Forum menu
Design/illustration...
 

[Closed] Design/illustration apps for iPad

Posts: 787
Free Member
 

If you have an iPad try out Autodesk sketchbook pro and get a decent stylus to go with it. I use a basic wacom Bamboo, (you can now get bluetooth ones that mimic pressure sensitivity but they are still not as good as using a proper tablet and stylus) and it's very good for sketching and quick graphics. IMHO Sketchbook Pro is far more intuitive than a lot of other programmes out there as it's for sketching/painting rather than purely photo manipulation or vector graphics which is a bit of a black art.

However, for the real deal you will need to go to a Wacom Tablet that is at least A4 sized ( preferably bigger), a half decent PC or Mac, a good graphics card, fast HD or SSD and a stack of RAM, the biggest hi res screen you can afford and sketchbook pro/any other decent sketching software plus photoshop and illustrator.

All expensive but a good investment if you are aiming to do any work professionally or at least half seriously.

Just a warning, a lot of the online tutorials for Photoshop and illustrator range from mediocre to useless due to the complexity of the software, face to face tutorials are much better providing you can get a good teacher. Oddly enough though some of the "for Dummies" books and "illustrator/photoshop in east steps " are actually very good indeed if you are starting with the software.


 
Posted : 02/01/2015 4:45 pm
Posts: 33970
Full Member
 

And for a Mac capable of doing high end design work, with software, you're looking at a minimum of 4k

Only if you're doing work involving absolutely huge files, video in 4-8k, or 3D CAD rendering enormous files.
In the real world of regular Photoshop/Illustrator, a well-specced iMac with lots of RAM installed along with really good backup.
I used to retouch scanned photos from a Crosfield drum scanner for high quality repro, for the likes of Titleist golf equipment, on a Mac tower with 1Gb of RAM, twin 486 KHz processors, and a 500Mb HDD*. Backup was onto DAT tape with Retrospect software.
Anything that's going for print won't be much bigger than 40Mb for a single illustration at 300dpi, which is standard litho resolution.
That Mac was around £2500, with another £2000 for its 21" CRT monitor, around 1996-7.*
A 27" iMac with the top spec would be perfectly adequate; anything more would require a MacPro cylinder, and I just don't see a requirement here for anything of that scale, we only use iMacs in our studio.
*As far as I can remember, it's been nearly twenty years!


 
Posted : 02/01/2015 7:38 pm
Posts: 8161
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]
Aaaah, the G4 Digital Audio or Gigabit Ethernet, I suspect. My favorite Apple tower design ever.

You are doing it down a little, though, I think you'll find it had 2x450MHz 7400 series G4's or perhaps a single 466MHz 7410. MHz, not KHz 🙂


 
Posted : 02/01/2015 7:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

After updating flash player I got an adobe advert that I thought might be useful to the OP:

Bundle up
Photoshop and Lightroom together
£8.57/month

I know we'd come to the conclusion that buying the whole creative cloud suite of products was both overkill and prohibitively expensive but access to photoshop for under a tenner a month to get going doesn't seem too bad.


 
Posted : 02/01/2015 10:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Huddersfield media centre (by the market) used to have some kind of open access Mac design suite.

🙂 the idea that you need a Mac is ridiculous (never mind a £4k one)- I worked as an art director/flash designer/multimedia developer for several years on a £600 dell laptop plugged into a cheap 21" monitor (until melted, but that was due to relocating to sunnier climes).

And as for software, if you're learning then there are cheap/free ways to get hold of it


 
Posted : 03/01/2015 11:32 am
Posts: 57390
Full Member
 

Yeah, but if you're designing for screen only, then file sizes are small. Flash files are tiny! I produce hi resolution multi-layered photoshop renders for print. File sizes are effing huge!!! You wouldn't be doing that on a PC laptop.

The OP is going to need to do high resolution illustrations for print. So a cheap PC. Laptop won't cut it

My kids still use my old one of these, for web browsing....

[img] [/img]

😀


 
Posted : 03/01/2015 1:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The OP is going to need to do high resolution illustrations for print. So a cheap PC. Laptop won't cut it

If they were purely vector based illustrations maybe a laptop would be ok. But were talking scanning, manipulating, editing, illustrating, lots of layers. Big files needing to be print ready. Very different to a flash file. An example I have just done is 4 gig, it's huge both in physical size and file size, this isn't an abnormal file size for some projects. I expect the OPs files to be much smaller than that in the first instance but they can easily get bigger as they want more from the software.

A cheap 21" monitor? Was this on old tube style monitor? Things are very different now.


 
Posted : 03/01/2015 1:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It you're looking at illustration software for the Mac check out [url= https://affinity.serif.com ]Affinity Designer[/url]

I've recently moved over to Designer after using Illustator nearly 20 years. So far I'm very impressed. It does nearly everything I need ( missing a few typography features, but they're supposed to be on the way). I believe Designer is a credible alternative to Adobe Illustrator at a sensible price.

On the iPad i use Pixelmator.


 
Posted : 03/01/2015 1:35 pm
Posts: 1442
Free Member
 

I produce hi resolution multi-layered photoshop renders for print. File sizes are effing huge!!! You wouldn't be doing that on a PC laptop.

this^ i just supplied a well known high st retailer with some still life images for an email campaign that were 11300x7500 pixel dimensions and 257meg flattened tiff (layered files were 8-10gb) it may only be seen on a phone/laptop screen but a lot of clients need the option to print big if their needs change, it’s easy to make things smaller but uprezzing non vector images can only be taken so far.


 
Posted : 03/01/2015 1:36 pm
Posts: 8161
Free Member
 

Sorry - Can't help it:

"
How do you titillate an Ocelot?
Oscillate it's tits-a lot!
"

IGMC


 
Posted : 03/01/2015 2:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

As you were asking about the ipad, 53 is pretty cool. A couple of in app purchases and I bought " the pencil" for 20 ish on Amazon.


 
Posted : 03/01/2015 2:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It you're looking at illustration software for the Mac check out Affinity Designer
I've recently moved over to Designer after using Illustator nearly 20 years. So far I'm very impressed. It does nearly everything I need ( missing a few typography features, but they're supposed to be on the way). I believe Designer is a credible alternative to Adobe Illustrator at a sensible price.
On the iPad i use Pixelmator.

I am going to give this a try out if curiosity. What made you switch from illustrator?


 
Posted : 03/01/2015 3:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What made you switch from illustrator?

I couldn't justify the expense of Adobe's Creative Cloud.


 
Posted : 03/01/2015 5:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I tried the demo and I think it's ok for someone wanting to get into design but not have the means for CC. I would still advise to use a free copy of CS2 though .


 
Posted : 03/01/2015 6:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Update: The course my wife booked onto has been cancelled due to lack of take up. Arrrrgghh!!! Got to wait to at least April for another one. Also the woman who is in the business who helped her sell some work last year has moved away from Hudds so will be unable to help her any more.

1 step forwards and 2 steps back. 🙁

Why is it so damn difficult to penetrate this business????

It's such a shame. Her work has other professionals really impressed but as my wife can't use (and hasn't got) the tech needed it seems like her skills are wasted. We can't afford for her to go back to Uni but that seems like the only option.


 
Posted : 13/01/2015 5:24 pm
Posts: 33970
Full Member
 

You are doing it down a little, though, I think you'll find it had 2x450MHz 7400 series G4's or perhaps a single 466MHz 7410. MHz, not KHz

Sorry, you're right, it's a long time since I used one, and I didn't think to check the specs. Lovely machine, always looked impressive sat on the desk with a 21" monitor when clients came around, much better than the grubby, dusty beige boxes that used to accumulate dust kitties and scuff-marks inter the desk. Mine was a twin processor, the 2x450MHz version, with 1Gb RAM. 😀
There's still one in use at work from my previous place, as an email server, but that one's a single processor. Mine got chucked in a skip, along with most of the other machines, by the administrators when the company went tits-up.
Heartbreaking. 😐


 
Posted : 13/01/2015 7:57 pm
Page 2 / 2