Oakleys - worth the...
 

[Closed] Oakleys - worth the money.....

58 Posts
45 Users
0 Reactions
442 Views
Posts: 14342
Full Member
Topic starter
 

....or overpriced form over function?

Fancying a pair - I'll not say which pair, as to avoid a barrage of abuse and they would be more for fashion than sporting activities, so you might ask why I'm bothered about function - still want them to justify the cost from a quality/comfort/optical perspective.


 
Posted : 22/05/2013 9:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Nicest sunglasses I've ever had on my face. And the only ones that don't seem to cause me to have headaches.

Happier now 😉


 
Posted : 22/05/2013 10:00 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Yes.


 
Posted : 22/05/2013 10:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Had a similar dilemma recently over some evil eye pros, glad I got them now though best glasses I've had


 
Posted : 22/05/2013 10:01 pm
Posts: 1747
Free Member
 

If my Radars went missing I'd buy another set.


 
Posted : 22/05/2013 10:02 pm
Posts: 1617
Free Member
 

If anything I think Oakleys are cheaper now than 10 yeas ago.

Just got my first new pair in about 10 years (Gascan S with bronze polarised lenses) for £61 new and am very happy with them. Fantastic optics.


 
Posted : 22/05/2013 10:02 pm
Posts: 14342
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Quick positive responses already, so I presume there will be more....

...but to add to the question - are the polarized lenses worth the premium?


 
Posted : 22/05/2013 10:03 pm
Posts: 91104
Free Member
 

I've tried loads, I do every time I need new ones. I've not found anything as good.

Except for perhaps Tifosi. My Mrs has some biking style ones. Now personally I don't think they look anywhere near as good, but the photochromic lenses have better range than my Oakleys, they change quicker AND they work in the car, mostly. All for only US$60.


 
Posted : 22/05/2013 10:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

yes and yes


 
Posted : 22/05/2013 10:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yup. Love mine. Even better value if you go for Polarized.


 
Posted : 22/05/2013 10:12 pm
Posts: 10418
Full Member
 

I have three pairs atm, and had another but lost them, my first pair as well I nearly cried!!

I can see why people might think they are over priced, but the fit is fantastic and there's zero distortion. Life would be wrong without a pair.


 
Posted : 22/05/2013 10:12 pm
Posts: 1617
Free Member
 

my new ones are polarized. Definitely worth it.

edit: sorry, [b]polarised[/b]


 
Posted : 22/05/2013 10:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I use a pair of polarised Oakley Garage Rocks in the car. Remove any reflections on the windscreen, are a delight to wear for long periods and have great lenses.

Rachel


 
Posted : 22/05/2013 10:18 pm
Posts: 813
Full Member
 

my last custom pair I got for nowt, best glasses I never bought.


 
Posted : 22/05/2013 10:19 pm
Posts: 14342
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Hmmm, a custom pair I'd like - but £185 for my configuration is pushing it a bit!


 
Posted : 22/05/2013 10:20 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

Polarised are great for driving but a bit of overkill for cycling (IMO). However, they do mess with the display on my car stereo!!


 
Posted : 22/05/2013 10:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've got two pairs of V1Frogskins that I bought in Innsbruck in 1988 and they are still going strong. And they were getting 25 weeks use a year on snow (and all summer too) up until 1997 when I bought a pair of Fives which I am still wearing now after 16 years 😀
Every day use/mountain biking/skiing/walking/driving etc.

So I would say they are well worth the money yes.

I've had stuff like RayBans etc that break/bend/scratch just from wearing them to the pub in summer, but the Oakleys can take a lot of abuse without any issues.


 
Posted : 22/05/2013 10:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Whoops! Sorry I knew that. My phone autocorrects too that.


 
Posted : 22/05/2013 10:37 pm
Posts: 4743
Free Member
 

Ive got a genuine polarised pair, and a pair of the fakelys. I don't think the real ones are any better to be honest, and cos they are polarised they make some displays difficult to read.
I was really surprised just how good the fakes are, when I trod on them they fell into pieces, but it all just clipped back together, unmarked.


 
Posted : 22/05/2013 10:39 pm
Posts: 43615
Full Member
 

Mine are prescription with transition lenses. Expensive? Hell yes. But I reckon the best £ for £ improvement I've ever made to my cycling. My original Half Jacket XLJs must be 4 years old now and still going strong. I just bought a set of Windjackets too....


 
Posted : 22/05/2013 10:42 pm
Posts: 20776
 

2 genuines and one fake pair here. The genuines are ace, the fakes are good too as the genuine lenses fit 🙂

Not sure I'd consider another brand tbh...


 
Posted : 22/05/2013 10:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I find that since I've started wearing Oakleys, I've never permanently lost a pair. I used to leave cheap sunnies all over the place and was constantly having to replace them.

Spending £120 - £180 focuses the mind somewhat. Same with Clippa lighters and a nice Zippo - never left a Zippo down the pub 🙂


 
Posted : 22/05/2013 10:50 pm
Posts: 91104
Free Member
 

Spending £120 - £180 focuses the mind somewhat.

It might focus YOUR mind but it does nothing for my wife's 😡


 
Posted : 22/05/2013 10:53 pm
Posts: 14342
Full Member
Topic starter
 

I've lost plenty of zippos!


 
Posted : 22/05/2013 10:56 pm
Posts: 4743
Free Member
 

I lost a zippo- the first present my Mrs ever gave me 🙁


 
Posted : 22/05/2013 11:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The cost does focus the mind, but none of mine were particularly expensive. most expensive ones were £75 i think?

I've still got a few zippo's from when I used to smoke. People never "borrowed" them, they had there cigarette lit for them and it went back where it belonged 😀


 
Posted : 22/05/2013 11:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I lost a pair of polarised Hatchets for six months. Eventually I resigned myself to never seeing them again and bought a pair of polarised Straight Jackets. The very day the new ones arrived - the VERY DAY - I found the old pair in the pocket of a dressing gown I hadn't worn for six months.

The wife still has the Hatchets four years later 🙂


 
Posted : 22/05/2013 11:24 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I used a pair of polarised oakleys in the car and they make the working day much more bearable.

Not too sure which model without nipping out to the car, but they are not cycling style.

They make things more high definition for want of a better phrase, and I even keep them on when its dull weather as they make everything so much clearer ( and I've perfect eyesight been tested before anyone asks 😉

I agree with the earlier post about them playing havoc with displays on stereo and phone etc because at first I thought my phone was broke till I took the oakleys off !!!

Got some Fakeleys for the bike and they are not too different in vision on the polarised lenses but the genuine ones do have a bit clearer vision but only slightly.


 
Posted : 22/05/2013 11:39 pm
Posts: 466
Full Member
 

Just to throw an alternative opinion into the mix....

I have been a massive fan of Oakley over the years, M-Frames, Radars, Half-jackets, Minutes, Racing Jackets (plus several others) and at least 3 pairs of snowboarding goggles. The M-frames I also use as safety glasses, but what has annoyed me about them is the lenses delaminating after a few years, like a coating on the inner surface coming off. Considering you pay ~£50 for a replacement lens, I would expect them to last pretty well.

I have therefore started getting replicas from eBay for ~£25 for a frame + 5 lenses including polarised (Radar) which are indistinguishable from the real thing, and aren't an issue if you scratch them. At that price they can almost be treated as disposable.

I know the lenses won't be as good as the genuine article, but from a value POV I can't fault them.

Cheers, Rich


 
Posted : 23/05/2013 5:07 am
 igm
Posts: 11844
Full Member
 

The Fakleys route looks interesting - and my Oakleys use goes back to E-wires.

The Jawbones can be had for £15-20. You could fit genuine lenses if you wanted the "better" lens and you'd still be a third the cost of the full price option.


 
Posted : 23/05/2013 6:46 am
Posts: 3834
Free Member
 

Oakleys are massivly overpriced for what they are - but - they are easily the best sunglasses I've ever worn (and I wear them every day out here).


 
Posted : 23/05/2013 7:14 am
Posts: 646
Full Member
 

Oakley's for riding

Maui Jim's for poncing about.


 
Posted : 23/05/2013 7:20 am
Posts: 690
Free Member
 

IF you want a good pair of sunnies:

http://www.mauijim.com/


 
Posted : 23/05/2013 7:27 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Can't comment on the polarised lenses but in this house we have 2 pairs of original straight jackets, a pair of original five's, 1 pair of splice, 1 pair of half jacket XLJ, 1pair of square wire titanium, 1 pair of original half jackets.
For us Oakley sunglasses have been good the coatings on the lenses do peel though if your a sweaty person .Have a look at places like polimil.co.uk if you aren't swayed by fancy lens and frame colours. I bought most of the families sunnies in sales so never paid full whack for any of them but would pay as I like the fit and optical clarity ( they generally look pretty cool too)


 
Posted : 23/05/2013 7:28 am
Posts: 6926
Free Member
 

Got 2 pairs:
Radar for on the bike (relatively cheap to replace if I kill them)
X-Squared polarised for everything else (very expensive and I don't want to kill them in any way shape or form)
The optics are fantastic but polarised really are the mutts..


 
Posted : 23/05/2013 8:17 am
Posts: 39519
Free Member
 

ive got minutes and jawbones.

my seeing specs need replacing - im going to go for oakleys for them too now as a glasses wearer ive yet to try any as comfortable as any oakleys ive put on my face.


 
Posted : 23/05/2013 8:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have a pair of SPLICE that I bought back in 2000.
Wear mine pretty much daily.
Wouldn't even consider another brand as the fit is perfect for me (fat head)


 
Posted : 23/05/2013 8:26 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

From a purely optical point of view, if you are thinking of oakley money check out Maui Jim's, optically far superior for similar money


 
Posted : 23/05/2013 8:59 am
Posts: 15
Free Member
 

i have a pair of half jackets i bought at least 15 years ago the optics are great and the lens has saved my eye in a crash where the same bit of rock as scratched my lens took a chunk out of my cheak bone.

The customer service is excellent the leg socks have worn out a couple of times and i have lost nose rubber bits Oakley have always just sent spares through the post after a phone call . They are worn daily and have outlived a number of quality "smart" sun glases i have bought for non casual wear .


 
Posted : 23/05/2013 9:03 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have some I bought for wearing off the bike. Frankly tho they are too expensive to risk scratching, leaving on the roof of the car, on the ground etc so I have cheaper glasses for riding.


 
Posted : 23/05/2013 9:23 am
Posts: 39519
Free Member
 

my oakleys lenses seem to wear very well ... mines get used daily and hardly have a mark on them.


 
Posted : 23/05/2013 9:40 am
 LoCo
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yes


 
Posted : 23/05/2013 9:43 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

As always, on the graph of price vs function, there is the law of diminishing returns. Despite being near the top of the price range, I think they are worth the money.

The frame designs are good/pretty, but it's the optics, especially to quality of the prescription optics, that sells them for me.


 
Posted : 23/05/2013 9:45 am
Posts: 11381
Free Member
 

I have approx 40 pairs, so of course I'm going to say yes


 
Posted : 23/05/2013 9:55 am
Posts: 5938
Free Member
 

I have
A pair of Jaw bones, and a pair of race jackets for riding in

A pair of root beer frog skins for not riding in.

I like them all


 
Posted : 23/05/2013 9:56 am
Posts: 6382
Free Member
 

Have a pair of polarised plaintiffs for everyday use, but am I the only one who's head gets a bit done in when driving by all the pretty patterns the polarisation causes on car windows.

Don't understand How people manage to keep the lenses scratch free, all the pairs I use for cycling have picked up scuffs and scratches.


 
Posted : 23/05/2013 10:16 am
Posts: 39519
Free Member
 

i simply do not try and clean them when they are dirty with the bag.

see folk doing it all the time when they get muddy .... might as well be using a scouring pad on them.

rinse the mud off fully with water


 
Posted : 23/05/2013 10:20 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Have got a few pairs of Oakleys and generally I like 'em

But I think it's fair to say that although they are 'Oakleys' they are all different - some are quite a bit better than others and some are no better than equivalents from Rudy Project or Ray-Ban for example.

Personally I would not buy inexpensive Oakleys I think the competition in that segment is too fierce and you are essentially paying a premium for a fairly mundane pair of sunglasses with an 'O' on them.


 
Posted : 23/05/2013 10:30 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

Well, just for balance, I wouldn't be seen dead in Oakleys.
Too expensive, but mostly...

TOO COMMON.


 
Posted : 23/05/2013 10:32 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 23/05/2013 10:33 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Couple of years back I did an over the bars at Innerleithen and landed eye-first onto a pointy rock.

I was wearing some Oakley Minutes and all they had was a small scratch from the dead centre of the rim to the edge of the frame where the rock slid across. There was enough force in there to "pop" the skin on my nose open where the (rounded) frames dug in.

Scars on knees etc. I can deal with, but when it comes to eyes I would rather pay out for decent kit (from genuine sources).

I've still got those glasses, though after about 10 years of riding in all conditions the fire coating is coming off. I snapped the frames once in really cold weather and Oakley sent me some new ones for £7. I've now got some flak jackets with black polarised lenses, mostly for driving (you can't see sh1t in the woods with them on) and for making blue skies look cool. But I'll probably get some clears or grey lenses for biking (CRC were doing them for £40 and they just snap in).


 
Posted : 23/05/2013 10:34 am
Posts: 3192
Free Member
 

my girlfriend recently sat on her Oakleys - wire frames, completely an totally flattened - ready for the bin. We went to the Oakley store and told them exactly what happened.... 2 weeks later they were returned, 100% fixed, 100% free of charge.


 
Posted : 23/05/2013 11:19 am
Posts: 8685
Full Member
 

I have a couple of sets of Radars (I was too lazy to change the lens regularly :p ) and whilst I like them there's no way they're worth the money. The lenses are good but they're quite easily scratched, not as much as the £5 safety specs but I'm careful with mine (bagged all the time when not used) and they still have a fair few scratches on the various lenses.
I prefer my Rudy Project Rydons to for comfort but the greater lens covered of the Radar (whatever the deepest style lens option is) does work better most of the time.
I'd say Oakley Radars are worth £50, the other £100 you're paying is for the name and marketing budget.


 
Posted : 23/05/2013 11:41 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Got two pairs of jawbones for riding, some crosshairs for work, some frogskins for the pub, and some others that I keep in my car. Worth every penny and I wouldn't buy anything else. Snapped some m-frames last year, 8 years old, no receipt, Oakley sold me some new ones for £20. Brilliant customer service.

I've had 10 or 15 other pairs in the past and the thing with oakleys are, when you're bored of the ones you have, someone will buy them and you can get new ones. They're like currency!


 
Posted : 23/05/2013 11:45 am
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

Yes and despite the price they've worked out good value.

I'm still using M frames from the late 90s every day on the commute, yes they have newer lenses but that makes them good value for money.


 
Posted : 23/05/2013 11:49 am
Posts: 14342
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Great responses folks (was wondering how long until Houns showed up 😉 ).

So - next question. Anyone managed to pull off wearing white Batwolfs (with 00 Black polarised) without looking a right plonker?


 
Posted : 23/05/2013 12:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i've (still) got a ... 9? year old pair of prescription oakleys

(not tinted)

i even managed to drive over them once, and they're fine.


 
Posted : 23/05/2013 12:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

gibber - Member
Couple of years back I did an over the bars at Innerleithen and landed eye-first onto a pointy rock.

I was wearing some Oakley Minutes and all they had was a small scratch from the dead centre of the rim to the edge of the frame where the rock slid across.

This is why I wear Oakley eye protection on the bike. Off the bike I wear Police sunnies.


 
Posted : 25/05/2013 1:39 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've got some polarised ones and they're good. I can wear them all day and the lenses are excellent. I did try some cheaper non Oakley polarised and they gave me a sore head.


 
Posted : 25/05/2013 8:04 am