An analysis of trol...
 

MegaSack DRAW - This year's winner is user - rgwb
We will be in touch

[Closed] An analysis of trolling....

19 Posts
17 Users
0 Reactions
109 Views
Posts: 7
Free Member
Topic starter
 

[url= http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-14898564 ]Analysis of trolling[/url]

And thoughts about removing anonymous logins...


 
Posted : 14/09/2011 1:34 pm
 GW
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

would you really come here so often if there was no trolling?
seriously?
😕


 
Posted : 14/09/2011 1:37 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

He first became aware of the phenomenon in the 90s when a friend cross-posted on fan sites for Lord of the Rings and Star Wars, asking: "Who'd win in a fight - the Emperor or Gandalf?" Manuel says his friend sat back and laughed like some "mad scientist looking at insects in a jar" as hundreds of passionate posts followed.

*bows*

Dom Joly:

"One guy tweeted from his work account that he hoped my kids die of cancer. I let the MD of the firm know and the guy was fired. I felt no guilt, he should have gone to prison."

Seems pretty harsh?


 
Posted : 14/09/2011 2:11 pm
Posts: 3351
Free Member
 

I regularly frequent b3ta (the humour site set up and co-run by Rob Manuel) and am pretty seasoned to such comments. It's about appropriateness, one would expect the sort of responses that might constitute trolling there, but it's a pretty sick thing to do to post on someone's FB memorial just to be a knob.

It's one thing to incite a heated debate about whether Blue Thunder would kick Airwolf's ass than to mock the families of a suicide victim. As for Dom Joly, I can't say that I disapprove of his actions. Just because he's in the public eye it doesn't mean that he should expect tasteless comments about his children to be posted on his twitter page.


 
Posted : 14/09/2011 2:20 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

I agree re. Dom Joly - just that losing one's job/going to prison seems disproportionate.


 
Posted : 14/09/2011 2:36 pm
Posts: 1340
Free Member
 

cynic-al - Member
I agree re. Dom Joly - just that losing one's job/going to prison seems disproportionate.

I'm guessing to the MD it was a reasonable action to preserve the reputation of his company. It was probably gross misconduct according to their policy.

Matt


 
Posted : 14/09/2011 2:49 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

The anoynomity is the key people behave on here and on the internet in ways they would not do in the real world.
I find it pathetic [ ie deserving of pity] that the real them is a bit childish, quite antoganistic and little bit harsh with people when they can get away with it


 
Posted : 14/09/2011 2:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

GW - Member
would you really come here so often if there was no trolling?
seriously?

Trolling's OK, it's the Elfings that ruin things 🙄


 
Posted : 14/09/2011 3:03 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

Sean Duffy was sentenced to 18 weeks in prison for being only slightly worse than you when you accuse people who disagree with you of being 'a bit like Joseph Fritzl'.

-- http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/science-%26-technology/uh%11oh%2c-says-everyone-on-internet-201109144300/


 
Posted : 14/09/2011 3:18 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

"Virulent, baseless and anonymous internet abuse is as natural as eating, breathing or pointing and laughing at a procession of funeral cars.

Aye its a free speech issue for sure


 
Posted : 14/09/2011 3:34 pm
Posts: 32558
Full Member
 

Free speech comes with rights and responsibility - think this case highlights that "society" is entitled to punish those who cross the boundaries of "acceptable" social behaviour, even on the internet. Failing to do so will encourage that behaviour to spread into wider usage, causing potentially wider repercussions.

Of course, we then have a big debate about what is acceptable.


 
Posted : 14/09/2011 5:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

think this case highlights that "society" is entitled to punish those who cross the boundaries of "acceptable" social behaviour,

😯

I mean really? We're now using our judicial system to punish those we don't like? Where's the line? I just can't understand how you go to jail for posting offensive things on the internet? Yeah, it's antisocial, but a crime? Surely it's up to the owner of the board or group to police the content. Otherwise why are their moderators and admins?

It seems like an incredible leap for me to go from comments on a website to hard time in jail.


 
Posted : 14/09/2011 5:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Whilst trolling can be annoying, I find it helps me to think about things from a different viewpoint.
It also, obviously, leads to more lively and often funny debate.

Much more interesting than a group of sheep all saying
sheep voice
"Baaa +1 to that comment"


 
Posted : 14/09/2011 5:37 pm
 DrJ
Posts: 13567
Full Member
 

"The word comes from a Norse monster"

No it doesn't - it comes from the name of a type of fishing bait.


 
Posted : 14/09/2011 5:38 pm
Posts: 10168
Full Member
 

The anoynomity is the key people behave on here and on the internet in ways they would not do in the real world.

very true, I moderate my behaviour lots more on something like Singletrack than I do face to face. Just goes to show that somewhere along the line I see some on here as peers I'd like approval from*

*jeesus I'm doomed 😯


 
Posted : 14/09/2011 5:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

A good troll can help to find the true beliefs and personalities of people in a forum like this. Trolling as in the articles is something completely different.


 
Posted : 14/09/2011 5:42 pm
Posts: 17179
Full Member
 

I wouldn't worry on here. This morning I wanted to have a look online at a news story. Underneath people could comment.
Lets just say they weren't the lovely, caring ,open minded people we have on here. Pats on the back to each and everyone of us, no matter what shorts we wear.


 
Posted : 14/09/2011 5:43 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

Matt I agree.

Junkyard I'll have your pity - I'll take what I can get.


 
Posted : 14/09/2011 10:11 pm
 Olly
Posts: 5209
Free Member
 

Trolling is defined as the abuse of the dead

Oh shut up BBC.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 14/09/2011 10:19 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

Deary me. Sounds like things are going a bit too far there.
The man said nasty things about me.

So in Dom Jolleys example, if a man said nasty things about him to his face would getting the man sacked (and suggesting he should go to jail) really be appropriate behaviour? Really?

No, of course it wouldn't. Idiots are everywhere. Look at that bloke on telly, errrm, Dom Jolley. He can be quite offensive sometimes, I remember one sketch he did, he was laughing at thin people. I'm thin. Do I post to the director of BBC to get him sacked? Do I say he should go to jail? No, of course I don't, I'm a grown up and can decide to ignore people I don't like. If he tries to punch me because I'm thin that's a different matter but pointing and laughing? Nah, go for it mate. Fill your boots.


 
Posted : 14/09/2011 10:35 pm