"Brought"...
 

Subscribe now and choose from over 30 free gifts worth up to £49 - Plus get £25 to spend in our shop

[Closed] "Brought" and "Bought" My theory.

66 Posts
35 Users
0 Reactions
173 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

One "r" makes so much difference but I reckon its evolving on the internet to mean the same.

Will I get a grant to study it, ya reckon?


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 1:12 pm
 aP
Posts: 681
Free Member
 

Why, do you know someone called Grant, or is it just a general see if they'll come out of the woodwork query?


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 1:15 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

See also:

Looser vs loser

You're vs your

It's vs its

etc etc etc

The internets is fool of stupid people.


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 1:26 pm
Posts: 20
Free Member
 

My mother-in-law gets them mixed up when speaking "I've brought a new coat". Annoys the hell out of me, then again so does she......


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 1:29 pm
Posts: 464
Free Member
 

"I've brought a new coat"

From where did you bring it?

From the shop, where I bought it.


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 1:30 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50446
 

You've been reading my posts haven't you Graham.


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 1:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Lend > Borrow.

It has always got on my man-norks.


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 1:38 pm
Posts: 12
Free Member
 

It's not so much that the internet is full of idiots, rather that there are the usual idiots who have now found themselves in a position to advertise their idiocy.

I work with highly paid, apparently intelligent people, who, among other irritating traits, aspirate their aitches and use "them" in place of "these" or "those".

I have advanced my contempt to mere indifference.


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 2:12 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

Please cbike, in your studies could you PLEASE PLEASE find the origins of somthinK and anythinK and nothinK?
So I can go back in time and reverse it to stop all these people (including, occasionally, my own wife, who spends far too much time around teenagers) sounding like total F7^$*NG IDIOTS.
thanks a lot.


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 2:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've never heard this 'brought/bought' thing before. Is it an English thing?


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 2:28 pm
 nonk
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

why does being rubbish at english mean that you are stupid?
some would say that this assumption in its self is proof of stupidity.
i might be keen on this view for a reason though 😉


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 2:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I also HATE the lack of apostrophes used nowadays.

Such as 'Yorkshires Finest Cakes'.

It is possessive you nonce - put a u****ing apostrophe in their*.

* 😉


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 12
Free Member
 

why does being rubbish at english mean that you are stupid?

It doesn't; it just means you are more likely to originate from The North(tm).


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 2:39 pm
 nonk
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

just west of newcastle actually 😆


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 2:40 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

Yes, nonk. Some would say that calling someone stupid for thinking someone stupid for not being able to speak English properly is the most stupid form of stupid there could possibly be.

😉


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 2:42 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

If you are English and can't speak English properly then you [i]are[/i] stupid and/or lazy. Simple.

You're / your really winds me up, but I think the something/somefink thing is down to a regional/class accent.

*takes cover*


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 2:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Has anyone axed you to do this cbike?


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 2:52 pm
Posts: 16
Free Member
 

im defiantly getting annoyed at the misuse of apostrophe's

Better put this for the slow'uns: 😉


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 2:54 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

You're / your really winds me up

Yep.

1: "Your stupid"

2: "My stupid what?"

1: "OMG u dont even no wot stupid is. Looser."

2: "Tighter."

1: "wot?"

I guess it's entirely possible that the first actor in this sketch is actually a triple-PhD Oxford professor and chairman of Mensa, but somehow it seems unlikely.


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

less/fewer and one i heard yesterday talking about military deaths "lesser" most of those within about 4 rows of me heard the expeletives.


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 2:57 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

[i]but I think the something/somefink thing is down to a regional/class accent.[/i]

Regional/class?? Which one? I live in the south, where people say it and this annoying Liverpulian bloke opposite me says it all the time.
I think it's down to stupity.


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 3:14 pm
 nonk
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

so if someone lacks the skills you have that makes them stupid?


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 3:19 pm
Posts: 12
Free Member
 

Has anyone axed you to do this cbike?

Ah, you're thinking of, inter alia, Chaucer, aren't you, and the recent metathesis of the original variants "aks" and "ask"? 🙂


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 3:20 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

I've never heard this 'brought/bought' thing before. Is it an English thing?

No, I've seen it used on both UK and US websites, so not just English. However it seems almost unheard of in people with English as a second language, which suggests that English is being taught properly abroad, but not in the UK/US! The aitch/haitch confusion drives me nuts at times.


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 3:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I would suggest that if someone lacks the necessary skills to communicate correctly in their first language, they certainly show signs of not being very intelligent. Of course some people have specific disabilities such as autism and dyslexia which could give people the impression that they are stupid when, in fact, they have a specific disability which makes communication through the written language sometimes hard to do.

People who do not know the difference between 'brought' and 'bought' or 'their' and 'there' just show signs of stupidity through a lack of ability (or desire) to learn English correctly.


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 3:24 pm
Posts: 7100
Free Member
 

I hate the unnecessary use of punctuation just to emphasise a point !!!!!!!


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 3:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I see what you did there...


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 3:26 pm
 nonk
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

mf
arrogance brought about by the fact that you are english.


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 3:26 pm
Posts: 12
Free Member
 

People who do not know the difference between 'brought' and 'bought' or 'their' and 'there' just show signs of stupidity through a lack of ability (or desire) to learn English correctly.

And coming from the North.

Musn't forget that.

Hee hee. 😀


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 3:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

so if someone lacks the skills you have that makes them stupid?

When it comes to mother tongues... pretty much, yes.


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 3:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I hate stupity!

I lived in Liverpool for 8 years and people always ask to "lend" a pen/tenner/other daily object of you. That is really wrong.


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 3:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]The aitch/haitch confusion drives me nuts at times.[/i]

Me too. People are going to start saying feff, mem and woubleyou soon 🙂


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

arrogance brought about by the fact that you are english.

Sorry? Where is the arrogance? I was simply putting my point of view across about what makes someone stupid or not based on their grasp of their first language. I do not think I was being arrogant in any way whatsoever.


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 3:31 pm
 nonk
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

sorry mf i missed the bit about it being their first language.
i take it back chap.


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 3:35 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

I must be arrogant too, because what you said, made perfect sense.

Lacking skills in the basics of communication? Yep, stupid.


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 3:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Apology on a forum shock! Someone borrow* me a chair.

Accepted 🙂

*;-)


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 3:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I work with many people who, despite being rather inteligent (Ph.D. or above), having varied social class origins and are from different regions of the country, confuse words or are unaware of grammatical errors. I imagine I would too, but both my parents are very literate and I read a lot of books as a child rather than watch television.

I imagine many of the issues being discussed here are the result of improper schooling, lower reading rates, poor grammatical and lexical support amongst family and friends and the all pervasive "dumbing down" of speech presented in the popular media. I doubt TXT speek or 1337 speek help much either. I especially dislike it when students use either of these in work they hand in. All of these problems would appear to be products of the environment we now live in. How to stop the downwards spiral?

Having just read what I have written above it all sounds very pretentious and Victorian. Hey ho 😐 . Smileys get on my goat too.

I ain't purfik neither. Somethings seem to have become ingrained 🙁


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 3:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

confuse words or are unaware of grammatical errors

I don't accept that an intelligent person (certainly not someone educated to Ph.D level) can have any excuse for making grammatical errors or confuse words. If they are able to learn a subject to that level, they are easily capable of learning their first language correctly (assuming, of course, they do not have a language-imparing disability).


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 4:03 pm
Posts: 16125
Free Member
 

I *hate* misuse of the reflexive pronoun. Saying "myself" when you mean "me" doesn't make you sound clever, it makes you sound like a telesales person.


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 4:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

don't accept that an intelligent person (certainly not someone educated to Ph.D level) can have any excuse for making grammatical errors or confuse words

Of course they can. They just place less importance on grammar than you do. Since they can still communicate perfectly effectively, who's to say that they're not the more intelligent people than those of us who get annoyed about it despite the fact that it has very little effect.

A bit like some mtbers I know who can't ride without stopping if something is not quite perfect (eg a brake lever isn't quite in line with the other) despite the fact that it's of no real effect.


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 4:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My point was that intelligent people can make these errors without realising it, albeit not as often as some of the less gifted members of our society. I agree that there is no excuse though, but how do you start to get them to correct their speech when they themselves are unaware?


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 4:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

But why are they making the errors? Why are they not aware? They are still showing signs of stupidity, Ph.D or not, if they are unable to grasp their own language - things they were taught in school. It certainly makes them look stupid.

I do appreciate that some very gifted people have dreadful written skills but they often have the sorts of disabilities I have already mentioned.

They just place less importance on grammar than you do

That is a very different argument - if they know how to spell, punctuate and use grammar correctly when they need to then fair enough. If they just don't understand it, then they do not have a basic skill they should have learned at school.


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 4:22 pm
Posts: 12
Free Member
 

Stop being so precious you lot.

Can't we get back to baiting thicko oiks?

😀


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 4:25 pm
 nonk
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

i think i get my knickers in a twist at the term stupid.
i had a fairly gypo childhood and feel that folks tend to confuse uneducated with stupid.my english is pish but i dont feel it has held me back,perhaps it has with choices of oportunities but other than that it's going ok.
however at 32 years of age it could be said that i should have sorted it by now.


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 4:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I left school with a grade 5 CSE in English. Everything I have learned since has been from listening, learning, understanding. I could never understand when I should use an apostrophe until a friend explained about possessive/plural. One minute later I understood something that 12 years of school couldn't teach me. How much of that was bad teaching, how much was a new-found desire to actually understand I really don't know.


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 4:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm not sure much of what we are talking about is taught in schools. I certainly wasn't taught it in an active manner until near the end of secondary school, by which time it is too late. Hence my point that maybe they don't realise they are doing it because they have never been taught it and those around them are the same or worse and so it continues.


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 4:54 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

I don't accept that an intelligent person (certainly not someone educated to Ph.D level) can have any excuse for making grammatical errors or confuse words. If they are able to learn a subject to that level, they are easily capable of learning their first language correctly (assuming, of course, they do not have a language-imparing disability).

While I like to think I have a decent grasp of English and can write a coherent page, I'm fairly sure that I don't know every last rule of grammar and spelling. While writing a technical paper I'd be sure to check everything (though there are multiple areas where there are more than one solution), on a forum post I may lapse a little. Though you can be pretty damn sure I'd accept a kicking if I incorrectly used their/there where/wear/ware etc


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm the guy that usually gets asked if something is grammatically correct and I reckon I have a pretty good understanding of it.

Despite this, I've never learnt (and actually don't recall it being covered at school) what the difference between "who" and "whom" is. I've never bothered to learn because I reckon if you use the word "whom" you sound like a ponce no matter how grammatically correct you may be 😉


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 5:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm fairly sure that I don't know every last rule of grammar and spelling.

Me too.

(Another one of my bug-bears - to/too).

'I am going too the shops'.

'May I come to'?

Which is another one - may/can

'Can I lend your rubber'?

'I don't know, can you'?


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 5:00 pm
Posts: 303
Full Member
 

Two things that annoy me, the use of "I" when "me" ought to be used.
e.g "Do you want to come for a ride with Al and I?"

Use of "which" instead of "that".
e.g. "I bought a new Camelbak which has a 3L bladder."

On the subject of stupidity versus education, in my opinion it is a greater failing to be ignorant through lack of education when you have the ability to correct the deficiency than to be ignorant through stupidity since people are stupid through no fault of their own.


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 5:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

All of these problems would appear to be products of the environment we now live in. How to stop the downwards spiral?

no. way. Hosé.

It's like a backwards Sisyphus where we plummet endlessly downwards yet all still more us less understand each other. At the top was grunting.

'Can I lend your rubber'?
'I don't know, can you'?

Immediately followed by punch to MF 🙂
PS If I borrow you a rubber I don't want it back used thanks...


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 5:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

PS If I borrow you a rubber I don't want it back used thanks...

I was actually quoting a real-life experience of mine when Tony Rhodes (our year's mentalist nutter) asked me during a music lesson some 27 or so years ago. Back then rubbers were something you used to correct mistakes. Now you use them to prevent mistakes. 😉


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 5:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There and their-annoying but hey I let it go as they could be dyslexic or English is a 3 rd language...

But if it was my child, I'd slap them...

Also I'm studying basic French and I'm making a few mistakes-grass is greener on the other...


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 5:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

But if it was my child, I'd slap them...

I think it's already been established that you are illsuited to parenthood 🙁


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 6:40 pm
Posts: 460
Full Member
 

Anything that has the incorrect word used in its written description means I won't buy that product/service. I saw a house advertised the other day, a $million+ house and the description had "...with an ore inspiring view.". I emailed the agent and asked what sort of Ore it looked over and he came back to me somewhat confused. I pointed out his error and suggested that if it was my $million+ house with that description I would have lynched him. He hasn't changed it yet as he didn't actually know what the "right" word was. W T F.
Things like that, bought/brought etc all really annoy me. You may be super smart but please use the right words and spell them proper like. And if you don't know where to use the apostrophe then best bet is don't put it in.
Thank you. 😀


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 8:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

All this whinging and no mention of ickle, bockle, hospikle, skelington or chimbly.

This is The North, where we say what we like.


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 9:04 pm
Posts: 89
Free Member
 

I could care less about all the above points.

Or couldn't I?

👿


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 9:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

As part of my job I have to sanction letters that go out to customers.

My red pen is my best friend.

I am considered anal.

I love my red pen.

🙂


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 11:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Or couldn't I?

no.

Anything that has the incorrect word used in its written description means I won't buy that product/service

also known as "tilting at windmills" :o)


 
Posted : 12/11/2009 11:14 pm
 Nico
Posts: 4
Free Member
 

I haven't read any of these posts except the first couple as I couln't be arsed, but I should of. See what I did there. There are many grammatical errors i.e. too many or two few apostrophes, should "of", brought/bought, lend borrow, i.e./e.g. but the one that really gets on my moobs at the moment is "for free". It's just "free" you 'tards. And 'tards, of course. Merkans, eh?


 
Posted : 13/11/2009 12:06 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

proof reading the minutes I'd just sent out to the club, I found I'd used 'there' for 'their', oh the shame! Entertainingly, there's no ambiguity when spoken...


 
Posted : 13/11/2009 12:55 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I wouldn't worry there SFB, I'm sure no one reads their bike club minutes with so many untidy sock drawers in the country.


 
Posted : 13/11/2009 8:32 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What about "of" instead of "have". As in "I should of stuck in at school"


 
Posted : 13/11/2009 9:15 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Language change?


 
Posted : 13/11/2009 10:58 am
 FG
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

This is never going to change until presenters on TV start talking properly. Case in point: Jamie Redknapp.


 
Posted : 13/11/2009 11:44 am
Posts: 8756
Full Member
 

It wasn't until I learned German that it made me think about English grammar, too. That, and the pedantic tw@s on here.

Yes, I did just use @ instead of 'at'.

L8ters


 
Posted : 13/11/2009 12:25 pm
 nonk
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

he's a footballer man give him a break.


 
Posted : 13/11/2009 12:28 pm