Forum menu
Death Penalty.
 

[Closed] Death Penalty.

 ton
Posts: 24283
Full Member
 ton
Posts: 24283
Full Member
Topic starter
 

druidh
answer my question please.


 
Posted : 26/11/2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How about [url= http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Nickell_murder_case ]Colin Stagg[/url]

Stitched up like a kipper for a murder he did not commit. Clearly innocent as Robert Napper has now been convicted for it.
A brutal crime. He would surely have fitted your criteria for being hung.


 
Posted : 26/11/2009 9:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So Ton, if you read that muddy and confusing Mail article carefully, 3 murders by released, convicted murders over a period of 6 years

Quite a few indeed.


 
Posted : 26/11/2009 9:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[url= http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/mar/18/prisoner-hodgson-murder-quashed-miscarriage ]27 Years[/url]


 
Posted : 26/11/2009 9:41 pm
 ton
Posts: 24283
Full Member
Topic starter
 

teej, shit happens mate..
shall i reel off my list of mass murderers again...
all those poor relative left, and peter, and rose and dennis and donald..............all tucked up in their nice cosy paid for by us cells...
shame on you..


 
Posted : 26/11/2009 9:41 pm
Posts: 5400
Free Member
 

I'm not prepared to pull the lever myself, can't ask someone else to do it for me.


 
Posted : 26/11/2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

And as previously mentioned Stefan Kisko. An absolutely tragic case.

He was convicted of raping and murdering 11 yr old Lesely Molseed. Ons small problem... he did not, and could not have done it.


 
Posted : 26/11/2009 9:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Do you think mass murderers would be deterred by a death sentence?


 
Posted : 26/11/2009 9:44 pm
 ton
Posts: 24283
Full Member
Topic starter
 

JacksonPollock
i agree mate..terrible.
how many people did shipman do in tho??

Do you think mass murderers would be deterred by a death sentence?

no mate, but why should we pay to keep them..


 
Posted : 26/11/2009 9:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Why should we pay? The keep Esselgruntlfuttock in a job ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 26/11/2009 9:49 pm
 ton
Posts: 24283
Full Member
Topic starter
 

my cousin is a prison warder at monster mansion...
he looks after some nice residents..
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2009/05/31/baby-p-killer-s-cushy-cell-inside-monster-mansion-115875-21402275/


 
Posted : 26/11/2009 9:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Shoot the Bastards ton
Trouble is they need to be over 100% proved to kill someone
but even last year the Police got caught out trying to convict
an inocent man for a crime he had not done.
what the Police had done was to finger print the guy and found
that a small part of his finger print resembled the whole finger
print taken fron the scene, then the Police enlarged a small part of the guys finger print to match the suspects finger print.
This even went to Crown court on the strength of the made up finger print.


 
Posted : 26/11/2009 9:56 pm
Posts: 13356
Free Member
 

Yeehaa! Thanks skidartist! At the moment though, I don't work with moiderers ex or otherwise, & as for [i]and use their organs for donation and make some use out of them[/i] you wouldn't want them, even on your deathbed.


 
Posted : 26/11/2009 9:57 pm
 ton
Posts: 24283
Full Member
Topic starter
 

this bloke is one of the nice residents too.

should we keep him locked up till he dies or should we end it for him

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Maudsley


 
Posted : 26/11/2009 9:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Where is Esselgruntlfuttock?

he must have an opinion on this one.

Ton - have you been in a prison? They are not nice places and loosing your liberty is horrible.

So Ton - define how you can hang those people and not hang Stefan Kisko, Stephen Downing, Colin Stagg - or are you prepared to let these innocent men be hung?


 
Posted : 26/11/2009 10:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidney_Cooke


 
Posted : 26/11/2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I was in court on one of the days of Shipmans trial(in an observational capacity during my degree). He wasn't in court on that particular day thank god as I'd have probably been held in contempt!

The medical evidence was being put forward to decide what was admissible. What struck me was how robust the system is. Law is tested all the time but still it gets things wrong.

Do you think Shipman wouldn't have killed, for fear of the death penalty? He displayed psychopathic behaviors. His staggering arrogance put him beyond the rationale of the general populous. We (as a society) should have learned from him in the hope that understanding the mindset of people such as him, can lead to spotting the early warning signs in others to prevent horrific crimes like his from happening again.


 
Posted : 26/11/2009 10:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

He was one of 12 children, born in the Toxteth area of Liverpool, and spent most of his early years in Nazareth House (an orphanage run by nuns) in Crosby, Liverpool. At the age of eight, he was retrieved by his parents and beaten regularly until he was eventually removed from their care by social services.[1] During the late 1960s, as a teenager, Maudsley was a rent boy in London to support his drug addiction. He was finally forced to seek psychiatric help after several suicide attempts. It was during his talk with doctors that he claimed to hear voices telling him to kill his parents.

Yeah lets hang him..


 
Posted : 26/11/2009 10:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

At the risk of once again being looked upon as a racist, nazi or extremist and AFAIK, the BNP manifesto includes the reintroduction of the death penalty as a sentencing option in certain cases.


 
Posted : 26/11/2009 10:07 pm
 ton
Posts: 24283
Full Member
Topic starter
 

teej, unfortunatley, yes i have. not proud of it.


 
Posted : 26/11/2009 10:08 pm
Posts: 13356
Free Member
 

Your cousin works in Wakey then Ton? Up to now I've worked in Durham, Frankland (both high security cat A's at the time) & where I am now, which will remain anonymous. When you read security files on SOME inmates, there's no way MANY can think 'aahh, bless, lets give them a second chance' some might, but not the majority.
For what skidartist said, I'll never be out of work even if the death penalty was re-introduced.
TJ may have worked in the prison system but I'll wager he wasn't pounding the landings.


 
Posted : 26/11/2009 10:08 pm
 ton
Posts: 24283
Full Member
Topic starter
 

esselgruntfuttock
yes mate, and another at hull.


 
Posted : 26/11/2009 10:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

One thing is whilst the Death Penalty was in place
crime was in no shape or form as it is today!


 
Posted : 26/11/2009 10:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

esselgruntfuttock

Never pounded the landings for sure. Prison nurse. It was enough to have some idea of what happens but not enough to have a deep knowledge

I certainly believe that there are some who need to be removed from society never to re-enter it and some people are irredeemable.

I believe in rehabilitation but I am realistic enough to know for some this is not possible. I have no issue with open ended sentences and I believe our judicial system fails - too many folk get sentences that do nothing - either they need to be and can be rehabilitated and this does not happen - or they can't or wont and need to be removed from society.

However reform of the system is another topic for another day.


 
Posted : 26/11/2009 10:16 pm
 ton
Posts: 24283
Full Member
Topic starter
 

teej, lets agree to disagree, i am hungry??


 
Posted : 26/11/2009 10:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Grantway - murder is at a 20 yr low at the moment - the rate has been steadily dropping for this time.

Why? I have no idea but I guess its increasing prosperity and better treatment of mental illness


 
Posted : 26/11/2009 10:17 pm
Posts: 13356
Free Member
 

Soz TJ, missed your thread while I was (slowly) typing under the affluence of G&T, It's been a hard day again! I'm in a working prison where the vast majority of inmates...work. The majority on my wing see prison as a hinderance & don't find it particularly difficult. Why this is I don't know cos I couldn't do a month's bird never mind a good stretch. Our place is obviously not a bad place to be, 7 channels on the telly, decent visits opportunities, foods not too bad (yes, I have tried it but don't let on!)plenty of time out of cell, staff aren't manic, mostly. & even our several soon to be cat D's say it's not really difficult! May vary from jail to jail & length of sentence etc.
Any questions, form a queue.


 
Posted : 26/11/2009 10:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

ton - Member

teej, lets agree to disagree,

I have no problem with that - your opinion is yours and at least you accept the logic that if you have capital punishment innocents will be hung.

i am hungry??

Who are you going to eat? The murderers or me? ๐Ÿ˜ฏ


 
Posted : 26/11/2009 10:20 pm
 ton
Posts: 24283
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Who are you going to eat? The murderers or me?

a certain kind of burger....... ๐Ÿ˜ฏ ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 26/11/2009 10:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

esselgruntfuttock

Respect to you. You do a job that many could not.

Interesting that you say your place ain't to bad - but you couldn't do a month.

Pentonville was horrible - thats my main experience. One thing I found both interesting and good to see was the quality of the prison officers. I was expecting a bunch of real arses but on the whole they were decent blokes wanting to do a decent days work with a touch of humanity - and some were very good indeed.

Right - beer o'clock

laters peeps


 
Posted : 26/11/2009 10:27 pm
Posts: 13356
Free Member
 

Mine's another G&T then, rest day tomorrow, thank ****!


 
Posted : 26/11/2009 10:37 pm
Posts: 19543
Free Member
 

LOL! Just like to answer TJ.

[b]On this I am a new testament man - "turn the other cheek" not an old testament man " an eye for an eye"[/b]

Jesus!(in Spanish accent please) Are you trying to be a martyr? I hope you have not confused yourself with Stockholm syndrome? Compassionate yes but martyr slapping cheek and all that is not right.

Eye for an eye? They are only between those people who are the victims of heinous crime so those people who protest against the punishment is in fact being "compassionate" for the wrong reason when the case is clear.

Fair enough if the case is not clear and you protest but if you protest against all cases there must be something wrong.

Some good arguments from TJ as usual and highly entertaining but somehow something is not right.

[b]Now you answer

Are you prepared for one of your family to be put to death after a miscarriage of justice?[/b]

If it is a miscarriage of justice no. As you say 'miscarriage' and who would let that happens without protest?

๐Ÿ™„


 
Posted : 27/11/2009 1:23 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Chewk. Look at Stephen Downing, Stefan Kismo. Colin Stagg. All would have been executed by the eye for an eye folk. all innocent but stitched up


 
Posted : 27/11/2009 1:27 am
Posts: 19543
Free Member
 

[b]TandemJeremy: "Chewk. Look at Stephen Downing, Stefan Kismo. Colin Stagg. All would have been executed by the eye for an eye folk. all innocent but stitched up[/b]

Yes, it's not perfect but the guilt will be with the people who stitched them up. They too must be brought to justice if they use underhand tactics.


 
Posted : 27/11/2009 1:46 am
Posts: 785
Full Member
 

Back to the OP's question, death penalty, Yes or no...

How about an 'opt in' death penalty? If you believe in the death penalty as a deterent, you sign up for it...

Idea being there are 2 differing tarifs for all crimes. The none death penalty tarrif has much longer jail time for all crimes. Where as the death penaly tarrif has much reduced jail time for minor offences , but more serious crimes are punishable by death.

Idea shamelessly nicked from Mark Thomas's tour eariler this year.


 
Posted : 27/11/2009 7:32 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Base Ball Bat works


 
Posted : 27/11/2009 10:51 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

chewkw - Member

TandemJeremy: "Chewk. Look at Stephen Downing, Stefan Kismo. Colin Stagg. All would have been executed by the eye for an eye folk. all innocent but stitched up

Yes, it's not perfect but the guilt will be with the people who stitched them up. They too must be brought to justice if they use underhand tactics.


So your solution to the innocent being killed by the state ios to just keep killing people till all worngs re righted? You know how daft that is dont you]The its not perfect but means we kill people who have not committed any crimes BTW.


 
Posted : 28/11/2009 1:04 am
Posts: 19543
Free Member
 

Junkyard - Member

So your solution to the innocent being killed by the state ios to just keep killing people till all worngs re righted? You know how daft that is dont you]The its not perfect but means we kill people who have not committed any crimes BTW.

No. It means doing a thorough investigation before sentencing and not some underhand tactics.

๐Ÿ˜ฏ


 
Posted : 28/11/2009 3:14 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Chewkw.

So how are you going to stop the misscaiges of justice then?

You don't think the above cases were "thoroughly investigated"


 
Posted : 28/11/2009 9:22 am
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

doing a thorough investigation before sentencing and not some underhand tactics.

so you propose the Status Quo excellent suggestion.


 
Posted : 28/11/2009 12:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

YES

NO

SOMETIMES

How about securing the perimeter of one of the more desolate islands that exist in some number off the coast of the UK, landing the worst of our prison population - the ones with no hope of redemption - in a huge group and set them free to take part in a battle royale type sentence, and then use the threat of this punishment as a future deterrent?


 
Posted : 28/11/2009 12:49 pm
Posts: 11
Free Member
 

TJ - I respect your well made points however please desist from asking those in favour how they would prevent miscarriages of justice until you can say how [b]you would prevent reoffending by those released under the current system[/b].

Can we at least agree to sterilise them? ๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 28/11/2009 1:40 pm
Posts: 11
Free Member
 

Whilst money isn't the driver on this issue, I'd rather provide improved healthcare etc with the money saved from keeping those who have been sentenced never to be released than keep them in some degree of comfort and probably protected into their dotage. That's a no brainer of a choice to me. And to be clear this relates only to those sentenced never ever to be released.


 
Posted : 28/11/2009 1:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No as people can be framed and I don't trust the police.

How many innocent people have been wrongly convicted and released?

Bloody hard labour though.


 
Posted : 28/11/2009 5:42 pm
Page 6 / 7