Forum menu
Coming from the other little thread, is the term "Jock" offensive?
Personally I would suggest it is no more offensive than being called a "Limey" by the "Yanks"? Not very polite but hardly offensive.
no more than 'fat' is.
Yes
Probably no more offensive than the collective name us "Jocks" use for the English...
Never bothered me when I was doon sooth ,I always had plenty smart arse comments to throw back.
๐
Is it worse than "sweaty sock"?
It's probably racist but not all that offensive. I'm scottish and I don't start crying if someone calls me it.
Depends on how it's used. If it's used with the intention of belittling or demeaning (as it usually is on here) then yes, it's offensive.
the key is in how it is received.
I live properly down south and I used to know a scottish bloke who's nickname was jocky. He never seemed to mind particularly and it wasn't used in a derogatory way, just a name. I met him a couple of years back and he told me that he'd hated it but hadn't felt that he could mention this as he felt he would get a huge amount of grief if he did.
I do find it objectionable because of the way in which it is used rather than the term itself. In my experience it is not used affectionately, generaly deployed by WASPs. Having worked with a lot of "frenchies" in my time they used to call me "Haggis" (AGEEESS!) which was more playful. Only the English call us Jocks!
If people I don't know call me a jock or sweaty sock, it irritates me and is generally followed by a suitable retort.
If it's mates then I don't care.
Racist? You mean xenophobic?
Probably no more offensive than the collective name us "Jocks" use for the English...
I wouldn't deem 'superiors' as offensive.
It's always meant to be when I use it....
As with most of these terms it is the context that render the word offensive, not the word itself. I have however never found the term "sweaty" or "sweaty sock" to be used in anything other than an offensive way.
Is scouser or geordie or taff or tyke cockney or ****
generaly deployed by WASPs
The most stereo typically WASPs I have ever met have been Scottish. They took their bigotry to another level!
Is scouser or geordie or taff or tyke cockney or ****
**** - Yes. Surprised with that one.
Geordie - No. Unless the person is actually from Sunderland. Although it could be argued that if that mistake is made it's actually a complement. ๐
Some people are such sensitive little souls.
Anyone from Wales get offended by 'Taffy', and what about 'Paddy'?
Edit : beaten by Winston and lol as my OH always corrects people when she is called Geordie as she was born in Hartlepool !
I wouldn't deem 'superiors' as offensive.
You are a superior to no one so you will never hear it
Been shopping lately?
I've never heard a fellow Scot refer to another using that term. That should be a clue to those who persist in using the term. It's disrespectful.
Some people are such sensitive little souls.
It's not being sensitive. It's taking offence to someone trying to act like a dick towards you ๐
It's disrespectful.
But is it offensive?
Taffy is better than the usual sheep shagger but is still bloody annoying.
EDIT: How about bloody pommes, rosebief?
are you offended by a lack of respect?
Some people are such INsensitive little [s]souls[/s] TOOLS.
Its ok between mates but its a lazy stereotype
like calling someone french a frog etc
Its not designed to be nice but when they object the users says they lack humpur and its only a laugh etc
Its poor rand I dont do it
PS Taff is South Wales it is Gogs for North Wales
But is it offensive?
It's intended to be derogatory, so yes.
I would never dream of calling someone I didn't know a "taff" or "paddy", since i've got a basic grasp of social skills. Therefore when someone uses "jock" to me, it's an easy way to work out where they fit in the scale of Nice Person to Complete ****.
**** yes it's used by my Indian colleagues. But I also heard it a lot in bradford but justified as simply a shortening of ****stani
Same as thai or aussie etc
It's intended to be derogatory, so yes.
Can't agree with that, as I've heard it used quite fondly on many occasions.
Can't agree with that, as I've heard it used quite fondly on many occasions.
As I said above, if it's between friends than yes, it's fine. But if you think as a stranger, you can call someone a jock and they'll think you're using it fondly, you probably need to work on those social skills ๐
I used to get chatting to plenty of people when i lived in England who would say something like "yeah, i love the jocks" as if it was some sort of compliment. It's not ๐
A lot of nicknames used this year in morzine in the gypsy camp were based on where you were from I can't remember anyone's actual name now
Being Welsh, what I like to be called is my name.
I'm sure every other nation will agree.
If you can't be bothered to remember someone's name what a nice guy you are.
EDIT: not meant at you Sancho, you typed it while I was typing
I used to get chatting to plenty of people when i lived in England who would say something like "yeah, i love the jocks" as if it was some sort of compliment. It's not
Well it's better than "I hate the jocks" ๐
I am from Glasgow (originally) and I don't take offence to being called a Weegie even if it includes the usual "soap dodger" addendum. Again this is mostly playful but Jocks, no; because it's a term most often used by little english people in a demeaning context.
Aye, Weegie is playful - Jock is never used by someone who's wanting to be nice in my experience.
Perhaps by some Scots folk coming forward and identifying it as derogatory and offensive, those who have previously used it have learnt something and will now stop doing so?
Is "jock" offensive?
Well, is Sassanah offensive?
I think the answer lies in who uses it in which manner
Well, is Sassanah offensive?
Of course it is!
The only exception perhaps being if you're delivering a history lesson.
whilst we are talking about this I'd be interesting to hear what terms the Scottish use for the English that you would consider to be derogatory as well.
answers the question really
Thanks for the heads up Scotroutes. I will call my mate Jocky Grey in Edinburgh at lunchtime and [i]"tell him"[/i] he needs to find a new name for us to use rather than offend him. I am sure he wont mind - hes only been using it for 30 odd years or so.
[quote=gordonb ]Is "jock" offensive?
Well, is Sassanah offensive?
I think the answer lies in who uses it in which manner
FWIW - my MiL would call me a sassenach as she live in the Outer Hebrides and I'm from Edinburgh.
answers the question really
No it doesn't. The point is that it's almost impossible to use either jock or sassenach in social circumstances with people you don't know without it's use being anything other than to cause offence/wind up.
Between friends is an entirely different situation, but I don't think that's what we're talking about here.
I will call my [b]mate[/b] Jocky Grey in Edinburgh at lunchtime and "tell him" he needs to find a new name for us to use rather than offend him.
Keep up at the back
I'd be interesting to hear what terms the Scottish use for the English that you would consider to be derogatory as well.
English b@stard was popular when I lived up there. Not directed at me personally, some (not all, obviously) people seemed to think that the word English would always be followed by b@stard(s).

