Forum menu
Labradors make perfect guide dogs for blind and partially sighted folks; can anyone imagine how difficult their lives would be without their canine companions, or seeing-eye dogs?
Dog gets fed and sleeps in a warm place, owner doesn't walk under a truck: perfick.
My partially sighted Inverness mate was given a seeing-eye dog. It was a death-trap. Stopped to eat chips off the ground, wanted to talk to every single passerby, wandered out into the middle of the road to sniff at pigeons and God forbid he should take it to the pub - spent all night licking up spilt beer to the point where it couldn't sniff let alone see...
But that dog was the exception to the rule. Retired shortly thereafter.
buttercup - MemberA dog, is just the same as a child. Just about as useful. Just as much love given to it. if a child ran up and touched a strangers leg, and said stranger gave the child a smack.. would you accept that? Why would you accept it if it were furry and quadrapedal?
I hate to be rude here, but you are a fool.
Because a dog is an animal not a human. Different rules apply moral and legally. There is no equivalence.
I suggest if you cannot understand this then yo are the fool.
all we non dog people ask is you train your dogs properly adn make sure that yo meet your legal responsibilities to keep them under control.
Yo! Yes I agree to a point. Dogs are unpredictable and may bite or even rip and tear. A child off the leash may give a mild smack.
My dog will not savage anything over the size of a rabbit, so he's allowed off the lead in public places. Please do not walk your hamster on the links. He will kill it.
Do the same regulations apply to Grizzly Bears whilst shredding the trails in Canada? Who even owns the bears?!!! What if you cycle through a fox poo in Trinity (Edinburgh)?
Finally, SFB was able to quit this forum. I'm guessing he was advised to do so by a professional. Joking apart, it might not be a bad idea. I've considered going cold-turkey myself.
TJ,
The foolishness I speak of is of a man who would quicker decide to abuse a living creature because he felt he had a higher right than it.
The scenerio of discussion purely states the dog did nothing wrong. The nonowner was actually okey with the presence of the dog.
A dog is just the same as a child. Surely, it will not develop into the legal responsibility that a human would. but it is equally cared for and should be treated as such. You train a child the same you do a dog. Toilet training. Tricks. Boundries.
It is alive. It belongs to someone. It has a personality. A name. Above all, it was being social. No violent acts towards the child. No menacing action at all.
No need to kick in it's teeth.
Don't get me wrong. If an animal is out of line and poses an actual threat, it needs to be dealt with. As do people.
We are all animals. We all follow the same laws.
Just enforced by different sentients.
UR, I think there is almost a pecking order of who has a right to be there, it goes something like:
- us, people that is - because we are top of the food chain, and in the context of the OP this includes children
- native species, i.e. wildlife, foxes, robins, badgers and grizzly bears (in Canada that is, not Yorkshire)
- introduced species, dogs, dairy cows, grey squirrels etc.
Sometimes there are conflicts, e.g. cows vs badgers, but mostly it's fairly clear to me. We all have a responsibility toward our wildlife, and we have a responsibility to care for any animals we introduce.
So in answer to your question a fox is native and has a right to exist and behave in it's natural manner, including taking a dump some part of Edinburgh I'm not familiar with. I'm not concerned about your dog being off the lead as long as it's under control, which pretty much means it's obeying your verbal commands.
Loving the concept of teaching children 'tricks'. Oh and children aren't owned and haven't been since the children act introduced in the 80's.
All of that is irrelevant though. If you can see that someone is frightened by your dogs presence, the right thing to do is remove your dog, not lecture the person. Equally if my child was pulling the dogs tail, I'd be removing her and apologising profusely.
Rich penny exactly my point thank you!
All of that is irrelevant though. If you can see that someone is frightened by your dogs presence, the right thing to do is remove your dog, not lecture the person. Equally if my child was pulling the dogs tail, I'd be removing her and apologising profusely.
This.
It's not that hard really is it?
Wununfred!
[b]A dog is just the same as a child.[/b] Surely, it will not develop into the legal responsibility that a human would. but it is equally cared for and should be treated as such. [b]You train a child the same you do a dog. Toilet training. Tricks. Boundries.[/b]
It is alive. [b][u]It belongs to someone.[/u][/b] It has a personality. A name.
🙄
Don't get me wrong. If an animal is out of line and poses an actual threat, it needs to be dealt with.
so how would you deal with............. [b]FENTON![/b] when he gets all aggressive wilth the deer?
I suggest if you cannot understand this then yo are the fool.
And at this point any credibility in the argument is lost.
All of that is irrelevant though. If you can see that someone is frightened by your dogs presence, the right thing to do is remove your dog, not lecture the person. Equally if my child was pulling the dogs tail, I'd be removing her and apologising profusely.
The correct thing to do is to not even let the dog off the lead in the first place if you have the slightest idea that there will be other members of the public running around out of control. Prevent rather than cure. Go find somewhere that is unoccupied with uncontrolable people and childred.
One thing these threads have demonstrated to me since my return is the inability of people to live together with both sides claiming the greater right to be somewhere or do something, it's a crowded little island. You'd all get along a lot better if there wasn't all this point scoring going on.
Ok, not read all the posts so my viewpoint may have already been covered.
As a dog and child owner I can say there are definitly two firm schools of thought with this one.
1. Dogs should be under close control at all times, if they don't return on call then they should only be off-lead where they won't bother anyone
2. There are far too many over-protective parents out there who will see a dog coming and very quickly grab their child and hold them up in the air or cross the street or something else which essentially tells the child dogs are bad, and tells the dog these people are nervous.
Based on your post, it seems like point 1 is the most appropriate and the dog owners sounded like they were looking for an argument. Don't let it bother you too much, you'll always meet idiots when out and about.
Broadly speaking, dog owners make their problems everyone else's problems:
*Dog needs exercise - don't own a house with a big enough garden? Just let it off the leash in a public space.
*Dogs s--t everywhere - can't stand the sight and smell of dogs--t around the house and garden? Take it to a public space to let it spread its detritus.
*Empathy - not sure how other people will react to bounding pounds of meat and teeth? Tell small children that the dog won't b... He's never done that before..!
Dog owners = anti-social.
ourmaninthenorth: living in his own black and white world.
Can't you spot the obvious troll? 🙄
ourmaninthenorth: this is just how many of us non-dog people feel, but I (we?) accept that owning a dog is something other people enjoy so we put up and shut up. It's when irresponsibility creeps in that things come to a head.
The comment is true for *some* owners, but they can give all owners a bad name.
buttercup - Member
The fact that poodle is a massively available breed of animal is, in fact, a man made deal. However, the building blocks for what we now know as a poodle existed(before man got ahold of it) all on its own.
I still am skeptical that anyone can believe that an animal only exists to serve another, however.A dog still exists in the wild. Wolves. Coyotes. Hyena. Don't see anybody with a pet hyena very often.
Aren't hyenas more closely related to cats than dogs?
so how would you deal with............. FENTON! when he gets all aggressive wilth the deer?
a lead, some training (fenton and his 2 legged friend). a whistle, that sort of thing is surely worth a try...
failing that, a rifle. (fenton and his 2 legged friend).
What you need is to borrow my dog, she goes from very placid to a whirling dervish of snarling fangs if over bouncy or grumpy dogs get near our son.
*reads OP and ignores remainder of thread*
you should be able to self launch a power kite.
Personally I think that dog ownership in urban areas is irresponsible, anti-social and ultimately a little cruel.
If you disagree, fair enough because I guess you've decided you love your pooch.
Personally I think that dog ownership in urban areas is irresponsible, anti-social and ultimately a little cruel.
What a crock of shit. ****.
buttercup - MemberTJ,
The foolishness I speak of is of a man who would quicker decide to abuse a living creature because he felt he had a higher right than it.
correct. Humans have rights. dogs do not.
The scenerio of discussion purely states the dog did nothing wrong.
Wrong the dog was not under control. It upset a child.
Personally I think that [s]dog[/s] child ownership in urban areas is irresponsible, anti-social and ultimately a little cruel.
FTFY.
Seriously though, which urban area do you live in where there isn't easy access to green space to exercise/walk a dog?
which urban area do you live in where there isn't easy access to green space
What a [s]crock [/s] field of shit?
Regardless of the reason some people/children are scared of dogs, I think it's courteous to appreciate that and reign your dogs in if necessary.
My little whippet cross tends to act more erratically and interested in people who act erratic and you end up with a wierd mutual distrust scenario that just seems to exacerbate the situation. It's just easier to call her to heel.
Loving the concept of teaching children 'tricks'.
I've not seen a dog doing this:
I've not seen a dog doing this:
Quite possibly the worst video ever?
I do, however, have it on good authority that a dog was resposible for shooting and editing that video.
AWESOME.
Humans have rights. dogs do not.
incorrect. they might not have the same rights, but they do have rights. but let's not dwell on being reasonable.
let's not dwell on being reasonable.
Indeed.
Dogs have rights? really? Please tell me how?
You have to be a human to have rights. Can a dog sue someone? We have duties towards dogs for sure as we do to all animals but its nonsense to suggest a dog has rights
you're in your little ethical world aren't you?
try the animal welfare act.
Kevin Bridges sums it all up in a minute!
chutney13 - Memberyou're in your little ethical world aren't you?
try the animal welfare act.
No - that describes humans duties towards animals - not that a dog has rights.
my mistake, i shouldn't have commented. your grasp of semantics is to be commended. i am sure you are capable of winning many arguments, well done. Have you thought of doing a law degree, i hear the tinpot academy is good.
Chutney - you appear to have got yourself in a bit of a pickle.
You'll never beat TeeJ like that.
Its an important difference when people try to claim a dog has an equal right to a human - it does not.
Couldn't stay away from it TeeJ. I'm disappointed in you.
.
Nobby - rights? Its a legal concept only available to humans. Check it out. We have duties towards dogs, a dog has no rights at all and is not equal to a human as someone tried to claim.
So lets see some of these rights nobby
DD - Ok
So... anyhooooo... what do we think about cats? Cats are just, like, miles better than dogs, aren't they?
I'm very very disappointed this thread isn't littered with lolcats. Its a missed opportunity. Certain people (phil!) are slacking, and quite frankly need to up their game a little. Sort it out!
Some people think that dogs are stupid, mine, for example, would try to do something several times without success but eventually realised that simple repetition of the same pointless act would not achieve the result she wanted and would therefore give up.
Some people on the other hand....
[img] http://www.smileys4me.com/getsmiley.php?show=2140 [/img]
rights or Rights, right?