Forum search & shortcuts

EU Referendum - are...
 

[Closed] EU Referendum - are you in or out?

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I REALLY can't believe STWers are still posting about the Referendum result and public opinion. We just had a General Election. People voted on manifestos (and (non) promises of writing off student debt too 😉 )


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 3:26 pm
 igm
Posts: 11874
Full Member
 

Julian - be careful. Questions matter.

Same people doing the poll work done more recently.

http://whatukthinks.org/eu/questions/in-highsight-do-you-think-britain-was-right-or-wrong-to-vote-to-leave-the-eu/?removed

Yes polls have inaccuracies. Look at the know accuracy of a company where you can,look at a basket of companies and look at the trends within a company. Also look at poll type. People are less willing to admit to being Brexies on the phone (or voting Tory normally).

One poll alone is never a good thing to rely on.


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 3:29 pm
 igm
Posts: 11874
Full Member
 

Jamba - this fight will be going on for years. Bringing down Brexit and the Brexies that caused it may we'll take that long. They're generally older and dying out - but not exclusively.
Anyway they have don't harm to my family's future so I will see what I can do to get even. The same way you would in return. 😉

As for what people voted for, I voted to try and weaken May (and the UK government generally) as I thought it would give the UK the best long term future if the negotiations became virtually untenable. Didn't work. We got the evil waste of space (can you be both) that is Sturdy.

However the fight goes on. For decades if necessary.


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 3:31 pm
 mrmo
Posts: 10720
Free Member
 

when we put in place free trade agreements elsewhere which will happen quickly

DD, sadly i don't think it is delusional, i wish it was though. Fast deals are bad deals, but politics demands they be done. It will shaft the UK but that is of no importance. There is money to be made by selling off the NHS and ramming GM and chlorine down our throats.


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 3:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Utter Brexit fantasy.

As opposed to a global recession predicted by the IMF / OECD ?

A free trade deal with US and Japan in cars is pretty trivia imol. They both manufacture here so a commitment to keep that and share some technology (eg hybrid vehicles ?) and we are done ?

Gove just ruled out chlorine chicken (frankly I don't see the fuss, I've eaten it many times) btw. Whatever US farmers say it's not going to derail a deal on cars.


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 3:32 pm
 igm
Posts: 11874
Full Member
 

I hope we're not getting American cars. They really are shoddy.

I lived there, I've driven there (as I think have you). Badly designed, inefficient, poorly made and rarely drive well.

As opposed to a global recession predicted by the IMF / OECD ?

Did I miss that press release? I remember a large reduction in GDP over many years relative to the counter factual, but it was still positive. And that seems to be happening in the UK at least.


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 3:35 pm
 mrmo
Posts: 10720
Free Member
 

Julian, what i will say from your link, there is no clear demand for anything.

This is the crux of the argument. there is no real demand for anything. A few vocals on both sides. Brexit will lose, IMO, because of time and money. 88c to the pound for your summer holidays, that is Brexit and that is what the average voter will see. They will see the chaos of no deal as it isn't going to happen smoothly like so many brexiteers claim.

The question is who do they pin the blame on.


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 3:36 pm
 igm
Posts: 11874
Full Member
 

Jamba 😉


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 3:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Customers choice igm. Ford Focus, Fiesta, Mondeo etc ? They can make cars at all quality points.

Gove is no mug, his announcements on no diesel (and petrol) by. 2040 plays heavily into Japanese and American hands as European manufacturers have prioritised diesel. There is some Brexit politicking in this


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 3:42 pm
 igm
Posts: 11874
Full Member
 

Ever driven a good American car. I haven't.

And those you mention are European cars.

As for Japanese manufacturers, like say Nissan and Mitsubishi who clearly are good at electric / hybrid - aren't they part of the Renault Nissan Alliance and effectively Renault owned these days? I don't think that European manufacturer will struggle.

Tesla is technically interesting but flawed as a company - they'll collapse in the not to distant future, though I expect the products to continue in some form.

Not sure your optimism / pessimism for Japan &a US / European car companies actually stacks up that cleanly.


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 3:44 pm
Posts: 57410
Full Member
 

Fast deals are bad deals, but politics demands they be done. It will shaft the UK but that is of no importance.

I think the phrase that Liam Fox, David Davis and chums better get used to hearing is

"take it or ****in' leave it mate!"

That's the 'deals' we'll be getting


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 3:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Don't push the positivity too far jambas - 0.3% GDP was hardly stellar in 2Q! Not a catastrophe but not great either.


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 3:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Maybe the truth does lie somewhere in the middle TMH but when faced with such negativity why the hell not eh ?

@igm we live in a democracy, by all means support / vote for / create a party that wants to stop Brexit / re-join the EU. Maybe you can find a Farage / UKIP equivalent who can do it single handed ? But it certainly aint Blair, Cable or Caroline Lucas. Corbyn amd McDonnell want out of the EU so they can nationalise / support industry. I think they wre misguided in that but I support their view that they wamt to chance to control UK government policy

Electric / Hybrid announced by Grayling not Gove. Both at centre of Vote Leave


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 4:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[b]2040[/b] plays heavily into Japanese and American hands as European manufacturers have prioritised diesel

checks calendar... yeah, I bet VW are pulling their hair out and are already taking sledgehammers to diesel production lines 🙄

Is 2040 when Gove thinks we'll have sorted out all our trade deals, then?


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 4:17 pm
 igm
Posts: 11874
Full Member
 

2040 is to give a 10 year life cycle before our 2050 commitments. And that came from the governments zero emission vehicle advisor when I spoke with him last week.


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 4:32 pm
Posts: 3188
Full Member
 

GM just sold their eu cars to Peugeot, Chrisler is Fiat ?

Not much choice is it ?

Same with Japanese, big Toyota factories in France.


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 5:20 pm
 igm
Posts: 11874
Full Member
 

Incidentally I think certain manufacturers are going to find they backed the wrong horse on charger technology.
A decent DC charger network, just to buy the chargers, looks like it will cost as much per annum as the entire UK electrical distribution system from LV to 132kV. And that's before you install and connect the chargers. Eye watering.
My suspicion is that although DC charging has advantages for the car, it will therefore be too expensive for a mass roll-out - without which range anxiety will stop folks buying electric.
Something to consider when looking at who's ahead technology-wise.


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 5:43 pm
 DrJ
Posts: 14041
Full Member
 

Dr - thats a really poor attempt, although expected as I typed. Would you confuse the idiom with earlier comments- SNAP, the trap was sprung!!!

ROFL - yeah, it was all just a cunning plan, nothing to do with being a hypocrite. How could I have doubted it?!


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 5:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You didn't - you made a vain attempt to connect this thread to the JRM and failed. Apples and pears, apples and pears. Better luck next time.

Up to you if you want to delet the word hypocrite ^ though - probable better not as the irony would be missed


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 6:05 pm
 igm
Posts: 11874
Full Member
 

Stop squabbling boys.

If you need to be nasty to each other, do it with style and hyperbole.

Like wot I always do like. 😉


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 6:14 pm
 DrJ
Posts: 14041
Full Member
 

You didn't - you made a vain attempt to connect this thread to the JRM and failed.

Self evidently I didn't.

hypocrite

How would you suggest describing someone who criticises others for doing what he does himself?


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 6:26 pm
 mrmo
Posts: 10720
Free Member
 

just came up on my twitter feed, and as STW is the font of all knowledge.

If no deal is better than a bad deal with the EU why are we caring about deals with the US, China, etc because obviously the deal will be in their favour not ours???


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 6:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Dr?

😉


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 6:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Jambas - do have a read of Gideons Gobshite tonight - the reporting of GDP and then leader are brilliant(ly awful)


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 6:44 pm
 DrJ
Posts: 14041
Full Member
 

I'm happy to let the readers judge for themselves who the ... err ... inconsistent one is ...

How sad that in this day and age people are still judged by how they talk, how they dress.

Looks like a new suit. Very smart but should have cut the label off. Purple tie for Lent too...amazing
Mr Corbyn doesnt wear a tie most of the time,

Indeed, someone really should have a word. At least french socialists maintain a sense of style.

Perhaps now that he does his top button up and wears a tie.


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 7:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Oh a derail - what fun. Damn wrong choice of phrase when sitting on a train....


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 7:13 pm
 igm
Posts: 11874
Full Member
 

Hmmm. Brexit... derail... if only someone could do puns and word play and things.

So tell me THM, do your more 'verbose' days correlate to long train journeys too, or is it your daily commute?


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 7:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bit of both!!

Plus nature of work on a particular day.


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 7:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If no deal is better than a bad deal with the EU why are we caring about deals with the US, China, etc because obviously the deal will be in their favour not ours???

A bad deal with the EU would/could include ludicrous budget contributions (eg imo any amount), continued full access to fisheries, something similar to freedom of movement, jurisdiction of ECJ

Why is it [b]obvious[/b] a deal with US or Japan would be a bad one ? They won't ask for a budget contribution (EU is unique in asking for money), they won't ask for freedom of movement or expect their courts to tell us which criminals we can or cannot deport. We have a trade deficit with them as we do with the EU so getting a balance is going to be hard anyway.


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 7:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

TMH the Standard is worth what you have to pay for it, nought. Gideon is just a very bitter man having seen his UK political career evaporate. I'm sure he'll angle for something at the IMF etc.

@igm IMF downgraded their 2017 UK forecast and left 2018 unchanged. We are a smidge below Germany (1.7 vs 1.8) but still ahead of France and of course Italy. Spain is growing strongly but who wants 10% general and 25%+ youth unemployment ? Not me.

@mike Corbyn said he would "deal with" outstanding student debt as it was unfair that large numbers if students would have debts whilst under Labour new students would pay nothing. His intention was blatantly clear, to me and thousands of current and ex students.


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 7:51 pm
 igm
Posts: 11874
Full Member
 

@igm IMF downgraded their 2017 UK forecast and left 2018 unchanged. We are a smidge below Germany (1.7 vs 1.8) but still ahead of France and of course Italy. Spain is growing strongly but who wants 10% general and 25%+ youth unemployment ? Not me.

Not sure why that's @igm

Someone else comment on the economy or did I do it and forget? I mean I have done in the past, but not recently.

Was it this?


As opposed to a global recession predicted by the IMF / OECD ?

Did I miss that press release? I remember a large reduction in GDP over many years relative to the counter factual, but it was still positive. And that seems to be happening in the UK at least.

I don't think what you've said is incompatible with what i expressed. A large reduction over a long period is a small reduction on average relative to a positive counter factual in each year. The reduction in GDP was across 20 years or so as I recall so no further downgrade for 2018 is neither here nor there. Also who cares if we managed to damage the EU at the same time - if anything that just makes it worse.
Remember I work in an industry where 10 years is short term - I tend to see things a little differently as a result.
Year on year GDP fluctuations is vaguely interesting but not concerning either way. I thought you did pension type investments don't you think over those sorts of terms too?


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 7:56 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

Oh a derail - what fun
not really you could answer his charge that you are a hypocrite and explain the statements you made and explain why you are not. Alternatively you can pretend you dont accept the faultless logic and weakly troll and obfuscate to the undeniable evidence, before your eyes, of your own hypocrisy.
Its not even debatable is it hence we have this charade.


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 8:02 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

Why is it obvious a deal with US or Japan would be a bad one ? They won't ask for a budget contribution (EU is unique in asking for money), they won't ask for freedom of movement or expect their courts to tell us which criminals we can or cannot deport.

So what would they ask in return?

We could offer them tariff free sales of cars, but since our currency has been devalued that would probably not even offset that. So what do we make that they want that they can cut tariffs on?


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 8:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So GDP will have to collapse by 5% in the next 12 months to match Gideon's / HMT's Project Armageddon predictions.

https://order-order.com/2017/07/26/5-gdp-in-next-12-months-needed-to-meet-treasury-predictions/


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 8:16 pm
 igm
Posts: 11874
Full Member
 

Nah. The start point has been displaced that's all. 😉

You don't want to believe everything you read Jamba.

And if you do, read it very carefully. Including all the assumptions and caveats. Which that link doesn't give you does it?

Remember economists do rational modelling and people aren't rational - at least in the short term.

Marketeers are better for short term predictions than economists I'd say.

Longer term, relative to a counter factual that may itself move, they ain't to bad.

That said some of the other numbers in that link aren't far off are they?


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 8:23 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

You don't want to believe everything you read Jamba

He seems to believe everything he reads that he wants to believe, and anything that doesn't fit his predetermined opinion is dismissed.


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 8:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Now, now Jambas you had you fun pre the vote, time to leave the massive abuse of what the forecasts "actually" said to "those who cannot accept the vote."

The forecasts were neve even close to that kind of headline. Hence we had it quoted above


 
Posted : 26/07/2017 8:25 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

@mike Corbyn said he would "deal with" outstanding student debt as it was unfair that large numbers if students would have debts whilst under Labour new students would pay nothing. His intention was blatantly clear, to me and thousands of current and ex students.

What did he write it on a bus?
Anyway he didn't win the election so he can't implement his policy and now all students are screwed over. Nice way to go for most on here who had a free uni education.

Anyway still not come back to do the maths questions where you take more away but have more to spend.


 
Posted : 27/07/2017 12:22 am
 sbob
Posts: 5581
Free Member
 

How would you suggest describing someone who criticises others for doing what he does himself?

A forumite? 🙂


 
Posted : 27/07/2017 12:28 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

CBA reading all the squabbling on here, so it might have been done, if so my apologies. But I was wondering if jamba would like to remind us what Labour's policy on Brexit is?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-40726213


 
Posted : 27/07/2017 1:21 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Confused?


 
Posted : 27/07/2017 5:49 am
 igm
Posts: 11874
Full Member
 

Flexible?


 
Posted : 27/07/2017 6:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Incoherent?

Intentionally vague - let's hope the voters are not smart enough to notice

(Greetings from the train IGM!)


 
Posted : 27/07/2017 6:27 am
 igm
Posts: 11874
Full Member
 

In certain situations, those words are political synonyms.

(Not on the train today, so there'll be less posting from me.)


 
Posted : 27/07/2017 6:46 am
 Del
Posts: 8284
Full Member
 

You don't want to believe everything you read Jamba

He seems to believe everything he reads that he wants to believe, and anything that doesn't fit his predetermined opinion is dismissed.

TBF, i'm sure we're all guilty of that to a certain extent, if we're prepared to admit it or not.

The overwhelming majority of labour voters were remainers. Seems Jezza is marching off in his own direction again, irrespective of anyone else's views

Binnerrs without this position / manifesto Labour would have been crushed at the GE. See what @tmh says above - spot on about moving the GE away from Brexit

not sure what your point is? labour did their best to campaign on the ground on which they were strongest? well, duh.


 
Posted : 27/07/2017 8:50 am
Page 682 / 1714