MegaSack DRAW - This year's winner is user - rgwb
We will be in touch
i've had mine on about 18 months. They clamp down the side of the roof where the door closes as theres no gutter or mounts on the roof. I've noticed the rubber trim on the doors is distorted a bit, but just wondered if they are on long long term eg 3 or 4 years does this get any worse, or anyone ever had the trim split?
Just wondering as i'm looking to change my car and if they can cause damage long term i might look at one with roof rails
You'll probably be left with slightly distorted rubber that'll take a while to return to shape. And may have paint worn through where grit gets under with vibration. But other than that I can't see much of an issue.
They do return to normal but take a bit of time...I've got a similar situation...problem I've found is if the roof isn't spotless then when you clamp the mounts down and remove them, they leave a few marks...
yes they do
I guess you guys must use them continuously for work otherwise you'd be mad to leave them on permanently as they increase fuel consumption by about 10%
Which car?
I have only noticed a 0.5mpg drop in my average fuel use, so I've no issues leaving them on...
Mine actually dented the roof of my Corolla Verso, they are an expensive make too, Atera I think it is.
Its not as if I clamped them down.
Ours have been on 7 months and the computer still shows we are doing exactly the same average consumption.
the 10% figure is for a roof rack, with some crap on it
I only loose ~15% tying 8 surfboards (total hight approx 2', full width of the car, overhang front and rear) to mine, so I doubt very much you'd get 10% with 2 small bars.
I'd agree with the scratches under the footpacks if left on for ages...I've noticed a couple of scuffs...I've got some touch up paint so I'm going to fix those and then probably stick some helicopter tape over where the feet sit to help prevent that again.
BTW - Our identical consumption is for the bars AND the box (160l jobbie) on permanently to lug baby things around.
I know Seat had to replace some Ibiza models a few years ago after their own brand roof racks left creases in the roofs of some cars.
BTW - Our identical consumption is for the bars AND the box (160l jobbie) on permanently to lug baby things around.
Well either your car's computer is wrong, your car had rubbish aerodynamics to begin with, or your driving style has changed to be a bit more smooth as if all other things are equal that simply should not be possible. To be honest I'd suspect the latter as your driving will almost certainly have changed as a result of having kids.
Driving style makes a huge difference. A few months ago I had a long drive with bikes on the roof which normally seriously compromises the fuel economy. The route I ended up taking was pretty heavy but flowing traffic which reduced my speed to 50-60mph. My mpg was much higher as a result.