Forum search & shortcuts

F1 2016 (Bound to c...
 

[Closed] F1 2016 (Bound to contain spoilers!)

Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

well that was a tad embarrassing for the other teams over 1 sec back for the nearest non merc ! 🙄


 
Posted : 09/07/2016 5:38 pm
Posts: 18087
Full Member
 

Yes indeed, have the FIA called in the UCI yet to check for motors?


 
Posted : 09/07/2016 6:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That banner is ace 😀


 
Posted : 10/07/2016 12:33 am
Posts: 25957
Full Member
 

I'm not a big follower of F1 (or this thread), so forgive me if this is old news

Ricciardo's on R5 just now talking about being a fan of thrash metal, having just sung a line of "love is all around" in response to a question abot whether he's feeling it at Silverstone

Yesterday I heard him saying that, after a race, he needs to check himself in a mirror and make sure he's still a 9 or 10 before relaxing for the evening

Good work IMO (unless he's a complete arse, of course)


 
Posted : 10/07/2016 11:30 am
Posts: 13647
Free Member
 

Is Brawn definitely returning or was that specualtion?


 
Posted : 10/07/2016 11:36 am
Posts: 13827
Full Member
 

Get on with it ZZzzz


 
Posted : 10/07/2016 1:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

10 second penalty for Palmer on top of the time that he'd already lost. That'll learn him twice.


 
Posted : 10/07/2016 1:44 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

*conspiracy theorists hat* lewis has a problem @ baku "can't tell you lewis"..... british gp rosberg has an issue and straight "go to mode...."


 
Posted : 10/07/2016 3:08 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

they enjoyed that !

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 10/07/2016 3:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

british gp rosberg has an issue and straight "go to mode...."

And it's immediately leapt upon by the Stewards. No great conspriracy.

Looks like a slam dunk penalty...

Hopefully 😀


 
Posted : 10/07/2016 3:33 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

merc conspiracy not an FIA one 😉 I don't believe in it the engineer panicked and blurted out the solution !


 
Posted : 10/07/2016 3:39 pm
Posts: 10650
Full Member
 

Rosberg had a problem that would have stopped the car (stuck in 7th); an instruction to keep the car going is allowed under the rules. The second communication which advised avoiding 7th and then telling him how to avoid 7th is more of an issue. It's the second communication which is under investigation.


 
Posted : 10/07/2016 3:42 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

if it's a safety issue the only message allowed should be "strat mode 4 box box box".


 
Posted : 10/07/2016 3:54 pm
Posts: 10650
Full Member
 

Not if you're about to stop the car on track...


 
Posted : 10/07/2016 3:59 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

and yet he passed the pit lane entry another 6 or 7 times

Rosberg: “Gearbox problem.”
Engineer: “Driver default 1-0-1, chassis default 0-1, chassis default 0-1.”
Engineer: “Avoid seventh gear, Nico, avoid seventh gear.”
Rosberg: “What does that mean, I have to shift through it?”
Engineer: “Affirm Nico, you need to shift through it. Affirm, you need to shift through it.”

the conversation and nothing about being stuck in 7th


 
Posted : 10/07/2016 4:06 pm
Posts: 10650
Full Member
 

Klunk - Member
and yet he passed the pit lane entry another 6 or 7 times

After the conversation, yes. So?

the conversation and nothing about being stuck in 7th

You could see it on the steering wheel and the team would be able to see it from the telemetry.


 
Posted : 10/07/2016 4:38 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

so it was never a safety issue, it was a protect 2nd place issue.


 
Posted : 10/07/2016 4:45 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

when you thought nothing could be slower than a 4th umpire lbw referral

3rd even 😳


 
Posted : 10/07/2016 4:49 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

you get the feeling if it was manor or Sauber, 10 sec penalty without even so much of a second thought! 😉


 
Posted : 10/07/2016 4:58 pm
Posts: 1512
Full Member
 

Ridiculous delay! I sense some strongly put arguments...


 
Posted : 10/07/2016 5:17 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

or contemplating something more serious than a 10 sec penalty.... must be a DQ on the cards


 
Posted : 10/07/2016 5:19 pm
Posts: 10650
Full Member
 

A car stopping on the track IS a safety issue when those coming from behind you are doing 150+mph


 
Posted : 10/07/2016 5:26 pm
Posts: 1512
Full Member
 

Maybe they were watching the Wimbledon final first?


 
Posted : 10/07/2016 5:27 pm
Posts: 10650
Full Member
 

Regardless, that photo of Lewis Hamilton crowd surfing at the British Grand Prix will go down in history as one of the best!


 
Posted : 10/07/2016 5:32 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Nico should be penalised, partly for being Britney and partly for receiving team help. Hamo! Hamo!


 
Posted : 10/07/2016 5:41 pm
Posts: 10977
Full Member
 

10 second time penalty for Nico, max takes p2, nico drops to p3.

http://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/rosberg-handed-10-second-time-penalty-drops-to-third-797642/


 
Posted : 10/07/2016 6:41 pm
Posts: 13282
Free Member
 

Yay! Although I feel slightly bad for saying that.


 
Posted : 10/07/2016 7:29 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Britney robbed Max of his rightful podium celebration. Wish he'd take his sour mug and eff off. Lewis will now turn up the playful mind games on him further 😀


 
Posted : 10/07/2016 7:31 pm
Posts: 10977
Full Member
 

Penalty was for telling him how to avoid 7th rather than telling him what setting to use. Millions per race and he needs to be told that you avoid 7th by going from 6th to 8th...


 
Posted : 10/07/2016 7:37 pm
Posts: 2085
Free Member
 

And he kept using 7th anyway. Not worth the penalty.

Interestingly it sounds like telling him what engine and chassis settings he needed was allowable under the rules


 
Posted : 10/07/2016 8:10 pm
Posts: 111
Full Member
 

He is indeed well paid but I think the reason he asked how to avoid 7th gear is that you can't change from 6th to 8th in an F1 car hence the car sticking in 7th which made it appear he was still using it ... Alway I think they deliberately broke the rules knowing Britney would get a penalty giving Lewis an advantage in the championship (joking).


 
Posted : 10/07/2016 9:03 pm
Posts: 34070
Full Member
 

That sign that sands posted is genius! #rubbinghisnoseinit 😆


 
Posted : 10/07/2016 9:15 pm
Posts: 18087
Full Member
 

Well I've just caught up it. Couldn't catch it yesterday, there was some proper racing going on elsewhere.

Max eh? There's the future of F1.


 
Posted : 11/07/2016 12:54 pm
Posts: 1905
Free Member
 

Yep - Verstappen's overtake on Rosberg for P2 on inters was special - absolutely millimetre perfect!! I think I actually jumped off the sofa shouting "go on lad!"


 
Posted : 11/07/2016 1:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My take on yesterday; tarmac run offs have helped ruined F1. The amount of times the top guys just ran it off the 'circuit' but returned with no penalty was ridiculous. Considering it was a damp race it was all pretty formulaic with Hamilton cruising to victory. The only decent moments of interest with the Verstappen's overtake on Rosberg, and Vettels spin. Even Palmer missing a wheel was mostly missed by the TV.


 
Posted : 11/07/2016 1:54 pm
Posts: 3351
Free Member
 

It's not so much the runoff areas, as the camera angles. They're zoomed in from a distance so any sense of speed is lost in translation.

F1 would be the perfect sport to experiment with camera drones.


 
Posted : 11/07/2016 2:34 pm
Posts: 18087
Full Member
 

My take on yesterday; tarmac run offs have helped ruined F1. The amount of times the top guys just ran it off the 'circuit' but returned with no penalty was ridiculous.

Definitely.


 
Posted : 11/07/2016 4:59 pm
Posts: 3314
Full Member
 

Yep, as much as I don't want to see them smashing themselves up, there needs to be some reason to attempt the corner, even at the expense of a lock up/flat spotting a tyre/losing time or speed.P previously you'd stick it in the gravel and game over, or you'd e driving on cack tyres fora good while. Maybe they need mandatory drive through or something to make it worthwhile trying to make it stick.


 
Posted : 11/07/2016 5:03 pm
Posts: 10977
Full Member
 

It's not beyond the wit of man to come up with an automatic system that detects when they've exceeded circuit limits, iirc it's already in place in some series. Next question is what to do about it - if there's any leniency then it will be exploited by someone, so some enforced time penalty but applied immediately so the result on the track is the actual result. Maybe reducing ers deployment for the next lap, though that would be seen as another artificial tweak.

Or just stick armco 100mm outside the white line and make every track as severe as Monaco.


 
Posted : 11/07/2016 5:57 pm
Posts: 13647
Free Member
 

Amazing stuff from Verstappen!


 
Posted : 11/07/2016 7:38 pm
Posts: 14189
Full Member
 

Halo on the Red Bull today at Silverstone - it doesn't get any better looking with familiarity. Not the way to go IMO...

[img] [/img]

http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2016/07/12/pictures-2016-f1-testing-day-eleven-silverstone/


 
Posted : 12/07/2016 12:34 pm
Posts: 12503
Full Member
 

The screen was better than that I reckon. At least that looked like it belonged on a car.


 
Posted : 12/07/2016 12:38 pm
Posts: 1512
Full Member
 

Didn't the screen fail the safety tests though? Think that's why the halo is the least worst option


 
Posted : 12/07/2016 12:42 pm
Posts: 12503
Full Member
 

I thought it just wasn't so far along in the safety tests, rather than failing? Could have misunderstood though.


 
Posted : 12/07/2016 12:45 pm
Posts: 1338
Free Member
 

i saw it mentioned somewhere, possible on BBC that screen had failed the test where they fire a tyre at it.


 
Posted : 12/07/2016 12:53 pm
Page 23 / 39