Forum menu
whats the estimate >1bn Russian money laundered through british banks?
as long as that stays the same I dont think the russians will mind too much
they were quite blatant in their support for Brexit on RT, farage galloway and brexiter tories like Peter Bone appearing regularly
I think that its achieved its aim brilliantly for them, Johnsosns push for more sanctions ignored by other EU countries and the fallout from brexit (this election included) have hobbled us economically and politically for the next few years
(its why the Tories think everyone is desperate for Strong & Stable leadership after Cameron threw us all to the dogs)
Playing with the yougov swingometer, it really isn't far off a hung parliament now!
According to Matthew d'Ancona in today's Guardian, a lot of Tory MP's, and I suspect a lot of tribal tory voters regard the following manifesto statement....
[i]We do not believe in untrammelled free markets. We reject the cult of selfish individualism. We abhor social division, injustice, unfairness and inequality. We see rigid dogma and ideology not just as needless but dangerous.[/i]
as nothing short of heresy. Rejecting as it does the words cast in stone from... you know... HER.
The party is holding it together for the time being, what, with an election in weeks. But if she is re-elected, and actually tries to follow through on any of that, then the Tory's could pretty soon be looking about as united in a common cause as those sat on the benches opposite have done for the last 12 months.
A graduate tax is an interesting comparison - particularly given that those who benefit most from university are predominantly from reasonably well to do backgrounds who have been afforded the opportunities to get them there - there is a strong argument that using low paid workers taxes to pay for middle class kids to go to university is unfair. Personally I would be all for an extra -x- pence on income tax rates for graduates rather than a complicated loan system.
Similarily, TJ has accurately laid out the dilemma of it being unfair both ways, poor people subsidising middle class inheritances, versus people who have scrimped and saved having to pay while their spendthrift neighbour gets it free.
There's no easy solution... well, unless we legalise the Swiss option, and pensioners start doing what's best for both their family and society in general.
The party is holding it together for the time being, what, with an election in weeks. But if she is re-elected, and actually tries to follow through on any of that,
she wont follow through on a bit of it, immighration cuts, dementia tax, itll join the 'workers on boards' gimmick as a nice idea that shed never have got her MPs to vote thru in any meannigful way
as nothing short of heresy. Rejecting as it does the words cast in stone from... you know... HER.
I think that's nonsense - as portillo rightly pointed out on this week, Thatcher would never have countenanced some of the more recent privatisations
Ninfan - you are not allowed to agree with me - have you read the rules? 😉
The horse has bolted from the strong and stable.
So first they piss off their core support by threatening to take their kids inheritance away from them, then in classic style they do a massive u-turn even though the manifesto is printed and two senior ministers were on the prime political news telly show only 24 hours ago defending it, and have now completely destroyed the central slogan which they've been drilling into everyone's heads for the past month. Strong and stable? Dithering and incompetent more like. I can only imagine the scene in tory HQ right now 😀
A graduate tax is an interesting comparison - particularly given that those who benefit most from university are predominantly from reasonably well to do backgrounds who have been afforded the opportunities to get them there - there is a strong argument that using low paid workers taxes to pay for middle class kids to go to university is unfair. Personally I would be all for an extra -x- pence on income tax rates for graduates rather than a complicated loan system.Similarily, TJ has accurately laid out the dilemma of it being unfair both ways, poor people subsidising middle class inheritances, versus people who have scrimped and saved having to pay while their spendthrift neighbour gets it free.
Ninfan - you're giving far too much thought to other peoples opinions - for a politics thread.
Did someone hit you over the head with a cricket bat? 😀
This threads making for interesting/informative reading, unlike the EU thread. Keep it up guys.
The impending diabetes / obesity epidemic is likely to prove useful. People probably won't even make it to retirement.. Never mind dementia to look forward to
I can only imagine the scene in tory HQ right now
Boris will be hoovering up disgruntled back benchers like a deranged Labrador, ready for the election after this one. The pug in the middle is Theresa May right now, notice that quick glimpse of despair as the pug realises how quickly the lab has gobbled his food down and what is coming next - that moment was Theresa Mays interview today.
The impending diabetes / obesity epidemic is likely to prove useful. People probably won't even make it to retirement.. Never mind dementia to look forward to
I've already pointed out that that problem is solved post Brexit - when we have to reintroduce ration books
Here we go....
[b]U-TURN AHOOOOOOOOY!!!!!![/b]
Who'd have thunk it eh?
If Paul Dacre told her to paint herself purple and run naked down the Mall, she would.
I think ninfan has a point - albeit possibly not the one he thought he had.
The Tory policies smack of a government scared witless of the impending Brexit debacle, and trying to jettison any commitments they can to free up wiggle room for the impending economic slowdown.
Remember Fallon at the weekend saying that they didn't quite know just how bad the impact of low immigration would be in the economy (read jobs, wages)? That's the gun barrel they're staring down.
They probably aren't even that worried if Corbyn wins. He's committed to Brexit and whomever is in power at the point of Brexit is probably going to make themselves unelectable for a generation.
So are they going to print a new version of the manifesto?
Maybot is proving as shambolic at this as she was as Home Sec
shes will still win tho! 😯
I would expect the diabetes rise to lead to more folk needing care not less - as the complications of diabetes lead to disability before death
I can't quite tell if Ninfan is being serious or not.
I guess though that post-Brexit, given this country hasn't been able to feed itself since the 19th Century, then the reliability of our food supply comes down to the competence of David Davis. So Ninfan may well be right.
If only the media would just go hard on May for this U- Turn
What? The media controlled by Billionaires?
BTW has anyone given any clarification regarded jointly-owned houses? If partner A requires care and then dies, what happens to partner B who is still living in the house? Evicted to pay off the debt, or is the debt carried over indefinitely?
If only the media would just go hard on May for this U- Turn
i saw the front page of the daily mail on friday i think. even that was muted in its criticism of the policy.
tomorrow will be presenting the u-turn as a glorious success.
thecaptain - MemberBTW has anyone given any clarification regarded jointly-owned houses? If partner A requires care and then dies, what happens to partner B who is still living in the house? Evicted to pay off the debt, or is the debt carried over indefinitely?
There would be a charge on the property so when it is sold or person B dies the government gets their slice. No sale could be forced tho
Some craic over the Sturgeon vs Nurse incident in last night's Scottish TV debate
A nurse who claimed last night she has to use foodbanks because her salary isn't enough to survive on.
So far the internet detectives have revealed
- She claimed to be a Grade 6 Nurse, yet also claimed she earned significantly less than the salary for that particular grade
- Her daughter goes to an £11k a year private school
- She spent new year in New York and claims her friends paid for it
- She lives in Stockbridge (average house price £380k)
- Drives a nice convertible Mini
- Eats out in fancy restaurants a lot
- She was on Question Time but didn't get to ask her question so the BBC invited her back to the Scottish debate so she could ask...
Nothing dodgy there. Nope. All above board and honest...
Maybot is proving as shambolic at this as she was as Home Secshes will still win tho!
I'm not so sure. She's completely pissed off her core support, completely destroyed her 'strong and stable' pitch, made her ministers look like idiots on the telly, and most importantly of all, taken the public for fools. I can't see her recovering from this. I wouldn't be surprised if we now see Boris et al starting to distance themselves from her, and George Osborne is sure to put the boot in.
And meanwhile Corbyn looks more authoritative every day. I know he doesn't do personal abuse, but if I were him I'd have the labour party graphic designers at work pasting her head onto a turnip and plastering it all over the internet.
She works for BUPA hence the lower salary perhaps - and BUPA do not use NHS grades. Still a tory plant tho and a liar
[quote=tjagain ]She works for BUPA hence the lower salary perhaps - and BUPA do not use NHS grades. Still a tory plant tho and a liar
Ah, interesting.
Agreed she's definitely a liar and a plant
What was it I was saying? 😀
This is not going to go away.
(Bugger beaten to it!)
What's happening to the 'don't knows'?
BoardinBob - Member
tjagain » She works for BUPA hence the lower salary perhaps - and BUPA do not use NHS grades. Still a tory plant tho and a liar
Ah, interesting.Agreed she's definitely a liar and a plant
Its only what I have read in t'internet
However what she is quoting is the starting salery for a band 5 nurse without any increments. IE someone in their first year of nursing. I am a top band five ( 10 years service) last year with unsocial hours payments I made £32 000. Now you can argue all you like about whether thats sufficient reward or not - but it certainly does not put you on the breadline needing foodbanks.
However what she is quoting is the starting salery for a band 5 nurse without any increments. IE someone in their first year of nursing. I am a top band five ( 10 years service) last year with unsocial hours payments I made £32 000. Now you can argue all you like about whether thats sufficient reward or not - but it certainly does not put you on the breadline needing foodbanks.
But it's not exactly enough for a decent standard of living for a professional of 10 years living in the south. If you were single and living in the London area, that'd pay for a shitty studio, your food, the underground and couple of meals out a month - with maybe a few hundred left over a month for savings. Fine when you are 21, bollocks if you are 31 - whats the pay like for the same position in London?
Still, she won't be on the breadline - so likely a Tory plant.
Crazy thing is the dementia tax isnt a bad idea
with caps set relative to local earnings/housing price etc it could be a great way of helping to fix the housing crisis (along with a huge new housebuilding scheme) and help redistribute wealth
would also require that social care be ringfenced or the councils already cut to the bone would still be unable to deliver it properly
unfortunately weak & wobbly Maybots 100% uncosted manifesto is so badly put together that it would just cause chaos
Just like her time at the Home Office she is running things very badly
Barnier & the gang are going to run rings around May & her team of incompetents
First election leaflet here - Lib Dems win. I'm relieved to find it's somebody I can vote for without having to cross my fingers or hold my nose, unlike the last couple of Lib Dem candidates here (I already knew that, he was selected a week or so ago - but it's nice to see the election leaflet doesn't have anything offputting either this time).
[quote=kimbers ]Crazy thing is the dementia tax isnt a bad idea
It's not at all - but you'd think the political parties would have worked out by now that it's not the merits of the ideas which matter. As I wrote earlier I can only assume they thought they had this election stitched up already.
But it's not exactly enough for a decent standard of living......If you were single and living in the London area, that'd pay for a shitty studio, your food, the underground and couple of meals out a month - with maybe a few hundred left over a month for savings.
So, enough to pay for housing, food, travel, occasional luxuries [i]and [/i] have some left over for some savings* all whilst living in one of the most expensive cities in the country?
I'll agree it might not be the height of middle class living but I'd hardly class that as not being a 'decent standard', it's above average and if you're in a partnership or married and that's only half your income I'd say its pretty good**, and as you say not on the breadline, and definitely waaaay above the many who struggle to both house and feed themselves, walk/cycle everywhere and can't put any money into savings.
* a few hundred a month into savings is a lot more than most people manage!
** although still not enough for what the job entails IMO, but that's more to do with the requirements of the job rather than the requirements of a decent standard of living, ie: I think the job deserves more rather than more being necessary for living.
[quote=amedias ]But it's not exactly enough for a decent standard of living......If you were single and living in the London area, that'd pay for a shitty studio, your food, the underground and couple of meals out a month - with maybe a few hundred left over a month for savings.
So, enough to pay for housing, food, travel, occasional luxuries and have some left over for some savings* all whilst living in one of the most expensive cities in the country?
I'll agree it might not be the height of middle class living but I'd hardly class that as not being a 'decent standard', it's above average and if you're in a partnership or married and that's only half your income I'd say its pretty good**, and as you say not on the breadline, and definitely waaaay above the many who struggle to both house and feed themselves, walk/cycle everywhere and can't put any money into savings.
* a few hundred a month into savings is a lot more than most people manage!
** although still not enough for what the job entails IMO, but that's more to do with the requirements of the job rather than the requirements of a decent standard of living, ie: I think the job deserves more rather than more being necessary for living.
If she is genuinely using foodbanks while leading the life that her twitter and facebook suggest, then she's abusing the service a foodbank provides and depriving someone else of the benefit. And that makes her a complete clownshoe.
If she's not using foodbanks, then she's a liar and plant by the tories or BBC.
Those savings would quickly evaporate because of the long hours on the job, so you'd be eating out a lot - and by travelling - you mean commuting to work. Yeah! ****in awesome!
And by a studio, I mean a 13 m2 room, with a shower and a kitchen stuffed into it. That's not even working class by the standards of further up north. Granted it's better than being unemployed up North, but I'd wager you'd feel better off on 18k in Sheffield.
Support for the Labour party in Wales has surged in the last two weeks, while the Conservative momentum in Wales appears to have gone into reverse.
http://blogs.cardiff.ac.uk/electionsinwales/2017/05/22/the-new-welsh-political-barometer-poll-5/
If she is genuinely using foodbanks while leading the life that her twitter and facebook suggest, then she's abusing the service a foodbank provides and depriving someone else of the benefit. And that makes her a complete clownshoe.If she's not using foodbanks, then she's a liar and plant by the tories or BBC.
Totally with you on that, I'm just surprised at Toms description of someone (not her) who, while single, can live in London, meet all their bills and save a couple of hundred a month as not being a 'decent standard of living'.
That's an aspiration for a very large number of people, and I totally understand the point about the standard of accommodation outside London (for the same money) being better, but that doesn't change the fact that that's actually a pretty decent position to be in.
Many many people scrape by month to month, in crappy acoomodation. only just covering their bills (or not) and not being able to save a single penny.
Don't get me wrong, I wish it were better for everyone (me included) but don't forget just how good we/most people on STW have it, and that one mans 'barely a decent standard' is another's 'decadent luxury that they'll never achieve'.
I don't know really what my point is other than 'keep some perspective'
As they say you don't win an election, the incumbent losses it. Well right now the Tories are really trying hard to do the latter. If May doesn't buck her ideas up, then rather than come out of the GE stronger, she could be severely weakened both with the electorate and her own party.
However, there are still nearly 3 weeks to go, but that's a long time when seemingly you have no clear message.
Was talking to a customer last week, an investment manager for a fairly big company in Wakefield. He made a very off hand comment that "we're all set for when Labour win". I pulled him up on it, basically saying I thought The Tories were all set to walk it, not according to him they're not. He's a Tory voter but is absolutely adamant that Labour will win, said that all the investment firms in the area and people in his network think the same, reckons the London bias of the media has vastly underestimated how well Labour are doing at the moment.
It was an interesting take.
A shitty studio in London is just big enough to get out of a single bed and put clothes on. 13m2 would be a bijou open plan apartment.
The Tory policies smack of a government scared witless of the impending Brexit debacle, and trying to jettison any commitments they can to free up wiggle room for the impending economic slowdown.
I think this is what we should really be scared off as she is clearly showing how bad she truly thinks Brexit will be - she cannot guarantee much and certainly not on spending or tax.
That said they really must be regretting using strong and stable as a slogan as whatever we wish to describe this as it is not that.
Personally I did not actually think it was that bad an idea as 100k is still a fair chunk of cash for most folk.
Tom_W1987
London weighting
Inner London 20% of basic salary, subject to a minimum payment of £4,200 and a maximum payment of £6,469
Outer London 15% of basic salary, subject to a minimum payment of £3,553 and a maximum payment of £4,528
Fringe 5% of basic salary, subject to a minimum payment of £971 and a maximum payment of £1,682
Band 6 starting point is 26 500 + unsocial hours premium worth to most a couple of grand a year
[url= http://www.cornwalllive.com/watch-boris-johnson-and-derek-thomas-confronted-by-angry-heckler-in-st-ives-over-brexit-promises/story-30347045-detail/story.html ]Meanwhile Boris does a runner[/url]


