Forum menu
I take it you you h...
 

[Closed] I take it you you have to be fairly strong to ride SS???

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#4867529]

WARNING! Following post contains serious day dreaming!

Just watched the Kunye video on MWM's and it occurred to me that you'd have to be pretty strong to ride any reasonable distance on a singlespeed,

What sort of ratio do people ride with? Where? and how far?

I've only been mtb for 3 years, switched to 1x9 this past month, My thighs are pretty big to what they were 3 years ago, I reckon another 2 years before trying SS, another year and I'd give Chris Hoy's hulk like legs a run for his money!

😀 😐


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 3:22 pm
 ojom
Posts: 177
Free Member
 

No but you will need a beard and questionable personal hygiene.


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 3:24 pm
 D0NK
Posts: 10677
Full Member
 

nope anyone can do it, technique is more important than power


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 3:25 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

[i]you'd have to be pretty strong to ride any reasonable distance on a singlespeed,[/i]

I think you just have to have a slightly different approach and really attack hills. If you normally sit and spin you'll run out of momentum on a SS fairly quickly. Stand up and fight and you'll surprise yourself what you can get up.

It's more technique and attitude than anything else.


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 3:26 pm
 nbt
Posts: 12482
Full Member
 

on a more serious note, just try it. Riding in one gear is not the same as riding singlespeed mind you, but you will be surprised at just how mnuch you can ride without the gears you currently find essential

no wondering if you;re in the right gear
no desperatly going for one more gear to help you up that last bit

either attack the hill all-out, or get off the bike and push

either way, you'll usually be at the top before your mates and be recovered by the time they arrive


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 3:28 pm
Posts: 9097
Free Member
 

I'm a 10st weakling an have no issues at all.


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 3:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

OK, but what ratio are you all riding though?


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 3:30 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

32:17 on 26"
32:20 on 29"

Downs and woodland around Brighton.

A lot on the gearing is down to where you ride. Anywhere flatter I'd probably drop a tooth at the back but the hills tend to become problematic after an hour two.


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 3:32 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

I ride a 32 - 14 on a 26er but I'm a MAN 🙂
Some of the bigger hills are a killer but that's why I single speed.


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 3:34 pm
 DrP
Posts: 12116
Free Member
 

32:16 here (26") - Sussex Downs/Worthing etc etc...

I've legs like an excited gazelle though.....!!

DrP


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 3:35 pm
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

anybody can SS, MTFU... or at least choose the gear ratio for the type of riding you do.


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 3:40 pm
Posts: 770
Free Member
 

You need a drinking problem to singlespeed.
Suits me fine. 😀


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 3:43 pm
 nbt
Posts: 12482
Full Member
 

32:16 on a 26ss
32:20 on the new 29er SS

I ride on the edges of the peak district so not exactly flat.


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 3:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Definitely technique over strength. Grind the hills and on technical climbs you'll develop a kind of hip thrusty movement that adds momentum to pedal strokes. Gurning helps too


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 3:51 pm
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

Never mind all the above posts, they're not really doing it properly; merely playing at it. To [i]really[/i] ride singlespeed you need to be fitter, stronger, and more technically adept than a geared-bike rider.
It annoys me on here that people don't take singlespeeding seriously; they mess around at it and think they're cool or something.
In answer to your question, yes, you do have to be strong to do it properly and it takes years to get to the point where you can really shout out "Yes, I am a singlespeeder!"


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 3:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I am neither strong, fast or fit and I ride (rode) SS. 32x16 FWIW.

I mostly ride alone, generally riding what used to be called XC or "dicking about in the woods". Linking little bits of trail up I can about manage 25 miles from my house and back again. I tend to walk up steep hills with a geared bike and tend to wear myself out more by trying to be fast. I must confess to having gears on currently as trail centres with mates were getting a bit dull as I'd have to sprint past them on the climbs (you can't just spin up) and they'd leave me standing on the long draggy fire roads.

I still ride SS on the road and find that generally (top speed aside) I'm faster as I'm trying harder!

Weirdly SS MTB reminds me of riding BMX, in the way we used to park on the industrial estates on the outskirts of nottingham and then slowly ride into the city, jumping, grinding, manualling off everything we could. Its kind of a fun way to ride, but I probably wouldn't attempt an all day epic SS. (though I have done road sportives SS)


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 3:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The extra effor required on the hills is obvious. The thing that surprised me was how much it killed my arms and shoulders. Your whole body is more involved than with a geared bike. Makes you realise how much gears let you ease into a climb.


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 3:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You have to be bloody daft, and not take it too seriously..
I'm enjoying it 😀


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 3:56 pm
 D0NK
Posts: 10677
Full Member
 

Gurning helps too
a good gurn can add anything up to 50W to your max power output, science FACT

no desperatly going for one more gear to help you up that last bit
after several years SSing I still get an itchy trigger finger atleast once a ride 🙂


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 3:57 pm
 ton
Posts: 24281
Full Member
 

singlespeeding is a bit like bum sex.......so like it, some dont. 😀


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 3:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Ok ok, I'm warming to the idea,

Are we riding HT or FS?


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 4:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Difficult to properly singlespeed an FS due to chain stretch issues, although I have seen spring loaded chain tensioners. It kind of takes away from the direct, simple feel that makes singlespeed appealing (to me at least).


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 4:34 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

I ran my Giant NRS SS with a Rohloff DH tensioner - was really nice to ride.


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 4:39 pm
Posts: 10746
Full Member
 

I ride either singlespeed or 2x9.

Both are fine. I'd really struggle without a granny ring on gears though.


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 4:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I wouldn't say that SS riders are strong, they just ride really slow


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 4:46 pm
 DrP
Posts: 12116
Free Member
 

Never mind all the above posts, they're not really doing it properly; merely playing at it. To really ride singlespeed you need to be fitter, stronger, and more technically adept than a geared-bike rider.
It annoys me on here that people don't take singlespeeding seriously; they mess around at it and think they're cool or something.
In answer to your question, yes, you do have to be strong to do it properly and it takes years to get to the point where you can really shout out "Yes, I am a singlespeeder!"

Oooh, get you... 😉

DrP


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 4:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Given the profusion of 9 stone shandy drinking girlpants who turn up to Ssuk every year I'd say not.


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 4:54 pm
 Muke
Posts: 4106
Free Member
 

Given the profusion of 9 stone shandy drinking girlpants who turn up to Ssuk every year I'd say not

Mmmm goes off to start diet so will not out of place on 3rd May 😉


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 5:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

32:18 on a 26er on Dartmoor.

As above it's a lot about technique - draggy climbs are the ones you're going to wish for gears on. Short sharp, steep ups you just attack.

You'll spend a lot of time out of the saddle so a good upper body workout.

I'm not sure whether singlespeeds are inherently slower - as above on a lot of climbs you'll beat the pants off people with gears as you're forced into attack mode. On techy stuff you'll probably match them for speed. It's the long flats or draggy climbs where you'll struggle. Round here it's pretty much either up or down so not really a disadvantage.

Forget all the haterz who say it's a fashion thing - what they don't realise is that it's basically just really good fun - like riding a big BMX bike. Riding my 1x1 always puts a grin on my face.


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 5:05 pm
Posts: 1442
Free Member
 

size of thighs has no bearing on suitability for single speed riding. general cardio fitness is going to be more indicative. most pumped up roid-rage gym pumpers wouldn't last 5 min on a bicycle.


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 5:10 pm
 IanW
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Naa!

32 - 15 here..rode SS for a few years now CBA putting the gears back on.

100kg @ 183cm 45yrs, mid table strava, ride 50 miles plus xc quite regular no more difficult than geared.

Did I mention I live in Suffolk.


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 5:16 pm
Posts: 24854
Free Member
 

I'm no athlete, trust me. I love it though, once you get the mindset that some hills can't be done (by me at least) and that walking's allowed it's surprising what can be done, and the ones that can't - meh.

I actually find it OK for longer rides, particularly bridleway cruise types, because when you hit the flats and spin out (at maybe 15-17 mph on my 34:20 29er) you can't go faster so you don't try, you just sit back and enjoy the ride and save energy for the other bits.

On the other hand - 90 mins of up-down-up-down at somewhere like swinley sees me breathing out of my arse and jelly legged!


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 5:35 pm
Posts: 8177
Free Member
 

I'm not sure whether singlespeeds are inherently slower

Due to the forecast, I did my normal commute today on the SnowRat-SS-SnowBike™ (36-18, 26" wheels & studded tyres). Certainly [b][i]felt[/b][/i] much slower, but I was actually only marginally slower (approx 2 mins over the hour). I normally use a 1x9 (36 - 11/32) 700c wheeled Kaffenback.

Take from that what you will! 🙂


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 5:52 pm
Posts: 5670
Full Member
 

33:17 for me. Even sprocket and chain wear.

As above with long draggy hills. Killers.

SS really have 3 speeds. Sit down, stand up, and push.

Oh, and MTFU. 😉


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 5:59 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

29erSS rigid here, ratio 32:17 but have recently changed cranks so now 37:20 (effectively the same) I have a 19 which I'll try out, but I've yet to hammer the 37:20 so until thAt happens it'll stay as is. Sth Downs bumps here.

And I sport neatly trimmed goatee, and spectacular hair.

You just have to modify technique, normal stuff, bit like riding a bike.


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 6:01 pm
 Kato
Posts: 825
Full Member
 

32:16 here, but i put a 17T sprocket on if i'm going anywhere near a hill


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 6:05 pm
Posts: 2305
Free Member
 

36-18 here on a 26. Recent convert. Like the simplicity of it. Most hills are ok but there's no(t much) shame in walking.


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 6:19 pm
Posts: 10199
Full Member
 

secret to ss riding..big guns, strong upper body and a gurn of power.... 😀

(all 29er)34-19 for wales, lakes, the peak etc... 35-18 on the SS race bike and 34-20 on the fatty singlespeed


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 6:45 pm
Posts: 3371
Free Member
 

I did the Strathpuffer on a SS - 34:17 on a 29er 🙂


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 6:52 pm
Posts: 1388
Free Member
 

Stubborness more than strength "i will bet to the top of this bloddy hill!", at +50 miles get knee twinges but that happens on the full suss aswell. I'd recomend spd's with some sort of platform to spread the pressure points on your feet (or better shoes but again stubborn).

Ridgid 29er and run 34:18 i think.


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 6:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Due to the forecast, I did my normal commute today on the SnowRat-SS-SnowBike™ (36-18, 26" wheels & studded tyres). Certainly felt much slower, but I was actually only marginally slower (approx 2 mins over the hour). I normally use a 1x9 (36 - 11/32) 700c wheeled Kaffenback.

Take from that what you will!

As an experiment I did my usual 6 mile commute on 3 different bikes over a week last year. Very steep and rough Devon lanes on a geared rigid 26" MTB on slicks, geared 29er on knobblies and my 1x1 with knobblies. The 1x1 was the fastest by around 3 mins in both directions.

My theory is riding singlespeed boosts the levels of sheer bloodymindedness such that you overcome the feeble rules of physics.


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 6:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

As above, tenacious rather than strong, IME.


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 7:10 pm
Posts: 27603
Free Member
 

32:18 on 26 here. Live the requirement for tenacity, and simplicity. As I'm indecisive the nature SS does me a world of good!


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 7:30 pm
Posts: 33970
Full Member
 

on a more serious note, just try it. Riding in one gear is not the same as riding singlespeed mind you, but you will be surprised at just how mnuch you can ride without the gears you currently find essential

no wondering if you;re in the right gear ?
no desperatly going for one more gear to help you up that last bit ?

either attack the hill all-out, or get off the bike and push ? (mostly the latter, [i]very[/i] occasionally the former)

either way, you'll usually be at the top before your mates and be recovered by the time they arrive. (You're kidding, right?)
32:16 on my SS, rigid, with carbon forks, weighs about 19lb.

[IMG] [/IMG]

Go on, you know you want to... 😀


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 7:31 pm
Posts: 10978
Free Member
 

I'm a 10 stone shandy drinking weakling and have represented my ****ree at European level SSing, my thighs are like twigs but I did hear a blind old lady in the supermarket say I looked rather fit in my bulging skinsuit, I ride 58 x 9 on a 36" unobtainium framed trellis bike.


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 7:33 pm
Page 1 / 2