Forum menu
I think Fraser Nelson has a woodshed full of axes to grind. Even the IFS must have noticed that."Scotland" achieved these figures under a UK government. As for the figures based on Osbornes budget No holes in that at all
Bit of an odd argument there.
Clearly it doesn't matter so much if a region of a country is in deficit, as long as the whole country isn't. This is a pro-union argument I think.
molgrips - MemberBit of an odd argument there.
Clearly it doesn't matter so much if a region of a country is in deficit, as long as the whole country isn't. This is a pro-union argument I think.
Posted 15 minutes ago #Report-Post
Don't be daft,the truth is there for all to see
C. Teamhavermore
Oh of course, there it is 🙂
Not odd at all David Cameron had promised a 200billion oil bonanza if Scotland voted no. [url= http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/feb/24/david-cameron-north-sea-oil-scottish-independence ]Guardian [/url]
Secondly most of the levers of economic policy remain in Westminster so Scotland can't fully develop it's own economic policies.
Though considering how completely wrong the OBR have been every other time they've forecasted oil revenues, we really have no idea where we would be. Basically, they're guessing. Badly.
I guess the OP's ignorance could be excused by the fact that he's been relying on Russia Today for news for the last ~18 months.
The Scottish Government's own figures (via [url= http://www.gov.scot/Topics/Statistics/Browse/Economy/GERS/GERS2016xls ]GERS[/url]), rather than the the OBR, show that Scotland would have been up a £15 billion deep **** creek if it hadn't been for the sensible, silent two million strong majority.
In what way were they silent?
gordimhor - Member
In what way were they silent?
By not starting endless whinging threads about not getting any pudding
Scotland can't fully develop it's own economic policies.
An independent Scotland would have been hamstrung by it's deficit that it would have had no chance to "develop" anything except high unemployment and austerity like you've never imagined in your worst dreams.
More reading for you from the [url= http://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/8218 ]IFS[/url]. I appreciate you like to maintain your student style political stance, overthrow the old order and all that, but in the face of financial reality it's as unrealistic as those cretins with "Don't blame me I voted Yes" stickers on their cars.
Couldn't give a fig about pudding, its just desserts. It's not even about the main course, more about building the house and growing veg in the garden.
If there was an independent Yorkshire it would be very successful. We'd not spend owt on nowt, what would be important is what's in mattress and in bank. It'd be a great example to Scotlandshire to follow.
Free Yorkshire!
C. Teamhavermore
You are on a roll this morning, ducks.
Interesting to listen to Today on R4 this morning and the tax policies. At least Labour are actually clear on raising taxes but those left-of-centre (sic) nationalists seem remarkably reluctant to do the same - how odd??? Rhetoric v reality??
Anway happy dependence day - a toast to the 55%. Well done, canny as always!!
[quote=gordimhor ]Keep it coming
The subsidies?
There are subsidies? How much have we given you so far?
Wasn't their a thread about this shit?
Even Nicola and Eck himself are no longer publicly saying that Scotland would have "an economy in the top ??", or saying that "the oil is just a bonus".
That should tell you something.
I'll just leave this here,
[url= http://chokkablog.blogspot.co.uk/2016/03/the-price-of-independence.html ]Stuff about scotland n'money n'that.[/url]
