However, the folks that claim there is no downside and anyone who has a different attitude to travel them are wrong don't help.
There are no downsides for many people. If you have home charging, and if you never tow (which is the huge majority of people, just try buying a car with a towbar to find out just how many cars don't have one), then there aren't any. If you don't tow you don't need to worry about people who do.
I keep trying to focus on the 80% (probably more like over 90%) of journeys where a car with a WLTP range of 250 miles would be just fine, but I can’t stop myself thinking about the other 10%
Are you towing? Or is it bikes and roof boxes?
why don't they make powered caravans
The technology has been suppressed by Big Campervan?
I'm just about to decide on my new car. 90% sure I'm going for the Megane. My average work journey is about 125 miles, so I will cover 80% of my journeys on a single charge.
Sensible attitude. Wish I could do the same 😀 I keep trying to focus on the 80% (probably more like over 90%) of journeys where a car with a WLTP range of 250 miles would be just fine, but I can’t stop myself thinking about the other 10%. So I end up looking at cars with WLTP ranges over 350 miles, which are all bigger and/or more expensive than I really want and I’m back to square one.
It wouldn’t really be an issue if I were just looking at leasing a car for a few years. It’s because I tend to buy cars and keep them for 6-7 years that I tend to worry about what the alternatives might look like in a few years and whether I would regret buying my “short range” car. But that’s crazy really. I don’t have a crystal ball and either it does the job I want or it doesn’t. If it does the job then it will still do the job years from now and it shouldn’t matter what else is out there. I don’t care that there are better cars than my current one. It does the job so I’m happy with it. But then it does cover 100% of what I want and not just 90%. As long as you ignore the fact that I want it not to spew toxic fumes as I drive along of course 😀
suspect there are a lot of people thinking along similar lines
re the two bar thing, I was after a byd sealion 7, until the Towbar cost was £2k and no roof rails. I only want to put a bike rack on, or the roof bike rails. Couldn’t get the two bar option on Tusker, it’s only on VAG cars as far as I can see, but I haven’t checked all cars.
Re caravans etc, is there a move for heavy commercial machinery to go EV, if they do, then it’s surely only a matter of time before this makes it way back into cars capable of towing, or EV motor homes ?
I quite like what Kia are doing with the pv5, with a potential camper model.
Are you towing? Or is it bikes and roof boxes?
If that was directed at me, then neither. It is just a case of a shorter range car requiring me to stop more frequently than I'd like on a long journey.
I realise it doesn't necessarily mean the overall journey is any longer in theory (it may just be more frequent but shorter stops). The total time for charging depends more on efficiency (which is better for smaller cars) and charging speed (which doesn't seem to be that closely linked to range) than it does on the actual range (which becomes less important the longer the journey). But having to stop more often than you want is still a pain as every stop involves a bit of extra faff.
To be honest, I probably wouldn't quite consider an EV for a personal car right now, but for a company car it makes sense. However, the Megane was really nice to drive. The instant shove and the refinement were a real surprise. I'm a petrol head, and I appreciate all sorts of cars from a base spec Fiesta to hypercars. EV's have their place and the tech and infrastructure keeps improving. Yes, they still don't work for many people, but for lots of people they do. We have a Kuga that we use for towing a small 2 berth caravan and doing bike duties, so the EV will mostly be for work only. I know that's an extremely privileged position to be in.
The Renault 5 (and Alpine A290) both have factory tow bar / rear bike carrier option on the strength of that we've ordered a 5. I won't be towing a caravan mind it's just going to be used for bike duties.
I did a long drive recently in our ICE and with a full tank we didn't need to stop. In the 5 we'd have to stop a couple of times to charge, once each way, but I was a bit meh we stopped anyway for coffee and superchargers are near by I think we'll be ok. The rest of the year we'll benefit from not having to fill up at all.
Yeah massive range might be nice but then you need a massive EV and that wasn't what we wanted day to day.
Would a seasucker type rack not solve the problem?
Obviously it's less efficient / impacts range but I'd hazard that it's not enough to offset the cost of a towbar over the life of the car and would only really be an impact on those 1% cases where you want to put 4 bikes on the roof and drive to the Alps or something.
Talking about massive range, I just stumbled through a Porsche e-Macan video shoot just now. So had a chat. 100kWh and up to 400 miles. They also had a Porsche E-bike charging from it. Looked like a xc/trail sort of e-bike. So coming soon - a video with some car-talk, bike charging and someone descending the blue trail at QECP. (Well I pointed the cameraman in that direction. It's got berms and some small jumps that could look ok on film).
Anyway the car, like Rustynissanprairies, but e, sort of. Probably not £500, ever.
I get my new car in a couple of weeks, as it is a hybrid Golf i don't need to use public chargers, but as part of the thinking was saving money, which home charging should achieve. But on longer trips which is going to be cheaper petrol or electric public charging.
Would a seasucker type rack not solve the problem?
I've seen a seasucker roof mounts for a bike on the top of a Hyundai ioniq (my20). There was a bike on the mounts worth almost as much as the car. The owner seemed to trust it.
I might do some research in to that option for my ioniq EV and see if there are any other adaptors for carrying long bits of wood that don't fit inside the car.
But on longer trips which is going to be cheaper petrol or electric public charging.
Supermarket Petrol! Is my guess.
I'm not sure what battery is in the golf hybrid but it probably won't get you 75 miles on electric so I guess petrol for the longer journeys over 100 miles 🤔
Any of the ID7 (tourer) drivers got any updates? How you getting on? Any downsides so far? I've noticed some low mileage examples appearing at lower prices so hoping to swap to one soon.
I'm not sure what battery is in the golf hybrid but it probably won't get you 75 miles on electric so I guess petrol for the longer journeys over 100 miles 🤔
Technically i think it is just under 20kwh and a claimed 80ish miles. which basically covers most of my use cases. It was the longer journeys with crap charging possibilities that swung the buying process. But the thought that came to me is that a day trip to london for example, would it be cheaper to top up the battery or run petrol. to get home.
I know public charging is more than home charging, just no real idea how petrol prices compare.
I might do some research in to that option for my ioniq EV and see if there are any other adaptors for carrying long bits of wood that don't fit inside the car.
I can't see why you couldn't use 4x front mounts (they're cheaper off-brand on Ali-express) and some 20mm tube to make front and rear 'racks'.
My worry would be if you tried to carry a sheet of something or a surfboard that has the potential to generate a lot of lift! Although for Surfboards most people just use foam cylinders to keep them off the roof and run the straps through the doors and hope it doesn't rain!
mrmo
I had a 71 plate Octavia Hybrid and I have a Polestar 2 now.
The Octavia was great and I used to charge it a lot for my 15 mile each way commute. The new hybrid golf has double the size of the battery. I would say work on the premise of getting about 60 miles from a 20kwh battery. The hybrids do fluctuate more than the Polestar however so impacted more by cold weather. The battery regen is miles better in the Polestar but this could have improved since my Octavia.
Hills, road speeds, weather and driving style will all have an impact on range so who knows what you will get. FWIW I always ran with no auto regeneration and used the brakes manually. I found this far more relaxing and I got much better range that way on my commute.
In the six months from December - May my Polestar has averaged over 3.5m/kwh. The Octavia was more like 3 but if it was really cold I would often run it just on petrol.
Not for major loads but 'long bits of wood' type - anyone used inflatable racks like
https://handiworld.com/handirack/
Yeah, I've used those inflatable racks, they work fine, as long as you make sure your paintwork is clean and the inflatable racks are clean so you don't scratch the paintwork.
Another point on using a hybrid. Nice A roads doing around 50mph are where they are really happy, motorway speeds trash the range on a hybrid compared to an 'all electric' car. You will get used to switching between petrol/electric and hybrid modes depending on the roads and speeds.
Would a seasucker type rack not solve the problem?
Obviously it's less efficient / impacts range but I'd hazard that it's not enough to offset the cost of a towbar over the life of the car and would only really be an impact on those 1% cases where you want to put 4 bikes on the roof and drive to the Alps or something.
For one bike maybe but tow bar plus 3 bike carrier costs option costs about same a 3 SeaSuckers, and even if there was space to attach 3 SeaSuckers the wife will object to having to remove wheels and lift bikes to use them, not to mention where the 3 wheels would be stored when 3 adults are in.
I am using a SeaSucker board mount on the ID buzz. Standard spec buzz had roof corrugations, but the glass roof on the GTX works well. I use it for a 14ft carbon race paddleboard and it's been absolutely rock solid.
First use was a bit nervous, but they really are amazingly sturdy and have the advantage of being easily removed when not in use.
Personally, I hope we never have EVs that can tow large trailers or caravans. They will be massively over powered for what most people need.
You don't need a massive amount of power to tow most things that you'd put behind a normal ISH car. There's plenty of people towing good sized caravans and trailers with 150hp diesel cars and panel vans. My 150hp Superb makes ridiculously light work of a boat trailer weighing in at 500-700kg.
From a driver perspective when you are towing what you really need is a bit of planning skills, torque that's accessible without spanking the thing, decent brakes and a bit of kerb weight to keep it comfortably in check on a windy and wet day. Something loads of current EVs could deliver.
The only real place EVs fall down as tow cars is range and/or ability to charge and if you're flirting with the edges of your weights for your license. The range issue really needs addressing with pull through charging and more rapid chargers. Commercially this isn't likely to happen any time soon and that to me is the key barrier. More is the pity as I'd really like one.
A lot of EVs are already relatively high powered compared to a similar use case ICE car and in a lot of cases I'd suggest far quicker than the talents of their drivers.
The Ioniq 5, which is broadly a decent sized family car comes with power outputs starting at 170hp going to 325hp. Hyundai's i40 estate by contrast reached about 140hp at it's peak in ICE format and pretty sure the Tucson was similar. Obviously the EV is carrying some extra weight but even so that 170hp is the base model not the top one.
Any of the ID7 (tourer) drivers got any updates? How you getting on? Any downsides so far? I've noticed some low mileage examples appearing at lower prices so hoping to swap to one soon.
I am really liking mine. Done about 6500 miles now including a few longer trips. I wouldn’t say it’s particularly exciting in any way, but it’s very comfortable and seems well put together. Have had a couple of instances where the main screen has crashed but I suspect that was a dodgy software update, both happened within a few days and hasn’t happened again for a couple of months now. My only gripe is one I think common to most cars these days, where the auto cruise reads a road sign wrong or thinks you are on a different road and suddenly slows you from motorway speeds to something silly like 20. Of course it never actually gets that low but it’s very jerky as it changes then I react to take over. On the whole it’s so comfortable, spacious and easy to drive that we’ve opted to take it to France in the summer (~800 miles) over our diesel Mazda 6.
I can't see why you couldn't use 4x front mounts (they're cheaper off-brand on Ali-express) and some 20mm tube to make front and rear 'racks'.
I have looked at some options. Seasucker are too expensive for me. Rockbros could provide a cheaper option. I took a look at the suckers that can be used to lift glass and tiles and they seem to be in my price range.
Not for major loads but 'long bits of wood' type
I think I'll watch some videos on this type of roof rack and see how they work with bits of wood.
re towbars and Tusker :
Couldn’t get the two bar option on Tusker, it’s only on VAG cars as far as I can see, but I haven’t checked all cars.
I specced one on a Tusker order on my BMW i4 2 years ago, again for bike rack duties. If retirement plans work out I'll be handing it back in 2027 and buying my own EV something. Top contender currently is the EV3, or maybe a Scenic, but I'm sure there will be other options when the times come. A towbar will be a definite requirement, so will either buy a 1 yr old something that can have a retrofit towbar, or a new something with one specced as a factory order. Car will likely be kept for 5 yrs plus, and the Kia 7 yr warranty offers some benefits over the normal 3 years, though accepting not much to go wrong on EVs
it’s very jerky as it changes then I react to take over
Is there not a setting to adjust how quickly it responds to these things?
In other news my neighbour replaced her Model 3 with an i4 and said it's much better. I have no experience of it other than it's looks great, is a lovely colour, and it makes a beautiful sort of peaceful heavenly sound as it approaches, rather than the grating whine of the Tesla which was quite loud or the slightly quieter mechanical whine of my Hyundai.
where the auto cruise reads a road sign wrong or thinks you are on a different road and suddenly slows you from motorway speeds to something silly
There's an option to turn off the "set cruise to speed limit" function, and the "slow to glacial pace because there's a bend, roundabout or whatever" feature too. And they don't turn back on at restart unlike the speed and lane warnings.
The Renault 5 (and Alpine A290) both have factory tow bar / rear bike carrier option on the strength of that we've ordered a 5. I won't be towing a caravan mind it's just going to be used for bike duties.
I did a long drive recently in our ICE and with a full tank we didn't need to stop. In the 5 we'd have to stop a couple of times to charge, once each way, but I was a bit meh we stopped anyway for coffee and superchargers are near by I think we'll be ok. The rest of the year we'll benefit from not having to fill up at all.
Yeah massive range might be nice but then you need a massive EV and that wasn't what we wanted day to day.
If you are an analytical type it can be fun to play with different cars on ABRP. I don't know how accurate it really is, but at least it tries to take into account range, efficiency, charging speed and location/type of chargers to plan a journey for you and the results can be quite surprising.
For example, I've done lots of plans for different EVs of a 500 mile journey that we've been taking a few times a year for the past 25 years. So, safe to say I know the journey pretty well in an ICE car.
If I take the Renault Scenic (WLTP=379 miles, starting at 95%, wanting 20% at the end and favouring fewer stops) I can in theory do the journey with two stops and a total charging time of 1 hour.
Now if I switch to something much different; a Volvo EX30 twin-motor (WLTP=278 miles, same conditions) I would need 4 stops, but surprisingly the total charging time (and therefore total journey time) is identical.
OK, you have to take more breaks in the Volvo and more breaks means more faff in reality, but the Volvo is a totally different proposition for a daily driver (sub 4s 0-60 but 100 miles less range than the Renault) and you might think that the price you pay for that is that it would be totally unsuitable for a long journey. But, at least in theory, it looks as though it would be fine.
For comparison, a Kia EV3 (WLTP=350 miles but faster charging than the Scenic) requires 3 stops but only 57 minutes of charging time. So, saving a whopping 3 minutes from the ten hour journey 😀
In an ICE car we usually stop three times and are stopped for a total of at least two hours (sometimes as much as three). OK, 20 years ago I would do it with a single 30-minute stop, but those days are long gone. So, in theory at least, they all work but the Volvo is dictating where I stop while in the Scenic and the EV3 I can basically stop at all the places I would normally stop in an ICE car and the total charging time is less than half of the time that I would be stopped for anyway. For the other 355 days of the year the Volvo would be a lot more fun, but probably the sort of fun that would just get me into trouble 😀
would it be cheaper to top up the battery or run petrol. to get home.
In this case, running petrol to get home would most likely be cheaper. Charging an EV 'away from home' is still ridiculously expensive.. it's offset by the fact that home charging is ridiculously cheap.
I never really understood why I saw hybrids charging on the street/motorway/garage... i cans ee best use for a hybrid as charging at home and using electric for the short journeys at vv low cost, and then the ICE/fuel stations for longer ones.
DrP
I've seen a seasucker roof mounts for a bike on the top of a Hyundai ioniq (my20). There was a bike on the mounts worth almost as much as the car. The owner seemed to trust it.
I might do some research in to that option for my ioniq EV and see if there are any other adaptors for carrying long bits of wood that don't fit inside the car.
Ionic Classic EVs have a 0 load rating for the roof. Makes no sense as the hybrid is rated, so the car is likely up to taking the load, but could cause insurance awkwardness if anything were to happen?
Not for major loads but 'long bits of wood' type - anyone used inflatable racks like
Yes, they were rubbish.
They scratched the paint
They were a faff to fit (an electric pump would solve some of that I suppose)
They (or maybe because you are limited in how short/tight you can make any straps holding the load on) were noisy.
They let water in if it's raining.
They got a puncture on the 2nd outing and can't be repaired. Might have been caused by putting them in the car whilst surfing on a warm day.
it can be fun to play with different cars on ABRP. I don't know how accurate it really is
It's quite pessimistic for my car. Not sure about others - but you can tweak the data it uses for the calculations.
Any of the ID7 (tourer) drivers got any updates? How you getting on? Any downsides so far? I've noticed some low mileage examples appearing at lower prices so hoping to swap to one soon.
I am really liking mine. Done about 6500 miles now including a few longer trips. I wouldn’t say it’s particularly exciting in any way, but it’s very comfortable and seems well put together. Have had a couple of instances where the main screen has crashed but I suspect that was a dodgy software update, both happened within a few days and hasn’t happened again for a couple of months now. My only gripe is one I think common to most cars these days, where the auto cruise reads a road sign wrong or thinks you are on a different road and suddenly slows you from motorway speeds to something silly like 20. Of course it never actually gets that low but it’s very jerky as it changes then I react to take over. On the whole it’s so comfortable, spacious and easy to drive that we’ve opted to take it to France in the summer (~800 miles) over our diesel Mazda 6.
What spec have you got??
Two days in to my ID7 GTX. It seems genuinely lovely so far. Very well put together, seats lovely, drives nicely and massive boot. The factory fit swivelling tow bar looks good.
It's quite pessimistic for my car. Not sure about others - but you can tweak the data it uses for the calculations.
In that case it should be even easier to live with the shorter range car.
I've done lots of "analysis" of different EVs in order to try to decide what to buy but have basically just discovered what EV owners know; that you can live with any modern EV. It might require a bit of a change in your approach (charge when you can not when you need to) but it's not that big a deal.
Longer range only really matters if you are doing journeys that are between the range of the shorter and longer range cars, so it's a case of one car requiring a charge while the other lets you do the journey in one go. Once you get beyond the range of the longer range car (or your bladder/concentration) it's more a case of fewer but longer stops vs more but shorter and overall the difference is probably not worth worrying about.
I wonder what the average range of EVs will be in 2030. Any predictions? 😀
There are lots of articles online making dramatic predictions. Usually based on selective reporting of the data. For example, you often see the claim that EV range more than trebled from 2014 to 2024 and therefore should double by 2030 to over 500 miles. It's true that median range in 2014 (in the USA which is the only country I can find data for) was 84 miles and this was 283 miles in 2024. But it was 90 in 2015 and then 218 in 2016. Over the five years from 2019 to 2024 it only increased by 18% so that would give a prediction of around 350 miles by 2030.
I wonder what the average range of EVs will be in 2030. Any predictions?
About 250 miles.
That’s enough for all but edge cases and , as the technology gets more efficient they’ll just put less battery in each car to make them lighter / cheaper / more eco friendly.
If you want to measure the development of EVs then looking at range in isolation is a poor measure. It'd be better to look at something like range per tonne of vehicle weight - that'd capture improvements in drive train efficiency as well as in battery energy density.
Double post
it’s very jerky as it changes then I react to take over
Is there not a setting to adjust how quickly it responds to these things?
Pass, it's not frequent enough to have bothered looking at it in any depth, it's just annoying on the occasions it happens.
There's an option to turn off the "set cruise to speed limit" function, and the "slow to glacial pace because there's a bend, roundabout or whatever" feature too. And they don't turn back on at restart unlike the speed and lane warnings.
Oh this is good to know! Although I do quite like being able to just hit 'Res' and have it auto go to whatever the current limit is...
What spec have you got??
The very base spec, no options or anything (not that it really needs any).
About 250 miles.
That’s enough for all but edge cases and , as the technology gets more efficient they’ll just put less battery in each car to make them lighter / cheaper / more eco friendly.
That's lower than it is now. I'd say that's quite an optimistic view of the future 😀
It would require the charging network to improve to the point where people didn't worry about being able to charge when they stopped and for people to buy cars based on what they actually needed rather than what they thought they needed. The first is certainly possible, but given the number of people using a hulking great 4x4 to take the kids to school, the second seems unlikely.
I can see a bit of a divergence in the next few years though; with long range being used as a selling point at the luxury end of the market while at the other end cheaper batteries lead to reductions in cost for vehicles with a more sensible range. Since I said median range I guess it's not impossible that this does come down a bit as a lot more cheaper EVs get sold.
I'd hope that customers and manufacturers are smart enough by then to realise that most people, most of the time don't actually drive that far. Then start focusing on charging speed/infrastructure and km/kwh. So the couple of times a year they need x00 mile drives, they can stop for 10 minutes after 200 miles and charge their sensibly sized battery back to 90%.That's lower than it is now. I'd say that's quite an optimistic view of the future 😀
that'd capture improvements in drive train efficiency as well as in battery energy density.
This..
I love watching the 'munroe live' youtube videos where they strip down the latest EVs and motors, and really geek out about them.
One recent(ish) video they had the latest VW reduction gearbox, and were commenting that simple improvements in its efficiency (like, just 3 cogs..) have drastically improved the efficiency of the whole vehicle.
And other simple changes happen too; the latest Polestar 2 disengages the front motor/gearbox at stable speeds, which again improves its range over the model I have. All little things that add up.
DrP
I'd hope that customers and manufacturers are smart enough by then to realise that most people, most of the time don't actually drive that far.
So do I, but I'm not sure what there is in the history of car manufacturing to suggest that will be the case. At least in the UK. Maybe in France where they have more of a history of "cars for the masses" with things like the 2CV, R5, R4 etc.
they can stop for 10 minutes after 200 miles and charge their sensibly sized battery back to 90%.
I actually think that ten minutes is probably the worst. Too long to just sit and wait for it to charge but not long enough to go grab a coffee/snack. Unless you can get charging times down below five minutes they might as well take half an hour. I think what we need is a change in mindset from refuelling being something that you try to do as quickly as possible to recharging being something that you do whenever you are not using the car anyway.
Personally I expect that solid state technology will lead to the production of cars with ranges over 600 miles. There will be a lot of fuss about these in the press and they will serve a useful purpose in silencing those people who say they will only get an EV when it can go as far as their diesel car. But whether many people actually buy them is another matter.
Well my work has changed the goalposts. Was set on the Megane but they have asked to find something with more range, simply to cover more journeys and have a buffer over winter. So, the Megane is out the window and it's back to the Born and the Scenic. I test drove a Born last night. Mostly liked it. A pillar window seems odd, but I'd get used to it. It was the VZ, so stiffer suspension etc, but the ride was good but firm. I don't mind that. The V3 77kwh is what I'm likely going for now.
Interesting, in light of the earlier conversation, if employers are going to start demanding that company cars have longer ranges than people really need.
Are you going to test drive the Scenic @stcolin? Google OS and that single button to set all the driver aids the way you want them would be a big plus for me, but it is a bigger car than the Born so it would be interesting to know if it feels much bigger to drive.
By the way, I know the VZ version of the Born has the newer (higher efficiency) motor and the upgraded infotainment system with radical new developments like backlit heater controls that you can actually see in the dark 😀 Not sure if those have made it to the V3 yet.
Personally, although I accept that 250 miles is all most people need most of the time, I think 350 might be the sweet spot. A bit of a buffer and enough to ensure that you still get 250 in the winter. Much more than that and I'm not sure I can see the point though.
I see BYD have announced a new architecture and charger to deliver a sub five minute charge. So, I'm sure we are not far off the 600 mile range car that can add 200 miles in under five minutes. Totally pointless for most people and probably a cul-de-sac in the evolution of EVs but at least those people who are daft or stubborn enough to want to drive an EV in exactly the same way as they drive an ICE car will have an option 😀
Not sure if those have made it to the V3 yet.
Yes, they have. Infotainment was very fast and the I didn't mind the touch screen controls for the heaters etc. Can be voice controlled anyway. I might test drive the Scenic to see how it feels compared to the Megane.
I can see a bit of a divergence in the next few years though; with long range being used as a selling point at the luxury end of the market while at the other end cheaper batteries lead to reductions in cost for vehicles with a more sensible range.
They will make cars with multiple battery options, as they do now.
I'd hope that customers and manufacturers are smart enough by then to realise that most people, most of the time don't actually drive that far
Right but people still want to be able to do the edge cases because they are the most fun parts. I could do most of my journeys in a 24kWh Nissan Leaf but I don't want to buy one.
If people come out with cars that can charge in 5 minutes, the chances of actually being able to find a charger to supply 1MW are pretty slim IMO. I don't think installers will install them either. Much harder to supply, so they'll put a few in premium locations, charge £1.50/kWh, and most people will realise they aren't in as much of a hurry as they thought they were.
In other news, the BYD Dolphin Surf is launching in the UK at £18,650 which makes it one of the cheapest cars of any fuel type on sale in the UK.
So do I, but I'm not sure what there is in the history of car manufacturing to suggest that will be the case.Cost.
Adding range to a fuel car is just a matter of a bigger tank and packaging headaches. The on cost is minimal.
Adding range to an EV is direct cost for every kwh.
If people come out with cars that can charge in 5 minutes, the chances of actually being able to find a charger to supply 1MW are pretty slim IMO.Maybe in your impoverished island state... 😜 But a reasonable sized battery, charging in 10 minutes won't need anywhere near 1MW, i mean, if you want to stick to 80-90-100 kwh, you'll need that. But as i said, i hope the market wakes up.
Right but people still want to be able to do the edge cases because they are the most fun parts.What? Sitting in a car for 500+km without a break is fun?
What? Sitting in a car for 500+km without a break is fun?
Well, you know I'm a massive EV fan but there are still issues. Your 300 mile car could become a 180 mile car with bikes on the roof and back, or 150 miles towing. Then charge that to 80% and you are having to stop quite often, and trying to figure out what to do with your caravan or trailer. It takes quite a committed EV fan to attempt a long caravan trip. However the situation change quite a bit if you can get hold of a 600 mile car. I'd get one if it were available and I could afford it. It if were a choice say between a 300 mile 1 year old car vs a 600 mile 4 year old one at the same price, I'd get the older one.
Thinking that people who need (want) to stick bikes on the roof or people that tow caravans are even remotely going to influence EV development is, frankly, insane.
Following numbers are from Google so add salt to taste....
Caravans (tourers) in the uk? 555000. Cars in the uk. 33.93 million.
0.16 percent (assuming my Friday afternoon maths hasn't let me down).
No way is less than 0.2 percent of the EV car market going to in any way influence what is produced.
It's more likely to be some lobbying group getting the government to set targets / change tax rules that make larger, longer range vehicles more profitable / desirable that will do that!
I wonder if the Camping & Caravan Club have a politcal lobbying team?
Your maths let you down🤣,.
It's about 1.6%, so still not a large percentage
