[img] 
[/img]
Should shorten most threads by at least 42.764% and improve others by a clear and majestic 27.97362% while bringing at least 38.9278% of threads more to life than using normal conditioner.
😆 True true ...
Believing in science too much you might as well hang yourself.
What is the probability of that! 
2, 3, 5, 7 & 10 on the car insurance thread. Although i am responsible for a couple of those!
Actually would threads not just die on their arses with no one bothered to justify each point with a spread of peer-reviewed randomised double blind trials because it was more fun to post silly pictures of narwhals etc?
[img] http://http://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2012/04/22/mysteries-of-evolution-the-narwhals-tusk-or-rather-tooth/ [/img]
Needs something on misrepresentative statistics - although I accept that's probably the most difficult thing to spot, and could probably have a whole top 10 all of it's own.
Source?
8 and 9