support Ukraine is too little and too late.
I'm not so sure about that. It's getting a lot of airtime rightly because it's horrendous and unthinkable but the Russians are getting a fight that they hadn't considered in their wildest dreams. The tide of conflict can turn suddenly and without much warning. The resolve of the Russian armed forces to stay in the fight in the west is being tested to it's maximum now and if some proper retaking of territory and defeat of a large section of ground forces may come a very rapid recalibration of what's possible and sustainable. If the Ukrainians clober them back towards the Belorussian border in a significant way it both prevents the cutting off of Western supply lines but scores a very severe blow to morale of an army that's clearly already struggling to motivate towards any sort of initiative. It's ugly but it's by no means certain cities would fall one by one. My other suspicion is the Western front is a feignt to keep a large portion of armed forces engaged away from the eastern half which is what Putin eyes as the prize. What happens months from now when the Ukrainians decide they want parts of their country back is also unclear.
I don’t believe that for a minute – you don’t have a military the size of Russia’s without having a stockpile of ammunition and the war factories to produce more. Unless the claim is that they only have access to 3 days’ worth on the frontlines?
Russias main issue with logistics is they are heavily bound to the railway network rather than air/trucks to shift stuff. Once they get outside of the motherland they don't have the rail network to depend on, though you'd have thought they'd have enough trucks to nip across the border and back so it does seem strange.
My other suspicion is the Western front is a feignt to keep a large portion of armed forces engaged away from the eastern half which is what Putin eyes as the prize. What happens months from now when the Ukrainians decide they want parts of their country back is also unclear.
They appear to be using fairly raw/untrained troops at the moment (for reasons unknown) - the Chechens and Syrians are on their way now so things could get really nasty as I don't think wither of those have a particularly good reputation for acts of kindness. Its such a horrible nightmare watching NATo tip toes around trying to not start WW3 whilstall this happens in front of them.
Colourful description
https://twitter.com/TrentTelenko/status/1506310039363112961?t=WXwoLSJUBXMFmicfgNl0Mw&s=19
Submarine…Trident submarine, in case you were wondering what their boners were the size of… (predictive text kept changing it to Binners 😂)
Not sure about Syrians but Chechens appear to have been there for some time (and are fighting for both sides). Quite a number of them got wiped out in the early days (unverified). And there was a video posted by Kadyrov apparently of him on outskirts of Kyiv which was geolocated later to…Grozny. There was also some footage of them fighting in Mariupol, which consisted of them firing machine guns at an apartment block…
you’d have thought they’d have enough trucks to nip across the border and back so it does seem strange.
Thing is that the further you go from the railhead, the fewer trips each truck can make each day. The Russian supplies all have to be hand loaded and unloaded from the trucks (the stuff in pictures isn't palletized and they won't have forklifts at the frontline), so the turnaround for each truck at each end of the journey will be slow. If you assume things are going really smoothly and they can turn the truck around in one hour at each end and can drive at 50 mph on good roads, that's a four hour round trip at 50 miles distance. So, one truck will probably make three or four trips per day for short journeys under ideal conditions. If the turn-around is two hours at each end and you can only drive at 30 mph, you're looking at one trip per day for a 100 mile journey.
That's without having Ukrainians hiding along the roads blowing up trucks that then block the roads. All the debris from the blown up trucks will shred the tyres of other trucks that drive through the scene so they have to detour around those, which means going off road. This is why the Russian advance stalled, they just don't have enough trucks to supply their army over long distances so they have to stay close to railheads.
That command post thing - it's undamaged and appears to have been abandoned. How is that possible if it's that important?
Unless it's deliberate? In which case there could potentially be a fifth column in the Russian army? I'm filing that idea under fantasy for now though.
thols2 - are you a military logistics specialist?
Unless it’s deliberate? In which case there could potentially be a fifth column in the Russian army? I’m filing that idea under fantasy for now though.
That was the theory with the Pansir air defense thing which was captured intact, and still switched on! IE it was deliberate. My guess is not so much a fifth column as an attitude of 'We really don't want to be here, why are we even attacking these people, it's not our fight, let's just **** the whole thing up and then we can go home'
I was wondering about the dead/wounded ratio in the estimates of Russia casualties. It didn't seem to add up. Whatever the real numbers are, they must be truly horrifying.
https://twitter.com/TrentTelenko/status/1506430419629219848
thols2 – are you a military logistics specialist?
No, but I once had a job that involved logistics and lots of loading, unloading trucks - the principle is the same, you need more trucks to ship the same quantity over a longer distance. What I wrote is just a summary of what a military logistics guy put on Twitter, I was too lazy to go back and search for his original thread. It won't be too hard to find if you do a quick search. Key point is that Russia relies on trains for logistics and just doesn't have enough trucks to supply an army very far from a railhead.
Unless it’s deliberate? In which case there could potentially be a fifth column in the Russian army? I’m filing that idea under fantasy for now though.
One theory I've seen is that Russian conscript soldiers are trained to strictly follow orders, they are not trained to act independently like Western professional soldiers. They will not destroy their own equipment unless an officer orders them to. If they destroy it, they might be court-martialed or just shot on the spot. Better to let it be captured than take the risk. Just a theory, but it is amazing seeing all the stuff just left sitting in fields.
This article explains why Russia can't advance far from railheads. They don't have enough trucks, plus there are Ukrainian forces roaming the countryside attacking convoys behind the Russian advance.
https://warontherocks.com/2021/11/feeding-the-bear-a-closer-look-at-russian-army-logistics//a >
