Apocalypto
 

MegaSack DRAW - This year's winner is user - rgwb
We will be in touch

[Closed] Apocalypto

42 Posts
27 Users
0 Reactions
75 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Peoples thoughts please. Tah


 
Posted : 06/01/2010 9:08 pm
 Keva
Posts: 3262
Free Member
 

I liked it.


 
Posted : 06/01/2010 9:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have to admit I haven't seen it but..
Bearing in mind its by Mel Gibson I suppose its about how Mayan society was destroyed by The Jews/ The English/ Gay people, with lots of torture sequences?


 
Posted : 06/01/2010 9:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Gay. In denial.


 
Posted : 06/01/2010 9:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

west kipper
Mayan society was destroyed by Gay people

😆


 
Posted : 06/01/2010 9:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Again, My knowledge of the artistic work of Mr Gibson is limited to what I learnt from South Park.


 
Posted : 06/01/2010 9:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yep OK, good old revenge story, done in loin cloths and spears.


 
Posted : 06/01/2010 9:23 pm
 jedi
Posts: 10238
Full Member
 

i liked it


 
Posted : 06/01/2010 9:23 pm
Posts: 4607
Free Member
 

sucked worse than any other movie ever made.


 
Posted : 06/01/2010 9:27 pm
Posts: 7100
Free Member
 

Good film. But Mel Gibson is still a t**t.


 
Posted : 06/01/2010 9:27 pm
Posts: 293
Free Member
 

Went to see it in Finland, didnt know it was in Mayan with subtitles didn't understand a word 😯 3 of us at the end just sat there laughing.


 
Posted : 06/01/2010 9:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

worth the watch


 
Posted : 06/01/2010 9:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Great. That's the office row sorted then. It went like this. [b]Apocalypto is good.[/b] No it's not, it's crap. [b]Your a mong who likes WWF.[/b] WWF is real and they would kick your ass. [b]You would like to do some thing to their asses.[/b] It's got subtitles[b]. You can't read and drive a purple fiesta[/b] and so on.


 
Posted : 06/01/2010 9:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'd watch it if it was on, so that I could get a proper opinion, but the thought of my watching it would in any way financially enrich an (allegedly)anti-semitic, fundamentalist, son of a racist, australo-american dwarf has prevented me from offering my critical review so far.


 
Posted : 06/01/2010 9:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

TheSwede - do you work for the Cabinet Office ?


 
Posted : 06/01/2010 9:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Random aside from a dyslexic - any of you read Apocolypso by [i]Robert[/i] Rankin? - Mad and very funny 😀


 
Posted : 06/01/2010 9:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 06/01/2010 9:45 pm
Posts: 7538
Full Member
 

excellent film!!


 
Posted : 06/01/2010 9:48 pm
Posts: 31061
Free Member
 

I thoroughly enjoyed it - many of the films loved here are made by tossers - some bigger than MG, some smaller, but tossers nonetheless.

And it was only the very end of the film that we saw the image of the ships arriving - Roman Catholic Conquistadores one assumes.


 
Posted : 06/01/2010 9:53 pm
Posts: 34074
Full Member
 

hhhmm was ok good to see some south american history in a movie and in the native tongue but was quite hollywood in the end

i asked my guide in peru what she thought of it (native quetchan(sp?)- descendent of the incas and archaeology graduate) she said it was very innacurate and was culturaly way off the mark for the mayans

so kind of like braveheart then!


 
Posted : 06/01/2010 9:55 pm
Posts: 5902
Full Member
 

Not a bad film, but Mel Gibson has issues. It's overly gory in places, as is his version of the Jebus story. He's a bit mad for torture scenes, really


 
Posted : 06/01/2010 9:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I've watched it three time now and I would never in a million years guessed that Gibson had anything to do with it to be honest. Randomly, I have a mate who looks just like the grumpy one.
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 06/01/2010 10:01 pm
Posts: 621
Free Member
 

visually interesting but somewhat lacking in the story department. Worth a watch I suppose.


 
Posted : 06/01/2010 10:04 pm
Posts: 4607
Free Member
 

Not a bad film, but Mel Gibson has issues. It's overly gory in places, as is his version of the Jebus story. He's a bit mad for torture scenes, really

Which is precisely why i disliked it so much. Mel just has to be a bit mental. There is simply no call for that much gore.


 
Posted : 06/01/2010 10:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Shocking. But not nearly Mel's worst film. If he ever makes anything more awful than the Passion of the Christ, I'll be genuinely surprised.


 
Posted : 06/01/2010 10:08 pm
Posts: 2350
Full Member
 

good film , seen it twice


 
Posted : 06/01/2010 10:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

SaxonRider - Member
sucked worse than any other movie ever made.

This is not possible due to the fact the "The Core" was made. Which is [i]actually[/i] the worst film ever made.

The writers of the core should perish by some ironic geological death.

Apocalypto - nothing special and from what i gather pretty inaccurate historically.


 
Posted : 06/01/2010 10:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks for the feed back folks all though some of you are very wrong and it is a good film and thats that and this the end of this thread. Now what do you all think of The man without a face, rigid fixies and olives I say crap on all accounts.


 
Posted : 07/01/2010 12:56 pm
Posts: 5807
Free Member
 

I liked Apocalypto, it's pretty much a 90 minute chase sequence. I'm not sure historical accuracy was even attempted.

SaxonRider - Member
sucked worse than any other movie ever made.

This is not possible due to the fact the "The Core" was made. Which is actually the worst film ever made.

Clearly neither of you has had to sit through "The Holiday" or "Love Actually".

@ TheSwede - awful, idiotic, lovely (but not the tasteless stoned ones in brine).


 
Posted : 07/01/2010 1:24 pm
Posts: 5902
Full Member
 

Love Actually was not that bad, actually. Kiera 'I can do a great impression of a lump of wood y'know' Knightley is quite hot in it, for starters.


 
Posted : 07/01/2010 1:47 pm
Posts: 53
Free Member
 

Cool movie.
Like going on holiday..


 
Posted : 07/01/2010 1:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

worth a watch, good cinematography...worst stuffed 'panther' fight ever though


 
Posted : 07/01/2010 3:28 pm
Posts: 7766
Full Member
 

The panther was [i]stuffed?[/i]


 
Posted : 07/01/2010 3:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

House: I've read Apocalypso. It's at least as good as The Davinci Code 🙂
(but then I'm a big Rankin fan)

And the worst film ever made is Thomas The Tank Engine & The Magic Railroad.


 
Posted : 07/01/2010 3:36 pm
 Keva
Posts: 3262
Free Member
 

I thought it was about the Aztecs not the Mayans, or am I wrong ?


 
Posted : 07/01/2010 3:39 pm
Posts: 785
Free Member
 

I liked it very much and I like passion of the Christ too

Shoot me


 
Posted : 07/01/2010 3:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

yeah seriously i think it was stuffed/soft toy like!

watch the scene again, the legs don't bend or anything when it jumps on him 😀

rest of the film was well done though


 
Posted : 07/01/2010 3:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think that sometimes, walla24, that filmmakers make these scenes a bit artificial on purpose, so the audience (and animal right groups) know that no animal was actually hurt)
Watch the beginning of Pale Rider, and the scene with the dead dog for another classic soft toy effect.


 
Posted : 07/01/2010 5:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

yeah fair point, its not a negative, just something which made me chuckle 🙂
also when bravheart jumps his horse into a moat 😆


 
Posted : 07/01/2010 5:13 pm
Posts: 34074
Full Member
 

definately the mayans
apparently the spanish arrived 300 years after the fall of the mayan civilization - would have been correct for the aztecs or the incas though


 
Posted : 07/01/2010 5:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

ill be a real nerd now, in the city they were fire ring piles of lime stone in kilns to make quick lime and using lime plaster with their hands .
By the time the Spanish got there they were all starving because the ground was rising up and there irrigation channels wouldn't work .

i enjoyed the film though, and i don't listen to folk music.


 
Posted : 07/01/2010 6:30 pm
Posts: 5807
Free Member
 

nicko74 - Member

Love Actually was not that bad, actually

You.

Big.

Jessie.


 
Posted : 07/01/2010 6:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

yetirose - Member
i enjoyed the film though, and i don't listen to folk music.

I must return that Earl Scruggs cd to you rosey 😉


 
Posted : 07/01/2010 9:33 pm