Forum menu
compact system came...
 

[Closed] compact system cameras

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#5138172]

afternoon....
i have decided that a new camera is in order this year but dont want a point and click and am thinking that a dslr might be a bit much for me.
so i have been looking at the compact systems, up to around £400ish, the chap in jessops recomended the cannon eos m.
so who's got one and are they worth it?
cheers


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 4:47 pm
Posts: 151
Free Member
 

Putting it politely the eos m isn't the best bet.

Look at Olympus and Panasonic for m4/3 or Sony NEX for aps/c.

I'd look at a Sony Nex 3 or 5 personally (there's a couple of generations of each available to suit the budget). Molgrips will be along shortly to recommend Olympus, closely followed by Cougar to recommend Panasonic. Nobody will recommend an eos m (probably).


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 4:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

tbf i thought it was strange as the chap didnt even go through any of the other brands!


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 4:54 pm
Posts: 151
Free Member
 

I expect he's got a storeroom full of eos-ms he can't shift 😉


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 4:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

😆


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 4:59 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

There's a huge amount of Canon/Nikon fanbo-ism, for some reason. I don't think it's entirely justified and it edges out other manufacturers who make good stuff.

5e is the Eos-m supposed to be bad? I read a few good tihngs about it.


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 5:13 pm
Posts: 17852
Full Member
 

shuffles in.....

looks sheepish......

.....Nikon 1......cough....

wanders off......

(PS - I am not a professional camera advisor).....


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 5:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

why the cough and shuffle? i thought the 1 was a fairly good camera (judging by the reviews)?


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 5:33 pm
Posts: 33980
Full Member
 

You might like to have a shufti at this:

[b]Fujifilm X20: A classically styled, 12oz compact camera with an upgraded sensor and optical zoom[/b]
http://www.coolhunting.com/tech/fujifilm-x20-camera.php
The price is in your ballpark, too.


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 5:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

conuntzero...reminds me of the cameras my dad had! would like something a little more modern in apperance as i'm nt a big fan of the retro look


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 5:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Depends on the type of photography you do.
Is it to take pics of bikes/riders or take landscapes/snapshots whilst out riding?

I am a photographer and a mtb rider so tell me what you want to take photos of and whether you are prepared to carry multiple lenses...


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 5:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Basicly
avoid the eos-m - focus speed so slow its useless for anything except still life
For landscapes / snapshots - sony nex 5R is good (best quality sensor)
For action shots / olympus e-pl5 or e-pm2 as focus speed is unbeatable
Panasonic GX1 or GFs are ok, produce funny reds but ok if you dont mind post processing

The best compact camera out at the moment is the sony RX100 hands down.


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 6:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

hi rich... it will be for general pic taking. wildlife shots whilst out with the dog/fishing (have several kingfishers that regulaly fish next to me at my club lakes, buggers catch whilst i dont!!!). small enough to take out riding but with more control and better quality than a point and shoot. plus landscapey stuff when out walking. i dont really want to take a mahoosive slr around with a load of lenses and i dont think that i would use it to its full potential...hth


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 6:03 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Loving my Panasonic Lumox GF1 with 20m lens here.

Also like my lumix G1 which I got as a small handy camera to use when the Nikon D300 was a bit too much.

The D300 got sold not long after my Lumix G1.


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 6:14 pm
 dobo
Posts: 3
Free Member
 

i use the realativley small olyympus epm1, good qulity pics for the price i paid, also got a huge deal on the fantastic panasonic 20mm f1.8 pancake lens.
the focus on the epm1 combined with the pany f1.8 is not as quick as the stock lens.
whilst it is a small setup when on the mtb i often stil reach for the water/shockproof sony tx5 that is tiny and fast.
walking and sight seeing etc i go for the epm1 and at night of course the pany 1.8 lens
also worth noting the video capability on the epm1 is not great nor is macro unless you get different lens


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 6:17 pm
Posts: 78521
Full Member
 

Lumix GF5, sir?


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 6:27 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

conuntzero...reminds me of the cameras my dad had! would like something a little more modern in apperance as i'm nt a big fan of the retro look

The retro look IS the modern look, currently!

also worth noting the video capability on the epm1 is not great

Better on later models though. The E-PM2 has the great sensor from the top of the line Olys, which is apparently really good.


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 6:27 pm
Posts: 6132
Full Member
 

Panasonic GX1 user here. Nice camera - significant step up from a point and shoot, lots of control. Size is good too, not too big (especially if you go for the powerzoom lens), but a good heft to it.


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 6:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

🙄 its as bad as asking which bike!!! 😆
i guess its a case of demoing a few in the shops then? see which feels best?


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 6:53 pm
Posts: 33980
Full Member
 

reminds me of the cameras my dad had! would like something a little more modern in apperance as i'm nt a big fan of the retro look

That's rather the point, though, as it's often the case that trying to make a camera look whizzy and über-modern just ends up compromising ergonomics and usability. Photographers often prefer those older camera layouts, because the controls are where they [i]need[/i] to be, not where some design-school graduate thinks they look better, or removed completely and replaced with a bunch of cascading menus.
Plus cameras like that tend to be a lot tougher, using more metal than plastic.


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 6:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

fair point count... especially as it'll be in a bike bag quite alot..


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 6:59 pm
Posts: 17852
Full Member
 

daftvader....I was being 'funny' after the comment from molgrips about Canon and Nikon fanboi-ism.

2 of my mates have got Nikon 1's and they do take really good pictures. We've also got one in the lab at work and it works really well. Better than I thought it would ,to be honest.


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 7:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

stumpy...guess its on the list as well then!


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 7:05 pm
Posts: 151
Free Member
 

5e is the Eos-m supposed to be bad? I read a few good tihngs about it.

Oh yes. I'm surprised you've found a good review, even from die-hard canon fans.


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 7:27 pm
Posts: 9976
Full Member
 

I'd look at an Fuji X20 and of Canon G15 if you want a view finder

If you camera is to over lap with biking then good AF is a must

SO phase detect autofocus will help

That's Nikon 1 or Fuji X20 od Nex 5r

I found this X20 review compelling

http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/fujifilm_x20_review/


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 7:33 pm
Posts: 9976
Full Member
 

hi rich... it will be for general pic taking. wildlife shots whilst out with the dog/fishing (have several kingfishers that regulaly fish next to me at my club lakes, buggers catch whilst i dont!!!). small enough to take out riding but with more control and better quality than a point and shoot. plus landscapey stuff when out walking. i dont really want to take a mahoosive slr around with a load of lenses and i dont think that i would use it to its full potential...hth

OK know one has mentioned anything remotely wildlife capable. Me included. You need lot of zoom. I have taken ok wild life shots on an older zoon. Panasonic Fz5

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]

This list might help for finding a compact super zoom

http://www.imaging-resource.com/WB/WB.HTM?view=dp_long

http://www.cameralabs.com/buyers_guide/superzoom/best_superzoom_camera.shtml

On you budget you could almost do a pocket camera and superzoom. One for biking and one for fishing. Most camera should give good IQ these days


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 7:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

theres the thing, i dont mind getting a second lense with high zoom capability. it isnt going to be on there for the cycling side of things, but when i am out doing other stuff an extra bit of kit isnt going to be a problem.


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 7:55 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

Olympus do a 70-300mm zoom for micro 4/3. I have a full sized lens with the same specs, and it is usable hand held in many conditions. It's equivalent to 600mm in old money, any more and you would start needing support.

Quite small too.


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 8:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

i am used to holding long things!!! 😉
its just another tech minefield isnt it?


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 8:29 pm
Posts: 206
Free Member
 

Olympus e510 here got it off ebay and so far so good 4/3 so not as weildy as a full size


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 8:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

sorry for stupidity.... whats 4/3?


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 8:40 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

earl_brutus, e-510 is an SLR, although they are pretty small for an SLR they're still quite a bit bigger than compact systems. However, it's worth noting that I picked up an e-420 SLR, which is apparently the smallest ever made, in sparkling new condition for £120 including lens. No image stabilisation, limited ISO range, and not the fastest continuous shooting speed but a tiny real SLR for peanuts!

daftvader - 4/3 is the lens fitting system used by Olympus. Micro 4/3 is a different (but related) smaller system used on compact system cameras, and is used by many manufacturers. Most manufacturers have their own lens fit system, but micro 4/3 is supposed to be an open standard.


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 9:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

cheers molgrips. may look for a small body slr for comparison. lots to learn and even more choice than i initially thought.... my brain hurts!


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 9:07 pm
Posts: 151
Free Member
 

I don't think it's an open standard.


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 9:07 pm
Posts: 9976
Full Member
 

Ok Good plan. Mirrorless with 2 lenses

So not Nikon 1 the long lens isn't long enough

Not NEX as longer lenses are limited and pricey and not long enough

Not Canon EOS as its slow to focus and feautures 2 lenses

So Micro fourthird it is. I'd look for a twin lens kit with the longer lens at least 200mm

You might find a used G3 twin lens kit for that. Or is it £400 and extra for the second lens?


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 10:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

i think it'll be about £400 for the initial get me started kit... then once i get the hang of it i will look at extra lenses etc


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 10:23 pm
Posts: 151
Free Member
 

I wouldn't worry too much about 'long' lenses. Anything around 150mm on m4/3 or 200mm on nex is as long as you need unless you start to get into specialist uses.


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 10:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

cool. thanks for all the advice everyone.
hopfully i will be able to get what i need/want and start taking some non phone pics 🙂


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 10:55 pm
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

I'm a big fan of the Micro 4/3rds system - there's some great lenses available and the sensors are really quite good now. I still use the first generation G1/GF1 with decent results.

[url= http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6153/6214408423_52e04fccf9.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6153/6214408423_52e04fccf9.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/grum_wynne/6214408423/ ]Biscuit[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/grum_wynne/ ]Grum Wynne[/url], on Flickr

[url= http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4072/4461219922_e8ac7324b6.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4072/4461219922_e8ac7324b6.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/grum_wynne/4461219922/ ]GF1 and 20mm Macro - w/ Raynox DCR 250[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/grum_wynne/ ]Grum Wynne[/url], on Flickr

[url= http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8253/8640338005_7297285c4d.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8253/8640338005_7297285c4d.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/grum_wynne/8640338005/ ]Helvellyn April 2013 (17 of 22)[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/grum_wynne/ ]Grum Wynne[/url], on Flickr

[url= http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5296/5448479212_f271e5a5d1.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5296/5448479212_f271e5a5d1.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/grum_wynne/5448479212/ ]20100308-Lancaster March 8th 2010-1040746[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/grum_wynne/ ]Grum Wynne[/url], on Flickr

[url= http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4141/5448686578_0d32aaeefc.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4141/5448686578_0d32aaeefc.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/grum_wynne/5448686578/ ]Crashing Waves[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/grum_wynne/ ]Grum Wynne[/url], on Flickr

[url= http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3335/4632127172_874d8f3a84.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3335/4632127172_874d8f3a84.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/grum_wynne/4632127172/ ]Williamson Park Butterfly House[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/grum_wynne/ ]Grum Wynne[/url], on Flickr

I'm not a big fan of my 45-200 though - it's very soft at the longer end. Some people seem to have better copies than me though. The 100-300mm looks much better.


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 11:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

nice grum! looks like 4/3 is the way forward....
how trustworthy is the second hand market for lenses?


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 11:26 pm
Posts: 40
Free Member
 

I am another partial micro 4/3 convert - bought a used E-PL1 for a pittance with the kit lens (which is pretty reasonable as they go) and the 15mm f8 bodycap lens which is an absolute blast (and I have been using it a LOT... to the detriment of my Nikons which come from the pricey end of the current market).

The intention was to be a replacement for my Canon S90 that died a death - which had been my biking camera of choice - but I have been using it for a load more than that. I haven't taken anything overly Earth shattering with it as yet, due to time constraints more than anything, but I can see it's potential (and I can gain some sales from locations that in the past my compact wasn't producing high enough quality files in).

I can see me upgrading to one of the posh Olympus jobs in the coming months....


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 11:30 pm
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

nice grum! looks like 4/3 is the way forward....

Ta - remember there is a distinction between 4/3 and Micro 4/3 though (with some crossover but only in one direction!)

how trustworthy is the second hand market for lenses?

I've bought quite a few from talk photography forums without any issues. Only from people with good feedback though.

(and I can gain some sales from locations that in the past my compact wasn't producing high enough quality files in).

What kind of stuff are you selling?


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 11:37 pm
Posts: 4279
Full Member
 

I've got a GF5. I really like the x-lens 14-45 for the pocketabiity of it. Makes for a nicely compact camera - although I've had some issues (blurry shots that really should be sharp) at small aperture that I haven't looked in to.

I also went for the 45-200mm tele - I think I made a mistake and should have gone for the much more compact 45-150 - which would get more use.

I'm still going to add a wide aperture pancake lens or two for biking shots and maybe a macro lens over time.


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 11:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

i think that i will be driving mrs vader mad in the next month with near constant research, trips to camera shops etc.
looks like getting a base unit with a decent all purpose lense is the most sensible option and then getting another one or two once i am comfortable with the main functions. a course will probably be on the cards too


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 11:51 pm
Posts: 40
Free Member
 

Landscape/travel/general outdoorsy stuff in the main. The D800E knocks the spots off the m4/3 Oly, but it is a lot more to carry on the mountain bike/motorbike! The little PEN is only just suitable IF the exposure is nailed and the light is perfect - there isn't much latitude to tinker much, but in the right circumstances it is producing some really nice and vivid files.

Even with the cheapo 15mm toy lens 😉 (Actually especially with it!)

I wish I had easier manual control though, hence why I am considering an upgrade - probably on the list if I can get a good few months in - but it isn't pressing!


 
Posted : 09/05/2013 12:04 am
Page 1 / 2