Forum menu
Would you buy a (ne...
 

[Closed] Would you buy a (new) fatbike for ~£1k?

Posts: 513
Free Member
 

Cool cheers for the info


 
Posted : 27/05/2016 7:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Had 2 Floaters delivered today, wrapped in a bin bag.

Looked and felt like a dead body. A heavy dead body. Light those tyres ain't


 
Posted : 27/05/2016 8:14 pm
Posts: 9217
Free Member
 

Floaters were weighing 1400g each or so, back at Easter, despite the marketing blurb.

How heavy are yours, slimjim78?


 
Posted : 27/05/2016 8:27 pm
Posts: 21
Free Member
 

Anyone used those maxxis mammoths,any good?? Could do with a narrower tyre for the back.


 
Posted : 27/05/2016 8:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I used them, great in the summer months super fast rolling. But leathal in any form of slop of wet ground


 
Posted : 27/05/2016 10:03 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Worked out a bit lighter than BR2250s, but more importantly cost me less

Can you tell us what the standard wheels weighed, for comparison purposes when shopping for replacements Northwind?

I'm torn between spending more on the Dune, including upgrading to a large frame, buying a new frame/forks (after seat post, stem/bars) or getting some 27.5+ wheels/tyres for my FF29.


 
Posted : 28/05/2016 7:32 am
 Alex
Posts: 7681
Full Member
 

I popped into SLAM69 in Glouc yesterday. They've got some nice fat bikes in there including a beargrease with a leif fork that weighs about 25lbs. Also doing their own brand which look really nice and you can have in any colour.

The BR2250s on hope hubs look fantastic and are so light. I nearly left with a pair. Definitely the next upgrade for me.


 
Posted : 28/05/2016 8:26 am
Posts: 6761
Full Member
 

Northwind,

Just read back through the last few pages,

I have a 9:Zero:7 190 frame with 190 spec cranks and they are very wide....
The bb shell is 100m

Do I understand that its possible to fit a RF 100mm 170 spec crank and flip the ring on the outside of the spider?

Im getting a bit hacked off with pedal strikes in ruts and a bit of a groin pull due to the wide pedal position...


 
Posted : 28/05/2016 10:00 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

their own brand which look really nice and you can have in any colour.

They are Smokestone "The Henderson". I have ordered one from the first batch. All of my OOF bits should swap across. I have seen them throughout the prototype process and Graham has put lots of thought into what people want and what makes a good fatty. Hoping to have the bike built for July. Will review it and let you all know how it rides, super excited to be honest!

Unfortunately all my current bits (hubs etc) are purple so I need to select a colour that suits them. That isn't just boring black! Decisions, decisions


 
Posted : 28/05/2016 10:56 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Fahzunnd! Good work fatists.

Do I understand that its possible to fit a RF 100mm 170 spec crank and flip the ring on the outside of the spider?

I think NW (and I) are referring to direct mount chain rings, whereas it sounds as though you are referring to a spider/104bcd set up. So, possibly not. However, if you have an RF crank that has a removeable spider with Cinch interface, then you may be in luck.

smokestone 'the henderson'

Been waiting a while for these to show up, there's limited info available - in fact, next to none on the slam69 website. What standards is it running? You mention your fatty trail parts fitting so assume it's not a 177/197 straight through axle ?


 
Posted : 28/05/2016 12:36 pm
Posts: 524
Free Member
 

Standard BR2250 wheels weigh 2250 grams although Several reviews I have seen they have come in just under that.


 
Posted : 28/05/2016 1:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Slimjim have you been on the smokestone website?

http://www.smokestonebikes.co.uk/frames/the-henderson/

12x177 rear hub spacing so I can change end caps on my rear hub I'm told. 100mm Bb so my hope one will bolt in and I can then swap over my xt 12 speed and aeffect cranks. Will need a new headset and a stealth reverb but otherwise my bluto, fatsno br710's etc will all transfer over. I have seen the final prototypes in the flesh and swung my leg over one. It just feels right. Plus Graham is a great guy who is always happy to help. So I'm already sold with deposit down.


 
Posted : 28/05/2016 7:17 pm
Posts: 66105
Full Member
 

That Henderson looks good. And totally custom build, that's ace. I guess they're connected to Dartmoor in some way? (worth mentioning either the frame or bike spec is wrong, it says 30.9 and 31.6 seatpost so be careful)

jeff1155 - Member

Can you tell us what the standard wheels weighed, for comparison purposes when shopping for replacements Northwind?

Standard Dune? Mine were 1739 rear, 1490 front without rim strips (I can't remember what the standard strips are but it's more than you might think; I replaced mine with pvc tape, works great and weighs nowt.)

TBH the dune wheels have been fine for me but I was loving the half kilo an end weight saving today!

rickmeister - Member

I have a 9:Zero:7 190 frame with 190 spec cranks and they are very wide.... The bb shell is 100m

Do I understand that its possible to fit a RF 100mm 170 spec crank and flip the ring on the outside of the spider?

It's complicated, basically. Which 190 cranks is it? If it's raceface we might be able to do some useful comparisons... It'll depend on the frame though, I did the flipped ring thing with the 170 Aeffects on mine and it fits well- not too tight, not too far, perfect really.

And yeah, that q factor change is worth it imo, there's trails I ride where the cranks are physically too wide (broon troot at glentress requires a planned pedal smash on one corner, or maybe some ninja lean moves, otherwise both pedals ground out!)


 
Posted : 28/05/2016 7:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The first proto was 30.9 but the production bike is 31.6. I remember discussing it with Graham


 
Posted : 28/05/2016 7:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How much are the pre-production frames costing russy?

How heavy are yours, Slimjim78?

Just weighed them, 1360 and 1340. I've been spoilt by my Juggernauts I think.

EDIT* just got the link above working on my iPad..450 notes for the frame eh? Ouch. Looks like I'll be enjoying the Dune for at least another season then.


 
Posted : 28/05/2016 8:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Production frames are £450 I believe although I'm sure it will depend on what you wan sorting paint wise.


 
Posted : 28/05/2016 8:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I liked the polished prototype. What's the deal with having them done any colour then?


 
Posted : 28/05/2016 8:34 pm
Posts: 66105
Full Member
 

Good stuff, 30.9 can **** off.

RACEBIEK!

[URL= http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i264/Northwindlowlander/mountain%20bike/Dune/IMG_0405_zps0xxnjod1.jp g" target="_blank">http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i264/Northwindlowlander/mountain%20bike/Dune/IMG_0405_zps0xxnjod1.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL]

Ended up a bit over the 27lbs as I went back to split tubes for the tubeless- first attempt at wrap failed, it'll work though I'm sure. Standard dune photography issue, the sun was out so it was glowing 😆 Never missed a beat all day, 6 laps which made me I think 28th in solo males under 40, out of about 50, I'll take that.


 
Posted : 28/05/2016 9:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

To be fair, it would be best speaking with Graham. I have just booked a medium frame from the first batch. He has selected the colours on the website as standards. But I believe you can select something different if you so wish. I am likely to go the flo green or electric blue


 
Posted : 28/05/2016 9:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bloody hell , STW hasn't changed at all. You ask a simple question re Budget fatbike choice and get totally ignored only for cock measurers to then get out the tape measure and scales to weigh there fud chariots and publish thier findings.
Would it seriously kill you to give a little guidance to non ****stanes and give some guidance....


 
Posted : 29/05/2016 12:46 am
Posts: 66105
Full Member
 

That's the Calibre Dune I bought from a supermarket for £500. A look at all the people who've subsequently bought this bike because of info in this thread might help you pull your head out of your arse.

As for giving a little guidance, tbh I wouldn't want to set my sights so low. Still, [i]your [/i]contribution to the thread is surely of great value.


 
Posted : 29/05/2016 1:05 am
Posts: 513
Free Member
 

It's amazing on the pic how the 4.8 makes the 4.0 look small


 
Posted : 29/05/2016 7:18 am
Posts: 17288
Full Member
 

Northwind, what are your ready to roll wheel weights?
My fatty weighs about 6 lb more with a carbon fork and I can only assume that extra weight is in the wheels.


 
Posted : 29/05/2016 8:14 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Stanfree, that's a poor and inaccurate summary of a >1000 post thread.

Because obviously you've read the entire thread before wading in and insulting the contributors, right?

There are two fat bikes available for less than 500 quid discussed regularly here, so half the OP's threshold and hardly "fud chariots".


 
Posted : 29/05/2016 9:28 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Stanfree - it's '**** stains', you cock monkey.


 
Posted : 29/05/2016 10:00 am
Posts: 66105
Full Member
 

zippykona - Member

Northwind, what are your ready to roll wheel weights?

The wheels are just under 2200g and I think about the same for the tyres- the split tubes just now add maybe 130, 140g IIRC, the pvc rim tape weighs grams.

TBH everything on the bike is light, except the dropper- it's mostly parts I already had but they're from my old XC race bike and Ragley Ti so there's no flab. Ti bolts on a fatty 🙄 Frame and fork is only about 2700g inc complete headset so barely more than the Fatty frame alone. The Dune fork is light but quite nasty, very harsh, I reckon your carbon will be a lot nicer to ride on tbh but it's only a little lighter. (I'm kind of amazed that this makes a difference with a 4.8 tyre but it does)

(*incidentally; I've mentioned this before in the thread but most people recommend the Schwalbe AV10D for split tubeless on an 80mm rim. I used an AV10 and an AV10D on the stock dune wheels and these are the sv10 (same tube, presta). It's a fair bit lighter, and fits an 80mm rim absolutely perfectly so no excess, no trimming, you can see it there but only just. More importantly, much cheaper and more available- I paid £3 a tube from halfords instead of the £11 the AV10D I used first. You need to be sure to cut it tidy and get it centred mind but imo it's just the better choice)


 
Posted : 29/05/2016 1:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

/\ good tip, thanks.

Is it possible trim the tube short of the rim bead so that it's not visible externally ?


 
Posted : 29/05/2016 2:09 pm
Posts: 66105
Full Member
 

Not sure... But it's just a mm or so it pretty much blends in, I don't think you're likely to care once it's on. Unless it protrudes more on your rims anyway. I think if you cut it down it might quickly become a pain to get it in exactly the right place to seal...

(I was surprised btw, I thought the tube would mess with the rim bead on the DTs but it still retains the tyre well)


 
Posted : 29/05/2016 2:26 pm
Posts: 66105
Full Member
 

For slimjim:

[URL= http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i264/Northwindlowlander/mountain%20bike/Dune/IMG_0415_zpsqnro1ors.jp g" target="_blank">http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i264/Northwindlowlander/mountain%20bike/Dune/IMG_0415_zpsqnro1ors.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL]

[URL= http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i264/Northwindlowlander/mountain%20bike/Dune/IMG_0414_zpsk639s513.jp g" target="_blank">http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i264/Northwindlowlander/mountain%20bike/Dune/IMG_0414_zpsk639s513.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL]

It's not too obvious that there's a tube there, this one was a wee bit uneven but I figured that'd be more useful for you- the other end is a bit tidier. Up close you can see and feel that there's a flap but from any distance it just kind of looks like the bead strip on the tyre.


 
Posted : 29/05/2016 7:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Aye looks good. Those rims look ace too. What's the most noticeable aspects after fitting them?


 
Posted : 29/05/2016 7:23 pm
Posts: 6761
Full Member
 

Great thread...

Ill just leave this here from this week.......

[img][URL= http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v633/rickmeister/P1220093_zpsgxqzeiy8.jp g" target="_blank">http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v633/rickmeister/P1220093_zpsgxqzeiy8.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL][/img]


 
Posted : 29/05/2016 7:36 pm
Posts: 66105
Full Member
 

Just the weight really, it picks up and accelerates much nicer and it's that much easier to maneouvre. Definitely a plus for a trailey fatbike. TBH I found the stock dune wheels totally satisfactory though.


 
Posted : 29/05/2016 7:41 pm
Posts: 9440
Full Member
 

Great thread...

Ill just leave this here from [s]this[/s] last week.......

and possibly for sale to fund a new project...

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 29/05/2016 7:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Is that near Widdop Bregante?


 
Posted : 29/05/2016 10:28 pm
Posts: 9440
Full Member
 

Blackstone Edge - above Littleborough. Hollingworth Lake in the distance.


 
Posted : 29/05/2016 10:32 pm
Posts: 9217
Free Member
 

18" Voodoo Wazoos are listed as 4 available on the Halfords Ebay store today, after seemingly running out of stock several weeks ago...

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/VooDoo-Wazoo-Fat-Bike-Bicycle-26-x-4-Tyre-16-Speed-Alloy-Frame-Mud-Snow-Sand-/201373335552

Halfords own 10% promo drops price to £449.

Go to Ebay via Topcashback to get 4.4% back until end of 31st May.


 
Posted : 30/05/2016 1:24 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Fell off my Dune for the second time over the weekend, ouch my ribs are sore - very similar to first time, in a tractor track, hit the edge of the raised central section, lost the front I imagine - I wasn't aware of anything except instantly flying through the air, then landing on my shoulder and banging my head on the ground.

Things is, before the Dune I hadn't fallen off a bike for 30 years, even if only the last 4 has seen me cycling a lot more, but now I've done it twice in three months and hurt myself. Are Jumbo Jims susceptible to washing out, am I travelling faster/over confident with fattie tyres, or am I just an idiot who needs to stay away from tractor ruts or get some training?


 
Posted : 31/05/2016 7:09 am
Posts: 6289
Full Member
 

What tyres and pressures are you running?


 
Posted : 31/05/2016 10:11 am
Posts: 66105
Full Member
 

Ruts are weird sometimes for fatbikes just because every rut is basically narrower- it's much easier to clip a pedal or barge the tyre into the edge, when the tyre's wider. Could it be just that?

The JJ's not the grippiest tyre for sure but it in the dry it does have decent grip. As long as it's on the ground anyway! If the bike's bouncing, it's a different story.


 
Posted : 31/05/2016 10:13 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

What tyres and pressures are you running?

Jumbo Jims, tubed on stock wheels, at 9psi. I could let skittle more out, I've never felt them close to bottoming out, but they roll nicely at that pressure, but I can see it might make the side wall overly stiff and not compress when riding up the side of a rut?

Incidentally I also installed SV13F tubes, but I can't get the tyres to seat on the rims evenly - one section always sits inboard and a bit lower, giving me a nice oval tyre...?


 
Posted : 31/05/2016 10:25 am
Posts: 66105
Full Member
 

I'm not sure about these SV13Fs, they don't seem to fill the tyre nicely, if that makes any sense? As if they're just struggling to stretch to 4 inches. I can't really rationalise this but that's the impression I had...


 
Posted : 31/05/2016 10:28 am
Posts: 6289
Full Member
 

OK, I was thinking the pressures might be too low, leading to a bit too much self-steer. But 9psi should be enough. Maybe best just to avoid ruts for a while 🙂


 
Posted : 31/05/2016 10:37 am
Posts: 41848
Free Member
 

The results are in!

My hunch was right, Kenda Juggernaughts are slow. Unsurprisingly Schwalble and Specialized are 1 and 2 given their reputations for making fast tyres.

Be interesting if someone sent him a Floater, my impression was it was faster than the Juggernaught but I've not tried enough others to rank it.

http://www.bicyclerollingresistance.com

(edit, the site has nothing to do with me, I just got shot down a few pages back when I offered to swap floaters for Juggernauts)


 
Posted : 31/05/2016 10:51 am
Posts: 6289
Full Member
 

Interesting test, but presumably it's only really relevant to riding on a smooth road.

For example, the test implies that we should be riding at pressures as high as 20 psi to reduce rolling resistance. Fair enough, on a smooth road a higher pressure should be better as it means less sidewall deflection. But once you add bumps you lose a lot more in lifting the weight of the bike+rider up and down and a softer tyre, which rolls over the bumps, can be faster.


 
Posted : 31/05/2016 11:19 am
Posts: 41848
Free Member
 

Interesting test, but presumably it's only really relevant to riding on a smooth road.

For example, the test implies that we should be riding at pressures as high as 20 psi to reduce rolling resistance.

The winner was the liteskin Schwalble, and the differences were most apparent at 8psi.

If rolling resistance is a measure of how easily the carcass deforms over the drum, then I'd actually expect the difference to be even more marked off road as each little bump is like a miniature drum that the tyre has to deform over. Or at least neutral, for every bump you go over, there's a hollow that the tyre doesn't have to deform into.

50W saving at 18mph, even if that's halved at normal speeds 25W isn't a gain to be sniffed at.


 
Posted : 31/05/2016 11:57 am
Page 23 / 49