Forum menu
France and the Burk...
 

[Closed] France and the Burka Ban-should they ban it?

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#1248926]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/8473822.stm

I have to agree with them but I don't want to seem racist. When in France I want to be in France not Mecca.

Is it racist? or is it forcing people to adapt to France rather than France adapt to Islam interpretation by some?

Ideas?


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 3:29 pm
Posts: 151
Free Member
 

A simple law preventing you from covering your face/head unless there's a good reason would do the trick (and being oppressed isn't one).


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 3:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Personally i think it is offensive to civil liberties.

France however, is a legally secular Nation, the UK is not. We have a State-sanctioned Church(es) and a Monarch who is head of that Church. We could not legally enforce a ban on religious symbology without disestablishing the Church etc.


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 3:32 pm
Posts: 762
Free Member
 

+1 for 5thElefant

And ban those frigging stupid hoddies which also have a face part in the style of a WW2 gas mask.


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 3:35 pm
Posts: 7365
Free Member
 

5thElefant +2


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 3:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm from the old school that says "when in Rome, do as ....." so I think the French have the perfect right to put a stop to the Burka and I would like to see the same thing here.


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 3:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If I were French, I would agree with the ban
I'm not so I don't really care what they do


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 3:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Understood uplink but it could apply here one day and implications from it could be positive or negative in the long term.


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 151
Free Member
 

Understood uplink but it could apply here one day and implications from it could be positive or negative in the long term.

Can't see it.


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 3:42 pm
Posts: 35040
Full Member
 

They do things differently in France....

They don't for instance have the notion of state measured ethnicity, one is French, and that's the end of the matter, they don't for instance label each other "Afro-British" for example as we do, you're just French. This has both obvious advantages and obvious disadvantages.

The burqua ban has to be seen in this context, it's simply "not French" I don't think it's necessarily right or wrong, although I'm uncomfortable with it being banned personally. I don't think such a law would or could be passed in this country for instance.


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 3:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'd not be unduly concerned if it were implemented here


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 3:42 pm
Posts: 34531
Full Member
 

its bollox in my opinion

while im not a fan of the burkha (hate all religions) the government has no right to tell me what clothes i can or cant wear


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 3:44 pm
Posts: 151
Free Member
 

its bollox in my opinion

while im not a fan of the burkha (hate all religions) the government has no right to tell me what clothes i can or cant wear


Would you be particularly bothered if you weren't allowed to wear a mask and hood in public?


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 3:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

5thElefant - Member

Understood uplink but it could apply here one day and implications from it could be positive or negative in the long term.

Can't see it.

Take off your burka?

I could see it happening here if done democratically with votes but probably would be as a backlash to Islam fear. Also other religions would be next like turbans and wearing crosses in school...

Maybe you're right.

I do like the idea of French or non French. But would people accept it here?

Ban on Hoodies? great idea!


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 3:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Would you be particularly bothered if you weren't allowed to wear a mask and hood in public?

As a recreational ninja such an imposition would seriously affect my ability to ninge.


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 3:48 pm
Posts: 29
Free Member
 

I'm with Plant.


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 3:48 pm
Posts: 34531
Full Member
 


Would you be particularly bothered if you weren't allowed to wear a mask and hood in public?

you ever been to a fetish club?


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 3:49 pm
 jond
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

The religious requirement, as I understand it (I could check with some mates or colleagues I guess), is to dress modestly. If you look through the muslim world that's interpreted very differently - it's a cultural issue (as is female circumcision, for example, which is also illegal in the UK).

Equally, you wouldn't expect to go to a muslim country walking around inappropriately dressed..tho' the irony there is that a western woman in *some* countries is far more likely to be hassled...so much for western decadence...


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 3:51 pm
Posts: 151
Free Member
 

you ever been to a fetish club?

No, but that's not public, it's a private club. If you want to dress up like a ninja in private that's completely fine.


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 3:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I,m with muddydwarf.

France has a secular constitution and this gives a rather different complexion on these sorts of things. In the UK in would be much harder to do.

You have to remember that the complete covering of the face is no means accepted in Islam as needed - covering your hair, arms and legs is enough to satisfy the needs of the religion according to most Islamic scholars. No need to cover the face. It makes me uneasy and could be a cover for racism but given the constitutionally secular nature of France then its easier to do than in the UK.


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 3:53 pm
Posts: 3228
Full Member
 

How on earth does it make you uneasy?


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 3:57 pm
Posts: 151
Free Member
 

I've never understood how bleeding hearts don't make a fuss about burkhas. If the BNP insisted their women should wear masks in public the bleeding hearts would go apeshit over it.

And... where are the bloody feminists? They should be making a real fuss.

Liberal racism - "they don't know any better"?


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 4:03 pm
Posts: 12148
Free Member
 

Am I right in thinking that the Burka isn't even an item of religious dress, more to do with some acient muslim guy hiding his wives from peeping toms by a curtain and the fashion catching on.
If so then isn't it only as sensitive as a hoodie or black balaclava.


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 4:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 4:07 pm
Posts: 35040
Full Member
 

[i]And... where are the bloody feminists?[/i]

Some Islamic feminists have co-opted the buqua.


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 4:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Freedom of expression though isn't it?

'IF' we were ever to bring in a law like that on the dubious grounds of combatting terrorism, it would then inevitably lead to other acts being created on similarly dubious grounds - don't like hooded sweatshirts so ban them etc.
What next, long hair banned for blokes?
Trousers banned for women?

Bad law inevitably breeds more bad law.

I don't like the burkha, but as long as people choose to wear it then that's their affair.


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 4:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

mtbfix - Member

How on earth does it make you uneasy?

Uneasy because I wonder if the intent is racist or that it is a start of an attack on religious freedoms.

Its one of those areas where its easy to see with "commonsense" what he answer should be - but actually trying to define this and write it down in such a ay that it couldn't be used as an instrument of oppression - and will it lead to even more restricted lives for these women as they might then be forbidden from leaving the house at all.

5th - weirdly enough many women want to wear them - perhaps brainwashed into it. I believe you are 100% right that it is an instrument of oppression but as above I find that the idea of the state saying what you can and cannot wear makes me uneasy.

No easy answer and I have no firm opinion.


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 4:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

oldgit - Member

Am I right in thinking that the Burka isn't even an item of religious dress, more to do with some acient muslim guy hiding his wives from peeping toms by a curtain and the fashion catching on.
If so then isn't it only as sensitive as a hoodie or black balaclava.

Pretty much. As I put above most Islamic scholars would consider keeping hair, arms and legs covered would be enough.

There was an interesting case in the UK a year or two about this. a girl at school wanted to wear not a burka but a long flowing robe that is worn by some islamic women. The school refused to let her and as a part of the subsequent court case the local Imam stated that the clothes that were acceptable to the school were acceptable to Islam as well


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 4:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The Hanibal hoodie anyone?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/birmingham/content/articles/2007/10/01/hoodie_clothing_feature.shtml


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 4:18 pm
Posts: 34531
Full Member
 

surely lycra is the next thing to ban offensive if you ask me.

[img] [/img]
[img] [/img]
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 4:22 pm
 hels
Posts: 971
Free Member
 

"where are the feminists ??"

Over here !

In my humble opinion the wearing of the Burka is totally offensive and not the woman's choice at all in any realistic way, and only a few faltering steps away female circumcision.

Although it said on Radio 4 (so it must be true, I'll check the Guardian) that only about 2000 women wear it so a ban is a bit heavy handed and strikes me as bullying women who are already extremely vulnerable. How about they just throw the husbands/fathers etc in jail until they give the women their freedom ??


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 35040
Full Member
 

[i]How about they just throw the husbands/fathers etc in jail until they give the women their freedom ?? [/i]

They would argue that they are liberating women from male oppression.


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 4:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How about they just throw the husbands/fathers etc in jail until they give the women their freedom ?

who'd make the tea for the kids?


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 4:34 pm
Posts: 17395
Full Member
 

It shouldn't be banned. Nor should mini-skirts or other such delights 🙂


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 4:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Hels - there was a very interesting piece in the Guardian - a British (non practising) muslim went to one of the residential religious schools in ****stan. Teh pressure on her to wear a burka came from the other women there.

Perhaps its brainwashing / indoctrination but in some cases it clearly is the woman's choice to wear it.


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 5:01 pm
Posts: 151
Free Member
 

Perhaps its brainwashing / indoctrination but in some cases it clearly is the woman's choice to wear it.

Female circumcision is the same. Just because it's other women applying the pressure it doesn't mean it should be condoned.


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 5:03 pm
Posts: 3729
Free Member
 

So in order to protect women and ensure that they are free to choose what they should wear, certain items of clothing should be banned?

I'm surely not alone in detecting a slight trace of irony here.


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 5:05 pm
 hels
Posts: 971
Free Member
 

TJ I read that piece in the Guardian and interpreted it very differently. IIRC In the end she wore it to fit in, much like the other women I would imagine. It was all very sad.


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 5:07 pm
 hels
Posts: 971
Free Member
 

It is a bit like the prostitution argument n'est-ce pas ?

The Police arrest the women not the men.

I think I would have to say that I am anti-burka wearing but believe that banning it won't solve the problems.


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 5:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

keep it just for the ugly birds ?


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 5:29 pm
Posts: 18593
Free Member
 

I have to wear a T-shirt and shorts to jog through town though I'd rather not when it's 40°C (I'm male). So the woman's argument about having the right to wear what she wants doesn't hold up as nobody in France has the right to dress as they wish at present. If there's a limit to how much I can undress and jog through town why shouldn't there be a limit as to how much I can cover up? It could be problematic on the pistes on cold days though.

Je suis fier d'être citoyen d'une république laïque et je soutiens le projet de loi.


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 9:22 pm
Posts: 13291
Free Member
 

i'd happily ban it.

couldn't give a flying **** what 'minorities' think about it. put it to the popular vote - much like Switzerland did re. the minarets.

the GF got shouted at in Iran for not covering enough of her hair. she had to sit in a different section of the bus when travelling with her dad. this was 2 years ago.

it's also the ****ing stench of sweaty flesh that eminates from these burka wearing folks on a hot day. when you're stuck behind one of them (think that's a slightly impersonal.....? i find it rather impersonal when someone hides their face from me) it makes you gag.

besides, if you were to walk through central london, your face covered with a buff, do you think the old bill wouldn't take any notice?
[url=

time i've posted this recently.... mr connelly.[/url]


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 9:39 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

without reading the thread I will counter the it is oppressive to women post that must have gone up by now.
Oddly we never seem to say this when we see pictures of half naked women walking the streets of Newcastle in nowt but a short skirt and skimpy top - apparently that is their right but the second they cover up a man has made them do it.....wonder why we object to one and not the other.
my basic point is anyone can wear whatever they want I dont see clothes or the lack there of personally offensive
How many of you on here know anyone who wears a Burkha Obviously dont let this stop you speaking on their behalf. , I have conversed with some and have asked them why they do this?
I work in a multi cultural area [33% Asian] iirc and interview and work with many wearers of the Burkha. I love the juxtaposition of seeing someone dressed like that whilst talking on their Iphone to their mates about Big brother. I also like seeing them walking down the street in Burkha with tEvery she ubber bling handbag always maked me chuckle.Not one single person I have conversed with about this views this as anything other than a personal choice and as a sign of their faith. The women seem to have free choice of this whether married or single [though not necessarily about covering the hair]. I have seen people in family units with mother wearing head scarf one child uncovered one in Burkha.
You do realise that under the Burkha they are dressed like other people, jeans , dresses whatever and in their own homes they dont do this.
There may a be a point re security but why does anyone get het up about what someone else wears?
Liberal freedom of choice is my option. Let em wear what they want
I have traveelled in Middle east and depending on exactly where you are no you dont necessarily have to dress as they do and cover up...has that argument come up yet we couldn't wear x in their country?

Alpin isnt smoking , being British and riding a bike a minority thing in Germany lets hope they respect your choices abit more eh?
I also dislkie religion but I dont see why we should go ape about their clothes Do you people get just as upset about Nuns?


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 9:41 pm
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

Don't see why they should not be banned. Went to Turkey for hols last year - a Muslim country - they're banned there, have been for years.


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 9:48 pm
Posts: 13291
Free Member
 

half naked women walking the streets of Newcastle in nowt but a short skirt and skimpy top - apparently that is their right but the second they cover up a man has made them do it.....

no no, you're right....

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 22/01/2010 9:51 pm
Page 1 / 2