Forum search & shortcuts

Kate Middleton
 

[Closed] Kate Middleton

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#4361882]

Quite a fine pair aren't they. :mrgreen:

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Who? William and Kate? Not really a fan of the royals myself.


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Pics or it didn't happen 😀 #don't obviuosly, will get you a slapped wrist...#


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

CAN'T FIND THEM!!!


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:17 pm
Posts: 9238
Free Member
 

Great headline from the Telegraph on this subject...

Kate Middleton topless photos: with camera phones and drone technology, [b]soon no one will be safe[/b]

Pretty sure I won't have a drone trying to look at my moobs as I wander around the beach


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:18 pm
Posts: 34575
Full Member
 

meh its just boobs

the internets full of em


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:18 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

It is an invasion of her privacy and I dont support it

FFS leave them be everyone is entitled to some privacy

If it matters I would get rid of the Royals but they should still be able to do things in private without us seeing the results just like everyone else.


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

soon no one will be safe

from Kate Middletons breasts?


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

from Kate Middletons breasts?

I sincerely hope so.


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:22 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

I expect them to be quite small and plain.

I'll be about as interested as I was in the Harry pictures. (ie. not very)


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:22 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

we've all got 'em. Some are just nicer to look at than others.


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I expect them to be quite small and plain.

Anything more than a handful is superfluous


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

friend's got a theory that if they're too big they bounce in different directions and make him dizzy when the girl's on top.


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:25 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

No one seems to have explained why she felt the need to get them out in the first place?

I assume that their security were with them + whatever servants etc might tag along.

Surely the best way to avoid having your bits photographed is not to take your top off?


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:25 pm
Posts: 18236
Full Member
 

Hmmm, I wonder what the Queens are like....


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:25 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

No one seems to have explained why she felt the need to get them out in the first place?

On holiday. In France. Where it is really quite common for women to sunbathe topless.

Why should she not?


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:27 pm
Posts: 4434
Free Member
 

Wow, She's got pixelated knockers. Is she in the SAS or something?


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:27 pm
 Solo
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]meh its just boobs

the internets full of em[/i]

Yes, but disperal is not uniform. They seem to be gathered in certain places of the web-verse.............
😀


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No one seems to have explained why she felt the need to get them out in the first place?

Here we go again. At least Edukator will be happy that she's not using a burqa to conceal terrorist weapons.


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:29 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

[i]Why should she not? [/i]

because someone might take a photograph?

It's not like there's not been a recent precedent of semi/naked royals having photographs taken of them.

and, if they're so desparate to protect her so she doesn't go down the Diana route then saying "Look, keep your bikini top on, love, it's not that much of a problem and it'll save a lot of hassle later on' might have been good advice for her husband to give her?


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Some thoughts spring to mind:

Sad

It's a pair of breasts ffs, what's the excitement?

Sad

Wrong, they/she had an expectation of privacy.


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Anyone who got into position to take that photo could have been in that same position with a sniper rifle...


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Anyone who got into position to take that photo could have been in that same position with a sniper rifle...

And they took a camera??? (Jesus wept what's wrong with people?) 😯


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:32 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

[i]they/she had an expectation of privacy[/i]

perhaps but I think it's not something they should 'expect' any more, wherever they are.

As I said it's not like there isn;t recent and historic precedent in their family of privacy being invaded.

It's sad but not unexpected, really, is it?


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:34 pm
Posts: 4405
Free Member
 

Yet everyone letching over her Sister's bottom during the wedding was fair game?


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:36 pm
 MSP
Posts: 15842
Free Member
 

On holiday. In France. Where it is really quite common for women to sunbathe topless.

Why should she not?

Then her statement should read "they are just a pair of breasts, get over it", instead of claiming to be saddened that her displayed breasts were actually seen. Maybe she thinks she is lady Godiva, and none of her subjects would dare look.


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Anything more than a handful is [s]superfluous[/s] a face full.
FTFY


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:41 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

@ MSP I think anyone but a fool can see there is a huge difference between sunbathing topless in the privacy of a country retreat with your husband and having them published
She was fine with her husband seeing them but not fine with the whole world this does not seem difficult to understand.


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:45 pm
Posts: 10341
Free Member
 

Then her statement should read "they are just a pair of breasts, get over it"

That would have been the perfect response.


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:47 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

perhaps but I think it's not something they should 'expect' any more, wherever they are.

Great. Can we look forward to [i]"Shock! The Queen Poos - Exclusive Pictures From Inside the Royal Bowl"[/i]?


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:48 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

GrahamS - who knows.

It is more likely to happen if the queen sits on a toilet in a middle of a field shouting 'Everyone! Everyone! Don't look at me!' though.


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There is an up her skirt shot of her on tinternets.


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've heard that Channel 5 are going to broadcast some royal nookie live...

http://www.channel5.com/shows/wills-and-kate-baby-fever/episodes/wills-and-kate-baby-fever


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There is an up her skirt shot of her on tinternets.

Of the queen?

It's okay, I wasn't planning on lunch today anyway.


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If she was in private grounds wi her boobs out then it is an invasion of privacy to take photos from outside and publish them. The photo was taken using a massive zoom lens so its obviously not an official thing. French perverts, papparazzi pricks. I think the real issue is the pominence of closererer and more and take a break magazines and the fact that people want to look at all this celebrity bull turd, cant see the point myself, dont know em, dont care.
Wills should send harry and the boys round, whats the point of being a royal if you cant use your military to avenge your wifes good name.


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:52 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I find it a bit sad on two points.

1) that a cameraman seemed to make huge effort to take the pics.
2) that people actually want to see them.

Bit vulgar.


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:53 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

There is an up her skirt shot of her on tinternets.

The Queen??

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:56 pm
 mboy
Posts: 12663
Free Member
 

friend's got a theory that if they're too big they bounce in different directions and make him dizzy when the girl's on top.

He's right you know... They start to bang into each other if they're too big, sending them off in different directions!

CAN'T FIND THEM!!!

http://lmgtfy.com/


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There is an up her skirt shot of her on tinternets.
The Queen??

No Kate Windsor duchess of Cambridge. Before she was of divine rights.


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 12:58 pm
 mboy
Posts: 12663
Free Member
 

I find it a bit sad on two points.

1) that a cameraman seemed to make huge effort to take the pics.

Money innit! MANY Thousands of quids to be made from just one photo even, the guy that took those probably earnt a year's Salary for most people just off an hours work!

2) that people actually want to see them.

She's famous... But not only that, she's also quite attractive! I'm not defending it, far from it, but there's a ready market there of people willing to pay if you get me. I think she should have as much privacy as anyone else, but sadly she won't ever get it because of who she is!

Bit vulgar.

The world is full of vulgar people... The world is also full of men who like to look at tits! C'est la vie.


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 1:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[quote> http://lmgtfy.com/

But you havent GTFM. Lazy.


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 1:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

But you havent GTFM. Lazy

Agreed... lazy


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 1:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

seen em...

not my cup of tea...

I prefer those that have a little less highness 😆


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 1:35 pm
Posts: 8413
Full Member
 

It's a pair of breasts ffs, what's the excitement?

what's the excitement? It's a pair of breasts


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 1:35 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

Wills should send harry and the boys round, whats the point of being a royal if you cant use your military to avenge your wifes good name.

Good idea - but what would he do with a France when it surrenders? 😉


 
Posted : 14/09/2012 1:39 pm
Page 1 / 3