Longest running ban...
 

[Closed] Longest running bands still recording/touring with the original members

Posts: 50252
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Am struggling to think of anything older than ZZ Top.

Anyone else?


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 2:02 pm
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

...

...

...

Aerosmith?
Motley Crue - although ZZtop and Aerosmith are older.
Heart, think its still the original band and they were around in the 70's.

EDIT: Rush? U2?


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 2:07 pm
Posts: 3536
Free Member
 

Rush changed their drummer after their first album, about 40 years ago. Since then though the line-up hasn't changed a bit.


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 2:15 pm
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

and of course aerosmith have parted company with various members in the past, albeit reunited. I suspect Heart may be the same. Motley isnt that old and of course neither is U2.


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 2:19 pm
Posts: 12087
Full Member
 

Are the Rolling Stones still touring?


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 2:19 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

the line up changed though as one died

Status Quo - are they still the original line up?

Mersey beat one - jerry and the pacemakers?


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 2:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The Stranglers are currently on their 40th anniversary tour with three out of the original four still producing studio work and two of the originals on stage. Jet Black's health isn't up to touring now.


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 2:35 pm
Posts: 5938
Free Member
 

Are the Rolling Stones still touring?

Ronnie Wood?

Status Quo - are they still the original line up?

No, drummer and bassist. I only know this as there was a program on BBC4 on Friday about them.


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 2:38 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

[i]The Stranglers are currently on their 40th anniversary tour with three out of the original four still producing studio work and two of the originals on stage.[/i]

Er, so not the Stranglers then!


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 2:40 pm
Posts: 6382
Free Member
 

The Seekers. Kind of.

Stones have lost Jones, Wyman and Taylor at a a minimum, over the years.


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 2:42 pm
Posts: 8177
Free Member
 

the answer is "Golden Earring" - all original members, formed in 1961 (I cheated!)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Earring


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 2:44 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Woody, from your linked article;

Current members of Golden Earring are Barry Hay (vocals, guitar, flute and saxophone, [b]member since 1967[/b]), George Kooymans (vocals and guitar, founder of band), Rinus Gerritsen (bass and keyboard, founding member), and Cesar Zuiderwijk (drums and percussion,[b] member since 1970[/b]).

Sorry, but if you're going to cheat, at least do it properly! 😉


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 2:45 pm
Posts: 12087
Full Member
 

Stones have lost Jones, Wyman and Taylor at a a minimum, over the years.

Fair enough, didn't bother to check the detail - they all seem so old I kind of assumed they were original 🙂


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 2:47 pm
Posts: 8177
Free Member
 

My bad. I was looking at another page, then noticed there was a Wiki page and never checked it!

I was looking at this

http://geekshizzle.com/2013/04/24/the-oldest-rock-bands-still-performing-today/

Which said:

Current members:

Name: Marinus “Rinus” Gerritsen
Role: Bass
Original Member: Yes
Time: 1961 – Present

Name: Barry Hay
Role: Vocals
Original Member: Yes
Time: 1961 – Present

Name: George Kooymans
Role: Guitars
Original Member: Yes
Time: 1961 – Present

Name: “Cesar” Zuiderwijk
Role: Drums
Original Member: Yes
Time: 1961 – Present

I took that to mean all original 😳


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 2:49 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

I think its definitely not Dr Feelgood:

[img] [/img]

How they can call themselves Dr Feelgood, I don't know!


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 2:50 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

Its hard most of the ones I think off have dead members such as the Beach Boys or the Bee gees ...i am racking my brain alphabetically!!!


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 2:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

ZZ Top changed their drummer after the first release.

Longest ever was probably The Four Tops - 1953 - 1997, but they are no longer going as the original line up.


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 2:54 pm
 LS
Posts: 1174
Free Member
 

^ Sort of - I think the first album was Gibbons, Beard and Hill but there had been other people with Billy before they got to that point?

If there's any doubt, you could always qualify it with 'and still producing great music' - that way ZZ Top definitely win 😀


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 2:54 pm
Posts: 17263
Full Member
 

The Osmonds / Jackson's?


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 2:56 pm
 iolo
Posts: 194
Free Member
 

Atomic Kitten?


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 2:58 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I think the first album was Gibbons, Beard and Hill but there had been other people with Billy before they got to that point?

That is indeed true. So not too sure if my own suggestion fits the bill or not! I suppose we could qualify it from their first album release!

Oh, and this;


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 2:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Chas & Dave?


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 2:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

ZZ Top - The first single (Salt Lick) was Gibbons, Greig and Mitchell, replaced afterwards with Gibbons, Beard and Hill - so not the "original" line up of ZZ Top, because there is a record made with a different one.


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 3:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Unless of course you start from the fist album, rather than first release.


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 3:02 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

I reckon it's U2..


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 3:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Chas & Dave?

Duo's can't count, because if it was a different line up, it would not longer be Chas and Dave - e.g. the Everly Brothers - spent a decade apart doing other things, but no one was the every brother in the interim...


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 3:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young - probably stretching the rules ( a lot) but the line up hasn't changed since they started with that name in 1969.


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 3:08 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

[i]Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young [/i]

[i]still recording/touring[/i] - last toured 2006


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 3:11 pm
Posts: 293
Free Member
 

Sex Pistols if you can call them a band these days. Matlock, Cook, Jones and Rotten


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 3:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Sex Pistols if you can call them a band these days. Matlock, Cook, Jones and Rotten

How could you forget Sid?


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 3:17 pm
Posts: 17263
Full Member
 

Sid was a replacement.


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 3:25 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

I don't think reforming for the annual gig can be considered "touring".

I'm still winning with U2 🙂


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 3:29 pm
Posts: 66086
Full Member
 

Nine Inch Nails- consistently throughout their life have been Trent Reznor and 4 blokes nobody knows the name of.


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 3:30 pm
 rhid
Posts: 1297
Full Member
 

sugarbabes


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 3:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Jethro Tull 😀


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 3:59 pm
Posts: 648
Free Member
 

Well, if he's^^ going to say Jethro Tull, I'll nominate Fairport Convention 😈


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 4:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

A bit closer to home, I'll be having dinner with one of Teenage Fan Club on Saturday night.

1989 to present.


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 4:01 pm
Posts: 2091
Full Member
 

BikePawl - Member
Well, if he's^^ going to say Jethro Tull, I'll nominate Fairport Convention

Certainly can't be Jethro Tull, as they changed bass players from Glenn Cornick to Jeffrey Hammond-Hammond (JHH played on "Aqualung") and it can't be Fairport either, because Richard Thompson and Dave Swarbrick were in the original line-up.


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 5:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Teenage Fanclub lost Brendan O'Hare after Grand Prix, or maybe thirteen - before Songs from Northern Britain at least.


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 6:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Definitely not The Drifters that's for sure though they must hold some sort of record for the most personnel ever.I remember when they were playing in two different venues in Manchester at the same time on the same night with two completely different line ups.They've aged well too 🙂
[img] [/img]
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 7:08 pm
Posts: 5938
Free Member
 

The Nolans


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 7:21 pm
Posts: 27
Free Member
 

I don't usually rise to things like this, even on STW, but I don't think Dave Swarbick was in the original line-up of Fairport Convention


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 7:25 pm
Posts: 5938
Free Member
 

agree with nostoc. but, there's no way they're on their original line up. i saw them about 6 years ago, and i don't think there was one original member. they were shite as well.


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 7:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Definitely not The Drifters that's for sure though they must hold some sort of record for the most personnel ever.I remember when they were playing in two different venues in Manchester at the same time on the same night with two completely different line ups.

I saw one incarnation at The Twisted Wheel (one of the two venues). Couldn't wait for the DJ to get back on if my amphetamine obscured memory of the period serves me correctly! 🙂


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 7:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Sugarbabes... Oh wait


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 7:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Teenage Fanclub lost Brendan O'Hare after Grand Prix, or maybe thirteen - before Songs from Northern Britain at least.

*extreme pedant alert*

i don't think Brendan O'Hare was [i]technically [/i] an original member?


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 7:47 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Not an answer at all, but I saw the Yardbirds live the other day and there were 2 original members and three lads who must have been in their 20's. This also meant they rocked rather hard for a 47-year-old act though

iirc there are 2 discreet/different versions of the Animals that still tour, each with one original bloke in them.


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 8:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i don't think Brendan O'Hare was technically an original member?

Well quite - wasn't an original member, did go on to be the drummer for 2.5 albums or so, then replaced by someone else, then they were replaced by Francis Mcdonald who did half of the first album.

If we are going to play that game, then Black Sabbath - they have played fairly recently with the original line up.


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 8:30 pm
Posts: 2091
Full Member
 

nostoc - Member 
I don't usually rise to things like this, even on STW, but I don't think Dave Swarbick was in the original line-up of Fairport Convention

You were right and I was wrong.........


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 9:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Clutch - recording and touring since 1990.


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 9:17 pm
Posts: 3747
Free Member
 

Blind Boys of Alabama. Playing since 1944. Sure, four of the six founding members are dead but surely they deserve an honourable mention 🙂


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 9:27 pm
Posts: 20
Free Member
 

Neurosis: If you ignore their various peripheral members, the core of the band have been together since 1985 and still going strong.


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 9:30 pm
Posts: 121
Free Member
 

Twisted Sister


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 9:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

UK Subs - formed in '79 or '80 iirc. Saw them a few months back - Charlie Harper is now 68 and was still giving it some on stage - fair play!


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 9:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Underworld. Well, they changed the band name but the members are still Fleur...


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 9:40 pm
Posts: 4097
Free Member
 

If we are going to play that game, then Black Sabbath - they have played fairly recently with the original line up.

Erm, they did a press conference as the original line up and promptly fell out with Bill Ward and he didn't play the shows.

Question on definitions - how are we meant to define "original line up?" - most bands go through changes in the formative period, but often establish a stable line up prior to recording the first album. U2 fall into this category, t'Edge's brother was originally part of the band, but had left before they recorded, and they've kept a stable line up for their entire recording career.

And what about bands that change their names? U2 also fall into this category btw.


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 10:02 pm
Posts: 4097
Free Member
 

Having looked at the wording of the question again, I'm taking it as being original members, with no new members, but it doesn't say that [b]all[/b] the original members have to be there, so on that basis, since the official members of the band are Brian May and Roger Taylor, I'm calling Queen (1971?)


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 10:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Erm, they did a press conference as the original line up and promptly fell out with Bill Ward and he didn't play the shows.

Ward played with them and recorded stuff around 2001 definitely - I saw them.


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 10:11 pm
Posts: 4097
Free Member
 

Ward played with them and recorded stuff around 2001 definitely - I saw them.

If thirteen years ago counts then that does open the field up somewhat. If that was the last thing they had done together then maybe you could have it, but since they have subsequently both played live and made an album without Ward, I don't think you can really..


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 10:20 pm
Posts: 13637
Free Member
 

When did U2 form?


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 11:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

When did U2 form?

1978?


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 11:21 pm
Posts: 13637
Free Member
 

I've thought of one- Kraftwerk


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 11:22 pm
Posts: 0
 

Cliff Richard


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 11:26 pm
Posts: 13637
Free Member
 

Wikipedia says 1976. I've just looked up Kraftwerk too, they've had loads of members.


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 11:27 pm
Posts: 7
Free Member
 

Cliff Richard

I was about to say that!


 
Posted : 06/03/2014 12:03 am