Anybody else a cand...
 

[Closed] Anybody else a candidate and HATING the waiting today?

108 Posts
55 Users
0 Reactions
287 Views
 LoCo
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well done for standing Rachel.


 
Posted : 08/05/2015 9:32 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

looking at the results of this election where for example the Greens have 3.7% of the vote giving 1 seat and the SNP have 4.8% of the vote and 55 seats

Spread out over how many seats contested? What % of the vote did they win the seats they contested by? Easy to make figures work you way, more detail needed. The Greens don't have a very good track record with figures recently!


 
Posted : 08/05/2015 9:34 am
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

I'm all for voting reform, but as the FT pointed out, be careful what you wish for:

[img] :large[/img]


 
Posted : 08/05/2015 9:35 am
Posts: 12081
Full Member
 

So how did you do, Rachel? Deposit saved at least I hope!


 
Posted : 08/05/2015 9:46 am
 igm
Posts: 11844
Full Member
 

If you'd been local, I'd have voted for you Rachel - you always come across as a genuinely decent person.

Just don't ask for PR elections when the Kippers are about. And note that the SNP proportion is an anomaly. They got half the vote in the seats they stood in - we will never know how many votes they'd have got if they'd stood in seats in EW&NI (maybe no more but I suspect you'd be surprised in some seats)


 
Posted : 08/05/2015 9:55 am
 LoCo
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm all for voting reform, but as the FT pointed out, be careful what you wish for:

Yep, slow hand clap up UK. More worried with self interest & blaming failings on others than the planet you'll be leaving for future generation. 😥


 
Posted : 08/05/2015 10:02 am
Posts: 173
Free Member
 

Deleted as someone else just said exactly the same thing!

(SNP = 50% of popular vote across all seats where they stood, not 4.5%).


 
Posted : 08/05/2015 10:09 am
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

But by the same token UKIP didn't have candidates standing in a lot of constituencies either, so their support may actually be higher too! 😯


 
Posted : 08/05/2015 10:42 am
Posts: 6209
Full Member
 

I certainly personally know several who have stood. Some have been successful, others less so.

Funniest was a Tory guy I know whose missus was Libdem. They stood in different wards so didn't compete against each other, but must be strange not having your own partner as support.

Neither of them won that time. But full credit to anyone who stands (unless they're BNP/EDL/...). Loads of councillors will just be walking in unopposed.


 
Posted : 08/05/2015 10:47 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm all for voting reform, but as the FT pointed out, be careful what you wish for:

It doesn't sound like you really are that enthusiastic about voting reform after all, if you don't mind me saying so!


 
Posted : 08/05/2015 11:20 am
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

😀 it's just a cautionary note KB. As I said in another thread I don't think that FT graph really tells us that much about what the results would look like under PR, because people would likely vote differently under PR.


 
Posted : 08/05/2015 11:52 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Quite a lot would change if we adopted some sort of PR, not least the likely break up of the larger parties into smaller, more focussed, parties.

I see this as a good thing, anyway.

Rachel (trying to think of something else, anything else, until 5pm...)


 
Posted : 08/05/2015 12:07 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Breaking up the large parties may not be a bad thing but PR tends to bring forward more marginal views as the FT chart shows with UKIP.

What I would prefer is the public placing a much higher priority on environmental concerns with a safety net in place to keep marginal views in check.

Well done for standing!

Iain


 
Posted : 08/05/2015 12:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

but PR tends to bring forward more marginal views
...because bland centre politics has done us so well?


 
Posted : 08/05/2015 12:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Hasn't done me any harm to be honest Rachel. Best wishes, 1hr 40 to go.


 
Posted : 08/05/2015 2:21 pm
 TP
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I would prefer PR. You only have to look at Scotland to see what's wrong with FPTP. Less than 50% of the votes yet 95% of the seats.


 
Posted : 08/05/2015 2:26 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

but PR tends to bring forward more marginal views
...because bland centre politics has done us so well?

Perhaps not but, how to put this delicately. I wouldn't want certain rather far right of centre parties to become any more marginal than they are and I'm rather a fan of anything that makes their voice have less gravity. In the case of [i]some[/i] marginal parties I think it would work well but I wouldn't want a blanket increase in [i]all[/i] marginal views.

Good luck by the way.

Iain


 
Posted : 08/05/2015 2:46 pm
Posts: 13594
Free Member
 

In the case of some marginal parties I think it would work well but I wouldn't want a blanket increase in all marginal views.

The only way to tackle extremist views is to challenge them head on. Trying to exclude or marginalise them just feeds them.


 
Posted : 08/05/2015 2:47 pm
Posts: 15
Free Member
 

Any result yet Rachael ? my brother came a valiant 4th.


 
Posted : 08/05/2015 3:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

No result yet but generally in the area the Cons are taking lots of seats. Well, nearly all actually.

:-/

Rachel


 
Posted : 08/05/2015 3:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

One good bit of news. Richard Bird, he once of cycle shop Fat Birds Don't Fly, has just been elected to council as an independent. 🙂


 
Posted : 08/05/2015 4:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Unfortunately, pretty much the rest of the council has swung to Conservative. Looks like I'll have to put the duck house order on hold until next time!!

Rachel


 
Posted : 08/05/2015 5:17 pm
Posts: 15
Free Member
 

Oh well better luck for you and us all next time.


 
Posted : 08/05/2015 6:06 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

"Progress without change", the Norfolk motto although I always thought the motto was "What?".

Good for Mr Bird. I like his shop very much.


 
Posted : 08/05/2015 7:12 pm
Posts: 1143
Full Member
 

Looks like I'll have to put the duck house order on hold until next time!!

Sorry to hear that. I had 3 of my ducks on standby for a new home. Donald, Jemima and Daphne will be so dissapointed 😆

Well done for standing. Better luck next time.


 
Posted : 08/05/2015 7:23 pm
Posts: 5646
Full Member
 

GrahamS - Member
But by the same token UKIP didn't have candidates standing in a lot of constituencies either, so their support may actually be higher too!

They stood in 624 constituencies in the GE.


 
Posted : 08/05/2015 7:26 pm
Posts: 1646
Full Member
 

My sister stood on the local City council election and she had to wait till gone 6pm today with lots recounts thru the day first of all on the general election and then on multiple wards that she has been elected.


 
Posted : 08/05/2015 11:01 pm
Posts: 7565
Full Member
 

couple more quick questions if you dont mind from a political dimwit....

do you stand for local council with hopes of going further? once elected to local council, go for 'promotion' to a 'ward'(?), and the long term plan is to be a local MP?
putting it in some sort of context, is it like playing for local sunday league footy side, hoping to be good enough for non-league, and if you turn out to be a decent player then youll end up pro?

or do you stand just cos you want to improve your local area and thats it?

how much money does it cost to stand for council, and what is payment likely to be? peanuts? voluntary? thousands in expenses?

genuine interest.


 
Posted : 09/05/2015 6:02 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I was standing for the Borough Council in a Ward. I'm not really interested in "promotion" as you put it to parliamentary elections.

As a Borough Councillor, you would get expenses of about £5k a year.

the only costs are in printing leaflets and shoe leather.

Rachel


 
Posted : 09/05/2015 7:26 am
Page 2 / 2