Geographical snobbe...
 

[Closed] Geographical snobbery - what's all that about then?

84 Posts
45 Users
0 Reactions
456 Views
 bol
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I just read some guy in another thread make the statement that

If you are really into riding MTBs you simply wouldnt live in London.

Now I don't live in London, in fact, living in Norfolk I'm probably considered even further down the MTB pecking order by some. I simply can't understand why where you live can be seen to dictate whether or not you have the right to enjoy something or not?

I'd love to live in southern California, Canada or the Lakes for example, but I've got other things going on in my life as well as cycling. Am I being over sensitive here (because my local hills aren't very gnarly), or is this sort of geographical snobbery a bit silly?


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 6:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

there are no mountains in London or Norfolk and that isn't snobbery


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 6:27 pm
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

stems from northerners who for some extraordinary reason consider living that far north and being the home of whippets etc is something to be proud of... 🙄

It satisfies their angst from living so far from civilisation, cuisine, any serious economic activity, sunshine, effective public transport and focaccia.


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 6:27 pm
Posts: 1442
Free Member
 

it's a serious business if you are a northerner or sweaty sock.


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 6:27 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Here we go again!

As mentioned on another thread, the cellar is well stocked. Decent claret for those with class, watery pish for the Northerners. 😉


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 6:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

havent you noticed on here yet???

people tend to speak from their 70's teatowel holder quite frequently.

😉


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 6:30 pm
Posts: 7100
Free Member
 

yep, can't see what this has to do with snobbery. Some places are better suited to mountain biking than others. No one is telling you that you can't enjoy doing what you do where ever you live are they?


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 6:30 pm
Posts: 34143
Full Member
 

its partly because there are no mountains

its also a general jealousy/ irrational dislike thing that a lot of northerners / rural types have about london


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 6:33 pm
 bol
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Well Jon, that was the way I read it. I think that's what it meant.

I'm not pretending there are mountains in Norfolk or London SFB - but if that were the criteria for being able to enjoy riding, Yorkshire wouldn't be any good either.


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 6:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's grim up norf (except Yorkshire)


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 6:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

its also a general jealousy/ irrational dislike thing that a lot of northerners

say WHAT ?? Jealousy has nothing to do with it!


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 6:35 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

kimbers - Member
its partly because there are no mountains

There are no mountains in Devon, so does that mean that no one in Devon can be a mountain biker?


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 6:35 pm
 nonk
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

yes london is the finest of places to live if your a mountain biker.
if only i could swap north wales for london...ah well i will struggle on. 😉


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 6:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yorkshire wouldn't be any good either.

FYI Yorkshire has mountains. I know because I rode over one of them yesterday:
[url= http://public.bay.livefilestore.com/y1pppdy94BOWA6IwSn_FdnpBJfJPlHt5X-Os7A0JJPsFKORlIXzxLYePV7KbxIfiUsAW-xKQe7vmMV39ut7U6F7AA/DSC_0196b.jp g" target="_blank">http://public.bay.livefilestore.com/y1pppdy94BOWA6IwSn_FdnpBJfJPlHt5X-Os7A0JJPsFKORlIXzxLYePV7KbxIfiUsAW-xKQe7vmMV39ut7U6F7AA/DSC_0196b.jp g"/> ?psid=1[/img][/url]


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 6:36 pm
 nonk
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

but you cant see the london eye from up there sf..


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 6:38 pm
 Kuco
Posts: 7211
Full Member
 

Thats a large hill not a mountain.


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 6:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Thats a large hill not a mountain.

that's half way down...

but you cant see the london eye from up there sf..

is that good for biking ?


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 6:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Norfolk does have mountains. Nobody ever heard of Beeston Bump?

There is no universally agreed definition of a mountain.


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 6:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What tires for streets paved with gold?

I don't consider (my native) Somerset to be superior to London. But I only enjoy being in London for about 48 hours max.

Somerset, on the other hand...


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 6:41 pm
Posts: 7100
Free Member
 

FYI Yorkshire has mountains. I know because I rode over one of them yesterday:

I can't see the mountain, it must be that hill blocking the view.


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 6:42 pm
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

Somerset, on the other hand...
20 hours tops.

😉


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 6:44 pm
 nonk
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

is that good for biking ?

no yer daft bugger that was me point man.


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 6:48 pm
Posts: 13265
Full Member
 

There any decent Margaux Captain?


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 6:49 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Bien sûr, Sandwich. Santé


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 6:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Because living East of the Tees /Exe isn't good for easy access to upland Britain?


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 6:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There are no mountains in Devon, so does that mean that no one in Devon can be a mountain biker?
WRONG!
High willhays and Yes Tor are over 2000 feet and therefore mountains in this country


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 6:55 pm
Posts: 3535
Free Member
 

[i] I simply can't understand why where you live can be seen to dictate whether or not you have the right to enjoy something or not?[/i]

Not sure that's really what he's meaning. I think he's just suggesting London is a rubbish place to live if you really enjoy mountain biking. Personally I wouldn't live in London for lots of reasons. Quality of live, access to hills and mountains and many other reasons.

He's not dictating, just passing comment.


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 7:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]20 hours[/i]

Ah, but a slower pace of life = equivalent to about 1000000000 London hours.

Hark at 'ee & his spreadsheets.


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 7:12 pm
Posts: 34507
Full Member
 

TJ posted some video the other day of some northern riding, on a downhill straight double-track that was so rad, they were all sitting down...and still one of them manged to fall off.

bless 'em


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 7:13 pm
Posts: 91108
Free Member
 

I dunno.. I just get annoyed when people say there's no good riding in the South east. It's not true 🙂


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 7:13 pm
Posts: 91108
Free Member
 

High willhays and Yes Tor are over 2000 feet and therefore mountains in this country

Since when is 2000ft the qualifying height?


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 7:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Of course you can be a "mountain biker" if you live in London, Im sure there are plenty of them that live there.

What they actually do though is very different to a proper mountain biker.

The London types tend to mince round southern trail centres or leafy bits of single track in the surrey hills once per month - they just call themselves "mountain bikers" as it makes them sound impressive to their office buddies at work, and it gives them a hobby to spend their vast wages on.


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 7:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Since when is 2000ft the qualifying height?

Although England is the poor relation on the British Mainland in mountain scale there are still over 200 which reach over 2,000 feet (610 metres) in height.

http://www.walkingenglishman.com/mountains.html


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 7:23 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Davidtaylforth, you'll not be getting a bite from that one, I'm afraid.


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 7:24 pm
Posts: 10651
Full Member
 

The OP was quoting Scruff and, believe me, he's got nothing to be snobby about, he'm from Great Wyrley.

But he's right. He gets up into those hills around Cannock about 5 times a week, sometimes on his way to work, sometimes on his way back, sometimes when he officially is at work. I don't think he'd swap that for Hampstead Heath.


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 7:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Thankyou for your support!


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 7:25 pm
 bol
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Yep David, that's the sort of attitude I'm talking about. 🙄

Because I live in east anglia, most of my riding is done on leafy singletrack - which I really enjoy. I also enjoy Wales or wherever when I get the chance. I find it surprising that some people evidently think that makes me inferior to them, and less worthy of the title "mountain biker". Maybe it's all in jest and I've just lost my sense of humour today...

Edit: sadly he did Captain - I obviously have lost my sense of humour today. 😀


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 7:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

no probs edric.


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 7:30 pm
Posts: 3535
Free Member
 

[i]Yep David, that's the sort of attitude I'm talking about[/i]

I think he's yanking your chain. At least I hope so.

Surely they are getting more at the area than at you? I've ridden on some lovely stuff in East Anglia, and been overtaken by lots of "proper" mountain bikers. However I don't think I'm being exactly controversial when I say the riding is places like Wales, Yorkshire, Scotland etc is going to be better.


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 7:47 pm
Posts: 10651
Full Member
 

And another thing. The M in MTB doesn't stand for mountain. It stands for Multi.

And there ain't a lot of Multi in London.


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 7:49 pm
Posts: 2003
Full Member
 

Because living East of the Tees /Exe isn't good for easy access to upland Britain?

Whats that make the North York Moors then?


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 7:56 pm
 bol
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Kenny - yes, I realised (belatedly).

I can't dispute that there is more challenging riding in other parts of the country - which I wish I had more time to take advantage of.


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 7:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

This thread has gone off at a tangent... OP you asked what geographical snobbery is about....

Answer: Swindon


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 8:04 pm
Posts: 2003
Full Member
 

No, its about reminding mancs they really just live at the top end of the midlands.


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 8:07 pm
Posts: 17371
Full Member
 

Edric 64 - Member
There are no mountains in Devon, so does that mean that no one in Devon can be a mountain biker?

Yup, but they can be cross country riders. Can't take the mountain out of mountainbike...

And it isn't snobbery, it's fact.


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 8:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

We were always told in geography that upland Britain was roughly defined by a line from the Tees to the Exe ,but I take your point


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 8:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Epicyclo that's not my quote I pasted that bit in !


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 8:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Whats that make the North York Moors then?

mostly flat ?


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 8:16 pm
Posts: 2003
Full Member
 

Except on the sides


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 8:31 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

there are no mountains in London or Norfolk and that isn't snobbery

It is snobbery because you constantly throw it back in peoples faces, trying to say that you can't possibly be a MTBer if you don't ride mountains [i]all the time[/i]

It's a also very tiring brand of bullshit.


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 8:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Where's Fred? - people slagging off London & he's nowhere to be seen

Has he been banned again & I missed it?


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 8:39 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Actually the North Norfolk Ridge is just as steep as Simonfbarnes photo, just not as high - but its easier to get to the summit. Beeston Bump is OK but Muckelburgh hill is a harder climb


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 8:42 pm
Posts: 5185
Full Member
 

If you're going to cut yourself off from civilisation because you're such a serious mountain biker who's riding Real Mountains (tm) all the time, why would you even base yourself in the UK?


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 8:49 pm
Posts: 17371
Full Member
 

Ah, sorry Edric.

While we do have actual mountains up here, there's plenty difficult riding in the south. Maybe we should rename the sport cross country biking.


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 8:52 pm
Posts: 496
Free Member
 

This is a non mountain in Devon.

This is Lustleigh Cleave.

[img] [/img]

From the top of the non mountain to the river at the bottom is just short of 1000 vertical foot of the most technical riding I've done in England and that includes the Lakes. If anyone feels that they can describe this as not mountain biking because the non mountain does not top out at a certain height, then I suggest that they bring their ignorance to the fair Cleave and let us watch and laugh as it kicks your asses into a corner.

That is all.


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 9:09 pm
Posts: 23301
Free Member
 

It's bloody good riding but it's not that hard....


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 9:11 pm
Posts: 496
Free Member
 

yet to ride with anyone that has truly pwnd the cleave. si, dave and neilforrow would probably come closest.


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 9:19 pm
Posts: 3535
Free Member
 

[i] If anyone feels that they can describe this as not mountain biking because the non mountain does not top out at a certain height,[/i]

Not sure anyone is arguing that. I thought they were debating what is classified as a mountain, not what is classified as mountain biking. Two very different things. I doubt if more than about 2% of mountain biking in the UK is done on official mountains.


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 9:21 pm
Posts: 496
Free Member
 

Not sure anyone is arguing that. I thought they were debating what is classified as a mountain, not what is classified as mountain biking

I think they were

epicyclo - Member

Edric 64 - Member
There are no mountains in Devon, so does that mean that no one in Devon can be a mountain biker?

Yup, but they can be cross country riders. Can't take the mountain out of mountainbike...

And it isn't snobbery, it's fact


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 9:27 pm
Posts: 145
Free Member
 

The north is full of small minded bigoted people, some of whom happen to be mountain bikers.


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 9:28 pm
Posts: 3535
Free Member
 

Okay, I admit defeat. I was meaning the earlier stuff about the 2,000 feet divide. In that case I think about 99% of us are going to have to stop calling ourselves mountain bikers.


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 9:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

CaptainFlashheart - Member

Bien sûr, Sandwich. Santé

Glad he's not Northern. Wishes he was French.


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 9:35 pm
Posts: 6382
Free Member
 

I doubt if more than about 2% of mountain biking in the UK is done on official mountains.

And most of that is just skirting round the side of them. Or looking for the lowest pass between two of them. Or gazing at them from a distance.


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 9:37 pm
Posts: 6382
Free Member
 

Glad he's not Northern. Wishes he was French.

Add to that regrets being Welsh.


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 9:38 pm
Posts: 17371
Full Member
 

When I venture south to mountainbike events on the non-mountains, I get just as knackered.

Give me a long steep rocky climb over slimy tree roots any day 🙂


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 10:25 pm
Posts: 34143
Full Member
 

lets not forget london even has forest
[img] [/img]
you can even ride mountainbikes there its got trees, singletrack, hills(well small ones), mud, etc
[img] [/img]

and you can take your bike on the tube out to loughton- right in the middle of epping


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 10:52 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

But at the end of the day, London is shit. At least that's something we can all agree on.


 
Posted : 23/08/2010 10:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Geographical snobbery is quite simple.

It's rubbish up north, but here in the south it's a bit better apart from Devon, Cornwall, Portsmouth, Southampton and London. Oh, and Swindon.

Hampshire's good, apart from the two dumps mentioned above.

Even the Romans noticed that people in southern Britain were more civilised than notherners because they'd had contact with the people on mainland Europe.


 
Posted : 24/08/2010 8:03 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The north is full of small minded bigoted people, some of whom happen to be mountain bikers.

Which is why the vast majority of posts on this thread are from defensive southerners preempting an influx of hate-fueled Northerners that live in their large, unbigoted minds. Lollers.

Enjoy the Epping cycle paths chaps.


 
Posted : 24/08/2010 8:12 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think you've all got carried away by the marketing men...

The "M" in mtb was to make it sound 'ard.

The term ATB "all terrain bike" never quite sold as many bikes. Although I reckon the French still have it right with their term "VTT" - velo tout terrain

Mtb's have very little to do with mountains. Yes the vertical drop is nice, but it's not essential (or even all that appealing as one climb / one descent) Bikes need a trail to follow anyway - so for me, "mountain" bike is a bit of a bullshit term.


 
Posted : 24/08/2010 8:13 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Even the Romans noticed that people in southern Britain were more civilised than notherners because they'd had contact with the people on mainland Europe.

Yes, that'll explain York and Chester.


 
Posted : 24/08/2010 8:13 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

they hung another monkey yesterday in Swindon. 🙁


 
Posted : 24/08/2010 8:19 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

[i]Yes, that'll explain York and Chester. [/i]

And Hadrians Wall. 😉


 
Posted : 24/08/2010 8:21 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm southern by birth, living in Yorkshire by choice. I would hate to live somewhere where I couldn't see hills (admittedly in the distance). But that's me.

I ride an off-road bike about once a week. I'm not looking for 'hard' stuff, I think it's the best way to get out in beautiful scenery, cover a lot of ground, and have fun. I also have a (very) full time job and a child.

Probably have more in common with walkers than 20-something hardcore downhill mountain bikers.

It takes all sorts. People live all over the place, for their own reasons. Some of them enjoy riding off-road (or even on mountains given the chance). Why do people (read boys) on this forum get so worked up about it?


 
Posted : 24/08/2010 8:21 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

they hung another monkey yesterday in Swindon.

And they nicked that idea from Hartlepool!!


 
Posted : 24/08/2010 8:24 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

so for me, "mountain" bike is a bit of a bullshit term.

It's just a name, get over it. All terrain bike would be equally wrong, as you can't ride over all types of terrain. Of course, then you have road bikes that you can also ride off road or up mountains on. Downhill bikes that you can ride uphill. Freeride bikes that you have to pay for. Etc...


 
Posted : 24/08/2010 8:25 am
Posts: 17371
Full Member
 

JulianA - Member
...Even the Romans noticed that people in southern Britain were more civilised than notherners because they'd had contact with the people on mainland Europe.

Nah, what they meant was quicker to surrender than the northerners...

🙂


 
Posted : 24/08/2010 8:27 am
Posts: 12081
Full Member
 

But at the end of the day, London is shit. At least that's something we can all agree on.

London's great. But as a True Mountain Biker I'm glad I live in Spain.


 
Posted : 24/08/2010 8:28 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yep, London is pants. I'm a Northener by birth, live on the Isle of Wight, (Good chalk singletrack and some very steep bumps), but work (and commute by bike) in London. I can't stick the place, Hyde Park and the Commons are poop for MTBing so I can't wait to get home and shred some chalk. Best of all though is going home to my native Staffs and taking on the moors. 😆


 
Posted : 24/08/2010 8:34 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

ying and yang innit e.g. excellent riding at Lee and Cragg Quarries and in the Calderdale valley, just up the road, but the Rossendale Valley is about as grim as a grim northern [s]town[/s] place could be.

Scotland FTW


 
Posted : 24/08/2010 8:35 am
Page 1 / 2