Ourmaninthenorth. I refer you to my argument earlier about the tangible impact that unprovable belief has on our everyday lives.
Often the argument is raised (and it has been several times within this thread) that people should be allowed to believe in whatever invisible friend gives them comfort. However it is far more complex than that and when political and economic decision are being made based on no evidence (and in this way it is unique) then religions have an obligation to prove the existence of their gods.
I would rather have the additional hospital please?
Theology degree
Hardly a respectable academic qualification is it? The hijacking of apparent scientific method to study the unfathomable and made up!
Ah but Britain's best ever pole-vaulter went the other way so I reckon it's honours even
Do you mean Jonathon Edwards? He was a triple jumper.
surfer - Do you know anyone who has done a Theology degree and do you know what's involved? Personally I would never "dis" anyone's qualification.
surfer - Do you know anyone who has done a Theology degree and do you know what's involved? Personally I would never "dis" anyone's qualification.
I do actually, although not a close friend. The area of study was vague (by definition) and they were totally focused on their study through their previous belief in god.
They produced nothing of academic worth and simply embarked on a journey of reinforcing their beliefs.
I would absolutely question the validity of any theological study and see it as a wholesale waste of time and resource.
Last I heard they were undertaking a PHD. What this can contribute to the body of "scientific" data out there is hard to fathom. I see the study of the Tooth fairy as a more valid area, at least it may have a spin off for the study of dentistry.
I am 100% sure that I don't want to go on an Alpha course, ever.
But the modern vogue for rude, shouty reductionist atheism is incredibly tedious. I wouldn't want to go on a Dawkins course either. 🙂
You don't kiss your brain away by taking a step of faith.
I would have to eliminate my sceptical intellect to achieve it.
But the modern vogue for rude, shouty reductionist atheism is incredibly tedious. I wouldn't want to go on a Dawkins course either.
Not aware their was one?
Its hard not to reduce religion to the belief in an invisible friend. When it controls resources that can be best used elsewhere and negatively impacts the lives of millions then its hard not to be a bit "shouty"
Or maybe you thing Atheists should treat religion with "respect" or deference?
Not for me thank you.
You don't kiss your brain away by taking a step of faith.
I think it was Hemingway that said "all thinking men are Atheists" whether true or not if furthers your argument not one bit.
There isn't. But if there was it would be run by and for dogmatic and tedious berks with mad eyes and ordinary, decent people wouldn't want to go. 🙂
"Do you know anyone who has done a Theology degree and do you know what's involved?"
yes and it was a joke, he even states that himself and he's a vicar, well ex vicar anyway...gave it up to be a technical author.
I work in an environment, where not only is christianity discouraged, but we now actively try to avoid employing avid christians on the grounds that their judgement is fundamentally flawed, and good intentions or not....they are more trouble than they are worth in the environment I work in. A few years back one was even been disciplined for trying to persuade one of our clients to attend the alpha course.
I'm an atheist and will stay one, and don't bother telling me to go on an alpha course cos it might open my eyes, that's on a par with telling me to believe that the earth is flat or the moon is made of cheese and there's a course I could go on which will explain it all to me, just plain stupid.
So, in answer to the original op's question. no I haven't and I wont be doing either.
There isn't. But if there was it would be run by and for dogmatic and tedious berks with mad eyes and ordinary, decent people wouldn't want to go.
Sounds like there would be little room for us Atheists then given it would be filled with religious zealots and their apologists pretending to be "objective" !
You know the type.
I'm not sure how [u]not[/u] being an adherant of religion automatically makes a person a "disciple" of the non-deity-worshipping Richard Dawkins.
Non-belief was around before he wrote a book, although he possibly voiced what a lot of people thought, but didn't know how to articulate.
Not having blind faith is not the same as denouncing a god. Given evidence and rational explanation (which is not something associated with religion), many people would be prepared to change their views in response to the evidence.
jahwomble - sounds like a nice place where you work!
surfer - I can tell you're very proud of your qualifications. 🙂
In case anyone missed it, [b]jahwomble[/b] is a ghostbuster...
surfer - I can tell you're very proud of your qualifications.
Not really but they are "robust"
Ah thanks sfb!
more of a ghostburster really 🙂
"t helps me cope day to day with caring for my severly handicapped son, it gives me reasoning, solice and comfort. "Perhaps your son would be better off being cared for by professionals? You wouldn't need your jesus crutch then. I'm sure it's very comforting but as I said before - being comforting doesn't make it true. You have to prove the case, and that has not yet been done.
Jeusu loves you, everyone else thinks your a **** MrWhoppit!
'pwned'
Chapter 2 vs 6 the Gospel according to LoulaBella
everyone else thinks your a **** MrWhoppit!
I don't. It's as well not to claim what to know what 'everyone' thinks, when many of us are not even self-consistent in thinking.
<wake up mode>
"ghostburster"
Now that is interesting - can i borrow your Tesla coil please?
I work in an environment, where not only is christianity discouraged, but we now actively try to avoid employing avid christians on the grounds that their judgement is fundamentally flawed, and good intentions or not....they are more trouble than they are worth in the environment I work in.
Unless you work in a mosque, isn't it illegal to disciminate on religious grounds?
yup, you'll need a big boot though..........
isn't it illegal to disciminate on religious grounds?
I wasn't aware there were any laws on religious discrimination - and why would they be suspended in a religious institution ?
Do you mean Jonathon Edwards? He was a triple jumper.
Ah yes. I know he's a triple-jumper. I had an image in my head of him triple-jumping while my hands typed 'pole vaulter'. Maybe there are forces beyond our comprehension at play?
isn't it illegal to disciminate on religious grounds
Other than where it is enshrined in law, I thought that too. Having said that if your religious beliefs make it impossible to do the job, e.g. a jewish/muslim pig farmer, then it would be a difficult one to prove.
"t helps me cope day to day with caring for my severly handicapped son, it gives me reasoning, solice and comfort. "Perhaps your son would be better off being cared for by professionals? You wouldn't need your jesus crutch then. I'm sure it's very comforting but as I said before - being comforting doesn't make it true. You have to prove the case, and that has not yet been done.
Ummm sorry just felt a little angry at your remark.
Yes some days im barely able to cope, others and in fact always Joel is an amazing gift from God (expecting a few remarks on that one :).
Before I had Joel I had no concept of what 'Love' (agape, might have to google agape)) is. Through Joel I have come to a deeper level of understanding of what love and patience is that I might have otherwise never experienced in my whole life. Another thing that I have realised about life (whilst were getting all deep and spiritual) is that sometimes out of the shi**est situations you can make/enjoy something truely beautiful.
I do get 'help' next year we will get our first overnight respite and I get help on Saturdays from a sessional worker, Joel is also in a special school which is amazing.
I would never just 'hand him over' to social care (although some people do because sometimes it is too much), but if my 'faith'in Gods love means that Joel can stay togehter as a family, that it helps my marriage stay strong (I should point out that about 80% of marriages with a child like Joel in the mix end in divorce)that can the way God sustains me be a bad thing?
I also would have never tried MTB if it wasnt for being a Christian, but thats another story 🙂
"Unless you work in a mosque, isn't it illegal to disciminate on religious grounds? "
No actually, there are plenty of places where it's not illegal.I work in a place founded on atheist and humanist principles. anti-theism is in our charter and everything.It's really no different than a Christian faith based organization having a policy of not employing satanists to talk to their clients.
[img]
[/img]
here is Joel at the Big Bike Bash, he went on a boat for the first time, it was amazing! I have to point out again that everyone at the event was superb with Joel and there was lots 'love'in the air. You dont have to be a Christian or in a church to experience love/care and friendship for one another and I realise this.
Bikes bring people together too!
I like being a Chrictian and my church rocks
[url= http://www.portsmouthfamilychurch.org/ ]family church[/url]
No actually, there are plenty of places where it's not illegal.I work in a place founded on atheist and humanist principles. anti-theism is in our charter and everything.It's really no different than a Christian faith based organization having a policy of not employing satanists to talk to their clients.
My Mosque example wasn't meant to be taken literally 😉
Where you works, it sounds reasonable to 'discriminate' on religious grounds. However, at a guess, most workplaces are probably not founded on atheist and humanist principles with anti-theism is in their charter.
I'm an atheist, but occasionally - usually whilst riding lush singletrack at dusk - I'll admit to being something of a pantheist...
And in those moments, I take [url= http://www.blupete.com/Literature/Poetry/WordsworthTinternAbbey.htm ]this[/url] as my scripture.
"Where you works, it sounds reasonable to 'discriminate' on religious grounds. However, at a guess, most workplaces are probably not founded on atheist and humanist principles with anti-theism is in their charter. "
you can get an exemption, but it's quite hard work, but any organization can in theory do it, but you need to prove a definite need to
from the European equality and human rights commission.....
"Where there is a Genuine Occupational Requirement (GOR) to employ a person of a particular race, ethnic or national origin, certain exceptions from the regulations are permitted covering selection, promotion and training, but the employer must be able to show that there is a genuine need taking account of the type of work, or the context in which the work is carried out.
Essentially, the same principles apply to religious discrimination, but in limited circumstances, exemptions from the Regulations may apply where an employer needs to employ a person of a particular religion. There is also an exemption for 'employers with an ethos based on a religion or belief'. This allows employers to place advertisements for jobs requiring a person to be of specific religion as long as it can be justified, which is difficult. The religious requirement must be crucial to the post. Exemptions also apply for acts done in the interest of national security. "
There's also some stuff about similiar philosophical ethos and discrimination
but I can't find it right now.....:)
"Jeusu loves you, everyone else thinks your a **** MrWhoppit!
'pwned'
Chapter 2 vs 6 the Gospel according to LoulaBella "
Hmmm. Doesn't look much like a state of grace to me, but thanks for the insult.
An American comedian (I forget the name) once poked sharp metaphorical sticks at Xtians as part of his standup.
He related that after one of his shows, he was accosted by some Xtians in the carpark who said: "Hey Buddy! We don't like what you said about jesus". To which the comedian replied:
"Well, forgive me, then..."
Bearing in mind what I said about Leprechaunology, still no evidence, by the way.
This allows employers to place advertisements for jobs requiring a person to be of specific religion as long as it can be justified, which is difficult. The religious requirement must be crucial to the post. Exemptions also apply for acts done in the interest of national security.
Presumably, this is why Christian schools often state that being a Christian is not a job requirement, but supporting the Christian-based ethos of the school is.
Mr Wopitt, Bill Hicks.
Dawkins may be a thorough aetheist, sure of his reasoning, and able to pick apart religious beliefs in a 1000 ways....but **** me he's a tedious man.
It quite interesting how many religious people try to group atheists into a sort of 'anti-religion', with Richard Dawkins as some sort of 'prophet'.
Is the concept of rational, individual thinking so lost to those that have fallen for the hoodoo of religion that that can't see fellow humans beings as anything other than another group of people rather than the individual, free-thinking people that they are?
I have read Dawkins but I find him throughly dislike-able. His approach is as preachy and evangelical as any outspoken religious person and therefore I pay it little heed.
To be honest though I wouldn't consider myself atheist. I don't bear it much thought in day to day life as my family and friends are what is important, not whether or not some sky fairy is watching over me or not. I would probably describe myself an apathetic agnostic as the concept of religion existing or not matters very little to me now days.
My view on does/does not god exist - Don't know, don't care.
yup, I could be wrong here, but I think some Catholic schools still insist on the Catholic teaching certificate as well, which is fair enough in context....
From our point of view, in an organization which actively promotes atheism and humanism, we'd have to seriously wonder why a committed Christian would want to work for us.:)
It quite interesting how many religious people try to group atheists into a sort of 'anti-religion', with Richard Dawkins as some sort of 'prophet'.Is the concept of rational, individual thinking so lost to those that have fallen for the hoodoo of religion that that can't see fellow humans beings as anything other than another group of people rather than the individual, free-thinking people that they are?
One could say much the same thing about many coments made on here about religious people.
Don't know, don't care.
nicely succinct 🙂 One might describe a 'relationship' with another entity based on their being completely unresponsive to be dysfunctional - far better to concentrate on real world relationships and interactions - which is actually encouraged by most religions too.
From our point of view, in an organization which actively promotes atheism and humanism, we'd have to seriously wonder why a committed Christian would want to work for us.:)
They might be an [url= http://www.google.com/search?q=atheist+quaker ]Atheist Quaker[/url] or an [url= http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_atheism ]Atheist Christian[/url] 🙂
One could say much the same thing about many coments made on here about religious people.
Except the concept of religion is not rational and therefore those that believe in religion are unrational.
Actually it was about Adam and Eve's disobedience and it was a fruit - it doesn't mention an apple.
You can't make someone love you so God gave us free-will so we could choose.
Erm you can if you are a God. If he gave me free will and I disobeyed him it is still his fault unless when I design a car without brakes it is it’s fault when it cant stop.
SFB
I wish - were I able to believe I could marry my g/f. Unfortunately it would require a lobotomy
I would have though she required a lobotomy just to openly admit to being your g/f 😉
Interestingy point on religious discrimination. Someone of any faith can demand that their child goes to a school of the same faith (paid by the state)- who will also transport the child there at the cost of the state. An atheist must just send their child to the nearest school even if it is a faith one. This is being challenged at European level. so atheists can be discriminated against as it is not a religion.
Jeusu loves you, everyone else thinks your a **** MrWhoppit!
'pwned'
Chapter 2 vs 6 the Gospel according to LoulaBella "Hmmm. Doesn't look much like a state of grace to me, but thanks for the insult.
I am fairly sure you started the insulting thread by suggesting her child needed paliative (for dying people FFS) care. Insensitive and crass in the extreme. It is the only point with which I agree with her you are being a c0ck.
Except the concept of religion is not rational and therefore those that believe in religion are unrational.
I wasn't refering to just the irrational part of the text I quoted.

