Big it up in a Frid...
 

[Closed] Big it up in a Friday styleeeeee. Or something. Here's the A&A!

105 Posts
35 Users
0 Reactions
441 Views
Posts: 50252
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Tennisist, Caroline Wozniacki
[img] [/img]

Another tennisist, Maria Kirilenko
[img] [/img]

Golfist, Natalie Gulbis
[img] [/img]

Let's have some more then....!


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 8:51 am
Posts: 25859
Full Member
 

Jessica Landstrom - footy

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 9:30 am
Posts: 5909
Free Member
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

oh, my, that footy girl is very pretty.


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 9:44 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

Snowboarder Jenny Jones. I'm all a-quiver.

[img] [/img]

she can do this!
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 9:57 am
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

dez - youd better go find a better picture of her, coz if they're taking photos of her wrapped in a duvet, you can be sure they're trying to hide something.

Im thinking "stocky" is how she's probably described....


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 10:01 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i] DezB - Member

Snowboarder Jenny Jones. I'm all a-quiver.[/i]

She looks about 12 yrs old!!!!!


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 10:02 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

This is all gonna end up in another 'Lazytown' episode!


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 10:03 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

that's ok, as long as no one posts a picture of sportacus! 😀


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 10:04 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

Claire Bevilaqua.
[img] [/img]

She can do this!
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 10:05 am
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

Hmm she does look a little on the young side to be out without her parents! Not sure stocky is a negative thing, plump maybe, but a well built, well toned girly girl can be attractive!


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 10:06 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

Is that better?

JJ ain't 12 and they ain't [i]hiding[/i] nothing!!


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 10:06 am
Posts: 50252
Free Member
Topic starter
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 10:07 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

[url= http://www.soulsports.co.uk/profile.html?jennyjones ]Evidence[/url] for the defence (exibit A)


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 10:07 am
Posts: 5909
Free Member
 

A little Google time reveals she was born in 1980. Proceed!

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 10:08 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

that's ok then!! I guess she will look young, seeing as i'm getting old!! Damn


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 10:14 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

Silence doubters!


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 10:14 am
Posts: 388
Full Member
 

Oh dear, I thought stephanie from lazytown was 18. Am I going to have to hand myself in to the local constabulary?


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 10:18 am
 Kit
Posts: 24
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

I love tennis players 🙂 (Marta Domachowska)

[url= http://hotfemaletennisplayers.blogspot.com/ ]More tennisers[/url]


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 10:24 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

how old is stephanie from lazytown?


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 10:58 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Just found this

Julianna Rose Mauriello (born May 26, 1991[1]) is an American actress. She starred in LazyTown, and has appeared in various Broadway musicals. Mauriello resides in New York City.[2]

From wiki. So its all ok then.


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:00 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[url] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julianna_Rose_Mauriello [/url]


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:00 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

apart from the fact she's American... :-p


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:08 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[voice of little girl from 'Poltergeist']It's starting again...[/voice of little girl from 'Poltergeist']

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:13 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[url= http://www.rugbyfanz.com/VideoShow.php?id=735 ]Natal Charks Cheerleaders[/url]


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:25 am
Posts: 7561
Free Member
 

you are going to get so banned


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:33 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Sorry. I'll be good, now.


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:35 am
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

woah, woah, woah.

steady on there.


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:36 am
Posts: 7561
Free Member
 

no really. I've got Gracie sat. here. Not even funny.


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:36 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Goodbye RudeBoy!

Strange that if you open the image in a different tab it comes up with what rudeboy meant it to be.


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:36 am
Posts: 6479
Free Member
 

Banned for posting a 'fruitbowl', oh the shame.


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:38 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

LOL!

yeah, seeya "rudeboy"!

thats just wrong.... so so wrong!

🙂 🙂 🙂


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:38 am
Posts: 5909
Free Member
 

My eyes!!!!


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:38 am
Posts: 7561
Free Member
 

Good speedy moderating there chaps. Good job.


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:39 am
Posts: 8177
Free Member
 

I guess somebody doesn't like you linking to their images! Pass me the bleach, my eyes need disinfecting 😯


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:39 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

in an attempt to save RudeBoy this is what he meant to post.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:40 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

FFS you idiot!!! NOT WORK SAFE!!!!
****!!!


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:40 am
Posts: 388
Full Member
 

Ah - that well known South African rugby team the Charks.

(to be genuinely pedantic they're called the Sharks as Natal are the club/distict side not the super 14 side)

Anyway back to the important issue - Have you seen the newer Lazytowns where Stephanie is wearing a track suit to disguise her (ahem) blossoming figure 🙂


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:41 am
Posts: 7561
Free Member
 

Labrat? Is that you?


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:42 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Is it safe to look again now 😯


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:42 am
Posts: 5909
Free Member
 

Where's Dibnah when you need him eh?


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:43 am
Posts: 7561
Free Member
 

Perhaps a further case for the preview feature. But on balance - I don't actually care 🙂


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:43 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

In an attempt to save the thread. Miss Atherton.

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:43 am
Posts: 7561
Free Member
 

And he could have edited it himself. So blatantly irresponsible.


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:44 am
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

I_Ache - is she sporting a "dirty sanchez" in that first pic?


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:44 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Looks like it. I think she looks pretty hot in the second pic.


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:45 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That was a very, very dodgy moment in the office.

Can we get a preview function back please (if this was a genuine error on rudeboy's part, then preview would have avoided it)


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:45 am
Posts: 919
Free Member
 

Has she got red hair and does she speak with a Welsh accent ?


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:46 am
Posts: 7561
Free Member
 

>Can we get a preview function back please

You can edit posts.
He didn't.


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:46 am
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

put a bit of adrenalin in your day though cheesy eh?

🙂


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:46 am
Posts: 7561
Free Member
 

not as much as that top bloke was putting in the bloke on the bottom...


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:49 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]put a bit of adrenalin in your day though cheesy eh?[/i]

If that's going white, cold sweat, feeling of violation & fear, then yes!


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:49 am
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

Its a fine line between being "outsourced" and gross misconduct isnt it.....

🙂


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:51 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

if this was a genuine error on rudeboy's part...

Obviously not a multi-tasker. Maybe he should only look at one page at a time?


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:51 am
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

To be fair to RudeBoy:

If he went to a website, saw a perfectly "decent" image and decided to link to it then that is the image he would see here (even in a Preview), because it is already in his cache.

Now if that site doesn't like people hotlinking to its images and actually serves up an "indecent" image to anyone that does, then RudeBoy has no way of knowing that. (Unless he clears his cache or forces a full page refresh with ctrl+F5)


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:52 am
Posts: 7561
Free Member
 

>To be fair to RudeBoy:

What would be the point (or the fun) in that?


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:53 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Indeed stoner!


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:56 am
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

Incidentally that's why it is a good idea to put a link to the original site when you link to its images - they get much less upset if you're actually generating visits for them, rather than just stealing their bandwidth

e.g.

[img] [/img]
Unknown Surfist from [url= http://www.surfersvillage.com ]www.surfersvillage.com[/url]


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 11:58 am
 Mark
Posts: 4273
Level: Black
 

Everyone needs to take responsibility for what they post. he will think twice about hotlinking to images in future and will make sure the image that appears is the correct one.

There IS an Edit function.


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 12:02 pm
Posts: 2522
Free Member
 

erm, not sure what I missed but sounds like its for the best.... 😕


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 12:03 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

Unknown kitesurfist.
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 12:03 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

fozzybear - Member
FFS you idiot!!! NOT WORK SAFE!!!!
****!!!

You're viewing an A&A thread and genuinely expect it to remain work safe?


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 12:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

there is worksafe and that!!!

that was NOT needed even by accident.....


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 12:09 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
Topic starter
 

C'mon folks, for the A&A to truly succeed, a little slef control is on order!

Keep it clean, people!

(By the way, this thread now has the best tag ever.....! Thanks, whoever that was!)


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 388
Full Member
 

That doesn't sound like too much to ask - i'm viewing it during the day and like most people i'm at work. If i want to look at other stuff I wait till i get home ;0


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 12:11 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

Agreed Mark - BUT.. there is currently no way to check that the image that appears is the one that you intend without posting it first (as there is currently no Preview function) and even then it requires knowledge of how to flush or bypass the browser cache (Ctrl+F5 in Firefox).

And as for hotlinking: ALL the images on this thread are hotlinks and are held on websites that the posters do not own. So even if they do look okay right now, those websites could decide to change them tomorrow and we'd end up with a page of filth.


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 12:16 pm
Posts: 25859
Full Member
 

LOL

c'mon, what was it ????


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 1:04 pm
Posts: 8177
Free Member
 

Think "Brokeback Mountain", but the really hardcore gay porn version. 😯


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 1:08 pm
Posts: 25859
Full Member
 

aaah, I think I see (though never saw BBM)

... were they athletic, or just energetic ?

(oh, and the cheerleaders vid was v poor IMO)


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 1:11 pm
Posts: 8177
Free Member
 

They were having anal sex. Frankly, I didn't feel like stopping to check out their athletic credentials. 😳


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 1:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

GENUINE, HUMBLE, SINCERE APOLOGIES TO EVERYONE!

I never, never intended for anything like this to happen. Brant, I am really sorry that your little one had to witness whatever nastiness it was.

In all innocence, all I thought I'd done, was post an image of the bloke out of Hellraiser, like the one above. That's all. an image I found on google, and one that's hosted by allposters.com. I have emailed Allposters, to inform them of this, and told them to sort this issue out.

When I posted the image, it appeared on my computer as the Hellraiser on. I haven't even seen the offending image. If I return to the allposter image, it does not link to any other image. therefore, I had no idea that an obscene and offensive image had appeared to everyone else.

I don't find this at all amusing, and am really angry that something like this can happen. I appreciate that people might have children who could see the images, or that they may be at work, or just find such images sick and offensive. I don't find it acceptable that such an image could appear from a genuinely innocent attempt to post a completely different image.

I can understand people being angry with me, but once again, it was a genuine mistake.

Thank you to Mark and TomDB, for being understanding, and believing me.

So, to everyone; I'm really, really sorry. I'll do my best, to make sure something like this never happens again.

RB.


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 1:19 pm
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

Phew, glad i missed that. If it had been yesterday (quiet on the phones) i probably would have been in deep do do by now.
Whats A&A stand for?


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 1:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Apology accepted here in my corner (thank god!!!) of the office.

here's hoping for the preview button!


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 1:28 pm
Posts: 25859
Full Member
 

cheesy, I reckon GrahamS is probably right - that somebody swapped images over as a sort of punishment

(surely he only cut & pasted the image location, rather than type it out wrongly)


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 1:31 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

I still think an A&A is not intended to be work safe as it is bound to be a bit risky. I wouldnt open it at work or if my son was about.


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 1:31 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks, RudeBoy, the thread appreciates the apology!

BigYinn, A&A is a simple concept, dreamt up by yours truly to replace the rather tired concept of Kylie. In essence, it is all about those who are both athletic AND aesthetic (Hence A&A). Always wanted this to be clean, and as it happens, open to the ladies and chap's chaps of STW as much as it is to those of us who like looking at the ladies! I'd prefer to see it remain as worksafe as we can, to be honest.

So, here's to keeping it as clean as we can and long may the A&A survive!


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 1:31 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

Is there a Kylie thread this week?


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 1:33 pm
 Kit
Posts: 24
Free Member
 

Is there a Kylie thread this week?

😯 After this thread? Who needs her!? 🙄


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 1:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

scaredy - sounds more like its the people hosting the image being a tad malicious to people who link to their images


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 1:36 pm
 Mark
Posts: 4273
Level: Black
 

I still think an A&A is not intended to be work safe as it is bound to be a bit risky. I wouldnt open it at work or if my son was about.

NO.. Absolutely disagree.. Everything.. and I really mean EVERYTHING that is posted should be worksafe. If we think it isn't we will remove it. This forum has no 'safe' zones.

As for similar situations to this that happen our policy is to ban first ask questions later. Rudeboy was banned then it was all cleared up and he was back posting within an hour. The preview function will be back.


 
Posted : 09/01/2009 1:49 pm
Page 1 / 2