What did you eat yesterday?
So we found the level of Edukator's peer reviewed scientific arguments, I see.
To the OP: could be just transient illness hangover, as you said. There have been loads of illnesses this year. I also sometimes get bugs of some kind but don't really have symptoms until I try and exercise.
but don't really have symptoms until I try and exercise.
this could easily be it.
If Drac, a moderator with medical knowledge, thinks I'm trolling on this thread then I will make no further posts on it without any need for a warning or ban, just the words "I think you're trolling".
Back on topic: not eating enough during endurance exercise has also been linked to suppressing the immune system. Eating a moderate amount of carbs during exercise can help with weight loss it facilitates fat burning. Don't starve yourself when out on the bike even if you want to lose weight. Carbs, for example fruit, in the first half an hour after exercise will be used to replace glycogen stocks rather than go to fat meaning that effective training will be possible the next day.
Back on topic: not eating enough during endurance exercise has also been linked to suppressing the immune system.
This certainly tallies with my experience. This is why eat less move more can be problematic - if I move more I have to eat more. So it's a question of how I move and what and when I eat.
However I don't rate fruit for recovery after exercise. Peer reviewed scientific research suggests HIGH GI carbs immediately after exercise, and fruit is low.
He's not trolling he knows what he's talking about, the message is off tangent. I was reffering to the a calorie is a calorie for loosing weight and that you will loose weight but the results being different. So by saying an endurance athlete needs high carbs is exactly the same as what I'm saying. Feed your body for what you intend to use it for but keep the calories at a deficit if you want to loose weight.
Leaner than he'd be without it.
"This certainly tallies with my experience. This is why eat less move more can be problematic - if I move more I have to eat more. "
When did eating more become the issue ?
some people dont get the whole move more eat less thing. its not move more - eat less than if you were sedentary.
its move more and eat less than you would have given you moved that much.
if you eat less than you did sedentary and expect to exercise as well - of course your going to get ill.
Then there is also the initial period when you start to exercise where you will gain weight - you gain weight as you are gaining muscle to put up with the exercise. this muscle weighs more than fat. this weight works in your weight loss favour - the more muscle massyou have the more your body burns sat at your desk.
when it comes to weight loss there is still no substitute for the quantity of weight loss that comes from a balanced diet & general exercise. Anyone can lose weight by not eating but its not good quality weight loss , you'll be losing alot of muscle doing that.
Gotta feed the machine.
just be clear, I am not doing anything quickly.. Just trying to make a lifestyle change.
Good on you. I stopped exercise for 2-3 years, just couldnt be bothered with it, more important things in life.
WHen I started again I couldnt believe the pain, and the way my body reacted, and I was only about 1 stone over weight. I found it very frustrating that I could do very little and that I appeared to have zero exercise tolerence.
Im now 2 1/2 back in to getting fit and it has taken that long to feel moderately fit again (doesnt help now being 40).
My adivce would be take your time, do things slowly, could down on crap in your diet, but do not stop eating, do not stop eating stuff you enjoy. Over time fitness will return and weight loss will happen, but expect neither over night.
when it comes to weight loss there is still no substitute for the quantity of weight loss that comes from a balanced diet & general exercise.
I suspect this is not true, or at least not specific enough with terms like 'balanced diet' and 'general exercise'. There is definitely more than one way to skin this particular cat.
I don't know what the medical explanation for this is, but there is definitely a period of adjustment to new exercise during which the body protests, throwing up weird symptoms. I've had this with starting out cycling seriously, taking up running and most recently with swimming. The latter, after only a short swim I'd be ravenous, but now I can swim a fair distance without terrible hunger pangs and faintness afterwards.
This phenomenon seems to abate with reiterated training. I've found that tolerating some moderate feelings of hunger after a big run or ride leads to consistent weight loss. I also eat less on a big ride and don't eat at all during big runs, whereas I used to 'bonk' hard (tee hee) if I didn't eat consistently over distances. Body processes change as you put different demands on the body.
When it comes to weight loss, all I know is that I personally react well to prolonged exercise, and it's correlated with a decent ish diet, low sugar and avoidance of alcohol. Even a week of low volume training and high alcohol consumption and the pounds pile on and any long bouts of exercise feel horrible. But it's a shorter distance back to race weight than the prospect of being 3 stone over weight. I'd say I've shed about a stone per year of consistent exercise and alcohol awareness.
Can't claim to speak for anyone else though. And body builder diets - that's some dark science, don't go there!
see i suspect people that say things like that are fat and unfit and looking for an excuse to justify it.
Like what? You referring to me?
i was actually yes , generalising.
the post between popped up between me reading and me posting.
. Well that explains a lot..toys19 - Member
I'm about 4/5 stone overweight.
Every time I do some exercise, it makes me ill the next day, not too bad, but fluish aches and pains and cold like sneezing/runny nose.I have heard that your fat contains loads of toxins, and that when you lose weight your body processes those toxins and that makes you feel crap.
Is there any truth in this
this just sounds like an excuse not to exercise. A good session should make you feel sore/ache/possibly make you feel ill if you over do it but I doubt that in your case!
Twice a week I eat nothing all day until about 8pm never feel ill or tired for that matter no matter how much exercise I do, although I would assume there must be a limit. Fetching a load of shopping from a supermarket 12 miles from my house using a well filled trailer had no effect. I dropped 1.5 stone this way in 5 weeks. Never felt ill at anytime.
. Well that explains a lot.
What does it explain?
but I doubt that in your case!
What do you doubt? That I would over do it?
.alaslas - MemberEven a week of low volume training and high alcohol consumption and the pounds pile on and any long bouts of exercise feel horrible. But it's a shorter distance back to race weight than the prospect of being 3 stone over weight. I'd say I've shed about a stone per year of consistent exercise and alcohol awareness.
Can't agree with you reference alcohol consumption I find a 60 mile pub crawl on my bike still results in weight loss.
So what works for sd-253 must work for everyone, right?
see i suspect people that say things like that are fat and unfit and looking for an excuse to justify it.
Or, put another way - the people to whom it does not apply succeeded, and the ones to whom it does apply found it hard. The former group, not having encountered a problem, would not be aware of it.
They would then post on the internet denigrating people who have had the problem and deny its existence - based on their own experience.
exactly, or put another way, anecdotes don't make science.
.toys19 - Member
Dont worry boys, one day they will prove that being bigoted is not something you can choose to do, you just can't help it. So then us bigot baiters will be the bad guys.
Or put another way agree with toys R us or your a bigot. Bigot appears to be your word for the day...every day!!
I think people who are fat eat to much...opps that makes me a bigot or possibly Toy R us is a fan of censorship?
.molgrips - Member
So what works for sd-253 must work for everyone, right?
Hard work works for everyone wherever your talking about exercise or calorie control.
Yep. But not everyone needs to work hard.
Exactly what that hard work should entail to achieve your aims, thought - that is another question.
.molgrips - Member
Yep. But not everyone needs to work hard.Exactly what that hard work should entail to achieve your aims, thought - that is another question
How hard you work is directly related to how much you stuff your face assuming you are talking about keeping your weight under control. I am writing about calories not volume of food. ie a
100grms of salad leaves = 16 calories.
A kilo of salad leaves = 160 calories.
100grms of Olive oil = 900 calories
A kilo of Olive oil = 9000 calories
A 10 hour cycle ride at about 10 miles an hour burns on average 2500 calories.
Calories in calories out. It isn't hard....unless you want it to be
.molgrips - Member
Yep. But not everyone needs to work hard
?? Not sure what you mean by that? Does only eating 500 calories a day twice a week constitute working hard? Obviously eating vast amounts of calories will require you to do exceptional if not impossible amounts of exercise.
. CaptJon - Member
So you're saying energy into your body, not energy into your mouth?
What Captjon are you burbling about?
Not sure what you mean by that?
What I said earlier. Some people stay skinny whatever they do.
I'm a skinny whatever I do kinda guy. Practically lived out a kebab shop for 2 years and never hit 10st (5ft11) with a slightly active job but no other exercise.
Now I have a less active job but eat better and now exercise 4-5 times a week to put on weight and that is hard work.
Go figure...
A little aside here, the amount of calories you get out of two what appear to be exactly the same foods are not the same. The greater you process a food the easier it passes through your stomach walls and into your blood and so on. Or put another way the more calories you get out of it. We as in humans took processing food so as to get more calories Out of it. The start was cooking food which will give you more calories than eating anything raw. Porridge I believe is an example the more the oats are processed the more calories you get out of it. Those little packets of "oats so simple" are highly processed therefore you get more calories out than if you eat unprocessed oats. How much extra doesn't appear to be easily measurable.
mssansserif - Member
I'm a skinny whatever I do kinda guy. Practically lived out a kebab shop for 2 years and never hit 10st (5ft11) with a slightly active job but no other exercise.Now I have a less active job but eat better and now exercise 4-5 times a week to put on weight and that is hard work.
Go figure
God how many times have I heard that? You have never checked your calories used and eaten so how do you know? And slightly active job which lasts for 8 hours would burn more calories than a 1 hour hard workout. A recent programme had 2 friends they both insisted they eat the same amount of calories. They did not live together so how would they know? Science can now actually tell how much a person eats (via urine samples. Both women were lying blatantly the fat one (12"shorter than thin one) eat far more calories than thin one. The thin one was seriously underweight and lying about the calories she eat she seriously under estimated her calorie consumption. Until you actually do the maths I suggest you go figure!
.molgrips - Member
Not sure what you mean by that?
What I said earlier. Some people stay skinny whatever they do.
So someone who eats 2500 calories a day and then increases his calorie consumption to 5000 calories a day BUT does not increase the amount of calories they use WILL NOT PUT ON WEIGHT?
Some people would yes. And also depends on the nature of those calories. This has been proven beyond all doubt. Search for the guy who ate 5000 calories a day.
Is it time to pose the veg vs butterscotch yumyums diet question again toys? 🙂
.molgrips - Member
This has been proven beyond all doubt
I have heard it all now! The only thing that has been proved beyond any doubt is eating more than you need makes you fat.
SD 253 I see that for some reason this is a sore subject? Very touchy about it?
I'm just telling you my personal experience. There is no doubt in my mind that I can eat more and do less and stay skinny than other people I know/work with.
I have eaten crap and not exercised with a semi active job
I have eaten crap and not exercised with a desk job
And eaten well and exercised with a desk job
All 3 scenarios resulted in being pretty damn skinny. If anything the eating well and exercise is letting me put on weight (muscle). I've never been anything close to overweight and I have been very unfit in the past.
Just seem the double the calories argument. Try and keep it reasonable 😉 2500 to 3000 would that mean you put on weight until you were 20st? What about 2500 to 2000 would you slowly waste away to nothing?
deadlydarcy - Member
Is it time to pose the veg vs butterscotch yumyums diet question again toys?
100grms of salad leaves = 16 calories.
A kilo of salad leaves = 160 calories.
100grms of Olive oil = 900 calories
A kilo of Olive oil = 9000 calories
Veg vs butterscotch yumyums
The doubling the calorie statement was a counter to
don't be pathetic.molgrips - Member
What I said earlier. Some people stay skinny whatever they do.
if you eat 500 calories more than you need then you will put on weight until you reach a plateau same with eating 500 calories less.AGAINJust seem the double the calories argument. Try and keep it reasonable 2500 to 3000 would that mean you put on weight until you were 20st? What about 2500 to 2000 would you slowly waste away to nothing?
pity you can't see statements like that..molgrips - Member
Some people stay skinny whatever they do.
Yes I abhore pathetic excuses. Can you think of another reason? As you are clearly implying you can. Again you actually have to prove your view NOT to me but yourself by doing the maths actually checking. Sorry it is my nature to want to see proof to actually do the maths. I do not assume anything. That's me.I see that for some reason this is a sore subject? Very touchy about it?
How are the calories of food calculated SD?
(Google will help you here. Not that you'd be the type of person to jump in with an ill-informed opinion before checking the facts.)
Some people are what I call "what else can it be people" A mate said I feel weak all the time, I am in pain all the time. It must be the Statins the doctors put me on 2 months ago. I questioned this "what else can it be" he went to the doctor long story short needed major spinal operation. Toy r us and molgrips are "what else can it be" type of people. Got it mssansserif
.deadlydarcy - Member
How are the calories of food calculated SD?(Google will help you here. Not that you'd be the type of person to jump in with an ill-informed opinion before checking the facts.)
What have I said that you disagree with?
Oh get a grip 😉 this is the internet don't get so worked up.
Anyways back to the almost rational and civil discussion. You talk about plateauing at a weight for certain calorie intake? Can we agree that this will be a calorie intake with a range for a certain weight? And this will be different from person to person?
Therefore I can say eat 2500 calories and be on the skinny end of skinny and someone else can eat 2500 calories and be on the tubby side of tubby? Assuming the same exercise level.
So 2500 is an average amount of calories so "normal" meals mean I stay skinny but the same meals could make someone gain weight.
That's the point we are talking about here. Clearly if I eat 10000 calories I'm going to put on weight it it's not really going to be an accident it will take effort to eat that much....
What else can it be? According to you it can't be anything else it's just what your opinion 😉
SD-253 - Member100grms of salad leaves = 16 calories.
A kilo of salad leaves = 160 calories.
100grms of Olive oil = 900 calories
A kilo of Olive oil = 9000 calories
100g of olive oil = 900 calories into your mouth, but may only be 630 calories into your body according to this: http://www.zoeharcombe.com/the-knowledge/energy-in-does-not-equal-energy-out/
By the same author this is interesting: [url= http://www.zoeharcombe.com/the-knowledge/eating-less-will-not-make-us-weigh-less/ ]Eating less will not make us weigh less[/url]
What other factors have an influence on calories burnt beside moving around?
muscle mass?
basal metabolic rate?
temperature of your house/workplace?
how much you use your brain?
illnesses?
CaptJon - Member
SD-253 - Member
I don't agree with the figure as its to low but clearly fat is harder for your body to Absorb as I have already stated/implied with the more a food is processed the easier it is absorbed and therefore the more calories you get. Try eating the same 900 calories of unprocessed olives?100g of olive oil = 900 calories into your mouth, but may only be 630 calories into your body according
to this: http://www.zoeharcombe.com/the-knowledge/energy-in-does-not-equal-energy-out/ <
As I said but not well put. It should read energy in does not equal energy absorbed. Also the food eat with it increase/decrease absorption.
why? you eat less calories you will weigh less. The variation is at the margins. You are merely making excuses for people you are not doing them a favour. If person is overweight and they keep on reducing the amount of calories they eat they will hit the point where there weight falls.By the same author this is interesting: Eating less will not make us weigh less
What other factors have an influence on calories burnt beside moving around?muscle mass?
basal metabolic rate?
temperature of your house/workplace?
how much you use your brain?
illnesses?
Obviously?
Also see earlier posting below again the difference is at the margins BUT there is much bigger margin here. If you eat 100grms of sugar (400 calories) in one go it would be in your blood stream in a minute but your body has no need of that many calories in one go so it goes into your fat store. While if you spread it over 2 hours your body wouldn't not turn it into fat it would use it as is. Now your body would clearly have difficulty turning that 400 calories that is stored as fat back into energy at the same rate as eating it over 2 hours.
.SD-253 - Member
A little aside here, the amount of calories you get out of two what appear to be exactly the same foods are not the same. The greater you process a food the easier it passes through your stomach walls and into your blood and so on. Or put another way the more calories you get out of it. We as in humans took processing food so as to get more calories Out of it. The start was cooking food which will give you more calories than eating anything raw. Porridge I believe is an example the more the oats are processed the more calories you get out of it. Those little packets of "oats so simple" are highly processed therefore you get more calories out than if you eat unprocessed oats. How much extra doesn't appear to be easily measurable.
By the way this is not really supportive of people who are overweight
100g of olive oil = 900 calories into your mouth, but may only be 630 calories into your body according to this
Edit - deleted, I didnt read the post properly!

