Forum menu
best 'budget&#...
 

[Closed] best 'budget' turntable?

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

http://www.stereophile.com/turntables/309/


 
Posted : 19/01/2013 3:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Put one of these in a nice plinth and give it a decent arm and it is very good:

[url= http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Technics-SP10MKII-Turntable-with-Technics-SH-10E-PSU-/300847323815?pt=UK_AudioTVElectronics_HomeAudioHiFi_Turntables&hash=item460be5daa7 ]Technics Sp10[/url]

My mate used to put them in layered Corian plinths and his own one uses an SME V with modest Denon DL304 cartridge. He has a very good CD system, but on the same album the sp10 is so much nicer.

When he was selling them he would invite people to bring round their LP12s, etc for comparison - and they would buy the Technics.

Some of it might be the SME arm as well though as I have an Origin Live modded RB250 on mine and it is nowhere near as good 🙁


 
Posted : 19/01/2013 3:48 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

I like Rega cartridges. Good value too.
The Elys 2 on mine replaced an Ortofon MC.
It's miles better.
Infinitely better than the aptly named Linn K9 too.

Had my Rega for 20 odd years, great bit of kit.
Does sound better on a shelf though.


 
Posted : 19/01/2013 3:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

http://www.stereophile.com/turntables/309/

the very same review that has turned my attention on a 25..

Sounds like a great prospect with the RB600 arm and possibiity of future upgrades, acrylic plate etc.

Cant find a UK original RRP though, any thought on original cost? Im guessing at £1000-£1200.
In which case coupled with ability to punch above its weight, a barely used one at £400 may well be a sound investment.

Ha, 'sound investment'

The SP-10 is interesting, Its good to see a few curve balls thrown into the mix


 
Posted : 19/01/2013 4:31 pm
 ski
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

slimjim78 how old are you?

I found having my ears syringed, was the best value Hi-Fi upgrade I have ever done!

BTW, I swapped over from a Revolver Rebel to a Pro-Ject Genie 3 (£200) last year, sounds fine to me and looks quite neat, not that, that is a thing for me.

Sounds great to my clean ears, if anything to clean 😉


 
Posted : 19/01/2013 4:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

haha!
34, not sure how deaf that makes me?


 
Posted : 19/01/2013 4:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The Rega P25 is a safer bet than making up an Sp10 - the SME arm to do it justice is > £1500

The SP10 is a broadcast turntable, but the bigger broadcast turntables, like the EMTs, go for crazy money


 
Posted : 19/01/2013 5:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

A Rega would be a safe bet however I'd be tempted to try and get hold of a 2nd hand LP12. I paid less that £300 for mine 'cause the Ebay seller didn't want to post and he was nearby. Mine is an early one with a SME arm and sounds wonderful.

On the Rega the RB250 is a better arm than the RB300 apparently, or has more potential. It's is down to the bearing arrangement.

I've got a modified RB250 on my other turntable and it does sound good. That was also 2nd hand - on a Thorens TD160B and is also very nice sounding.


 
Posted : 19/01/2013 7:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

And look what you can do to an RB250:

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 19/01/2013 11:43 pm
Posts: 21
Free Member
 

Ha ha, I have the SME V arm on my Orbe and its stunning but as stated isn't in the budget range. The SP10 is good but the trouble with most Linns and what their owners don't realise is that they are set up badly and they've become used to its sound. LP12's do "go off" and a proper service with a respected dealer will soon have it working as it should.


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 12:56 am
Posts: 33979
Full Member
 

TurnerGuy, interesting your mention of the SP10, I've just found this:

[IMG] [/IMG]

http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/analogue-source/190735-sp-10-mkii-next-project-5.html
The reason I was looking was the tone-arm; it's a Zeta, one of which I also have, mounted on a Logic DM-101.


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 1:11 am
Posts: 21
Free Member
 

CountZero, I had a Zeta on my LP12 back in the mid Eighties. I originally had the usual Ittok/Asak on my Valhalla Linn but upgraded to the Zeta with a Koetsu Black which is the cart I use now on my SME V arm. The Zeta is a fabulous arm but the bearings are a problem if buying now and they are hard to find in mint condition. It's hard to judge the sound compared to what I own now but I'm sure if new it would definitely give the V a run for its money and would probably cost the same to make anyway.


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 1:24 am
Posts: 33979
Full Member
 

Just had a look at a Zeta on eBay that sold in December. Went for £410, more than they cost new... 😯


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 1:26 am
Posts: 21
Free Member
 

Yes but I paid £375 for my Ittok LVII new and the Ekos new now is ridiculous money so I reckon a Zeta new would be well over £1k so £410 isn't bad especially if its low mileage and has good bearings. Tonally they're more neutral than Linn arms and are easier to match a decent MC cart with. I had another Linn a while back and tried find a Zeta but I kept thinking will it perform as well as a newer arm or am I being misguided by nostalgic memories lol. I never found one and I got an Origin Live Silver instead.


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 1:36 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

this looks like a good prospect. not heard of the cartridge, any good?

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/190784761668?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1423.l2649

TG - where do you begin to go about upgrading an RB250 like that?


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 1:55 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The SP10 is good

Here's that SP10 I mentioned:

[img] [/img]

The plinth is made of Corian and wood layers, and then has sorbothane suspended layers at the base - the more the better...

I had the plinth I bought from him drilled for a Rega mount which I almost regret as the SME sounds so good, but I am going to try one of those 'supercharged' RB250s above.

His CD system was fronted with the excellent Teac P30 CD transport (£3k) and a custom built tube DAC - but the SP10 was all over it for musicalality and smoothness/liquidity.

TG - where do you begin to go about upgrading an RB250 like that?

The guys that does them is Jeff at

[url= http://www.audiomods.co.uk/armmods1.html ]audiomods[/url]

I met him through the yahoo LS3/5a group as he is a fellow fan - I think I took my Cicable external LS3/5a crossovers round to his house for him to try, and an M-Audio SuperDAC/Monarchy 48/96 DIP combination I was using for an external DAC (now sitting here unused).

At that time he was just starting to experiment with drilling holes in RB250s to see what he could do with dampening them, but now I see he has gone the whole hog with them. The turntable he used is pictured on his site:

[img] [/img]

He also brought some Pye HF25 tube amps he was restoring round to my house to try with some Spendor SP1s I had at the time - they sounded absolutely fantastic - not only did the female vocalist sound incredible but you could smell her perfume...

[img] [/img]

Those amps come from the 1950s and have a massive bandwidth - there is masses of technical detail in their manuals. I think Pye knew what they were doing...


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 10:49 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

this looks like a good prospect

The Axis was their basic level turntable, the arm is pretty basic, and Stanton are a huge name in cartridges but mostly for their DJ stuff.

Unlike an LP12 you won't be able to upgrade far with the Axis, and nowhere with the arm, which probably isn't as good as an RB250 in the first place.

That Rega P25 looks like a much better bet.

You don't want to get too carried away - try the Rega and then if you think you want to go further you can sell it for good money.

If you end up with a big investment on the front end you will need a good amp/pre-amp to hear it, plus a better cartridge, and then a better phono stage, etc. It could be the start of a money pit which, at the end, will only have increased your enjoyment of the system by a small percentage.


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 11:00 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks for the pics, that tube amp looks brilliant. Ashamed to say ive never had the pleasure of listening to one. Ive also had half an eye on several tube phone stages, love the idea of one but not exactly sure what id be gaining/sacrificing.

TG - you clearly seem to know and are passionate about your audio - if I manage to stretch to this P25 or similar, I hope you dont mind me badgering you for more system partnership advice?!
I know exactly what you mean about the upgrade money pit, I hope my trusty old Cambridge Audio and Mission set up will let me hear the P25 sing at least enough to keep me smiling!


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 11:18 am
Posts: 21
Free Member
 

not only did the female vocalist sound incredible but you could smell her perfume...

And that's the sort of statement that the common sense man laughs at about people who spend thousands on hifi!!!!! I've no doubt her voice sounded very good indeed but "smell" - er speakers generate sound waves not smells and it's your brain making those senses up which then shows how powerful the brain is and CAN and DOES trick you into believing that one hifi component is better than another. I listen to music, I can enjoy it on an iPhone and my hifi and my senses can be strong using both as some songs make the hairs on the back of my neck stand on end. The man who pays £50 for his system and gets as much enjoyment as someone who's paid thousands is the one who's best off as he can then spend his money on lots and lots of things that will make his life better and I guarantee you 100% that lots of expensive hifi is bought by people who are out to impress people they don't like or don't even know.


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 12:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

it's your brain making those senses up which then shows how powerful the brain is

that was somewhat tongue in cheek, it was meant to indicate how realistic it all was and, if you closed your eyes, you could almost think that she was sitting in front of you.

But are you the same Hadge that has posted above about his hifi - this post seems out of character - if you have had the kit you list above and spent the money on that kit, then I thought that you would be aware of how good systems can sound?

100% that lots of expensive hifi is bought by people who are out to impress people

not mine - if I wanted to impress I would have that teres turntable, not my ugly Technics SP10. Just having a Technics turntable would cause derision from most hifi people.


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 12:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

TG - you clearly seem to know and are passionate about your audio

I haven't as much contemporary experience as many on this group so am maybe not the best person to ask.

I am solidly in the LS3/5a and Quad amp camp, although I have a rather lovely Music First TVC pre-amp now as Quad preamps are a bit mediocre.

Matching gear can be a bit of a crap-shoot, and what seems to work at the dealers might not work at home, due to room acoustics, etc. And often the dealer doesn't have the same gear as you for the rest of the setup.

So it is best to find a dealer that will lend you stuff, or has a cooling off period.

The other option is ebay where you can buy and then sell again if it is not right.

Plus - didn't you mention Pink Floyd, I am a bit of a soul/jazzfunk head so my priorities for a system - good midrange - might not be yours. So following my recommendations might not be a good plan...


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 1:08 pm
Posts: 21
Free Member
 

I've bought things because its my money, my hobby and I enjoy music, which hobby wise is the same as someone buying new parts for their mtb really. I agree about the perception about bring in the room etc which is the way the producers hope.
I thought your comment was tongue in cheek but honestly the doubters will thrive on those sort of comments and yes I do believe some expensive kit really does produce stunning sound but trying get that over to doubters or those that aren't interested is very hard to get across as such. I do believe though our senses trick us and I also believe hifi is like fine wine and food, some people get it and some don't.
By the way the SP10 you have really looks the part and hope it sounds every bit as good as it looks. Love your choice of arm too 🙂


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 1:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Love your choice of arm too

that's not my arm, it's the one on my mates 🙁

I have some tinnitus (tubes too narrow - needs constant exercise like cycling to keep them in good shape), so I know all about the brain making up sounds...

But no matter what the shape of my ears, I want my system to make my music sound as realistic and pleasing as possible.

I was aware of the power of the mind every since i read a story from some years ago about a test Wharfedale did.

3 pairs of identical Wharfedale Diamond speakers, one pair red, one pair white, one pair yellow.

The consensus of the listening panel was that the red pair sounded warm, the white pair bright, and the yellow pair was lean.

Just having the volume slightly higher when you switch components (more sensitive speakers for example) will make you think it sounds better, without necessarily noticing that it is louder.


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 1:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I listen to an iPod every day for approx 4 to 5 hours, im certainly not a hifi snob. But I am well aware that careful investment in hi-fi components can reveal a level of detail and clarity in your favourite albums that you didnt even realise was possible.
That 'hair standing on end' moment you mentioned.. it becomes more frequent, as well as that ear to ear grin when you realise that this is how its [i]supposed[/i] to sound - and your senses are being bombarded.

Of course its all to easy to get carried away with the marketing, but for me its about the opposite of trying to impress people, its about investing my spare hard earned in the best possible system that I can afford - to acheive total aural pleasure!

plus its a great hobby!


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 1:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I listen to an iPod every day for approx 4 to 5 hours, im certainly not a hifi snob.

I listen to a Cowon i10 most workdays as well, through Shure SE535s phones.

Even though it is a DAB recording the Shures, which are expensive, make it sound good.

I have a DAB radio in my system as well - it sounded pretty flat until the addition of that Music First TVC preamp, which is lovely and smooth but also seems to have more resolution than my old passive pre-amp or my Tact 2.2X.


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 1:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

ive been contemplating a set of clear 215/315/535's for a long time, would be really keen to experience how good they sound.

I really lik the idea of swappable cables as I get through a fiar amount of 'normal' earphones after the cables harden and/or split.

Really enjoying the braided cable on my awfully trendy Marley in ears at the moment. Keen to see how well they hold up.

So the 535's have justified the asking price for you? What do they have over the lower end models?


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 2:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So the 535's have justified the asking price for you?

yes, considering the number of hours I listen to them.

previously I had Etymotic ER6is which weren't great - had to use a lot of EQ to get a balanced sound - otherwise thing and bright - and I had a good seal with them - enough to block out 20 snoring civil engineers whilst trying to sleep in a hut in the lake district.

then Shure EC3s - pretty good but cables went in the end.

then Shure SE530s - very nice midrange

then Shure SE535s after getting the SE530 repaired by Shure, which is basically a discount on a new pair.

The Cowon has an MP3 enhance function which is useful, otherwise I don't use any EQ.

You see quite a few people with them now.

Beware of cheap sources though and possible copies.


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 2:33 pm
Posts: 1015
Free Member
 

I have a pair of SE215's and they are pretty good. They have superb bass but rely on a good seal which feels slightly odd to start with. Midrange is superb but treble is a bit dull although detailed. This gives a sound which is not at all fatiguing compared to a brighter balance.the lead loops over the ear which combined with the tight seal means they stay in place well. External noise is almost completely sealed out.


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 8:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

sounds pretty much exactly what im looking for, will try to get my hands on a pair this year.

How are the 535's worth so much more than the others in the range?


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 8:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How are the 535's worth so much more than the others in the range?

They are effectively a 3 way design - 3 armatures. Just better.

Shures are often quoted as a bit dull in the treble, but I would say that a lot of other phones/speakers are too bright 🙂


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 9:18 pm
Posts: 33979
Full Member
 

ive been contemplating a set of clear 215/315/535's for a long time, would be really keen to experience how good they sound.

I really lik the idea of swappable cables as I get through a fiar amount of 'normal' earphones after the cables harden and/or split.


I've got the 215's, had them for around two years now, and I love them, the replaceable cables are brilliant at the price. I use triple-flange eartips on mine, to get the best seal, I've never been able to get a seal using regular eartips. I'm considering shelling out on some custom eartips, but the current cost of £112/pair is a bit daunting.
I had the Etymotics as well, after reading lots of positive reviews, even got custom eartips for those, but I never warmed to them, they were never engaging. The Shure's, though, are fantastic for the money.
Really enjoying this thread, btw, my Zeta was bought brand new, about '82-ish. I paid about £270 or so, because I got 30% off, working in a hifi shop! It hasn't been used in years, the speed control on the t/table is on the fritz, but I couldn't part with it. I really ought to get it all cleaned up and see if I can get it fixed.


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 9:44 pm
Posts: 1015
Free Member
 

I've got one of those Logic Tempo turntables a couple of pages back with Datum tonearm & MC10 super cartridge, had it from new,thought about upgrading to a Plana 3 but in it's day it was about equal to a Planar 2 so would probably have to shell out a good bit more now


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 9:58 pm
Posts: 1015
Free Member
 

CountZero-do you use the Shure triple-Flange or copies? Do they come in different sizes?


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 10:01 pm
Posts: 8859
Free Member
 

I have a Michell Syncro with Moth tonearm, owned it for 25years or so, very nice kit IMO


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 10:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I have a Michell Syncro with Moth tonearm, owned it for 25years or so, very nice kit IMO

thats interesting, as I have half an eye on this:

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/150980040202?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1423.l2649

was blown out of the water on the Planar 25 I wanted.. The Syncro may end up a rebound purchase


 
Posted : 21/01/2013 12:41 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

but I couldn't part with it. I really ought to get it all cleaned up and see if I can get it fixed.

Do it! It'll be a rewarding journey.

BTW, great comments on the 215's, at the current pricing they can be picked up for, they certainly sound a great purchase


 
Posted : 21/01/2013 12:44 am
Posts: 33979
Full Member
 

CountZero-do you use the Shure triple-Flange or copies? Do they come in different sizes?

I [i]think[/i] they're Shure ones, but, TBH I'm not absolutely sure (!) now. Thinking about it, yes, they're Shure tips.
The reason I was confused is because I also have UE SuperFi 5 Studio and TripleFi 10 Pro 's and I needed triple-flange tips for those, and I couldn't remember which ones were which.
The Shure's really are fantastic for the money, the standard cables are really solid, compared to the weedy things that earphones usually have. The alternative cable with remote for iPhones isn't quite as chunky, but still pretty robust; the standard cable has a 90° plug, the remote cable has a 45° plug. 😀
Size-wise? Good question, the tips I got for my UE's came in small and regular, but I really don't know about the Shure ones. Check their web site, or look for alternatives; there are plenty about, just be certain they are for Shure 'phones, they have small diameter acoustic tubes, the UE's have bigger diameter tubes.


 
Posted : 21/01/2013 2:15 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

SE535s plugged in now, D&B playing, head nodding, slumped in chair so it's not too obvious...

I use the silicon tips that come with the Shures as standard. Not quite as isolating as the triple flanges but they are less intrusive. The seal is good for me - insert them and then pull them back slightly seems to work.


 
Posted : 21/01/2013 11:31 am
Posts: 2861
Full Member
 

slimjim78 - Member

I have a Michell Syncro with Moth tonearm, owned it for 25years or so, very nice kit IMO

thats interesting, as I have half an eye on this:

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/150980040202?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1423.l2649

was blown out of the water on the Planar 25 I wanted.. The Syncro may end up a rebound purchase

You certainly won't go wrong with it. I'm not sure if that's the earlier one? I think they had the rounded corners and the later ones had square corners - or maybe the other way around lol.

Anyhow, it's a lovely bit of kit.


 
Posted : 21/01/2013 5:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Hmmmm....

Things just got interesting guys..

In a fit of frustration as missing out on the lovely Planar 25, I went about filling the void and in a typical knee jerk reaction, I bid [b]much[/b] [b]more[/b] than I budgeted on a turntable which I know very little about.

And the seller only bloody accepted my offer.

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/271033500370?ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1439.l2649

In my eyes it gorgeous. And the little research I did revealed a turntable that 'must be considered' in the price bracket of £1200-£1500

Ok, so its the former model, but its brand new old stock. New version retails for £1500 (with cartridge) This one was up for offers at £699, I won it for £511 (gulp). It certainly [i]seems[/i] like a bit of a bargain?, and I certainly didnt expect them to accept my first offer, and I feel like a total mentalist (heaven knows what'll happen if the wife finds out)

So what I need from you guys is the following:

a) tell me its an absolute flippin bargain at the price I paid (bid history shows they had previously turned down offers of £700)
b) tell me I did the totally right thing
c) tell me how much better my life will now be
d) tell me this model offers incredible playback
e) tell me what cartridge and phono stage I need to do this justice, without breaking the bank (tricky)

Either satisfy me that this is a great bit of kit and a greater price, or I think im possibly going to need to do some grovelling to the seller, and try to 'downgrade' to the Planar 3 or RP1 that would totally have done the job!

Cripes!

EDIT: slight sick in the stomach feeling after reviewing the sellers questionable feedback history..


 
Posted : 21/01/2013 6:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I thought that you were going to say that you had bought a Voyd turntable to fill the void...

It should be good, although it may demand a better cartridge and phono stage than you were first thinking of.


 
Posted : 21/01/2013 7:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

slight sick in the stomach feeling after reviewing the sellers questionable feedback history

99.5% feedback - looks OK

I get that feeling sometime - before xmas I bought an 853 equilibrium frame from the classified on a whim, but my 725 equilibrium is fine and I find road riding pretty boring anyway, so it was pretty stupid.

Probably going to ebay it, but have to make sure I don't make a profit or I would be breaking the rules!


 
Posted : 21/01/2013 7:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

come on, dont hold any punches, tell me what you really think of it..

cash hasn't been handed over as yet, if you interrogate his feedback you can find at least a dozen awful transactions. And pics of the rest of his stock seem to reveal he is trading from a concrete bunker.
Of course, I could have checked these things before bidding..


 
Posted : 21/01/2013 7:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They look OK - I think they have been around for a while and look like enthusiasts. I bought my Quad 909s and Music First preamp from somewhere like that.

I note from their web site that they sell the Promitheus TVC pre-amp, which is a good value pre-amp that has been making waves on the forums, so for them to be the UK distributor is good.

See if you can go to one of their shops to pick it up, explain that you are after a phono stage/cartridge and would like a demo of stuff. Explain it might be out of your budget but they will probably go for it as you could be a future customer.


 
Posted : 21/01/2013 8:21 pm
Posts: 33979
Full Member
 

Ooooo, a Roksan! I have a recollection of those being pretty desirable. Very pretty. All you have to do now is find a suitable arm and cartridge.
Let me cast the Tarot...
...hmmm, I see an unexpected call from a man in a suit, bank something-or-other? 😆

I use the silicon tips that come with the Shures as standard. Not quite as isolating as the triple flanges but they are less intrusive. The seal is good for me - insert them and then pull them back slightly seems to work.

Believe me, I have tried every different size of 'bud'-type eartips going, and I've never yet managed to get the damned things to fit and seal properly. Triple-flange ones have been my saviour regarding canal-phones.


 
Posted : 21/01/2013 8:28 pm
Page 2 / 3