Forum menu
We were always told in geography that upland Britain was roughly defined by a line from the Tees to the Exe ,but I take your point
Epicyclo that's not my quote I pasted that bit in !
Whats that make the North York Moors then?
mostly flat ?
Except on the sides
there are no mountains in London or Norfolk and that isn't snobbery
It is snobbery because you constantly throw it back in peoples faces, trying to say that you can't possibly be a MTBer if you don't ride mountains [i]all the time[/i]
It's a also very tiring brand of bullshit.
Where's Fred? - people slagging off London & he's nowhere to be seen
Has he been banned again & I missed it?
Actually the North Norfolk Ridge is just as steep as Simonfbarnes photo, just not as high - but its easier to get to the summit. Beeston Bump is OK but Muckelburgh hill is a harder climb
If you're going to cut yourself off from civilisation because you're such a serious mountain biker who's riding Real Mountains (tm) all the time, why would you even base yourself in the UK?
Ah, sorry Edric.
While we do have actual mountains up here, there's plenty difficult riding in the south. Maybe we should rename the sport cross country biking.
This is a non mountain in Devon.
This is Lustleigh Cleave.
From the top of the non mountain to the river at the bottom is just short of 1000 vertical foot of the most technical riding I've done in England and that includes the Lakes. If anyone feels that they can describe this as not mountain biking because the non mountain does not top out at a certain height, then I suggest that they bring their ignorance to the fair Cleave and let us watch and laugh as it kicks your asses into a corner.
That is all.
It's bloody good riding but it's not that hard....
yet to ride with anyone that has truly pwnd the cleave. si, dave and neilforrow would probably come closest.
[i] If anyone feels that they can describe this as not mountain biking because the non mountain does not top out at a certain height,[/i]
Not sure anyone is arguing that. I thought they were debating what is classified as a mountain, not what is classified as mountain biking. Two very different things. I doubt if more than about 2% of mountain biking in the UK is done on official mountains.
Not sure anyone is arguing that. I thought they were debating what is classified as a mountain, not what is classified as mountain biking
I think they were
epicyclo - MemberEdric 64 - Member
There are no mountains in Devon, so does that mean that no one in Devon can be a mountain biker?Yup, but they can be cross country riders. Can't take the mountain out of mountainbike...
And it isn't snobbery, it's fact
The north is full of small minded bigoted people, some of whom happen to be mountain bikers.
Okay, I admit defeat. I was meaning the earlier stuff about the 2,000 feet divide. In that case I think about 99% of us are going to have to stop calling ourselves mountain bikers.
CaptainFlashheart - MemberBien sรปr, Sandwich. Santรฉ
Glad he's not Northern. Wishes he was French.
I doubt if more than about 2% of mountain biking in the UK is done on official mountains.
And most of that is just skirting round the side of them. Or looking for the lowest pass between two of them. Or gazing at them from a distance.
Glad he's not Northern. Wishes he was French.
Add to that regrets being Welsh.
When I venture south to mountainbike events on the non-mountains, I get just as knackered.
Give me a long steep rocky climb over slimy tree roots any day ๐
But at the end of the day, London is shit. At least that's something we can all agree on.
Geographical snobbery is quite simple.
It's rubbish up north, but here in the south it's a bit better apart from Devon, Cornwall, Portsmouth, Southampton and London. Oh, and Swindon.
Hampshire's good, apart from the two dumps mentioned above.
Even the Romans noticed that people in southern Britain were more civilised than notherners because they'd had contact with the people on mainland Europe.
The north is full of small minded bigoted people, some of whom happen to be mountain bikers.
Which is why the vast majority of posts on this thread are from defensive southerners preempting an influx of hate-fueled Northerners that live in their large, unbigoted minds. Lollers.
Enjoy the Epping cycle paths chaps.
I think you've all got carried away by the marketing men...
The "M" in mtb was to make it sound 'ard.
The term ATB "all terrain bike" never quite sold as many bikes. Although I reckon the French still have it right with their term "VTT" - velo tout terrain
Mtb's have very little to do with mountains. Yes the vertical drop is nice, but it's not essential (or even all that appealing as one climb / one descent) Bikes need a trail to follow anyway - so for me, "mountain" bike is a bit of a bullshit term.
Even the Romans noticed that people in southern Britain were more civilised than notherners because they'd had contact with the people on mainland Europe.
Yes, that'll explain York and Chester.
they hung another monkey yesterday in Swindon. ๐
[i]Yes, that'll explain York and Chester. [/i]
And Hadrians Wall. ๐
I'm southern by birth, living in Yorkshire by choice. I would hate to live somewhere where I couldn't see hills (admittedly in the distance). But that's me.
I ride an off-road bike about once a week. I'm not looking for 'hard' stuff, I think it's the best way to get out in beautiful scenery, cover a lot of ground, and have fun. I also have a (very) full time job and a child.
Probably have more in common with walkers than 20-something hardcore downhill mountain bikers.
It takes all sorts. People live all over the place, for their own reasons. Some of them enjoy riding off-road (or even on mountains given the chance). Why do people (read boys) on this forum get so worked up about it?
they hung another monkey yesterday in Swindon.
And they nicked that idea from Hartlepool!!
so for me, "mountain" bike is a bit of a bullshit term.
It's just a name, get over it. All terrain bike would be equally wrong, as you can't ride over all types of terrain. Of course, then you have road bikes that you can also ride off road or up mountains on. Downhill bikes that you can ride uphill. Freeride bikes that you have to pay for. Etc...
JulianA - Member
...Even the Romans noticed that people in southern Britain were more civilised than notherners because they'd had contact with the people on mainland Europe.
Nah, what they meant was quicker to surrender than the northerners...
๐
But at the end of the day, London is shit. At least that's something we can all agree on.
London's great. But as a True Mountain Biker I'm glad I live in Spain.
Yep, London is pants. I'm a Northener by birth, live on the Isle of Wight, (Good chalk singletrack and some very steep bumps), but work (and commute by bike) in London. I can't stick the place, Hyde Park and the Commons are poop for MTBing so I can't wait to get home and shred some chalk. Best of all though is going home to my native Staffs and taking on the moors. ๐
ying and yang innit e.g. excellent riding at Lee and Cragg Quarries and in the Calderdale valley, just up the road, but the Rossendale Valley is about as grim as a grim northern [s]town[/s] place could be.
Scotland FTW
I live in Cumbria and told in geography that a mountain was 1000m so I have always refered to the fells.
It is great to have the hills, I have lived most of my life in Keswick and I could have a different ride every day for a month easily. However the size of the terrain is not the most important factor to having fun. Somedays when you had carried the bike on your back to the top of High Spy to have a cheaky ride over Catbells it isn't as much fun as an evening through a wood. Then there are the days when you find yourself in the middle of a 2000 strong fell race and you wish you were anywhere else. My message is just enjoy your biking.
Regarding North South I feel very happy to be based in Cumbria, I often work in Suffolk (I like), London (hard work) and I can see many benefits to having more amenities but you will never get me to stay in a million years. I am sure millions would have the opposite view.
London is great, as long as your interests are not narrow enough only to include riding an over forked steel hardtail over barren double track every day.
I could never understand why anyone would want to live in a city anyway.
as long as your interests are not narrow enough only to include riding an over forked steel hardtail over barren double track every day
I had not realised such bikes were banned there
yes the MTB routes of London are trully phenomenal people come from miles around to ride their gnarly urban routes and the views are utterly superb from their as well really takes your breath away [ though that may be just the smog].
Some areas are better than others for riding a mtb not really that controversial is it?


