Forum search & shortcuts

Scottish independen...
 

[Closed] Scottish independence- where do you stand?

Posts: 5046
Full Member
 

Grum I think Devo Max was dead in the water right from the start despite having quite a bit of popular support. The political parties on all sides were against it, SNP because of fears it would split the independence vote, Unionist partly because of its implications for other parts of the and mainly because they feared it would merely be a gradual step toward independence. I think its better explained here

http://bellacaledonia.org.uk/2012/09/03/question-time-2/


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 11:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'd agree that Devo Max is probably what most people want. Why isn't it an option?

That's because Devo Max is taking the piss. It is having your cake and eating it. The student with the credit card analogy would have be taken to another level if the SNP got devo max.


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 11:52 am
Posts: 12089
Full Member
 

Still the Spanish PM is weighing in with his expected level of support. Of course, that part is all covered in the 667 pages!!! Expect wee eck to ignore the conclusion but focus on anohpther European leader describing him as the President of Scotland already. Does EIIR know yet?

The Spanish don't really distinguish between PM and President, and the local autonomous communities (Catalonia, Andalusia etc.) all have presidents. I'm sure that won't stop Salmond from making the most of that bit of the message, of course!


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 11:52 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"...where do you stand?"
probably next to the fire to keep warm.

Will it be so popular that it is standing room only?


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 11:53 am
 dazh
Posts: 13430
Full Member
 

There are plenty of issues for the North of England. Yes, the scots may not want the north of England involved. That's fine. No one is suggesting that the north of England be forced upon the scots against their will. There may come a point though when the north of England demands autonomy from London for exactly the same reasons as the scots are now doing. If/when that happens, and depending on how independence plays out for the Scots, there may well be a convincing argument for the North of England to join Scotland for each side's mutual benefit.


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 11:55 am
Posts: 3008
Full Member
 

Scot living in Scotland and a definite no from me, GF's the same. My father is also a no, step mums the same. Most of my mates are no or undecided.

In fact the only person I know voting yes for sure is Druidh 😆


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 11:56 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There may come a point though when the north of England demands autonomy from London for exactly the same reasons as the scots are now doing. If/when that happens, and depending on how independence plays out for the Scots, there may well be a convincing argument for the North of England to join Scotland for each side's mutual benefit.

Fanciful at best. I wouldn't hold my breath. IF scotland is successful, the last thing it'll want is to share that having taken all the risk and pain for very little benefit.
It's like watching your neighbour build a lovely big new house then asking if you can move in.


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 11:59 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

We're semi-seriously considering emigrating if Scotland doesn't get independence.

Ha! I might have to move with my job if it does go independent.


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 12:05 pm
Posts: 7766
Full Member
 

Back on topic
Scottish living in Scotland (doubly blessed) Yes
Mrs Duck; Welsh lucky enough to be married to a Scot. Yes


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 12:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

the north of England demands autonomy from London

FFS this is just getting silly now.

I would imagine London would jump at the chance. 8 million people living in some kind economic super city. Not having to worry about there under performing neighbours!

Anyway what about the Midlands?

Why not just go the whole hog and have anarchy?*

*By that I mean a truly anarchic state with no central government and not chaos and rioting.


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 12:07 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

English, almost as far from Scotland as I can be without falling into the sea.
I don't care enough to even post on this thread.


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 12:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

English, with some scots-canadian ancestry. I hope the scots vote yes, and just to ensure the vote goes that way I want the franchise extended throughout the UK so that we can vote to be rid of them.


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 12:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I am Scottish and British and a UK Citizen.
I am proud of all 3 and I know the difference between them.
I am voting NO, my wife is voting NO.

I believe the referendum will give a clear NO vote, but I fear the damage and bad feeling that Salmond and his cohorts are going to cause in the next 10 months. I fear that there is trouble ahead regardless.


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 12:31 pm
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

How could the Scots resist having some of this kind of culture as part of their proud independent nation?


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 12:39 pm
Posts: 597
Free Member
 

My OH's Moms Partner thinks we should all get to vote as it will effect us in England too...

By that effect, maybe the whole world should be governed in the same manner, oh wait...Team America!

Seems like most Scottish STWers are voting no...


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 12:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

For those worried about England being condemmed forever more to rule by the Tories if Scotland breaks away, in every election since the late 60s (at least) if you removed the Scottish vote from the overall then the rest of the UK would have ended up with the same government that was elected with Scottish votes included.

Show how little influence we Scots have over the government we get and is a main reason for me wanting independence


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 12:43 pm
Posts: 12089
Full Member
 

Show how little influence we Scots have over the government we get and is a main reason for me wanting independence

We'll just ignore Blair and Brown, then?


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 12:50 pm
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

For those worried about England being condemmed forever more to rule by the Tories if Scotland breaks away, in every election since the late 60s (at least) if you removed the Scottish vote from the overall then the rest of the UK would have ended up with the same government that was elected with Scottish votes included.

Don't think that's quite true. IIRC '64 and '74 would have been different and this last election would have been a Tory majority rather than a coalition (you can argue there's no difference though 🙁 ).

Show how little influence we Scots have over the government we get and is a main reason for me wanting independence

If you live in a 'safe' constituency as most of us do then you don't have any influence over the government you get either. The difference is Scotland potentially gets to potentially do something about it.


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 12:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

BLair and (by default) Brown were voted in by the English electorate as were Thatcher and Major. Scots didn't vote for Thatcher or Major at any point but were landed with them anyway, we arguably suffered the most from their policies as well.


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 12:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Grum, the figures I saw said that the Scots vote was not decisive in any recent election, I will go and check up on this though. Sorry if I'm spreading mis-information.(If I am I guess there's always hope of a career in politics)


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 12:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

For long time I've thought that the problem lies within London and the South East.
My proposal is to make everything within the M25 an independent state, outside Europe. We'll be happy, they'll be happy.
If that happens, the rest of us will be quite happy to continue as the UK I'm guessing!


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 12:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

we arguably suffered the most from their policies as well.

Really? I know plenty of Geordies and Scousers who will happily argue that with you!


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 12:58 pm
 igm
Posts: 11886
Full Member
 

I'm liking the idea that Scotland gets independence, the north of England applies to join and at a later date Wales follows suit.
It could be called the United Trailcentres of Britain.

Still wouldn't vote for independence (even if I got a vote).

Edit: Deveron has the answer.


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 12:59 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

For me the argument about Westminster rule rings very true, but is an argument for increased powers for the Scottish government (Devo Max), not a complete dissolution of the union.


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 1:01 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

igm - Member
I'm liking the idea that Scotland gets independence, the north of England applies to join and at a later date Wales follows suit.
It could be called the United Trailcentres of Britain.

Why does everyone think the North of England is part of Scotland? We sorted that one out years ago.


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 1:02 pm
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

In the last general election only slightly less people voted Conservative in Scotland than voted SNP, and Labour's vote was only a bit more than double the Conservatives.

Yes they only won one seat but it's not quite 'no-one votes Conservative in Scotland'. Interestingly the Tories were dominant in Scotland until 1955 or so.

[img] [/img]

An interesting view of the SNP vote here:

So, it would appear that, certainly 50 or so years ago, Scots tended to be marginally MORE Conservative than English. But you will also know, of course, that, to make broad generalisations to which there are obviously a few exceptions on both sides, Conservative supporters tend to be more oriented towards the individual, while Labour supporters are towards society. And, of course, one way in which "the individual" manifests itself is in the tendency to be more inward-looking than outward-looking. Hence, for instance, the greater measure of support in the Conservative ranks for such things as withdrawal from the EU and so on.

In the context of Scotland, "the individual" also finds another ready outlet, with the entity being Scotland itself. In effect, what has happened is that a large number of people who, put in and English setting, would be Conservative supporters are, in the Scottish setting, SNP supporters. It is, thus, almost certain that, in an English setting, Labour-held seats such as Edinburgh South, Ochil and Stirling would, this election, have returned Conservative MPs, as the combined Conservative and SNP vote in each is more than the Labour vote.

Also, over the years, the steady erosion of the Conservative heartlands by the Lib-Dems (as was also happening in large parts of SW England and Cornwall), coupled with the loss of the "traditional" Protestant vote for the Conservatives in the Glasgow area (now you know why Rangers play in blue), combined to significantly weaken Conservative presence in Scotland, so it could be that many Scots no longer felt the Conservatives to be a particularly credible choice. Add to that general decline the emergence of the SNP - with a spectacular by-election victory, seat taken from Labour, in Hamilton - and the Conservative fate in Scotland was secured: the mainstream right, by and large, now switched to the SNP.

So, those "die-hard" areas in the Highlands that the Liberals had been unable to take fell, in time, to the SNP.


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 1:04 pm
 dazh
Posts: 13430
Full Member
 

My proposal is to make everything within the M25 an independent state, outside Europe.

London's already a tax haven for foreign billionaires. The solution is not to give them even more autonomy from national and international regulation, but to tax them until they bleed within the current system.


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 1:05 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

Why does everyone think the North of England is part of Scotland? We sorted that one out years ago.

Pffft.. I tell my Scottish mates that the North of England is really just South South Scotland 😀


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 1:05 pm
Posts: 5046
Full Member
 

The SNP used to be known years ago as the tartan tories but that is clearly not the case now,50 years or so have passed since then.There is a tory support in Scotland but it is extremely low and there is no evidence that it is growing.


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 1:19 pm
Posts: 1858
Full Member
 

I can't vote anyway but in my experience it's best not to vote for anything where those whose idea it is aren't going to be left carrying the can or bearing any undisclosed/unidentified/inaccurately specified cost.

I can see politicians, advisers and the legal profession doing awfully well out of this, I'm less convinced about the rest of us.


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 1:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

.There is a tory support in Scotland but it is extremely low and there is no evidence that it is growing.

Have you seen grums' post?


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 1:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There is a tory support in Scotland but it is extremely low and there is no evidence that it is growing.

No new houses or golf memberships available in Elie then Gordie?


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 1:38 pm
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

There is a tory support in Scotland but it is extremely low

Only 3.2 percent less than support for the SNP, according to the last election.


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 1:39 pm
Posts: 5046
Full Member
 

yes tories still flatlining in all elections.SNP vote is low in uk election but still up.


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 1:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Tory support up 0.9% on previous.


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 1:41 pm
Posts: 8955
Free Member
 

JOIN SCOTLAND?! JOIN SCOTLAND?! It was them bastards that betrayed us to Edmund and lead to the loss of his majesty on the raise and the blinding of his sons. This after our glorious contribution at Brunabur, Malcolms issue can stuff it, we'd rather burn.


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 1:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I am British, born and live in England. I very much hope the vote is No but appreciate it's not my decision. I think the UK is stronger, economically and culturally as a combined group of nations.

If Scotland does vote Yes I would look very closely at the way Independence is setup. I wouldn't be in favour of allowing Scotland to use the Pound, I would insist Scotland takes it's share of the British National debt, I would insist it has it's own membership of the EU and not piggy back on the British membership. The British submarine fleet should be moved.

I think if Scotland votes Yes the rest of Britain should have a referendum on ejecting them totally from the UK.

FWIW I am not a Tory supporter.


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 1:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Scottish, resident in Scotland work all over the UK. I will be voting YES for independence, as are all family members eligible to vote.

I have already disowned those who previously indicated they were voting NO. 🙂

Prior to that it was probably a 50-50 split amongst the family.

Amongst friends it seems to 60-40 in favour of NO vote.

Amongst colleagues I have no idea as no-one seems to ever have the conversation.

Overall I think it will be closer than polls predict, but I fear the NO vote will just edge it. This would make things a bit interesting post referendum.


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 1:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think if Scotland votes Yes the rest of Britain should have a referendum on ejecting them totally from the UK.

Think you have somewhat missed the point of the referendum!


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 1:55 pm
 dazh
Posts: 13430
Full Member
 

I would imagine London would jump at the chance. 8 million people living in some kind economic super city. Not having to worry about there under performing neighbours!

It wouldn't be an economic super city if all the people they rely on to do the dirty jobs up-sticks and leave for other parts of the country because they can't afford to work or live in London. It'd essentially become a ghetto (albeit a very luxurious one) for the rich serviced by immigrant labour. If you look at other tax havens like Monaco, Liechtenstein etc they're very wealthy, but hardly economic powerhouses.

Anyway what about the Midlands?

What about them? 😀


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 1:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Absolute yes. For good or bad. From Glasgow.


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 1:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Absolute yes. For good or bad.

That's the type of conviction I admire. There's too much "maybe, but only if I will be no less well off".


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 1:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[b]dazh[/b] - Member
London's already a tax haven for foreign billionaires. The solution is not to give them even more autonomy from national and international regulation, but to tax them until they bleed within the current system.

Bit off topic this but ...

The rules for London are no different than the rest of the UK for wealthy foreigners. Most of them choose to live in and around London. With housing stamp duty at 7% for over £2m properties I think taxes are already quite high for them - no ? They tend to spend money and pay a lot of VAT.

As for "bleeding" them, that's just politics of envy. The French have seen what 75% (declared illegal) and 66% taxes have done for earnings over €1m, their citizens have left. Spoke to a horse racing trainer a month ago and the French raving scene has been decimated as the owners have left, those that care for horses, train them etc, they are not millionaires but depend on the wealthy for their livelihood. David Beckham came an played football for free, he waived his €5m salary (had equivalent amount donated it charity, the government even tried to tax that). At 50% tax perhaps the French would have collected €2.5m instead of zero.


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 2:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

ads678 - Member
I'm English/British, and very bored with the whole thing. As I don't have a vote I wonder why it's even on the news down here.

I say go for it, you already hate us so you may as well hate us across a proper border!

Hate has absolutely nothing to do with it.

It's just time for Scotland to stand on it's own 2 feet and live or die by it's own democratic choices.


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 2:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

@dazh - London would be massively better off if it where independent (it will never happen). London already pays for all the social housing required for low paid workers, fact is it also pays a lot towards the social housing and wealthfare for the rest of the country. Just look at stamp duty revenues and income tax by geography, the South East supports the rest of the UK. I don't have an issue with that as such, it's normal for a capital city. It's the bleed them type comment which I say, most respectfully, is misguided.


 
Posted : 28/11/2013 2:08 pm
Page 4 / 17