Forum menu
There isn't a snowballs chance in hell he will be banned. The Tories have already said as much and its Tera May's decision.
Of course he won't be banned, just nice it's being raised in parliament as it shows we as a nation don't approve of shite pedalling uber trolls, like Trump , (hope farrige would get the message to the wheels have obviously fallen off his ego wagon recently)
I say give all the BritLand tourists to Merica full cavity search upon arrival at Merican airports especially those that signed the petition.
Hope the fingers up their cavity will give them the message and wake them up a bit ... oh look the names on the list ... give it to airport security coz they could be potential trouble makers to incite ...
Where's the rubber gloves ...
😆
Because everyone loves a bit of sexual assault.
Or is it just reserved for those who talk out of their arse.
before or after this nonsense. He got Turnberry because it is a lame donkey of a business and the previous owners were laughing up their sleeves when they sold it (I have working experience of it and other Golf resorts in Scotland) and the Menie estate course is BS in terms of people travelling that far for a game of golf only. His business interests in Scotland are shyte. He won't be President of YooEssA anytime. Ever.There isn't a snowballs chance in hell he will [s]be banned[/s] [b]invest £700M into Scotland[/b]
thisisnotaspoon - Member
Because everyone loves a bit of sexual assault.
Or is it just reserved for those who talk out of their arse.
Coz they could be potential minority that want to influence Merican's way of life so better have full cavity search just in case ... just like their accusation that Trump would influence their way of life in BritLand.
Or is it just a group bias minority that refuse to realise the UK is heaven for doggy investors from other countries worst than Trump?
🙄
surroundedbyhills - Member
His business interests in Scotland are shyte. He won't be President of YooEssA anytime. Ever.
If not him then Clinton (female) will invest? ... eewwwee ... That woman should not be allowed to speak! (in male Clinton voice when he denied affairs with another female).
the UK is heaven for doggy investors
Because we Winalot?
Trump's previous promises of massive investment and job creation have turned out to be rubbish - the £700M is rubbish too.
Of course he won't be banned, just nice it's being raised in parliament as it shows we as a nation don't approve of shite pedalling uber trolls, like Trump
I think some of the thrust of the original petition has been lost in the spin though - as I read it, it wasn't purely a juvenile "we don't want Trump" petition, instead it pointed out the hypocrisy in banning lots of people from entry into the UK on the grounds of "hate speech" and "inciting racial hatred" but then allowing Trump in.
If they allow Trump in (and obviously they will) then they are sending a message that hate speech is acceptable from crazy white Christian guys but not crazy brownish Muslamic guys.
bencooper - Member
the UK is heaven for doggy investors
Because we Winalot?
No, it's in the nature ... it's business.
They are just being stealth rather than speaking loudly like Trump and are considered as the cash "angles" by the BritLand Govt.
These people don't get scrutinise and will never as they are not that stoopid to want to let you know. Low profile better for business.
Trump's previous promises of massive investment and job creation have turned out to be rubbish - the £700M is rubbish too.
Nahhh ... not sure what to invest in Scotland to be honest but Freedoommm! 😆
GrahamS - Member
If they allow Trump in (and obviously they will) then they are sending a message that hate speech is acceptable from crazy white Christian guys but not crazy brownish Muslamic guys.
You're a bit late to the game aren't you? They are already here ... 🙄
No, it's in the nature ... it's business.
That's what you think, Chum.
You're a bit late to the game aren't you? They are already here ... 🙄
And we chuck them out and/or ban them from entry to the UK if they are found to be inciting racial hatred.
Here is a handy list:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_banned_from_entering_the_United_Kingdom
(pleasingly, and contrary to media coverage, not everyone on that list is a muslamic hate preacher. In fact the majority are Americans)
That's what you think, Chum.
Are you suggesting that the UK has not got the pedigree?
The £700m is a wha whaaa baby cry from him.
Bit like kids if you take their toys away.
I personally would like to see him come over here again. Suspect his trip will be heavily protected at our great expense, a golden handshake in Daves pad in ruralshire, and a swift half down the heavily barricaded local Pub.
Then a trip along the A/M4 in a convey of 400 military grade vehicles, back to his fuelled up jet, Airforce 2.0
Are you suggesting that the UK has not got the pedigree?
IAMSure we do in some respects, pal.
Pretty sure its owned by Mars these days!
Pretty sure Trumps £700 million is much like his chances of actually being president.
Pretty much none existent.
Just to put some numbers to it, 10 years ago Trump claimed he'd be investing $1.5bn to create 6,000 jobs in Scotland.
Total amount invested: £6.4m
Jobs created: Less than 200
bencooper - MemberJust to put some numbers to it, 10 years ago Trump claimed he'd be investing $1.5bn to create 6,000 jobs in Scotland.
Total amount invested: £6.4m
Jobs created: Less than 200
^This. I heard he bought Turnberry for about £35 millions. His talk of hundreds of millions of pounds seems well off the mark. He could singlehandedly bankroll dualling of the A9 with that.
How many times has he gone bankrupt/restructured in the last 10 years?
Only yin way to sort that eejit,the next time Donnie boy is in a bar,in Scotland,he gets called oot fir a "square go".
How many times has he gone bankrupt/restructured in the last 10 years?
Apparently if he'd just taken his huge inheritance and put it in a savings account, he'd be 3x richer now. He's that bad at business.
Pretty sure its owned by Mars these days!
Must be feeling a bit of a chub now...
Did anyone else who signed this get the results of the debate through today?
I scanned the transcript of the debate (which was massive).
It seems that whilst, on the whole most people agreed with the premise of the request, no one was really taking it seriously.
I didn't see anyone really address the fact that the request was for consistency in application of the law. We have banned something like 80 other people for preaching similar things.
I might be wrong that it wasn't addressed, as couldn't read it all (would have taken me all day).
Also, it seems that there was no real objective to the debate. Nothing got decided and the decision of whether to ban him doesn't fall within the remit of this house. Or am I missing something?
Watch the debate: [url= http://parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/83208344-218d-4c43-9300-ca78c374b875 ]
Read the transcript: [url= https://hansard.digiminster.com/commons/2016-01-18/debates/1601186000001/DonaldTrump ][/url]
The Mad World of Donald Trump staring at 2100, C4. Should be a giggle (or an evening fap opportunity for STW's right wing nutjobs).
I hope Trump wins the Presidency then get ban from entering UK ... 😆
That will learn the tiny Brit islanders ...
Clinton wins ... we quicken our doom woohoo!
Blimey some mild contrition from Salmond. What next???
NEVER thought I'd ever agree with Alex Salmond