What bike related s...
 

What bike related stuff do you find aesthetically displeasing?

 feed
Posts: 925
Full Member
 

Cannondale lefty forks, the lack of symmetry is horribly displeasing to the extent that I wouldn't buy a bike with a lefty fork. Just looks wrong. 

On the same theme, bikes where the seat stays are at significantly different heights. 

 

 

 


 
Posted : 14/01/2026 3:20 pm
citizenlee reacted
Posts: 3629
Full Member
 

A couple from me, all covered already:

  • Most ebikes
  • Orange full sus frames
  • Rear mudguards on an MTB
  • Seat stays above the top tube
  • Full face helmet and glasses
  • Half shell helmet and goggles
  • Lycra and knee pads
  • Short/trainer socks on any bike
  • Rubber ducks on handle bar
  • To much ano, a bit here or there is ok though

And I'm sure there's more!


 
Posted : 14/01/2026 3:30 pm
chrismac reacted
Posts: 9104
Full Member
 

I've just mentally gone over my bikes and think I tick a large number of the sins, but all three are mostly lacking in bling, so I guess my biggest crime is the mis-matched tyre brands on the Stumpy. I can live with that.

One thing I don't like though, or at least my eyes find displeasing, is on full sus bikes when there is no continuous line between the top tube and the rear triangle. It's not relevant to all bikes (Scott doesn't do this on some models), but I see this on some bikes at rest and it looks like the whole bike has collapsed in on itself. Yes, I accept that there will be sag when I sit on the bike, BUT I WILL BE ON IT THEN AND WON'T SEE IT. If I am off the bike and looking at it, I'd like it to look nice to me. 

Colours? Some suit a bike, some don't. I have a matt black road bike with red sidewall tyres on, a green/gold HT with normal tyres on and a red/white Stumpy with more cables that a Russian shadow fleet tanker's anchor on. And mis-matched tyres. At least I colour matched the mudguard thing that stops clag getting on the shock.


 
Posted : 14/01/2026 3:57 pm
Posts: 10520
Full Member
 

WTF is this rubber duck on handle bars thing? I haven't seen this before but it sounds ****ing rediculous! How do they even stay on there? Can you buy bike specific rubber ducks???....

Edit: just googled it!😱 WTAF, the world is truely dying. More plastic tat from china, great....


 
Posted : 14/01/2026 4:06 pm
Paul-B, scaredypants, roger_mellie and 2 people reacted
 Olly
Posts: 5261
Full Member
 

Schralp

Eugh. worse than oxbow singletrack

Orange bikes?

[img] [/img]

are you mad. Lovely. (the new ones are all gross, thats fair)

 

 


 
Posted : 14/01/2026 4:31 pm
Posts: 175
Full Member
 

I was coming to ask if the rubber duck thing was real, as in the post above. Is this an area-thing? Where are people riding with them?

 


 
Posted : 14/01/2026 6:35 pm
Posts: 1110
Free Member
 

Full face helmet with glasses (especially when riding around a trail centre), Fox's new podium mudguard, Amflow ebikes,  the latest version of the Trek Slash, phones mounted on handlebars (especially if they're way off centre for some reason)


 
Posted : 14/01/2026 7:25 pm
chrismac reacted
Posts: 14698
Full Member
 

I think my biggest ick with other peoples bikes is horrific cable management out front. Two of my bikes - Levo and Boardman have the cables entering the wrong side of the frame (came that way), but I'll be buggered if I'm taking them out and re-routing them, I just make the best of them as they are.

Anything that I have a hand in putting together myself - the loops have to be even length and held together in some manner - sometimes it only takes a single cable tie to make all the difference.

Sort it out you scruffy oiks


 
Posted : 14/01/2026 7:33 pm
chrismac and citizenlee reacted
Posts: 1133
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Posted by: TheArtistFormerlyKnownAsSTR

I'll be buggered if I'm taking them out and re-routing them, I just make the best of them as they are.

I think that's the reason many of us scruffy oiks have bad cable management.


 
Posted : 14/01/2026 8:00 pm
Posts: 2209
Free Member
 

I can't stand when a dropper is not slammed. Any post showing looks weird to me. And obviously means that you're missing out on travel.


 
Posted : 14/01/2026 9:34 pm
Posts: 1135
Full Member
 

I’m surprised we’ve got this far without anyone mentioning spoke protector discs (aka ‘dork discs’).

I’m guilty of many transgressions judging by this thread - though many sacrifice sartorial elegance for function, which is fine by me. To paraphrase an earlier comment, nothing says you’ve given up on life more than not riding (or compromising your ride enjoyment) because you’re worried about how you look.


 
Posted : 14/01/2026 11:19 pm
Posts: 7469
Free Member
 

Posted by: fatface1

I was coming to ask if the rubber duck thing was real, as in the post above. Is this an area-thing? Where are people riding with them?

I know a guy who's had one on his bike for about ten years.

Also, a local lass who I fully expect to go pro won our national enduro champs for her age group (and tends to beat the elite times) and races with one on her bars!

... in no way am I advocating such behaviour though.

 


 
Posted : 14/01/2026 11:52 pm
Posts: 7469
Free Member
 

Posted by: northernsoul

I’m surprised we’ve got this far without anyone mentioning spoke protector discs (aka ‘dork discs’).

How about front brake disc covers? Don't see them very often. I used to run one on my moto after bending a disc "out whoop-whoop" once.

 


 
Posted : 14/01/2026 11:55 pm
northernsoul reacted
Posts: 679
Full Member
 

Road/gravel frames in xl which have disproportionately long head tubes look grotesque compared to their svelte, perfectly proportioned, medium sized models. 

Pencil case-like, barrel-shaped bar bags on the front of gravel bikes. Unless of course they’re actually full of pencils, protractors etc.., which is then justifiable.

Kashima forks and shock but not dropper post. Fur coat and no knickers!

+1 for anodised expensive tat.


 
Posted : 15/01/2026 12:24 am
citizenlee reacted
Posts: 1133
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Posted by: reeksy

Posted by: northernsoul

I’m surprised we’ve got this far without anyone mentioning spoke protector discs (aka ‘dork discs’).

How about front brake disc covers? Don't see them very often. I used to run one on my moto after bending a disc "out whoop-whoop" once.

I keep getting adverts for disc covers on Facebook. The selling point seems to be keeping your rotors clean. I was going ask if dirt and mud somehow doesn't ever get in from from the non enclosed side but didn't want to rain on their parade, or engage with the sponsored post.

Posted by: bonni

Road/gravel frames in xl which have disproportionately long head tubes look grotesque compared to their svelte, perfectly proportioned, medium sized models. 

Pencil case-like, barrel-shaped bar bags on the front of gravel bikes. Unless of course they’re actually full of pencils, protractors etc.., which is then justifiable.

Kashima forks and shock but not dropper post. Fur coat and no knickers!

+1 for anodised expensive tat.

Agree.

Guilty. I keep snacks, a pump and my phone in it. 

Agree,  although no Kashima items have ever been known to match.

Nice if done tastefully and all colours are the same shade.

 

 


 
Posted : 15/01/2026 12:34 am
Posts: 7469
Free Member
 

Posted by: bonni

Kashima forks and shock but not dropper post. Fur coat and no knickers!

ooh...ooh...that's me!!! What do I win?

I think we need a scoring system.

 


 
Posted : 15/01/2026 12:55 am
Posts: 7469
Free Member
 

Posted by: citizenlee

I keep getting adverts for disc covers on Facebook. The selling point seems to be keeping your rotors clean. I was going ask if dirt and mud somehow doesn't ever get in from from the non enclosed side but didn't want to rain on their parade, or engage with the sponsored post.

They're using them at DH World Cups to keep braking consistent so they must be something we all need ... right?

 


 
Posted : 15/01/2026 12:59 am
citizenlee reacted
Posts: 3333
Full Member
 

People riding round trail centres (so never too far from the car) with backpacks that look big enough to go on a weekend away with. 


 
Posted : 15/01/2026 1:04 am
chrismac and citizenlee reacted
Posts: 14698
Full Member
 

Posted by: bonni

Kashima forks and shock but not dropper post. Fur coat and no knickers!

Guilty m'lord, but that's how my Levo came. I may put a (stupidly expensive) Fox Transfer on when the AXS dies, but it's pointless as the fork and shock Kashima don't even look like they are even trying to be the same colour. Can't really see the shock from the drive side.

Big AXS mech, dropper not slammed, cables wrong side of head tube 😊

 

20251103_163545-EDIT.jpg

 


 
Posted : 15/01/2026 7:37 am
Posts: 9227
Full Member
 

You would hate my bikes then!  The maximum drop any of my seatposts have is 180mm.  

I can't stand when a dropper is not slammed. Any post showing looks weird to me. And obviously means that you're missing out on travel.

 


 
Posted : 15/01/2026 10:10 am
Posts: 679
Full Member
 

@TheArtistFormerlyKnownAsSTR: Haha! It’s either edgy or a faux pas. Like a tailored suit paired with expensive trainers! 😉

…and you dress to wrong side!


 
Posted : 15/01/2026 10:32 am
Posts: 4790
Full Member
 

Posted by: jamj1974

I can't stand when a dropper is not slammed. Any post showing looks weird to me. And obviously means that you're missing out on travel.

conversely, (and I know this has improved with things like the oneup being manually adjustable,) any time I see a dropper slammed in the frame I think it looks like someone has just thrown the bike together from a pile of bits and not actually "fitted it" to their body shape and preference. Like brake levers right up next to the grips.

if you don't have the top position as your ideal/efficient pedalling position, what even is the point of a dropper? 

I'm a long leg, short torso bloke though, so even by 210mm post has aboout 60-70mm extra shaft showing. I'll never have a slammed dropper.


 
Posted : 15/01/2026 10:36 am
Posts: 7469
Free Member
 

Posted by: ayjaydoubleyou

Posted by: jamj1974

I can't stand when a dropper is not slammed. Any post showing looks weird to me. And obviously means that you're missing out on travel.

conversely, (and I know this has improved with things like the oneup being manually adjustable,) any time I see a dropper slammed in the frame I think it looks like someone has just thrown the bike together from a pile of bits and not actually "fitted it" to their body shape and preference. Like brake levers right up next to the grips.

if you don't have the top position as your ideal/efficient pedalling position, what even is the point of a dropper? 

I'm a long leg, short torso bloke though, so even by 210mm post has aboout 60-70mm extra shaft showing. I'll never have a slammed dropper.

whereas I’m the opposite so I always get a slammed dropper with the perfect pedal height.

 


 
Posted : 15/01/2026 10:41 am
Posts: 5377
Full Member
 

I'm a shorty legged long torsoed gent, so my 170mm dropper is pretty much slammed (only built the bike yesterday so I'm still fine tuning it). And that's on a ML Bird Aether 9 with a widdly seat tube. My old 26" Rocket has a 120mm dropper with maybe an inch of shaft showing. 


 
Posted : 15/01/2026 10:58 am
Posts: 9227
Full Member
 

 

 

m a long leg, short torso bloke though, so even by 210mm post has aboout 60-70mm extra shaft showing. I'll never have a slammed dropper

Snap!  Me too!


 
Posted : 15/01/2026 11:15 am
Posts: 1133
Full Member
Topic starter
 

At least with a bit of exposed post there's somewhere for people to add their clip on mudguards 😉


 
Posted : 15/01/2026 11:18 am
Posts: 14698
Full Member
 

I think the only bike/post combo I could slam my post is the 225mm one I have on my Stanton - but I shimmed it down so I could have some of the silver post showing 🤣 


 
Posted : 15/01/2026 11:21 am
citizenlee and kelvin reacted
Posts: 1133
Full Member
Topic starter
 

I can slam the dropper on my Roscoe but it's only 150mm (stupid spec on a large frame) so it would be too short by around 20mm. I was going to buy a OneUp and but will be selling the bike soon so no point really.


 
Posted : 15/01/2026 12:01 pm
Posts: 4378
Full Member
 

Saddles pushed forward all the way on the rails. Was a trend a few years ago to "size up" and compensate by sliding the saddle too far forward. 

Just looks wrong. 


 
Posted : 15/01/2026 12:17 pm
Posts: 6357
Free Member
 

Black. Ok on tyre tread, brake blocks and possibly cables. Groupsets though? Bloody awful. Rims no, apart from very deep carbon ones which need tan side wall tyres to break them up. Chunky stems. Big fat frame tubes. Dirty great cassettes. Just use a triple mech. It won't pack up, won't drag the ground and weighs less. MTB uniform.

Not really looks although they look sill but full face helmets when riding the red runs. Be careful. Can't agree with the goggles with open face helmets though. That's how we used them on motorcycle helmets for the last century and that's where you MTB helms' come from.


 
Posted : 15/01/2026 2:55 pm
Posts: 34455
Full Member
 

Just use a triple mech

im pretty agnostic on most bits, but no way Im going back to front mechs, aesthetically or functionally they suck


 
Posted : 15/01/2026 3:24 pm
reeksy reacted
Posts: 14698
Full Member
 

Posted by: mattsccm

Just use a triple mech.

No


 
Posted : 15/01/2026 3:38 pm
Posts: 9010
Free Member
 

functionally they suck

Nope. My commute bike has a triple on the front and I love it. Quite often late at night I make it a nice hot chocolate, and a biscuit, as a bed time treat, read it a story, then tuck it into bed. Which is more than I do for my own children.

Doubles do suck though.

 


 
Posted : 15/01/2026 4:14 pm
tjagain reacted
Posts: 44685
Full Member
 

Posted by: kimbers

Just use a triple mech

im pretty agnostic on most bits, but no way Im going back to front mechs, aesthetically or functionally they suck

 

Errmmm - aesthetics is in the eye of the beholder and those huge rear cassettes look ugly to me and I have no issues at all setting up and using front mechs

 


 
Posted : 15/01/2026 4:19 pm
Posts: 1973
Full Member
 

I would have a front mech and a better range of gears.

Bikes are for riding and you can't see most of the bike when you ride it. If the bike is comfortable, reliable and easy to fix when it goes wrong that will do for me.


 
Posted : 15/01/2026 4:25 pm
Posts: 11808
Full Member
 

functionally they suck

I would love to see some science on this, I reckon functionally, 1x is probably worse. I drop more chains on my 1x CX/gravel bike than my 2x gravel bike, although on both it's still a vanishingly rare occurrence.

I have to straight the hanger of the 1x bike more often, presumably due to the bigger mech.

I can't prove it, but I'm fairly certain that on average the chain spends more time at greater sideways deflection on the 1x bike, and I'm pretty sure this HAS been shown to be less efficient.

Last time I saw a comparison, 1x was about 25g lighter than 2x for two otherwise equivalent groupsets.

So yeah, functionally I'll take 2x with no compromise on gear range, less weight on rear wheel, less expensive/vulnerable kit dangling off the rear axle, and greater drivetrain efficiency.

I think 'peak MTB drivetrain' for me was the 2x 10spd SRAM drivetrain with (from memory) 26/40 chainrings and perhaps 11-36 cassette.

Oh, and back on topic, it looked better with a smaller rear mech and cassette smaller than the big ring 😎


 
Posted : 15/01/2026 4:53 pm
 Gaah
Posts: 161
Free Member
 

Errmmm... Try reading the thread title 😉 

 

Personally. I find a tipped down saddle nose angle on an otherwise well spec'd high end bike aesthetically abhorrent. Even perfectly flat looks pretty horrid to me if it's on an mtb with its dropper post dropped all the way down to the seat tube collar . 


 
Posted : 15/01/2026 4:58 pm
Speeder reacted
Posts: 1133
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Yes, this thread is for being picky about how things look not how they function.

1x looks infinitely better than 2x and 3x, even with dinner plate sized cassettes, and I'll die on that hill.


 
Posted : 15/01/2026 6:17 pm
Posts: 44685
Full Member
 

Die then - 1x12 for MTBs is gopping


 
Posted : 15/01/2026 6:36 pm
Posts: 565
Free Member
 

Massive electronic front mechs the size of a packet of fags on a £10k road bike is a challenging look.


 
Posted : 15/01/2026 6:57 pm
tjagain reacted
Posts: 11808
Full Member
 

Posted by: citizenlee

Yes, this thread is for being picky about how things look not how they function.

Please sir, Kimbers started it! 😎

Agree on motorised front mechs, although I guess you could disguise it with an aero cover and save 5.8w? 😂

Screenshot_20260116-072546.png


 
Posted : 16/01/2026 8:29 am
citizenlee reacted
Posts: 16140
Free Member
 

e bikes. Face it, they're all gopping aren't they.

Definitely not the case , unless you are only referring to the ‘ebike of the year’ ?


 
Posted : 16/01/2026 8:42 am
Posts: 8832
Full Member
 

Front mechs are crude, ugly devices.  Wasn’t it the now King Charles who called them ‘a monstrous carbuncle on the face of a much-loved and elegant friend’?


 
Posted : 16/01/2026 10:00 am
Posts: 1973
Full Member
 

Any form of gears on bike are ugly.


 
Posted : 16/01/2026 10:43 am
Posts: 6066
Full Member
 

Honestly, a lot of bikes with massive wheels look aesthetically not right. I think it's where the frame geometry has clearly been wrapped around wheels that are big just for the sake of it - many 29" MTBs in small look a bit wrong. And as Bikeradar pointed out this week*, 32" bikes are absolutely gopping for the same reason. 

*in a complete failure of self-awareness, given that Bikeradar has been banging on for months about how 32" are soooo much better than anything else out there, even in the face of various readers and commenters explaining that nobody effing wants them

 


 
Posted : 16/01/2026 10:56 am
Posts: 9227
Full Member
 
Posted by: bonni

 

Kashima forks and shock but not dropper post. Fur coat and no knickers

I removed a Fox Factory post with Kashima from my bike and replaced it with a longer-travel OneUp Components dropper post with a black shaft and I haven’t replaced my Fox Factory 36 forks or Float X shock - both with Kashima! 

 


 
Posted : 16/01/2026 11:53 am
Posts: 6783
Full Member
 

Posted by: citizenlee

Yes, this thread is for being picky about how things look not how they function.

1x looks infinitely better than 2x and 3x, even with dinner plate sized cassettes, and I'll die on that hill.

 

It's fine to be wrong.

 


 
Posted : 16/01/2026 2:50 pm
Posts: 13251
Free Member
 

Posted by: DaveyBoyWonder

e bikes. Face it, they're all gopping aren't they.

 

This

 


 
Posted : 16/01/2026 3:47 pm
Posts: 13251
Free Member
 

Anyone, male or female, that isn't built like an athlete, wearing lycra

Sumo wrestlers are technically athletes.


 
Posted : 16/01/2026 3:57 pm
Posts: 1133
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Posted by: chestrockwell

Posted by: citizenlee

Yes, this thread is for being picky about how things look not how they function.

1x looks infinitely better than 2x and 3x, even with dinner plate sized cassettes, and I'll die on that hill.

 

It's fine to be wrong.

 

Indeed. Sometimes it's better to be wrong.

ewww.jpg

 

 


 
Posted : 16/01/2026 4:32 pm
Posts: 44685
Full Member
 

Posted by: Bruce

Any form of gears on bike are ugly.

 

Rohloff?  SA 3 spd?

 


 
Posted : 16/01/2026 5:50 pm
Posts: 3542
Full Member
 

Posted by: andytherocketeer

ENORMOUS WHEEL / FRAME LOGOS in bold all-caps when viewed from the side, especially those logos scaled up on deep section rims

Ooh, i'd follow this with graphics that looks cheap. The OEM wheels on my new EEB are guilty of this. 

 

 


 
Posted : 16/01/2026 6:27 pm
Posts: 3542
Full Member
 

My eeb. Big bulky bastard. I was trying to find one that I thought was aesthetically pleasing. Gave up and just went for an ugly green tank. 

cube-stereo-hybrid-one77-tm-800-2026.jpg


 
Posted : 16/01/2026 6:36 pm
fruitbat reacted
Posts: 9010
Free Member
 

Sumo wrestlers are technically athletes.

<googles sumo wrestlers in lycra...>

 


 
Posted : 16/01/2026 6:56 pm
Posts: 14698
Full Member
 

Posted by: relapsed_mandalorian

My eeb. Big bulky bastard. I was trying to find one that I thought was aesthetically pleasing. Gave up and just went for an ugly green tank. 

cube-stereo-hybrid-one77-tm-800-2026.jpg

 

I quite like that. 

 

Apart from the headset routing and shit white graphics

 


 
Posted : 16/01/2026 7:44 pm
Posts: 3542
Full Member
 

Posted by: TheArtistFormerlyKnownAsSTR

Posted by: relapsed_mandalorian

My eeb. Big bulky bastard. I was trying to find one that I thought was aesthetically pleasing. Gave up and just went for an ugly green tank. 

cube-stereo-hybrid-one77-tm-800-2026.jpg

 

I quite like that. 

 

Apart from the headset routing and shit white graphics

 

Yeah the headset is pig. Already sampled that delight changing the forks for kash factory ones. I got some custom camo decals for them, but they look shit. 

Also got rid of the hideous cube cockpit, got burgtec on there. 

Now thinking what colours to go for new decals. 

20260115_211339.jpg

 


 
Posted : 16/01/2026 8:55 pm
Posts: 14698
Full Member
 

Posted by: relapsed_mandalorian

Now thinking what colours to go for new decals

I actually don't mind them either 🤣

 

Talking of shit graphics, even as a Spesh fanboi, their lower end ebikes annoy me, they haven't even tried. 

Yeah, we'll just write Specialized in large white letters, that'll do

Screenshot_20260116_200039_Chrome.jpg

 


 
Posted : 16/01/2026 9:13 pm
Posts: 419
Free Member
 

Posted by: relapsed_mandalorian

My eeb. Big bulky bastard. I was trying to find one that I thought was aesthetically pleasing. Gave up and just went for an ugly green tank. 

cube-stereo-hybrid-one77-tm-800-2026.jpg

 

Same, and I've ended up with an ugly beige tank. 

I was tempted by the orbea wild m20 but I don't fancy waiting 3 months for warranty support should I need it, and the headset cable routing got me seeking out a safe space 

 

 


 
Posted : 16/01/2026 9:50 pm
Posts: 1133
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Posted by: relapsed_mandalorian

Posted by: TheArtistFormerlyKnownAsSTR

Posted by: relapsed_mandalorian

My eeb. Big bulky bastard. I was trying to find one that I thought was aesthetically pleasing. Gave up and just went for an ugly green tank. 

cube-stereo-hybrid-one77-tm-800-2026.jpg

 

I quite like that. 

 

Apart from the headset routing and shit white graphics

 

Yeah the headset is pig. Already sampled that delight changing the forks for kash factory ones. I got some custom camo decals for them, but they look shit. 

Also got rid of the hideous cube cockpit, got burgtec on there. 

Now thinking what colours to go for new decals. 

20260115_211339.jpg

 

I like that bike. Nearly went for one myself.

No decals are the best decals, or matte black.

 


 
Posted : 17/01/2026 1:43 am
 Gaah
Posts: 161
Free Member
 

Posted by: tjagain

Die then - 1x12 for MTBs is gopping

Bit harsh. Don't you think?

If you mean 1x12 "looks" gopping. He didn't actually mention 1x12.  He mentioned 1X. 

And 1X doesn't have to include a massive cassette, super long derailleur or a tiny chainring. 

1X with a small cassette, medium cage rear mech and mid sized chainring "looks" a lot less gopping and undisputably a far cleaner look than any front derailleur and chainset with three chainrings. 

 

I actually agree that massive cassettes and long cage mechs look worse. And even more so if paired with a tiny chainring on a massively long modern 29" wheeled bike. 

run 1x on all my mtbs but none have huge cassettes or tiny chainrings or long cage mechs. Not simply for aesthetics though. But for running cost/weight and functionality/durability. Looking less 'gopping' is just a bonus. 

 


 
Posted : 17/01/2026 3:34 am
citizenlee reacted
Posts: 3542
Full Member
 

Posted by: citizenlee

Posted by: relapsed_mandalorian

Posted by: TheArtistFormerlyKnownAsSTR

Posted by: relapsed_mandalorian

My eeb. Big bulky bastard. I was trying to find one that I thought was aesthetically pleasing. Gave up and just went for an ugly green tank. 

cube-stereo-hybrid-one77-tm-800-2026.jpg

 

I quite like that. 

 

Apart from the headset routing and shit white graphics

 

Yeah the headset is pig. Already sampled that delight changing the forks for kash factory ones. I got some custom camo decals for them, but they look shit. 

Also got rid of the hideous cube cockpit, got burgtec on there. 

Now thinking what colours to go for new decals. 

20260115_211339.jpg

 

I like that bike. Nearly went for one myself.

No decals are the best decals, or matte black.

 

I'm not a fan. I think they look naked. 

I'm a fan of the bike, was struggling to find something that met my want list and that I could get rapidly. Then I came across this and Damian Harris Cycles in Cardiff. Two weeks later it's here and good to go. 

Finished the last bits to get it setup today. First ride tomorrow. 

 


 
Posted : 17/01/2026 5:56 pm
citizenlee reacted
Posts: 14698
Full Member
 

Nah, not a fan of naked forks either. 

Sussed Bikes tend to knock a lot of their bikes out with no fork decals and they look a bit crap imo


 
Posted : 17/01/2026 6:23 pm
Posts: 1133
Full Member
Topic starter
 

I like the stealth look of no/blacked out decals.

How about gold or bronze to go with the Kashima? Would go nice with green frame.

 

 


 
Posted : 17/01/2026 6:43 pm
Posts: 3542
Full Member
 

Posted by: eatmorepizza

I was tempted by the orbea wild m20 but I don't fancy waiting 3 months for warranty support should I need it, and the headset cable routing got me seeking out a safe space 

One of my mates has one, first thing he did was replace the headset like this: https://easybikeparts.co.uk

I'm likely to go that way I think. 

 


 
Posted : 17/01/2026 8:21 pm
Posts: 1133
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Posted by: relapsed_mandalorian

Posted by: eatmorepizza

I was tempted by the orbea wild m20 but I don't fancy waiting 3 months for warranty support should I need it, and the headset cable routing got me seeking out a safe space 

One of my mates has one, first thing he did was replace the headset like this: https://easybikeparts.co.uk

I'm likely to go that way I think. 

I was thinking about getting one of those for my Rise when it arrives (Monday!). Only thing putting me off is I'm not sure if it covers the notch hole for the Spin Block.

 


 
Posted : 17/01/2026 8:36 pm
 Aidy
Posts: 2977
Free Member
 

I'm with whoever said modern geo bikes, they still look like someone fat has sat on the top tube, they might ride well, but they look horrible.

Personally, I reckon front mechs look smarter than giant cassettes coupled with a tiny single chainring.

On a road bike, flats look terrible.

Reflectors look terrible, as do lights.

I'm okay with silver nipples - in fact, I think black rims/black spokes/silver nipples is a nice contrast.

Any colour other than black for saddles/bar tape. Grips are acceptable in non-black.


 
Posted : 18/01/2026 4:20 am
Posts: 34940
Full Member
 

Pace square tubed frames. Folks used to rave about them BITD, I've always thought they looked like Mechanno, all they needed was an oversized nut at each end of the top tube to complete the look. 

Overly radical graphics (stickers) on frames. They look shit to begin with, like Action Man's bike. They're generally trying to disguise terrible frame shape choices themselves, but over time, and this is true of all stickers; the edges get scuffed, the colours start to fade, and it just looks even more shit. 

Custom bikes with terrible colour choices. OK, burnt Umber, or Dark Teal maybe your favourite colour, but it's still horrible. The same is true of Race Car 'inspired' colour schemes, they generally look shit. Honourable mention here for the Gulf coloured Privee Shan - which managed to pull it off.

There was for a while an Endura made DH shirt that was camo and orange panels (like duck hunters wear) for a bit they were the favourite of every 'larger farmed' gent (I think it was the sizing). At any park or popular trail head you went to for a while there was a literal army of fat DH tri-podding down a trail they had no business being anywhere near, dressed near identically in those really cheap Six Six One helmets and and bloody camo Enduro shirt. 


 
Posted : 18/01/2026 9:34 am
Posts: 14698
Full Member
 

Posted by: Aidy

I'm with whoever said modern geo bikes, they still look like someone fat has sat on the top tube, they might ride well, but they look horrible

 

I get why people don't like the Radical that was posted earlier, it's the overly steep seat tube that gives it the look. I'd still have one though. 

Look at the Ragleys. Other than a couple of degrees in the seat tube, the numbers are pretty similar. They look right to me

20231217_095327~2.jpg

 


 
Posted : 18/01/2026 9:58 am
citizenlee reacted
Posts: 12869
Free Member
 

Stems.

Aesthetically and practically stems have been horrible since the move away from the quil stem.

Caveats:

Yes, i know they weren't as stiff.

Yes there were loads of horrendous looking ones.

 


 
Posted : 18/01/2026 11:54 am
 aggs
Posts: 445
Free Member
 

Thorn seem to specialise in small frames with a  huge amount of spaces on the steerer. So ugly.

I am sure I saw pics of 100mm plus spacers! 

Not keen on tan walls tyres either. 

Not keen on those wide angles drop gravel bars unless the bike is loaded and on tour.

Mini bar bags on a aero carbon fibre or  super road bike with carbon  wheels etc.

Not quite as many now as there were.

Yep phone mounts should be on stems not the handle bars.

I could go on ,buy my quick thoughts with a cuppa..

Loved reading this topic 

 

 


 
Posted : 18/01/2026 12:39 pm
Posts: 4250
Full Member
 

When you cant route a rear brake cable into the correct side of the frame so you end up with this nasty bend rather than it neatly following the dropper cable from lever to frame. 

 

It annoys me so much I would consider through headset routing


 
Posted : 18/01/2026 1:03 pm
Posts: 25922
Full Member
 

Apologies to, seemingly 50% on here but Kashima.  Gives me a lot of FKW vibes and a bit too much "steal me" too.  I much prefer whatever the next down is - performance elite ?

I used to run a dork disc on my cx bike and will do again if I ever go back to racing

Ducks on bars?  Unless you're under about 12, nope

I really hate big logos, in fact all logos really


 
Posted : 18/01/2026 2:31 pm
 Aidy
Posts: 2977
Free Member
 

Posted by: TheArtistFormerlyKnownAsSTR
Look at the Ragleys. Other than a couple of degrees in the seat tube, the numbers are pretty similar. They look right to me

Yeah, I don't like that either. Still looks like someone's squashed it.


 
Posted : 18/01/2026 3:59 pm
Posts: 419
Free Member
 

Ahh see i like those ragley frames and love the shape. But then again in my teens in the 00's when we were all riding around on rockhoppers and gt avalanches trying to learn jumps we all salivated over 4x and dirt jump style frames, so the top tube would finally be out of our way.

 

Most modern hardtails tend to look like that regardless now don't they, which I like, but my dad in his 70s who has a penchant for collecting frames and bikes from the 90s and mid 2000s also hates that sloped top tube design. 


 
Posted : 18/01/2026 4:27 pm
Posts: 9280
Free Member
 

Hardtails that don't have a straight line from top tube to the seat stays. The Marin San Quentin is particularly gross with it's V-shaped TT/SS.

Full 29ers still look a bit weird to me, at least on the small/medium size frames I ride. 26 or 27.5 looks so much better and more "right" to me, even on bigger bikes.

Everyone's covered ebikes, they're still ugly AF apart from the odd few like the Amflow and some other SL bikes.

I don't like mismatched cockpits on my own bikes, not really an ugly thing but I like to have the same brand of bar/stem!


 
Posted : 18/01/2026 11:32 pm
Posts: 9280
Free Member
 

Also forgot to add - enduro hand covers/protectors. No exceptions. Absolutely awful.


 
Posted : 19/01/2026 2:27 am
Posts: 3611
Free Member
 

Most steel full suspension frames, especially single pivot look wrong to me. Some look ace, like hardtails.

Big rear mechs and cassettes, the downside of 29ers. 

Hand guards, I’d rather break my fingers on a regular basis than ride a bike with them on.

Massive sunglasses.

 


 
Posted : 19/01/2026 7:45 am
Posts: 9018
Free Member
 

I know its mentioned above but I'll mention it again - 32" wheels. Its getting a bit silly now isn't it. We really are in the realms of marketing figuring out what to do next to make things "better" and its "oh, we'll just make that bit bigger". Some stuff does work (fork travel + steerer tubes to accomodate) but things like bloody superboost. Get in the sea...


 
Posted : 19/01/2026 10:09 am
racefaceec90 and nicko74 reacted
Posts: 7469
Free Member
 

… just gonna leave this here 

IMG_2166.jpeg


 
Posted : 19/01/2026 11:33 am
Posts: 419
Free Member
 

Posted by: reeksy

… just gonna leave this here 

IMG_2166.jpeg

What on earth is that? What are they using it for? A spirit stick to ward off demons and roadies who shave their legs?

 


 
Posted : 19/01/2026 11:37 am
Page 2 / 4