If we're in a moani...
 

[Closed] If we're in a moaning mood

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I object strongly to the use of the word 'moron' or 'moronic' as used by a mod in another thread (also other derogatory terms involving people with learning disabilities - the few who know me will know why).

As it actually denoted a category of learning disability and was widely used as a categorisation for eugenics I feel it is unacceptable to be used to deride or describe others.

Those using it in such a fashion are being derogatory to those with learning disabilities, and making their condition an insult towards others.


 
Posted : 28/05/2009 5:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

report the post then.


 
Posted : 28/05/2009 5:13 pm
Posts: 3422
Free Member
 

Quiet, you cretin! ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 28/05/2009 5:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Is :mogn: OK?


 
Posted : 28/05/2009 5:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Those using it in such a fashion are being derogatory to those with learning disabilities, and making their condition an insult towards others.
Perhaps a very long time ago.

That's too PC a view for me, but i'll avoid using the word all the same.


 
Posted : 28/05/2009 5:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Even Mark has a 'Report-Post' button on his posts.

I'm just waiting for him to step out of line ......


 
Posted : 28/05/2009 5:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

well said OP


 
Posted : 28/05/2009 5:23 pm
 rs
Posts: 28
Free Member
 

Its just a word these days and nobody calling someone a mong is really meaning it as an insult to those with learning difficulties.


 
Posted : 28/05/2009 5:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

what IQ range corresponds to 'moron' ? Would such people be able to understand that the use of the word was insulting ?

Is 'dumbass' an acceptable alternative ?


 
Posted : 28/05/2009 5:26 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

It's the [url= http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_H._Goddard ]Goddard scale[/url] isn't it:

[i]idiot[/i] = IQ of 0-25
[i]imbecile[/i] = IQ of 26-50
[i]moron[/i] = IQ of 51-70

Though he was a bit of a fan of eugenics himself:

"A moron, by his definition, was any person with mental age between eight and twelve. Morons, according to Goddard, were unfit for society and should be removed from society either through institutionalization, sterilization, or both." (from Wikipedia)


 
Posted : 28/05/2009 5:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

SFB

IIRC its an IQ of 50 - 70, so the mildest category of LD - probably a mental age of 9-12 years old - so it would probably be understood, if not the exact meaning then the connotation.

Most folk of this level I know will have heard it as a derogatory term many times in their school life.

And it's dumass, there's no 'b'


 
Posted : 28/05/2009 5:32 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

And it's dumass, there's no 'b'

You sure about that dumbass?:
http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=dumass&word2=dumbass


 
Posted : 28/05/2009 5:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

And it's dumass, there's no 'b'

sorry, you're thinking of Alexander Dumas, noted French author...


 
Posted : 28/05/2009 5:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Is idiot ok?


 
Posted : 28/05/2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You sure about that dumbass?

please don't mock [b]dangerousbeans[/b]'s spelling difficulties ๐Ÿ™


 
Posted : 28/05/2009 5:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I like it as a word and think of it as another for idiot which it is i guess, i have known a few people in my 34 years whom have had relations with mental disabilities, and one used to use the term alot, as did my dad on the many occasions in my youth i was an idiot...don't take it to heart dude, like many things in life, only upsetting if your setup for being easily upset or summink...

but noted all the same.


 
Posted : 28/05/2009 5:51 pm
Posts: 5655
Full Member
 

"A moron, by his definition, was any person with mental age between eight and twelve. Morons, according to Goddard, were unfit for society and should be removed from society either through institutionalization, sterilization, or both."

Which in practice meant that anyone who failed an "intelligence test" (even if it was just due to poor education) could potentially be sterilised or institutionalised. This happened to quite a few unfortunate people. A really shameful chapter in modern American history.

What that Wikipedia article only touches on briefly is that Goddard was dishonest and his research worthless. He even had doctored photos in his textbooks to make the "degenerates" look less human. There's more about him in this book, which is excellent reading for anyone who wants to know more about "intelligence testing":

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mismeasure_of_Man


 
Posted : 28/05/2009 5:57 pm
Posts: 14905
Full Member
 

When did this forum merge with the Daily Mail?


 
Posted : 28/05/2009 5:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 28/05/2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

Fair enough, noted.


 
Posted : 28/05/2009 6:09 pm