[Closed] Since when did the HMRC lower the 40% Income Tax threshold to £34k?

So not only am I having to endure a 15 year pay freeze (whilst my salary is eroded by inflation), it's now no longer worth the effort of doing any overtime.

I'm managing to dry my eyes for long enough to see the screen and type this message, but it's quite an effort. Stay strong brave soldider!!

http://www.globalrichlist.com/

I appreciate your concern 🙂

Any other taxable perks?

i fail to see why its not worth doing overtime.

ok its not as lucrative as it once was but its still a net increase

they often state it as the amount of earnings over the tax free allowance... which would be about that much.

But it's only 40% on anything above £34,371 so it's still worth doing overtime.

It was 35k last year so not a big change. I feel sorry for those poor souls earning 150k [IMG] [/IMG]

34k of TAXABLE income, so with tax free allowance - so probably 42kish of gross income before 40% starts (depending on benefits in kind etc).

It goes to show my ignorance on the subject, I always thought the threshold was more like £40k.

Bah.

My rant still stands.

I feel sorry for those poor souls earning 150k

Why?

If your'e earning that much then you'll no doubt have a good account who will advise how you can spread your wealth and you'll end up paying less tax on it.

thestabiliser - Member
34k of TAXABLE income, so with tax free allowance - so probably 42kish of gross income before 40% starts (depending on benefits in kind etc).

By Jove, I think you've just solved my problem.

Bah.

My rant has been diffused.

My rant has been diffused

I do like a diffused rant 🙂

They say a problem shared is a problem halved. Happy to help you out as it's not a problem I ever expect to suffer.

The bit about 15 year pay freeze and my sarcastic remark about the Tories I still stand by 🙂

Your personal allowance is £8.3K, plus the 40% limit means that you are paying on above ~£42.6K. I wouldn't expect to see too much sympathy for your rant! You can go below this if you pay more pension and it could make a difference for some benefits.

Random capitals and areas of utter incoherence would have improved it vastly. Hardly even a rant, diffused, solid or otherwise. 1/10.

My rant still stands.

That you earn a very good salary and it's taxed?

@chojin - interesting excersize that you think that at 40% it's not worth putting in extra effort, how about 45% or 50% here or in France 75% - do you now see the logic in the argument that at a certain point increasing taxes becomes self-defeating

@Teetosugers - if you earn £150k through PAYE an accountant cannot really help you, it's a bit of an urban myth that higher earners have all sorts of wheezes to pay less tax on their income. Those with the most flexibility are people with their own companies (like BBC journalists and senior execs)

@ononeorange
I MeaN howOne is Supposed to rin two HOrsbixeswhilst funding theGlobalfiSHH unemploYED Sails into SUNset oFF a Meagre 1,000,000Lira a Day is Be4yon me. AfterALL prISOns these DAYSS are MORRE l|ImKLDOPJ Like hOlfiday CAMPSwith ALL tjeTeacchERS having PRizes For AL ItS NOWOnder THe yourngeer GEneration HASS No cCOmcepT OF LaYY DIana!!!

Better?

My rant has been diffused.

Your rant has been defused, not diffused, I hope.

Unfotunate fact of life, remember when only rich people paid higher rate tax? When I first started paying higher rate tax I was on very good money, now even folk in 'normal' jobs pay it...

Who'd have thought that coppers would end up paying 40% income tax on their pensions? See what I did there, started another thread, almost 😯

[i]So not only am I having to endure a 15 year pay freeze (whilst my salary is eroded by inflation)[/i]

Have you considered looking for another job?

@BR two ways of looking at that - that top rate of tax is "too low" or that police should be very happy that their earnings and their pension is above the threshold. I believe I'm right in saying that only the top 10% of workers pay the top rate of tax, that makes the police very well paid no ?

As mentioned you won't pay 40% and you can work plenty of overtime. I get a good wage and even with the overtime I did last year to pay for a nice holiday I didn't pay 40%

Coppers pay 40% tax on their pensions 👿 !!!! B****y copper plated civil service pensions (do you see what I did there 😉 ).

I can sympathise with the feeling that when 40% of your wage disappears before you even get it you do feel a tad stung, but you've still got the other 60% and are therefore still better off than if you hadn't worked for the extra. Does mean payrises don't up your take home at the same rate as before, but as you earn more, salaries seem to go up disproportionately anyway.

You won't get a lot of sympathy from those earning less as quite rightly from their perspective it's a rather nice problem to have but when you feel you've worked hard for the extra income it does hurt to lose so much of it, especially as in reality the threshold has come down significantly in recent years.

As mentioned you won't pay 40% and you can work plenty of overtime.

I can sympathise with the feeling that when 40% of your wage disappears before you even get it

That's not how it works, you don't pay 40% on the whole lot, there's your tax free allowance and other bands to work through before they start taking 40% of anything left

I blame the CIA. They smuggled the threshold in to destabilise the region and then blame it on...........

Oh, sorry, wrong thread.

jambalaya

[i]@BR two ways of looking at that - that top rate of tax is "too low" or that police should be very happy that their earnings[/i]

I don't think its an 'or', but an 'and'...

For me the top rate is far too low as people in normal jobs are paying upwards of 50% (income tax and NI) taxation on earnings, plus employers are paying another +12% of NI.

I think I do a damn site better job of spending my money than the Govt does.

There are three types of money:

1 My money spent by me on me - want quality and value
2 My money spent by me on a third party - want value
3 Someone else spending my money on a third party - want to be able to account for it...

thestabiliser - much better effort, well done. Almost totally unintelligible. I particularly like the lack of punctuation, although you lose one point for a full stop in there. 8/10. Keep it up!

.....only 40%! Sorry, but when I was little I remember my dad complaining about the tax he was paying (in The Netherlands). I never really looked into it, but I am pretty sure he mentioned a figure of 60%. And no, he did not earn a fortune.... He only had the occasional moan. At least someone was taking a higher % of his income than my mother 😉

The fact that you've had a 15 year pay freeze suggests you've been working for at least 15 years, yet you still haven't grasped the very basics of how you get paid and what tax you pay?

'Try putting your monthly deductions into grum's link...

One benefit of 40% tax rate is if you have a private pension you get 40% tax relief on what you put in.

Well spotted there! I see that you eventually took into account the £8,105 personal allowance where you pay no tax whatsoever.

http://www.globalrichlist.com/

Not sure if I'm pleased with this or not.

I'm the 56,281,319 richest person on earth!

bruneep - you can't be, I'm the 56,281,319th richest person on the planet!

Jeez...makes you think doesn't it?

i've just read this and had a hear attack and an orgasm in one minute flat 😆

You shouldn't put too much trust that globalrichlist site as it doesn't take into account living costs. If you earn £25K a year "you are the 1%" - most people on this forum wouldn't be able to survive on 25 grand a year in the UK (including me)

most people on this forum wouldn't be able to survive on 25 grand a year in the UK (including me)

😆 🙄

randomjeremy - Member

If you earn £25K a year "you are the 1%" - most people on this forum wouldn't be able to survive on 25 grand a year in the UK (including me)

For one person 20K per year is more than enough and you can save some.

😯

I'm not in the "most people" category................

I think the OP is being a little harsh blaming HMRC. HMRC havent changed the tax rates. George Osbourne and the govt actually changed the rates and get HMRC to sort out collecting it.

It depends where you live. 20k doesn't go far in that there London.

Where does his statement mention london?

By the time you add in other "taxes" - such as National Insurance, VAT, duty on fuel and alcohol, council tax - I'd guess that almost everyone pays much more than 40% of what they earn straight back to the Government (or its appointed representatives).

It depends where you live. 20k doesn't go far in that there London.

Agree. 20K would need to be doubled to exist comfortably in the home counties / London. You wouldn't be buying much of a house with that either.

sorry ewan i missed where buying a house was a necessity

you just have to live to your means.

Agree. 20K would need to be doubled to exist comfortably in the home counties / London. You wouldn't be buying much of a house with that either.

Define comfortably. I know plenty of people who live in/around London on much less than that and have perfectly happy lives. It shows an amazing lack of awareness of how many (most?) people live to come out with stuff like this. I guess for some people 'comfortable' means having a big house, driving an expensive car, having the latest fashions and tech, luxury holidays etc.

When I was in Romania apparently a doctors salary was around €3000. The cost of living was cheaper but not that much cheaper. Some people really have no idea how lucky they are (or at least how lucky they could be if they weren't so materialistic/competitive).

Some people really have no idea how lucky they are (or at least how lucky they could be if they weren't so materialistic/competitive).

This +1

jonny rocky mountain - Member
One benefit of 40% tax rate is if you have a private pension you get 40% tax relief on what you put in.

Not automatically. As i found out, it only happens if you phone HMRC and inform them. I was surprised how many people don't know this.

Kryton - been wondering about doing this for some time. Did you have to fill in a tax return (something I absolutely dread)?

[i]For one person 20K per year is more than enough and you can save some.

[/i]

if you still live with your Mum...

ononeorange - Member
Kryton - been wondering about doing this for some time. Did you have to fill in a tax return (something I absolutely dread)?

Nope. I phoned up HRMC pensions, reeled off the list of my pensions and contributions per month and the lady on the phone adjusted it there and then.

Also, you can claim backwards for six (IIRC) years - but for this you need write a simple letter noting the request to recongnise you pension contributions and again list 2006 = £x, 2007 = £y etc. The same lady as above gave me the details and address to write to.

10 mins work and I'm a whole £600 lump sum and £26 approx a month better off....

For one person 20K per year is more than enough and you can save some.

For one person 20K per year is more than enough and you can save some.

I would say it depends on your circumstances - if you want to live independently with a reasonable quality of life you would struggle on 20k. After deductions and including a 10% pension contribution you would be left with a take home wage of about £1200 per month.

Say (conservatively) £500 in rent, £100 in council tax, £200 food, £100 utilities including mobile/landline/broadband, travel costs, there wouldn't be much left for saving or anything else.

Of course you could live in shared accommodation and survive on porridge if you wanted to

It's reading this kind of thread that makes me miss TJ. He used to love commenting on these issues. RIP. 😥

Say (conservatively) £500 in rent, £100 in council tax, £200 food, £100 utilities including mobile/landline/broadband, travel costs, there wouldn't be much left for saving or anything else.

HA HA HA HA! If only....

200quid on food ....

dining on caviar and quails eggs are we ?

if not eating ready meals and shop in the right places then there is no need for 200 quid a month on food.....

we eat well with homecooked meals , lots of fresh meat, fruit and veg for a couple and rarely spend more than 30 quid a week including the odd bottle of wine.

but we do shop in aldi when ever possible.

but your rent is low and your utilitys are probably low as well ...

if your single and under 25 government expects you to live in shared accomodation.

i dont really see the issue with that if your single and its fairly standard issue in alot of other developed countries.

and and FWIW when i was a bike mechanic and we moved to aberdeen i was on 7.50 an hour and taking home 1200 before tax with the mrs being a post grad student. running a car and renting a 1 bed flat in not a great area of town. it wasnt the best but we still live similar life now we just choose to spend the difference in other ways

You won't be able to afford to own a home. You'd be pushed to run a car, and food would be from the value range. Nothing wrong with any of that but it is the reality.

Utter nonsense. We eat well and run a car on less than 20k a year and still afford foreign holidays, have a couple of decent bikes each etc

if you want to live independently

Since when did that become a fundamental human right? I share a house with my GF who earns similar and our quality of life is great thanks.

That globalrichlist tells us next to nothing. To compare our income with that of a Masai warrior is a bit daft really.

If you choose to completely ignore everything about it and pick the most extreme examples of living cost differences then yes it does. See my example re Romania though - at a guess living costs were a third to half what they are here, yet salaries were probably less than a tenth.

Utter nonsense. We eat well and run a car on less than 20k a year and still afford foreign holidays, have a couple of decent bikes each etc

If you choose to completely ignore everything about it and pick the most extreme examples of living cost differences then yes it does.

It's an average. "Low wage" places like africa and asia have billions of people. The whole thing is skewed nonsense. You didn't want to comment on the welfare income then?

Since when did that become a fundamental human right? I share a house with my GF who earns similar and our quality of life is great thanks.

Yes that's two incomes and you can share rent, bills etc?

£20k between you?

No.

The whole thing is skewed nonsense.

It's designed to make you think, not as a comprehensive study. Obviously it didn't work for some people.

You didn't want to comment on the welfare income then?

Compared to many people in the world, someone on benefits here is lucky, yes.

Yes that's two incomes and you can share rent, bills etc?

Yes - but lots of people are in a relationship, and it's something which you can also do if you share a house with friends, colleagues etc.

I can see how that would be difficult to manage for someone who considers anything less than XTR beneath them though.

That's a bit different then Grum, and I appreciate your candor. Your household income as a couple is quite different from;

For one person 20K per year is more than enough and you can save some.

I am trying hard to pay tax in the uk, just need a few more days here this year . Irrespective of Government and irrational rants its a better deal than alotof europe.

Most people on this forum wouldn't be able to survive on 25 grand a year in the UK (including me)

I earn less than this and have a car and have bought a house on my own. I am poorer the Grum and not only in financial terms 😉
About 22 k ish - dont work FT mind

http://www.givingwhatwecan.org/why-give/how-rich-you-are

this adjusts the figure based on "purchasing power" so it is not simply income based

Even assuming an income of £3,500 in the UK you are s till in the top 19 % globally
13.500= top 4.5%
25 k 1.1 %

Your perception of poverty and the reality of poverty are some way apart
Also here
http://www.leastof.org/worldwealthcalculator

I own the whole of Buckinghamshire, several large international companies and a hedge fund. This year for tax reasons I'm only taking £100 of income. Apparently despite my multi-billion pounds worth of assets this makes me the 5,770,080,000 richest person in the world. Either I'm doing something wrong or judging wealth solely by income is a stupid idea.

[i]"You are in the wealthiest 0.2% of people in the world. There are 6,584,870,214 (more than 6.5 billion) people less wealthy than you. You are 150 times wealthier than a billion people. [/i]

Why don't I feel rich, only averagely well off then?

so why exactly should someone who earns more actually pay a higher rate of tax?
(i dont earn enough to pay 40% by the way)

just beacuse you EARN it why does it mean you have to GIVE even more away when more you earn you will stillpay more tax anyway and when you buy your massive house your pay even more council charge and stamp duty etc etc.

i await the views

Why don't I feel rich, only averagely well off then?

Your feelings are based on other's lifestyles around you, somewhere else on the same money you'd feel richer, other places poorer

Either I'm doing something wrong or judging wealth solely by income is a stupid idea.

so why exactly should someone who earns more actually pay a higher rate of tax?
(i dont earn enough to pay 40% by the way)

just beacuse you EARN it why does it mean you have to GIVE even more away when more you earn you will stillpay more tax anyway and when you buy your massive house your pay even more council charge and stamp duty etc etc.

i await the views

What I have never understood is why someone poor like you thinks its ok for someone much richer than you to not contribute according to their means - how many Yachts do they need? We have peole in the UK relying on food banks due to some of the cuts in services.
If you are one of lifes big winners you should contribute to society according to your ability - your ability to pay is huge. As far as I know every country uses taxes to redistribute weath/income to some degree and TBH i dont believe you dont know the answer you just dont accept/like the answer

A second reason, however, was that I am indebted to the British welfare state; the very one that Mr Cameron would like to replace with charity handouts. When my life hit rock bottom, that safety net, threadbare though it had become under John Major’s Government, was there to break the fall. I cannot help feeling, therefore, that it would have been contemptible to scarper for the West Indies at the first sniff of a seven-figure royalty cheque. This, if you like, is my notion of patriotism. On the available evidence, I suspect that it is Lord Ashcroft’s idea of being a mug.

You aregument os WORK and EARN in capitals is to assume they all work hard for the money - Wayne rooney works hard to be a football player but he was also born very lucky on that he had a the talenmt - it was not , and it never is, just hard work that got them where they are today. It also requires luck. Plenty of folk work hjard on the mimnimum wage for 60 + hours a week just to feed their family but you know all that you simply dont GAS

Wayne rooney works hard to be a football player

really does he???????

one is called wealth and one is called rich but yeah folk often confuse the two like debt and defecit

[url= http://thesaurus.com/browse/wealthy ]Wealthy Definition: rich; having a lot of money[/url]

So not a bit like debt and deficit really.

[img] [/img]

relative poverty is just that, you will hear sloanes moaning about their allowances, the hard up farmer, the head of security at a bank who thought she should have been paid more--so took it instead, those of us on fixed incomes are rolling in it ...........

I am not really sure what your point is seeing as I agreed with you - do you just want an argument? If you put debt into that little link of yours would you believe Deficit is one of the words

Wayne rooney works hard to be a football player

really does he???????

So yuo think the rich Ronney does not work hardfor his money either but we should let him keep it

Both of you if you have a substantive point could you make it as it appears you want to just argue/troll/pin dance

Why don't I feel rich, only averagely well off then?

I've heard this from people earning very high salaries. By the time you've taken off money to pay for an expensive new car, large mortgage, private school fees, two foreign holidays, etc, there's not always a lot left, even if you earn six figures.

Most people tend to spend what they earn. Only poorly-paid people actually [i]need[/i] to spend what they earn.

"Rio
I own the whole of Buckinghamshire..."

You don't own my garden - so not quite the whole.

do you just want an argument?

What, you think I'd come on here just for an argument? 🙂 It's the use of "rich" as a synonym of "income" in that calculator that's causing me problems, and I suspect you'd agree they're not the same things; you can be rich with no income and poor with a "relatively" high income. Maybe I shouldn't have confused things by introducing the word "wealth"!

Edit:

You don't own my garden - so not quite the whole.

Right, I'll set my estate managers to look into this oversight at once. 8)