Can one name sum up...
 

MegaSack DRAW - This year's winner is user - rgwb
We will be in touch

[Closed] Can one name sum up a decade?

23 Posts
22 Users
0 Reactions
72 Views
 Pook
Posts: 12684
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Interesting article here
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/8399767.stm

got me thinking. Who would it be for the 2000s and why?


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 10:35 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

John Major
edit: 'and why'? - dull, grey, fairly un-memorable.


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 10:36 am
Posts: 5938
Free Member
 

George Bush


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 10:37 am
Posts: 5938
Free Member
 

or in cycling terms:
Lance armstrong


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 10:39 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bin Laden?


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 10:40 am
Posts: 3706
Free Member
 

Jade Goody.
RIP


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 10:43 am
Posts: 40432
Free Member
 

George Bush

+1 for Dubya


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 10:43 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

Definately Bush. I think there's a lot of lessons to be learned from this experiment of electing a monkey into the most powerful seat in the world.

edit: Just read the article, Madeleine McCann and Jade Goody? Come on! How on earth do these names sum up a decade?


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 10:47 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

George Bush

For all the wrong reasons - "mission accomplished" 👿

Madeleine McCann and Jade Goody

WTF? 🙄


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 11:02 am
Posts: 45
Free Member
 

Well I think it's actually 20 people - Bush and Bliar have to be there.


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 11:04 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[b]George Dubya Bush[/b] here too

Jade Goody -the name and all its tragic association stands for vacuous 'celebrity', so there is some justification.

Bush was fairly vacuous too, come to think of it. He's completely disappeared from the world stage, which is a good thing, but also says a lot.


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 11:07 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bush, and not in a good way.


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 11:09 am
Posts: 8
Free Member
 

Blair - if only for all the good he did with trying to recreate family values and a nurturing culture, the sure start system and children's centres, the things that are now just starting to bear fruit ready to be axed by the incoming tory government 🙁 (Don't agree with ALL that he did though)


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 11:16 am
Posts: 6382
Free Member
 

Murdoch's got to be in the mix as well, possibly as the most influential of the non-poliitcians.

On a similar note, listening to 1989:day by day on Radio 4 has been a real eye opener, a monumental year in 20th century history.


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 11:23 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

the sure start system

Yes, it is good and has been appreciated, mostly by the respectable people with some spare cash that would bring up their children properly anyway.

Don't get me wrong, I think it's great, but not [i]quite[/i] up there with Sept-11-2001 and the aftermath as the event/zeitgeist of the decade.


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 11:23 am
Posts: 23223
Full Member
 

Tiger Woods.

Dull and in retrospect a bit of a turd.


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 1:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Thatcher...


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 4:45 pm
Posts: 2003
Full Member
 

10 years.

Arent the rest of them eras?


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 5:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

ricky gervais


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 6:01 pm
Posts: 12079
Full Member
 

Ah, cripes, does this mean tv all over new year will be dominated by pointless tedious debates about the meaning of the decade just ending?


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 6:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yeah, Thatcher! And Gordon Gecko..."Greed is good".

Good job we have committed characters like this to the annals of history, else we could have had a near collapse of the political/economic systems that underpin our great nation!


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 6:16 pm
Posts: 74
Free Member
 

The Dacade dosen't finish till 2010..


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 6:24 pm
Posts: 16
Free Member
 

graham, there's no point being a pedant if you can't spell


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 6:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

.


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 6:50 pm