[Closed] Police Kettling Cyclists outside Olympic Opening

It's quite clear you have little or no understanding of CM rides, as the 'primary objective' is not to do as you say.And I think you're misunderstanding me; I was talking about the inevitability of delays if you regularly commute in a city the size of london.

Sorry Mike, could you try and be just a little bit more patronising please? There's a shred of I-know-best condescension you may have missed.

I spent years commuting into the centre of Manchester, daily, by bike. I know we're a mere sleepy backwater compared to you dashing young blades in the big city, but even we are aware of the concept of congestion

But Critical Mass has one essential ingredient that none of your other examples do. They're causing congestion [b]ON PURPOSE![/b]. If some cab driver, as a protest about conditions for cab drivers, just abandoned his cab slap bang in the middle of a massively busy box junction in the middle of the city, and strolled off, what would the reaction be? Seriously? Would they say "WOOOOOOOOOO YEAH!!!! LETS ALL GET BEHIND OUR BLACK CAB DRIVERS AND SUPPORT THEIR RIGHTS!!!!"

Or would they just think "what a stupid selfish, mindless ****!"

Have a guess. Go on!

You and others seem to be hung up on the appearance of CM riders. Strange, because my experience is that the riders are not on homogenous group, quite the opposite

I'm afraid, from my experience (and I used to endure their weekly shennaigans), they all look exactly the same. ie: all trying too hard to be 'different'

I was talking about the inevitability of delays if you regularly commute in a city the size of london.

Not in my experience.

"Crtical Mass appeals to the people who it appeals to, the rest of us look on in disgust at people using a mode of transport as a way to get attention by annoying other people."

So, you speak for everyone else then? Can you qualify this with any factual evidence?

"I only saw a video of people assaulting coppers"

Whereas i saw a video of a police officer using disproportionate force against the first guy with the bike, a woman trying to get him to calm down perhaps, then the officer seemingly losing control and becoming quite agitated. At one point, he shoved his female colleague away, when she appeared to be trying to calm him down. He had to be led away by other officers, eventually. Opinions are purely subjective however, and none of us who weren't actually there can say for sure what really happened. Other than only one person was arrested for assault. That individual could claim he was trying to prevent harm to others. Again, it's all down to subjective opinion. As we don;t know the motivations for that person's actions we can't be objective about it.

"I presume you were not there on Friday in London. And as such are speaking about what happened from a position of ignorance ??"

I wasn't at that particular junction, and i have already stated that there are times when the group stops and blocks junctions, however they don't usually do so for very long, just a few minutes, then move away. How long was that particular junction blocked for?

Again though, it's a relatively small number of motorists 'inconvenienced'. The cyclists could argue that the motorists' presence in such large number inconveniences them. Who is right here? I am inconvenieced by motorists practically every journey I make by bike, yet i accept that as part of riding in a large city. I'd quite like to see motorists banned completely from a large number of London's streets, but i also accept that my own wishes may not be to the liking of others. Compromise is the key here. But the main problem which exists is that instead of sharing the space on our roads, we end up having to compete for it. Which is why we arrive at a position of conflict.

It's quite clear you have little or no understanding of CM rides, as the 'primary objective' is not to do as you say.

It is if the police ask you not to go to a certain area and to avoid the olympic routes - and you then choose not only to ingore this, but to go out wiht the very aim of disrupting the olympic routes at the exact time that you know people will be heading for the stadium to take part in one of the biggest events ever to occur in London. and block the roads whilst shouting 'F*** the olympics'

But of course, its a celebration of cycling, not a protest 🙄

I also notice that Critical Masses early attempts at prpopaganda, announcing that the police had arrested them because they were blocking David Beckham from getting to the stadium, sort of fell flat, bacause about twenty eight million of us saw that he wasn't even travelling there by car in the first place 😆

It is if the police ask you not to go to a certain area and to avoid the olympic routes - and you then choose not only to ingore this, but to go out wiht the very aim of disrupting the olympic routes at the exact time that you know people will be hading for the stadium to take part in one of the biggest events ever to occur in London.

I note that this point has been made several times and is being ignored by the "right on" brigade.

I suspect it's because their reason-detre is one of deliberate disruption and aggravation. That being the case, the appeals to reason from those tasked with ensuring the smooth running of the event are naturally falling on deaf ears. The little tykes...

Compromise is the key here. But the main problem which exists is that instead of sharing the space on our roads, we end up having to compete for it. Which is why we arrive at a position of conflict.

So you define 'Compromise' as riding around deliberately delaying peoples journey's and generally inconveniencing them?

Have you ever thought about a diplomatic career with the UN? 😆

The CM-ers might also want to consider that appeals to the rest of us, in regard to what they see as oppression of their "rights", are likely to be ignored because we are the ones likely to be/are being inconvenienced by their little display of throwing the toys out of the pram.

I suspect it's because their reason-detre is one of deliberate disruption and aggravation.

No Mr W - how could you suggest such a thing? its a 'celebration of cycling' 👿

"Sorry Mike, could you try and be just a little bit more patronising please? There's a shred of I-know-best condescension you may have missed.

I spent years commuting into the centre of Manchester, daily, by bike. I know we're a mere sleepy backwater compared to you dashing young blades in the big city, but even we are aware of the concept of congestion"

I am talking about CM in London, i have no experience of the Manchester event. I understood this discussion to be about the London event. I will stand by my comments about you being ignorant about the London event, as your comments do not reflect my actual experience of CM rides here.Have you ever been on a London CM ride?

"Not so much an ideological dislike i simply think their methods are counter productive"

Whereas I, as a London cyclist, think CM does have some positive effect. From the perspective of a participant and a bystander. Cycling has become markedly more popular in London in the last few years, so it could be argued that CM, Skyrides and many other cycling events and campaigns are all doing their bit to raise the profile of cycling here.

If some cab driver, as a protest about conditions for cab drivers, just abandoned his cab slap bang in the middle of a massively busy box junction in the middle of the city, and strolled off, what would the reaction be? Seriously? Would they say "WOOOOOOOOOO YEAH!!!! LETS ALL GET BEHIND OUR BLACK CAB DRIVERS AND SUPPORT THEIR RIGHTS!!!!"

Or would they just think "what a stupid selfish, mindless ****!"

Have a guess. Go on!

A large number of taxi drivers staged a protest last week which caused some disruption, and many people sympathise with their argument. Personally I don't think taxi drivers are 'stupid, selfish and mindless', but i cannot speak for all others. Personally I support their cause, as I believe they have a genuine grievance which should be addressed.

I concede that my experience of CM as a participant and observer is different to that of others, but I am also aware that some on here are speaking through ignorance and prejudice, as seems to be the case quite frequently on this forum, sadly.

A lot of mountain biking in England and Wales constitutes tresspass. There are many who take a dim view of such activity, and would like to see it stopped. Do you who oppose CM align yourselves with those who oppose mountain bikeing, or do you believe you are entitled to act as you see fit?

Cabbies did demonstrate.
Grid locked parlament square and park lane for two hours.
Have a guess how many got nicked?
Out of the cyclists, 3 have been rightfully charged.
The other 178 were detained at stations for many hours, with no water or toilets, and then had there bikes confiscated.
Jesus, car drivers have killed people and spent less time in the cells than this lot.

Do you who oppose CM align yourselves with those who oppose mountain bikeing, or do you believe you are entitled to act as you see fit?

[img] [/img]

Whereas I, as a London cyclist, think CM does have some positive effect. From the perspective of a participant and a bystander. Cycling has become markedly more popular in London in the last few years, so it could be argued that CM, Skyrides and many other cycling events and campaigns are all doing their bit to raise the profile of cycling here.

I'm a London cyclist and I disagree with one key element of your post. Can you guess what it is?

Skyrides, Boris Bikes, blue superhighways, better signposting of quieter bike routes, Cycle to Work scheme and an overall improvement in the acceptance of cycling as a mode of transport have all greatly improved. I see no evidence that CM had any impact on any of that. I can only see them, as others have said, as a negative impact on cycling.

Stop doing your PR/Press officer job on here, and get to controlling the idiots who ruin the reputation of cyclists instead.

It is if the police ask you not to go to a certain area and to avoid the olympic routes - and you then choose not only to ingore this, but to go out wiht the very aim of disrupting the olympic routes at the exact time that you know people will be heading for the stadium to take part in one of the biggest events ever to occur in London. And block the roads whilst shouting 'F*** the olympics'

The police do not have the legal power to demand people avoid certain areas unless it is to prevent breach of the peace, or for safety reasons. The police order was legally invalid, as it applied to a 'protest', which CM, as has been defined in a house of Lords ruling, is not. That no-one has actually been arrested under any law relating to public protest, suggests the police actions were in fact illegal. If they were acting to protect public safety etc, then why did they not also prevent the free progress of other road users and pedestrians? Why did they target only cyclists? Why was a person who had nothing to do with the CM ride arrested? Why weren't correct procedures concerning rights on arrest followed?

A police officer cannot simply stop you doing something that is lawful, without good reason. So far, I have seen nothing that supports police actions in this instance.

I've always thought CM were a bunch of well meaning but misguided fools. My opinion hasn't changed.

Face it, the police did what they did for reasons of Olympic PR, not for pubic safety or any other excuse. The powers don't want any taint on their Olympics.

I'm not going to start defending the actions of CM, as some of you seem to know more about what actually goes on than me*. I had assumed it was just a ride through the city at a very leisurely pace with the protection of big numbers and making a point about bikes, what I have seen of CM in manchester (not much admittedly) has backed that up.

Complaining about rljing was somewhat amusing considering the number on here who do it (no I haven't been taking note if those complaining about CM doing it have done it themselves) hardly crime of the century and as I found last week keeping a small group of cyclists together is difficult enought hrough junctions, but I will admit that RLJing en masse will harm "the cause" more than the odd rider doing it.

However finally gettying to my point a go slow does appear to be widely held as a political tool. Lorry drivers on the motorway against fuel prices (bit of a canute-ism) taxi drivers on local roads round manchester recently, coz they aren't allowed in bus lanes. It's not just CM who use this tactic, whether it is counter productive will be a tricky one to answer.

Going out riding on your own is admirable but it's hardly bringing political pressure to bear is it?

*and some of it does seem out of order

"I see no evidence that CM had any impact on any of that."

So, because you personally have no knowledge of something, it therefore isn't fact? As I have said; many of those who participate in CM rides are active in campaigning for better provision for cyclists. They use CM as a way of furthering their campaigns. Which you would be aware of if you actually participated in CM rides yourself.

As for Skyrides etc; I agree that they have a positive effect, but how great is that effect? Skyrides simply use existing cycle routes (which many CM participants have actively campaigned for), and are aimed at those new to cycling and recreational cyclists, rather than regular commuters. Boris bikes are fantastic, and a genuine benefit to Londoners. Indeed, several were present on Friday's CM ride.

"Stop doing your PR/Press officer job on here, and get to controlling the idiots who ruin the reputation of cyclists instead."

I do not act as 'PR' for CM in any way, I am merely expressing my own opinion and trying to seek better solutions to the situation we have at present. I have and will continue to challenge behaviour by individuals which damages the image of CM. What do you do to help promote cycling in London?

Spot on glen.
Remember"it's not our olympics, it's theirs" 😀

have and will continue to challenge behaviourby individuals which damages the image of CM.

You busy like bee...

oh and I do wonder if those who claim to very rarely have incidents with drivers are riding around with their eyes metaphorically shut. There's sections of roads near me huge wide ones with loads of space for bikes and cars to get along harmoniously with absolutley no reason for any confrontation at all and yet still, every once in a while I'll get an idiot buzzing me for no reason, just to piss me off. Nothing to do with riding style, just the odd dickhead car driver.

Guess some riders must just be lucky eh? Very lucky.

Third time lucky. Mike >

It's quite clear you have little or no understanding of CM rides, as the 'primary objective' is not to do as you say.

What is the primary objective?

What is the primary objective?

Well, there is no specified 'primary objective', hence why I challenged certain opinions. Critical Mass is all about people who enjoy cycling in London meeting up once a moth to enjoy riding in a group of other like-minded individuals. That's the reason I and others I know go along. For me and many others, the politics is secondary to the ride itself.

This has been an interesting if frustrating discussion, but I hope that people will think more about how to have events like this in a more positive way, which gives all cycling a better public image. I concede this is not an easy task, and no solution can ever be universally perfect. I would also urge those doubters amongst you to come down and join in, see for yourself what the experience is like. Let's look for positives, not dwell always on the negatives.

Mike - my experience of being abused by CM riders (Edinburgh, not London) whilst cycling past them on my way home one night does not encourage me to want anything to do with them. You want the doubters to join in, preventing that sort of behaviour might be a good start

Critical Mass is all about people who enjoy cycling in London meeting up once a moth to enjoy riding in a group of other like-minded individuals.

So why not meet up and then ride off in several smaller groups? You still get your rides, no-one else is inconvenienced, everyone's happy. No?

The reaction on here of people so willing to denigrate protestors is quite alarming but not suprising, we have a state that attacks all the weakest in society, rewards the rich and protects their own interests at all costs, so any group going against the grain is going to be demonised.

in germany in the late thirties very similar things happened, attacks on minority groups, eventually 'ordinary' people found themselves doing some very extrodinary things--- only obeying orders !

Before the wolf pack round on me, i'm not saying this is what will happen just showing how easy it is to be swept along on a reactionary tide, and whether willingly or not you are doing the masters work for them.

Good luck mikeconnor, i feel that your words are wasted on here, i've had similar on other sites, internet does attract a specific kind of reactionary, who is good with a keyboard but not much else.

The police do not have the legal power to demand people avoid certain areas unless it is to prevent breach of the peace, or for safety reasons

If this was a friendly monthly ride, which is normally ridden in cooperation with the Police, you do as Police ask. End of!

Let's look for positives, not dwell always on the negatives.

I'm sorry Mike. I started out with no particular feeling about CM before Friday's events, however if you think the disingenuous self-serving twaddle you are using to justify those events is helping people 'understand' CM I fear you are sadly mistaken. The arguments you've put here are just counter-productive as far as I can see.

in germany in the late thirties very similar things happened, attacks on minority groups, eventually 'ordinary' people found themselves doing some very extrodinary things--- only obeying orders !

So far I've not seen anyone come up with any ideas of how to promote cycling in our cities, more effectively. Just a lot of moaning and prejudice. Maybe it would be more productive to seek solutions, than continue to be negative.

And who created the most negative press for cyclists this week? A thread on STW or Counter-productive Muppets?

So if anybody disagrees with the press officer's view of CM,then we are prejudiced? It's like this you patronising idiot; It is cyclists who use this forum. You may have chosen to ignore the fact, but when even other bike users condemn your tactics,it is a sign you are getting it badly wrong. I also like the way you try to justify blocking junctions,especially in the manner you do. Stopping dead for five mins is a little more than crossing. Actually that is reason for the police to act; public safety.Despite your attempts to dismiss it as a monthly ride,it was a deliberate attempt to disrupt as much of the opening ceremony as possible, as shown by the farcical claims about Beckham.

Maybe go and look at the footage posted above of the actions of your members...tell you what, lets be specific; what is your opinion of the guy kicking the legs away from the female cop,is that justifed? Or the rather sprightly disabled man,are his actions justified? Please enlighten me.
It's like this, if you cause an obstruction, you will be moved on; if you refuse to move you may be detained, if you resist, you WILL be detained. Of course you will feel that you were not causing an obstruction,just ensuring you could stay together.

Couple of other Q's; What is a non organised,loose group of cyclists doing going to the house of lords to get their status defined? That sound very, well organised to me. And why do you seem strangely reluctant to comment on any footage that shows you assaulting police,blocking junctions aggressively?

Junkyard; thanks for that comment the other night,hopefully a corner turned.

imnotverygood +1 to both posts

rudebwoy - stretching the "elastic" of the argument that far is likely to lead to either a painful snap back or a total breakdown. Not very likely to help the cause of cyclists though.

i've had similar on other sites, internet does attract a specific kind of reactionary, who is good with a keyboard but not much else.

Thank God we have you to do it for us then.

Good luck mikeconnor, i feel that your words are wasted on here, i've had similar on other sites, internet does attract a specific kind of reactionary, who is good with a keyboard but not much else.

Thank you rudebwoy. (I've learned how to use the quote function!) As i said it's been frustrating at times and I apologise if anyone feels I've been rude to them, it's easy to get a bit carried away on a topic you feel strongly about!

I still feel there's too much judgmental prejudice going on, and people expressing their own individual views as that of greater society's, and I would like to try to help people see an alternative view of things. I can appreciate that many people will have a negative view of CM, but it does seem apparent that some really have very little idea about what CM rides and participants are really like. I do feel it's important to discuss such matters openly and honestly though, and i thank those who have contributed in such a way. Some interesting points of view to consider.

So what.
The Police stated restrictions, due to whatever, could be Olympics, could be to avoid too much traffic build up, could be for saftey, could be anything. So what if they have no legal power to impose that restriction?

Well it's vital that we all strive to uphold the Law. the police, like everyone else, have to act within a legal framework. They do not have special dispensation to act as they please, no matter what the circumstances. Their powers exist through consensus of the people. They cannot simply choose which groups to target and obstruct. If they have legitimate, legally justifiable reasons to act in the manner that they did, fine. It does not at present appear to be the case here though. Which is very worrying in the context of a supposedly free and democratic society.

CM (now) is not one of them in the general public eye.

I disagree, as one of the 'general public'. What qualifies you to speak for others? I'm sorry, but that view is simply your own, and whilst it may be shared by others, it is not universal and does not in any way constitute a consensus of opinion. Please do not try to present it as such, and please accept that others have differing yet equally valid opinions.

Shall we hold a poll?

I'm figuring the arrested were nicked for wilful obstruction of the highway yes?

That's what I see from that YouTube footage anyways. You serve just to inconvenience the other road users by deliberately blocking busy junctions, under the thin veil of a harmless group cycle ride. Utter rubbish

mikeconnor - Member
... and please accept that others have differing yet equally valid opinions.

Quite and very apt, if ironic! 😉

So perhaps time for thread closure. This roundabout has been circled enough - time to unblock for the other traffic?

Mike, now that you're one of us, you need to become something other than a single issue poster. There are many, many other favourite subjects that will crop up with depressing regularity, 26ers vs 29ers, helmet or no helmet, atheism vs usually Christianity, atheism vs mrsbarnsleymitches chest, tubeless vs tubes, roadies vs mountain bikers, trail centres vs natural trails, rotating weight vs weight, electrolytes for cramp or not, the Olympics; farce or wonder, North vs South, Should I talk to people on the tube?, Why won't people stop talking to me on buses in Manchester, Scotland vs the world, the World vs Scotland, Arsenal, Man U, Spain; footballing geniuses or tedium encapsulated, What do you put in your Camelbak, space blankets as a seduction aid, horas penis, horas beautiful penis, hora and his penis adventures, not to mention the ever popular although somewhat seasonal What lights? threads.

Leave this now and raise your game laddie!

Duckman; it seems you have deeply entrenched views about the events of last Friday, which I suspect you will not be willing to have challenged. You resent being accused of being 'prejudiced' yet you use accusatory, inflammatory and prejudicial language in relation to participants of CM. Were you at the event on Friday? Did you witness all that happened both at Blackfriars road and at Bow Church? As I've said, accounts I have heard from eyewitnesses differ in their viewpoint to your own. How can you support your claim that those at Bow Church were definitely there with the sole intention of disrupting the Olympics? Do you have evidence to support such a wild accusation, or is such vitriol a result of your own prejudice?

Shall we hold a poll?

That would be interesting, if we could get those who attended the event themselves, to take part. I wonder what the general tone would be like if both 'sides' were represented equally?

If the police ask me not to go on a certain "right of way"... I comply. I find a different way.

I don't start using my wiki lawyer skills to determine if that request is legally valid, or because there's no police cordon that street still remains legal right of way. Nor do I start working out if the number of people in my group constitutes a "gathering" for the purposes of determining a protest group/march in central London.

I/we just go another way. Maybe other cyclists are different.

Well it's vital that we all strive to uphold the Law. the police, like everyone else, have to act within a legal framework. They do not have special dispensation to act as they please,

like [s]protesters[/s] celebrationists riding through red lights and obstructing the highway?

no matter what the circumstances. Their powers exist through consensus of the people. They cannot simply choose which groups to target and obstruct.

Like choosing not to target and punish people who run through red lights, or for that matter assault police officers in the execution of their duty.

If they have legitimate, legally justifiable reasons to act in the manner that they did, fine. It does not at present appear to be the case here though. Which is very worrying in the context of a supposedly free and democratic society.

Indeed, I fully support the right of people to peacefully protest... the only problem being that you claim its not a protest 😉

I'm figuring the arrested were nicked for wilful obstruction of the highway yes?

Well none have been charged as such, so I've no idea why they were arrested.

Mike, now that you're one of us, you need to become something other than a single issue poster.

I'm sorry! I have been reading this forum for a while, and it is at times very interesting, although quite confrontational in it's tone I feel. And I've been sucked in! I do feel passionately about issues surrounding cycling in London and everywhere else though, which is why I've signed up.

I will endeavour to discuss bikes more in the future, I promise!

Well none have been charged as such, so I've no idea why they were arrested.

Arrested to prevent a breach of the peace, which is a perfectly legitimate, legally justifiable reason for the police to act as they did, and no, they don't have to charge anyone with a criminal offence afterwards - I would suggest that if you want to get all technical on it, you'll be in for a nasty surprise on just how expansive that common law power of arrest is 8)

See below for a perfect example.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-15697632

So, its OK for the police to arrest 179 EDL members to prevent a breach of the peace, and only charge three of them is it?

I guess Critical Mass aren't going to jump up and tell us how arresting EDL members is equivalent to living in a police state and a suppression of their human rights?

That would be interesting, if we could get those who attended the event themselves, to take part. I wonder what the general tone would be like if both 'sides' were represented equally?

Yes, but you have been glibly talking about the [i]General Public's[/i] view of CM.

So to make it fair. You get the 500 people who attended the Critical Mass 'celebration' & I'll rustle up the other 56 million members of the population.

Arrested to prevent a breach of the peace, which is a perfectly legitimate, legally justifiable reason for the police to act as they did, and no, they don't have to charge anyone with a criminal offence afterwards

Did the police have 'reasonable suspicion' that a breach of the peace was indeed going to take place? Because CM is almost always peaceful with no arrests and without any breach of the peace occurring. Did the police have any other information to suggest this? Because in order for a police officer to arrest somebody, 'reasonable suspicion' must be justified. I have not seen or heard anything so far which supports this. Then there are numerous allegations that people were denied food and water, adequate toilet facilities, and access to legal representation.

CM participants are nothing like the EDL, and do not have any comparable history of causing public disorder. You would know this, if you ever participated in a CM ride of course.

So to make it fair. You get the 500 people who attended the Critical Mass 'celebration' & I'll rustle up the other 56 million members of the population.

As long as all information is made available to everyone without prejudice, I have no problem with that!

If the police ask me not to go on a certain "right of way"... I comply. I find a different way.

I do if I am given a legitimate and legally justifiable reason for the officer's request. Other wise I ignore (and have done so on numerous occasions) the request. I would do so safe in the knowledge i am breaking no law.

I do think it's very important that people fully understand the extent and limitations of police powers as well as their own legal obligations. Because if everyone did so, there would be less confusion on both sides, and less cause for conflict.

Mike >

Critical Mass is all about people who enjoy cycling in London meeting up once a moth to enjoy riding in a group of other like-minded individuals.