Forum search & shortcuts

Photography Q - Fla...
 

[Closed] Photography Q - Flashguns

Posts: 19914
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#313535]

I need a flashgun for my Canon 400D, and looking online at new ones, well, they ain't cheap.

So I'm thinking of a used one, and ebay chucks up a few below £100 (I can't afford any more, so don't even suggest it, OK?!)

Sigma EF500
Canon 540EZ,(Possibly) 420EZ, 430EZ (Last 2 can be bought for £50-£60)

Those are the main ones.
I just can't afford £100+ but what do I need to know. I know pretty much nothing about flashguns. Would the cheap Canons do the job and work properly with my 400D?
Aything else I should know or look at?

Ta muchly
🙂


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 3:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

older flashes used a higher trigger voltage that could fry a newer camera, check their compatibility

Flashes do degrade with use so beware of buying one that has been well used. i'd have thought you could get a Centon or Jessops own brand for sub £100 that'd be better than risking s/h

i used a Centon one on my nikon 35mm for years and it was great


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 3:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 nbt
Posts: 12490
Full Member
 

The EZ range aren't e-ttl compatible, so avoid them - you have to use them in manual mode, so you;re as well buying something completely manual for less money. YOu might pick up a 420 eX for around that price, one went on here for under a ton the other day


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 3:53 pm
 cp
Posts: 8970
Full Member
 

look out for the Nissin Di-622 - new for less than 100 quid. Check jacobs, warehouseexpress, 7dayshop


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 3:53 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Hmm. Just found out the 420 isn't compatible with digital cameras....


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 3:54 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
Topic starter
 

So EZ isn't digital, whilst EX is, yes?


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 3:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

None of the EZ range is compatible with Canon DSLRs unfortunately. Anything suffixed EX is fine though.

I'd look at a 2nd hand 420EX or the Sigmas if it were me.


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 3:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That's the bloody trouble with dijical; you've got to get specific dedicated bits, as older stuff dun't work.

Peter; you'll need a decent one, it's not worth getting a cheapo ime. Sigma guns are pretty good, actually, and a lot cheaper than Canon's own ones.

Jessops own ones are ok, too, and good value for money.

[url= http://www.jessops.com/online.store/categories/Accessories/Flash/Flashguns/products/Jessops/360AFD%20Digital%20Flashgun%20for%20Canon%20-67557/Show.html ]Jessops 360 AFD[/url]

something like that will give you a lot of flexibility, and is pretty powerful. Might not give you all the fancy Canon features, mind.

I'd avoid s/h personally, unless I can hold it and try it out.


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 3:56 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Apparently the Nissin flash takes 4 seconds to recycle?

Is that for one flash, or do you get 2-3 before recycling?


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 3:58 pm
Posts: 2350
Free Member
 

That's the bloody trouble with dijical; you've got to get specific dedicated bits, as older stuff dun't work.

No that's called progress.


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 3:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

that'll between full power releases


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 3:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No that's called progress.

Is it bollocks. It's called 'let's squeeze as much money as we can, from our gullible customers'.

I have a Nikon SB-24, and SB-28. Neither are fully compatible with Nikon's dijical cams, as far as I can understand. Won't allow TTL flash control. Why not? Both are superb bits of kit, and work brilliantly with my 801s, FM2 and F5.

I'll tell you why; so's I'd have to splash out £300+ on a completely new gun, which would be virtually the same, xept for the dijical compatibility. S'just to get more money out of people. I don't call that progress, I call it skanking.

****ing rip-off...


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 4:04 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
Topic starter
 

There's a few of those Sigmas about. The Canon EXs seem to fetch big money, even used....


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 4:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i tried to use my modern Nikon SB800 on this the other day, bloody thing wouldn't work. damn those capitalist barstuards

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 4:06 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Oi! Chill! No arguing in MY thread!

😉


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 4:06 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
Topic starter
 

that'll between full power releases

Is that to be expected? I was hoping a proper flash gun would be a bit quicker than the onboard flash, which will do 2-4 before I have to pause, which is a pain when there's 10 riders coming though and I can only take 5 flash shots.....


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 4:10 pm
Posts: 2350
Free Member
 

Is it bollocks. It's called 'let's squeeze as much money as we can, from our gullible customers'.

Sorry I don't recall any flashes from back in the day that use i-TTL, which for modern camera users offers automated lighting for most situations. I could go on and list a whole other heap of features that modern flashguns offer over old guns.

That isn't to say that all old guns are rubbish, they aren't, but they are certainly not as versatile.


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 4:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

my (formerly) top of the range nikon gun takes 2.7 sec at full power with an extra AA battery attached to the side

you won't get a lot quicker without an external power supply. you can fix the flash power lower in manual mode to get quicker

in reality you'll get a few shots off before it stops all together, usually i'll get 1 or 2 shots off exposed normally and then a couple under exposed


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 4:13 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
Topic starter
 

MrM - OK, fairy nuff, thanks for the info


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 4:16 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I'm beginning to think I might be better with one of those old-style disposable flash cubes that fitted into the top of the camera!
😉


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 4:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm not objecting to them making new guns, with new features; I'm objecting to companies like Nikon making their new cams only compatible with a whole new range of flash equipment. No reason for this. They could easily have made the cams compatible with older guns.

It's a conspiracy, and I think Dame Edna is behind it...

[img] [/img]

I mean, look at that face. Consomethinge evil.


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 4:17 pm
Posts: 2350
Free Member
 

I'm objecting to companies like Nikon making their new cams only compatible with a whole new range of flash equipment. No reason for this.

You mean like shimano/campag/sram making 9 speed groupsets that only work with 9 speed components, not 8,7 or 6...........


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 4:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No, ittud be more like making a new, slightly lighter 9 speed system, with improved shifters or something, and preventing compatibility with other 9 speed stuff. Or making a new XTR crankset, still 9 speed, but with a completely different ring BCD pattern...

Basically, leaving perfectly good, functioning (and bloody spensive) kit, redundant.

At least they kept the F-mount. So I could use my old AI lenses on a D3. Good stuff.

Oi! Chill! No arguing in MY thread!

Sorry, PP; has to be done.

Still, look on the bright side; could turn into a 300+ post thread, with people having blazing rows about politics, war, education or Jade Goody.

Which woodunt really help you with your question, would it? 🙁


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 4:33 pm
Posts: 357
Free Member
 

ive got a 420ex somewhere in the classifieds if thats any use?


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 4:35 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Sorry, PP; has to be done.

No. It doesn't.
Did you do well in your exams at school? The first thing we were taught was READ AND UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION BEFORE ANSWERING, and I don't remembering asking about what you're arging about. So sod off. Sling yer hook. Take a hike.

😉


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 4:38 pm
Posts: 2350
Free Member
 

Coming back to the OP.

I'd look at an off camera flash set up where you could use eg Vivitar 285hv and a phottix radio remote trigger. Which would allow a more creative use of the flash light.

You should get that lot for under £100 on that auction site.


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 4:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i'd just be glad sfb isn't around today


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 4:38 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Sod this. I'm just going to stick to taking photos in sunlight. It's cheaper and it looks nicer.

See?
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 4:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Did you do well in your exams at school? The first thing we were taught was READ AND UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION BEFORE ANSWERING, and I don't remembering asking about what you're arging about. So sod off. Sling yer hook. Take a hike.

(Runs off sobbing)
😥


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 4:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

ah but now you need a grad ND filter to stop those clouds blowing out

it's a never ending story i tell thee. nice pic


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 4:41 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Coming back to the OP.

I'd look at an off camera flash set up where you could use eg Vivitar 285hv and a phottix radio remote trigger. Which would allow a more creative use of the flash light.

You should get that lot for under £100 on that auction site

Thank you. That's good advice because that was going to be my next question (Remotes)


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 4:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Go secondhand - but buy from a dealer like ffordes.co.uk or mxv.co.uk that offers a guarantee.


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 4:45 pm
Posts: 2350
Free Member
 

Off camera flash

[url= http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3508/3207715652_af42db1b01_o.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3508/3207715652_af42db1b01_o.jp g"/> [/img][/url]


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 4:45 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I took that pic with my old Canon 4mp compact.......


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 4:45 pm
Posts: 2350
Free Member
 

I took that pic with my old Canon 4mp compact.......

Nice shot. The sky is a bit blown though.


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 4:51 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Sorry, what's a 'blown sky'?


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 4:52 pm
Posts: 2350
Free Member
 

Blown = Overexposed


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 4:53 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
Topic starter
 

OK, cool. I thought so.
How do you avoid that? Polorising filter?


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The benefit of going for a Canon 430EX or a 430EX II will mean much faster recycling times. Try seconmd hand through places like MXV as has been suggested or maybe save for a few months? I wouldnt buy second hand off ebay. You never know what they are going to be like.

The Jessops 360AFD isnt bad, Ive used them and they can be wirelessly linked to a Canon master flash like a 580EX or 580EX II. They have a lower flash power rating than the Canon 430EX and are not as fast at recycling but for the money they are a good bet. The E-TTL compatiblity is a good feature, and they have a wide angle diffuser built in (might have a catchlight as well)


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 5:07 pm
Posts: 2350
Free Member
 

You could use a graduated filter on the lens.

Or take two shots, one exposed for the sky, and one for the landscape and merge the two.


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 5:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

(Plays happily, with a lump of Plasticine, in the corner)


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 6:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

stop eating that plasticine, other people have to pay with it too


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 6:03 pm
Posts: 2350
Free Member
 

[img] ?v=0[/img]


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 6:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

anyone had any experience of sigma flashguns?

they seem pretty good value too....


 
Posted : 17/02/2009 7:33 pm
Page 1 / 2